Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2006

01-03-2006

Development of a cost-effective system for digital off-line analysis of transrectal ultrasound

Authors: R. Weidenhagen, T. Strauss, K. U. Gruetzner, F. W. Spelsberg, H. O. Steitz

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is the most sensitive and accurate technique for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. One of the most relevant problems of this technique is that the assessment of TRUS is possible only during real-time examination. Furthermore, interpretation of the ultrasound findings is difficult and requires long experience. We show the development of a new, cost-effective software solution for off-line examination and documentation of transrectal ultrasound.

Methods

The ultrasound device is connected to a frame-grabber card in a standard PC. Video capturing is done using a freeware software solution and various video codecs. The whole examination course is recorded. The examiner only has to concentrate on producing an artifact-free realization of the examination.

Results

The software solution offers a flexible review of each individual “frame” of the investigation on the personal computer, very similar to CT and MRI scans. Infiltration depth and lymph node status can be assessed at any time, independently of the investigation and the investigator. The picture quality is excellent even if a lossy codec is used. It is not necessary to do definitive assessment of the TRUS during the examination.

Conclusions

This new technique gives a cost-effective possibility for high-quality off-line staging, re-examination, re-evaluation, and documentation of rectal cancer. TRUS becomes an examiner-independent objective examination technique for staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adams DR, Blatchford GJ, Lin KM, Ternent CA, Thorson AG, Christensen MA (1999) Use of preoperative ultrasound staging for treatment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 159–166CrossRefPubMed Adams DR, Blatchford GJ, Lin KM, Ternent CA, Thorson AG, Christensen MA (1999) Use of preoperative ultrasound staging for treatment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 159–166CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Carmody BJ, Otchy DP (2000) Learning curve of transrectal ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 193–197CrossRefPubMed Carmody BJ, Otchy DP (2000) Learning curve of transrectal ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 193–197CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Garcia-Aguilar J, Pollack J, Lee SH, Hernandez de AnE, Mellgren A, Wong WD, Finne CO, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD (2002) Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 10–15PubMed Garcia-Aguilar J, Pollack J, Lee SH, Hernandez de AnE, Mellgren A, Wong WD, Finne CO, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD (2002) Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 10–15PubMed
5.
go back to reference Glaser F, Kuntz C, Schlag P, Herfarth C (1993) Endorectal ultrasound for control of preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 217: 64–71PubMed Glaser F, Kuntz C, Schlag P, Herfarth C (1993) Endorectal ultrasound for control of preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 217: 64–71PubMed
6.
go back to reference Karson TH, Zepp RC, Chandra S, Morehead A, Thomas JD (1996) Digital storage of echocardiograms offers superior image quality to analog storage, even with 20:1 digital compression: results of the Digital Echo Record Access Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 9: 769–778PubMed Karson TH, Zepp RC, Chandra S, Morehead A, Thomas JD (1996) Digital storage of echocardiograms offers superior image quality to analog storage, even with 20:1 digital compression: results of the Digital Echo Record Access Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 9: 769–778PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kim JC, Yu CS, Jung HY, Kim HC, Kim SY, Park SK, Kang GH, Lee MG (2001) Source of errors in the evaluation of early rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasonography. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 1302–1309PubMed Kim JC, Yu CS, Jung HY, Kim HC, Kim SY, Park SK, Kang GH, Lee MG (2001) Source of errors in the evaluation of early rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasonography. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 1302–1309PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kwok H, Bissett IP, Hill GL (2000) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 15: 9–20CrossRefPubMed Kwok H, Bissett IP, Hill GL (2000) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 15: 9–20CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lohnert MS, Doniec JM, Henne-Bruns D (2000) Effectiveness of endoluminal sonography in the identification of occult local rectal cancer recurrences. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 483–491PubMed Lohnert MS, Doniec JM, Henne-Bruns D (2000) Effectiveness of endoluminal sonography in the identification of occult local rectal cancer recurrences. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 483–491PubMed
