Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 3/2006

01-09-2006 | Original Paper

Development of a novel digital subtraction technique for detecting subtle changes in jawbone density

Authors: Frank Du Tré, Reinhilde Jacobs, Sean Styven, Daniel van Steenberghe

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to develop a novel digital subtraction technique for serial intra-oral radiography, which would allow the detection of subtle variations in grey values. Digital images of the maxilla of a dried human skull and of a fresh pig mandible were acquired using intra-oral photostimulable phosphor plates (Digora FMX, Soredex, Helsinki) with an aluminium calibration stepwedge incorporated in the filmholder. Exposures were made with an X-ray tube for intra-oral radiography (Prostyle Intra, Planmeca, Helsinki). During pilot testing, parameter settings were adapted to reach an optimal contrast. Exposures were repeated within a 1-week interval to determine the test–retest reliability of the development. After in vitro and in vivo testing, the exposure technique and software development were used to evaluate its applicability in a pilot clinical case. Although parameter settings remained stable during the in vitro studies, the clinical exposures yielded non-linear digital images, thus, not readily suitable for data acquisition and comparison of the regions of interest. To allow further analysis, image processing was carried out using self-developed software for semi-automated linearisation and optimised contrast normalisation. This processing significantly increased the precise quantisation of jawbone density and the assessment of subtle bone density changes in arbitrarily selected regions of interest of in vivo exposures. The clinical applicability of the technique is demonstrated in a pilot case. It was demonstrated that minute densitometric deviations could be detected. The present technique and image processing may allow the quantification of jawbone density.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Allen K, Emrich L, Piedmonte M, Hausmann E (1992) Relationship of texture measurements to the prediction of correct evaluation in subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 27:197–206PubMedCrossRef Allen K, Emrich L, Piedmonte M, Hausmann E (1992) Relationship of texture measurements to the prediction of correct evaluation in subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 27:197–206PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Allen KM, Hausmann E (1996) Analytical methodology in quantitative digital subtraction radiography: analyses of the aluminum reference wedge. J Periodontol 67:1317–1321PubMed Allen KM, Hausmann E (1996) Analytical methodology in quantitative digital subtraction radiography: analyses of the aluminum reference wedge. J Periodontol 67:1317–1321PubMed
3.
go back to reference Amendolia SR, Bisogni MG, Delogu P, Fantacci ME, Marchi A, Novelli M, Oliva P, Quattrocchi M, Rosso V, Stefanini A, Zucca S (2002) Experimental study of Compton scattering reduction in digital mammographic imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 49:2361–2365CrossRef Amendolia SR, Bisogni MG, Delogu P, Fantacci ME, Marchi A, Novelli M, Oliva P, Quattrocchi M, Rosso V, Stefanini A, Zucca S (2002) Experimental study of Compton scattering reduction in digital mammographic imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 49:2361–2365CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Benn DK (1990) Limitations of the digital image subtraction technique in assessing alveolar bone crest changes due to misalignment errors during image capture. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 19:97–104PubMed Benn DK (1990) Limitations of the digital image subtraction technique in assessing alveolar bone crest changes due to misalignment errors during image capture. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 19:97–104PubMed
5.
go back to reference Carlton RR, Adler AM (1996) Principles of radiographic imaging, 2nd edn. Delmar, Albany, NY, p 730 Carlton RR, Adler AM (1996) Principles of radiographic imaging, 2nd edn. Delmar, Albany, NY, p 730
6.
go back to reference Christgau M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Kolbeck C, Wensel A (1998) Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the determination of small changes in bone thickness: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85:462–472PubMedCrossRef Christgau M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Kolbeck C, Wensel A (1998) Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the determination of small changes in bone thickness: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85:462–472PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Coatrieux JL (2002) Signal processing and physiological modeling—part 1: surface analysis. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 30:9–35PubMedCrossRef Coatrieux JL (2002) Signal processing and physiological modeling—part 1: surface analysis. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 30:9–35PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Couture RA, Hildebolt C (2000) Quantitative dental radiography with a new photostimulable phosphor system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:498–508PubMedCrossRef Couture RA, Hildebolt C (2000) Quantitative dental radiography with a new photostimulable phosphor system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:498–508PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Couture RA, Hildebolt CFR (2002) Precise image-receptor calibration and monitoring of beam quality with a step wedge. