Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Case study

Development of accreditation standards for interprofessional education: a Canadian Case Study

Authors: Ruby E. Grymonpre, Lesley Bainbridge, Louise Nasmith, Cynthia Baker

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Academic institutions worldwide are embedding interprofessional education (IPE) into their health/social services education programs in response to global evidence that this leads to interprofessional collaborative practice (IPC). The World Health Organization (WHO) is holding its 193 member countries accountable for Indicator 3–06 (‘IPE Accreditation’) through its National Health Workforce Accounts. Despite the major influence of accreditation on the quality of health and social services education programs, little has been written about accreditation of IPE.

Case study

Canada has been a global leader in IPE Accreditation. The Accreditation of Interprofessional Health Education (AIPHE) projects (2007–2011) involved a collaborative of eight Canadian organizations that accredit pre-licensure education for six health/social services professions. The AIPHE vision was for learners to develop the necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes to provide IPC through IPE. The aim of this paper is to share the Canadian Case Study including policy context, supporting theories, preconditions, logic model and evaluation findings to achieve the primary project deliverable, increased awareness of the need to embed IPE language into the accreditation standards for health and social services academic programs. Future research implications are also discussed.

Conclusions

As a result of AIPHE, Canada is the only country in the world in which, for over a decade, a collective of participating health/social services accrediting organizations have been looking for evidence of IPE in the programs they accredit. This puts Canada in the unique position to now examine the downstream impacts of IPE accreditation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The 8 accrediting organizations that formed the core of the AIPHE project included Physiotherapy Education Accreditation Canada, the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, the Canadian Council for Accreditation of Pharmacy Programs, the Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing, the Canadian Association for Social Work Education, the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Committee on Accreditation of Canadian Medical Schools and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
 
Literature
3.
go back to reference Szasz G. Interprofessional education in the health sciences: a project conducted at the University of British Columbia. Milbank Q. 1969;47(4):449–75.CrossRef Szasz G. Interprofessional education in the health sciences: a project conducted at the University of British Columbia. Milbank Q. 1969;47(4):449–75.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Barr H, Ross F. Mainstreaming interprofessional education in the United Kingdom: A position paper. J Interprof Care. 2006;20(2):96–104.CrossRef Barr H, Ross F. Mainstreaming interprofessional education in the United Kingdom: A position paper. J Interprof Care. 2006;20(2):96–104.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Boyce RA, Moran MC, Nissen LM, Chenery HJ, Brooks PM. Interprofessional education in health sciences: the University of Queensland Health Care Team Challenge. Med J Aust. 2009;190(8):433–6.CrossRef Boyce RA, Moran MC, Nissen LM, Chenery HJ, Brooks PM. Interprofessional education in health sciences: the University of Queensland Health Care Team Challenge. Med J Aust. 2009;190(8):433–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Herbert CP. Changing the culture: Interprofessional education for collaborative patient-centred practice in Canada. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(sup1):1–4.CrossRef Herbert CP. Changing the culture: Interprofessional education for collaborative patient-centred practice in Canada. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(sup1):1–4.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rodger S, Hoffman S. on behalf of the World Health Organization Study Group on Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice. J Interprof Care. 2010;24(5):479–91.CrossRef Rodger S, Hoffman S. on behalf of the World Health Organization Study Group on Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice. J Interprof Care. 2010;24(5):479–91.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kassebaum DG. Origin of the LCME, the AAMC-AMA partnership for accreditation. Acad Med. 1992;67(2):85–7.CrossRef Kassebaum DG. Origin of the LCME, the AAMC-AMA partnership for accreditation. Acad Med. 1992;67(2):85–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kassebaum DG, Cohen JJ. Nonaccredited medical education in the United States. NEJM. 2000;342(21):1602–5.CrossRef Kassebaum DG, Cohen JJ. Nonaccredited medical education in the United States. NEJM. 2000;342(21):1602–5.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schwarz MR. Liaison committee on medical education: past successes, future challenges. JAMA. 1992;268(9):1091–2.CrossRef Schwarz MR. Liaison committee on medical education: past successes, future challenges. JAMA. 1992;268(9):1091–2.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Curran V, Deacon D, Fleet L. Review, assessment and recommendations of accreditation standards, policies, and practices as they relate to Interprofessional Education for Collaborative Patient-Centered Practice(IECPCP). Ottawa (Canada): Health Canada; 2005. Curran V, Deacon D, Fleet L. Review, assessment and recommendations of accreditation standards, policies, and practices as they relate to Interprofessional Education for Collaborative Patient-Centered Practice(IECPCP). Ottawa (Canada): Health Canada; 2005.
18.
go back to reference D’Amour D, Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: An emerging concept. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(S1):8–20.CrossRef D’Amour D, Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: An emerging concept. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(S1):8–20.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923–58.CrossRef Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923–58.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lavis J, Robertson D, Woodside J, McLeod C, Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):221–48.CrossRef Lavis J, Robertson D, Woodside J, McLeod C, Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):221–48.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Emergence of IPE accreditation standards within 8 accrediting organizations. Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative http://www.cihc-cpis.com/. [need to create link]. Accessed 29 Dec 2020. Emergence of IPE accreditation standards within 8 accrediting organizations. Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative http://​www.​cihc-cpis.​com/​. [need to create link]. Accessed 29 Dec 2020.
33.
go back to reference Canadian Residency Accreditation Consortium: Excellence in Residency Accreditation: Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs. Version 1.2. 2018. http://www.canrac.ca. Accessed 24 Jan 2020. Canadian Residency Accreditation Consortium: Excellence in Residency Accreditation: Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs. Version 1.2. 2018. http://​www.​canrac.​ca. Accessed 24 Jan 2020.
39.
go back to reference Narratives outlining progress in accreditation of IPE across the health/social service professions involved in AIPHE. Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative. http://www.cihc-cpis.com/. [need to create link]. Accessed 29 Dec 2020. Narratives outlining progress in accreditation of IPE across the health/social service professions involved in AIPHE. Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative. http://​www.​cihc-cpis.​com/​. [need to create link]. Accessed 29 Dec 2020.
45.
go back to reference Lawn S. Moving the interprofessional education research agenda beyond the limits of evaluating student satisfaction. J Res Interprof Pract and Educ. 2016;62(1):11. Lawn S. Moving the interprofessional education research agenda beyond the limits of evaluating student satisfaction. J Res Interprof Pract and Educ. 2016;62(1):11.
Metadata
Title
Development of accreditation standards for interprofessional education: a Canadian Case Study
Authors
Ruby E. Grymonpre
Lesley Bainbridge
Louise Nasmith
Cynthia Baker
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00551-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Human Resources for Health 1/2021 Go to the issue