11.
go back to reference Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Zippel R, Kuhn R, Wolff S, Pross M, Wierth A, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2002) Routine use of transrectal ultrasound in rectal carcinoma: results of a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 34: 385–390CrossRefPubMed Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Zippel R, Kuhn R, Wolff S, Pross M, Wierth A, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2002) Routine use of transrectal ultrasound in rectal carcinoma: results of a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 34: 385–390CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mascagni D, Corbellini L, Urciuoli P, Di Matteo G (1989) Endoluminal ultrasound for early detection of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 76: 1176–1180PubMed Mascagni D, Corbellini L, Urciuoli P, Di Matteo G (1989) Endoluminal ultrasound for early detection of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 76: 1176–1180PubMed
14.
go back to reference Novell F, Pascual S, Viella P, Trias M (1997) Endorectal ultrasonography in the follow-up of rectal cancer. Is it a better way to detect early local recurrence? Int J Colorectal Dis 12: 78–81CrossRefPubMed Novell F, Pascual S, Viella P, Trias M (1997) Endorectal ultrasonography in the follow-up of rectal cancer. Is it a better way to detect early local recurrence? Int J Colorectal Dis 12: 78–81CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Orrom WJ, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Jensen LL, Goldberg SM (1990) Endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal tumors. A learning experience. Dis Colon Rectum 33: 654–659PubMed Orrom WJ, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Jensen LL, Goldberg SM (1990) Endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal tumors. A learning experience. Dis Colon Rectum 33: 654–659PubMed
17.
go back to reference Ramirez JM, Mortensen NJ, Takeuchi N, Humphreys MM (1994) Endoluminal ultrasonography in the follow-up of patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 81: 692–694PubMed Ramirez JM, Mortensen NJ, Takeuchi N, Humphreys MM (1994) Endoluminal ultrasonography in the follow-up of patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 81: 692–694PubMed
18.
go back to reference Rotondano G, Esposito P, Pellecchia L, Novi A, Romano G (1997) Early detection of locally recurrent rectal cancer by endosonography. Br J Radiol 70: 567–571PubMed Rotondano G, Esposito P, Pellecchia L, Novi A, Romano G (1997) Early detection of locally recurrent rectal cancer by endosonography. Br J Radiol 70: 567–571PubMed
19.
go back to reference Santoro G, Di Falco G (2004) Atlas of endocanal and endorectal ultrasonography. Spinger-Verlag, Milan, Italy Santoro G, Di Falco G (2004) Atlas of endocanal and endorectal ultrasonography. Spinger-Verlag, Milan, Italy
21.
go back to reference Slone RM, Muka E, Pilgram TK (2003) Irreversible JPEG compression of digital chest radiographs for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold. Radiology 228: 425–429PubMed Slone RM, Muka E, Pilgram TK (2003) Irreversible JPEG compression of digital chest radiographs for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold. Radiology 228: 425–429PubMed
22.
go back to reference Tarantino D, Bernstein MA (2002) Endoanal ultrasound in the staging and management of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal: potential implications of a new ultrasound staging system. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 16–22CrossRefPubMed Tarantino D, Bernstein MA (2002) Endoanal ultrasound in the staging and management of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal: potential implications of a new ultrasound staging system. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 16–22CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tschmelitsch J, Glaser K, Schwarz C, Judmair G, Bodner E (1992) Endosonography (ES) in the diagnosis of recurrent cancer of the rectum. J Ultrasound Med 11: 149–153PubMed Tschmelitsch J, Glaser K, Schwarz C, Judmair G, Bodner E (1992) Endosonography (ES) in the diagnosis of recurrent cancer of the rectum. J Ultrasound Med 11: 149–153PubMed
Metadata
Title
Development of a cost-effective system for digital off-line analysis of transrectal ultrasound
Authors
R. Weidenhagen
T. Strauss
K. U. Gruetzner
F. W. Spelsberg
H. O. Steitz
Publication date
01-03-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0352-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2006 Go to the issue