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:56–62PubMedCrossRef Couture RA, Hildebolt CFR (2002) Precise image-receptor calibration and monitoring of beam quality with a step wedge. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:56–62PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Couture RA, Dixon DA, Hildebolt CF (2005) A precise receptor-positioning device for subtraction radiography, based on cross-arch stabilisation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34:231–236PubMedCrossRef Couture RA, Dixon DA, Hildebolt CF (2005) A precise receptor-positioning device for subtraction radiography, based on cross-arch stabilisation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34:231–236PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Du Tré F (2004) Applicability of radiologic analytical methods to evaluate the healing efficiency of extraction sockets using bone substitute materials. Master Thesis, Catholic University Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Leuven, Belgium, pp 146 Du Tré F (2004) Applicability of radiologic analytical methods to evaluate the healing efficiency of extraction sockets using bone substitute materials. Master Thesis, Catholic University Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Leuven, Belgium, pp 146
12.
go back to reference Ellwood RP, Davies RM, Worthington HV (1997) Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system. J Periodontal Res 32:241–248PubMedCrossRef Ellwood RP, Davies RM, Worthington HV (1997) Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system. J Periodontal Res 32:241–248PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Engelke W, de Valk S, Ruttimann U (1990) The diagnostic value of subtraction radiography in the assessment of granular hydroxylapatite implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 69:636–641 Engelke W, de Valk S, Ruttimann U (1990) The diagnostic value of subtraction radiography in the assessment of granular hydroxylapatite implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 69:636–641
14.
go back to reference Jean A, Epelboin Y, Rimsky A, Soyer A, Ouhayoun JP (1996) Digital image ratio: a new radiographic method for quantifying changes in alveolar bone. Part 1: theory and methodology. J Periodontal Res 31:161–167PubMedCrossRef Jean A, Epelboin Y, Rimsky A, Soyer A, Ouhayoun JP (1996) Digital image ratio: a new radiographic method for quantifying changes in alveolar bone. Part 1: theory and methodology. J Periodontal Res 31:161–167PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Griffiths GS, Brägger U, Fourmousis I, Sterne JAC (1996) Use of an internal standard in subtraction radiography to assess initial periodontal bone changes. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:76–81PubMed Griffiths GS, Brägger U, Fourmousis I, Sterne JAC (1996) Use of an internal standard in subtraction radiography to assess initial periodontal bone changes. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:76–81PubMed
16.
go back to reference Guneri P, Lomcali G, Boyacioglu H, Kendir S (2005) The effects of incremental brightness and contrast adjustments on radiographic data: a quantitative study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34:20–27PubMedCrossRef Guneri P, Lomcali G, Boyacioglu H, Kendir S (2005) The effects of incremental brightness and contrast adjustments on radiographic data: a quantitative study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34:20–27PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Handschel J, Kleinheinz J, Kelker M, Reuter I, Joos U (1999) Reproducible X-ray projection geometry in edentulous patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 28:368–371PubMedCrossRef Handschel J, Kleinheinz J, Kelker M, Reuter I, Joos U (1999) Reproducible X-ray projection geometry in edentulous patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 28:368–371PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hausmann E, Kutlubay ME, Odrobina D et al (1995) Studies on the angular reproducibility of positioning patients adjacent to an X-ray tube 2. A new electronically guided force-sensitive sensor-based alignment system. J Periodontal Res 30:294–297PubMedCrossRef Hausmann E, Kutlubay ME, Odrobina D et al (1995) Studies on the angular reproducibility of positioning patients adjacent to an X-ray tube 2. A new electronically guided force-sensitive sensor-based alignment system. J Periodontal Res 30:294–297PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hausmann E, Allen K, Loza J, Buchanan W, Cavanaugh PF Jr (1996) Validation of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using the electronically guided alignment device/impression technique. J Periodontol 67:895–899PubMed Hausmann E, Allen K, Loza J, Buchanan W, Cavanaugh PF Jr (1996) Validation of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using the electronically guided alignment device/impression technique. J Periodontol 67:895–899PubMed
20.
go back to reference Hayakawa Y, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Kuroyanagi K, Rumack PM, Schick DB (1996) Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:71–75PubMed Hayakawa Y, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Kuroyanagi K, Rumack PM, Schick DB (1996) Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:71–75PubMed
21.
go back to reference Helmrot E, Carlsson GA, Eckerdal O (1994) Effects of contrast equalization on energy imparted to the patient: a comparison of two dental generators and two types of intraoral film. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 23:83–90PubMed Helmrot E, Carlsson GA, Eckerdal O (1994) Effects of contrast equalization on energy imparted to the patient: a comparison of two dental generators and two types of intraoral film. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 23:83–90PubMed
22.
go back to reference Hildebolt CF, Fletcher G, Yokoyama-Crothers N, Conover GL, Vannier MW (1997) A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26:147–151PubMedCrossRef Hildebolt CF, Fletcher G, Yokoyama-Crothers N, Conover GL, Vannier MW (1997) A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26:147–151PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Janssen PTM, van Palenstein Helderman WH, van Aken J (1989) The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observes and quantitative digital subtraction radiography. J Clin Periodontol 16:335–341PubMedCrossRef Janssen PTM, van Palenstein Helderman WH, van Aken J (1989) The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observes and quantitative digital subtraction radiography. J Clin Periodontol 16:335–341PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kitagawa H, Farman AG, Sheetz JP , Brown WP, Lewis L, Benefiel M, Kuroyanagi K (2000) Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29:272–276PubMedCrossRef Kitagawa H, Farman AG, Sheetz JP , Brown WP, Lewis L, Benefiel M, Kuroyanagi K (2000) Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29:272–276PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lee SS, Huh YJ, Kim KY, Heo MS, Choi SC, Koak JY, Heo SJ, Han CH, Yi WJ (2004) Development and evaluation of digital subtraction radiography computer program. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98:471–475PubMedCrossRef Lee SS, Huh YJ, Kim KY, Heo MS, Choi SC, Koak JY, Heo SJ, Han CH, Yi WJ (2004) Development and evaluation of digital subtraction radiography computer program. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98:471–475PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lehmann TM, Grondahl HG, Benn DK (2000) Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29:323–346PubMedCrossRef Lehmann TM, Grondahl HG, Benn DK (2000) Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29:323–346PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Likar B, Pernus F (1997) Evaluation of three contrast correction methods for digital subtraction in dental radiography: an in vitro study. Med Phys 24:299–307PubMedCrossRef Likar B, Pernus F (1997) Evaluation of three contrast correction methods for digital subtraction in dental radiography: an in vitro study. Med Phys 24:299–307PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Loftin R, Webber R, Horton R, Tyndall D, Moriarty J (1998) Effect of projective aspects variations on estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 33:352–358PubMedCrossRef Loftin R, Webber R, Horton R, Tyndall D, Moriarty J (1998) Effect of projective aspects variations on estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 33:352–358PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Marino A (2000) Chaos and fractals in biology and medicine. Temple presentation. Temple University, Center for Frontier Science, 22 March 2000 Marino A (2000) Chaos and fractals in biology and medicine. Temple presentation. Temple University, Center for Frontier Science, 22 March 2000
30.
go back to reference Markov VT, Fetisov GV, Zhukov SG (1990) Corrections for absorption and beam inhomogeneity in X-ray single-crystal diffractiometry: method of analytical integration. J Appl Crystallogr 23:94–98CrossRef Markov VT, Fetisov GV, Zhukov SG (1990) Corrections for absorption and beam inhomogeneity in X-ray single-crystal diffractiometry: method of analytical integration. J Appl Crystallogr 23:94–98CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mol A, Dunn SM (2003) Effect of bone chip orientation on quantitative estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 38:296–302PubMedCrossRef Mol A, Dunn SM (2003) Effect of bone chip orientation on quantitative estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 38:296–302PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mol A, Dunn SM (2003) The performance of projective standardization for digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96:373–382PubMedCrossRef Mol A, Dunn SM (2003) The performance of projective standardization for digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96:373–382PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Nummikoski PV, Martinez TS, Matteson SR, McDavid WD, Dove SB (1992) Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 21:59–64PubMed Nummikoski PV, Martinez TS, Matteson SR, McDavid WD, Dove SB (1992) Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 21:59–64PubMed
34.
go back to reference Ohki M, Okano T, Yamada N (1988) A contrast-correction method for digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 23:277–280PubMedCrossRef Ohki M, Okano T, Yamada N (1988) A contrast-correction method for digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 23:277–280PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ruttiman UE, Webber RL (1987) Volumetry of localized bone lesions by subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 22:215–216CrossRef Ruttiman UE, Webber RL (1987) Volumetry of localized bone lesions by subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 22:215–216CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Schulze RK, d’Hoedt B (2001) Mathematical analysis of projection errors in “paralleling technique” with respect to implant geometry. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:364–371PubMedCrossRef Schulze RK, d’Hoedt B (2001) Mathematical analysis of projection errors in “paralleling technique” with respect to implant geometry. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:364–371PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Sewerin I (1990) Device for serial intraoral radiography with controlled projection angles. Tandlaegebladet 15:613–617 Sewerin I (1990) Device for serial intraoral radiography with controlled projection angles. Tandlaegebladet 15:613–617
38.
go back to reference Syriopoulos K, Velders XL, Geraets WG, van der Stelt PF (1998) A radiographic method for measuring radiation dose based on beam quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27:287–292PubMedCrossRef Syriopoulos K, Velders XL, Geraets WG, van der Stelt PF (1998) A radiographic method for measuring radiation dose based on beam quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27:287–292PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Tagger M, Katz A (2003) Radiopacity of endodontic sealers: development of a new method for direct measurement. J Endod 29:751–755PubMedCrossRef Tagger M, Katz A (2003) Radiopacity of endodontic sealers: development of a new method for direct measurement. J Endod 29:751–755PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Versteeg CH, Sanderink GC, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF (1998) Effects of calibration and automatic greyscale adjustment on detectability of simulated bone lesions using a storage phosphor system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27:240–244PubMedCrossRef Versteeg CH, Sanderink GC, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF (1998) Effects of calibration and automatic greyscale adjustment on detectability of simulated bone lesions using a storage phosphor system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27:240–244PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Webber RL, Ruttimann UE, Heaven TJ (1990) Calibration errors in digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 25:268–275PubMedCrossRef Webber RL, Ruttimann UE, Heaven TJ (1990) Calibration errors in digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 25:268–275PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference von Wowern N (1985) Dual-photon absorptiometry of mandibles: in vitro test of a new method. Scand J Dent Res 93:169–177 von Wowern N (1985) Dual-photon absorptiometry of mandibles: in vitro test of a new method. Scand J Dent Res 93:169–177
43.
go back to reference von Wowern N (1985) In vivo measurement of bone mineral content of mandibles by dual-photon absorptiometry. Scand J Dent Res 93:162–168 von Wowern N (1985) In vivo measurement of bone mineral content of mandibles by dual-photon absorptiometry. Scand J Dent Res 93:162–168
44.
go back to reference von Wowern N, Worsaae N (1988) Bone mineral content of the maxilla estimated by dual-photon absorptiometry after augmentation with bone or hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 67:1405–1408 von Wowern N, Worsaae N (1988) Bone mineral content of the maxilla estimated by dual-photon absorptiometry after augmentation with bone or hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 67:1405–1408
45.
go back to reference von Wowern N (2001) General and oral aspects of osteoporosis:a review. Clin Oral Investig 5:71–82CrossRef von Wowern N (2001) General and oral aspects of osteoporosis:a review. Clin Oral Investig 5:71–82CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H, Sasaki T (1997) Quantitative subtraction with direct digital dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26:286–294PubMedCrossRef Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H, Sasaki T (1997) Quantitative subtraction with direct digital dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26:286–294PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Yoshiura K, Welander U, Shi XQ, Li G, Kawazu T, Tatsumi M, Okamura K, McDavid WD, Kanda S (2001) Conventional and predicted perceptibility curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30:219–225PubMedCrossRef Yoshiura K, Welander U, Shi XQ, Li G, Kawazu T, Tatsumi M, Okamura K, McDavid WD, Kanda S (2001) Conventional and predicted perceptibility curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30:219–225PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, van Aken J (1991) In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel film holder and an X-ray beam manipulator. J Periodontol 62:674–683PubMed Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, van Aken J (1991) In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel film holder and an X-ray beam manipulator. J Periodontol 62:674–683PubMed
Metadata
Title
Development of a novel digital subtraction technique for detecting subtle changes in jawbone density
Authors
Frank Du Tré
Reinhilde Jacobs
Sean Styven
Daniel van Steenberghe
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0055-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

Clinical Oral Investigations 3/2006 Go to the issue

Calendar of Events

Calendar of events