Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Development and validation of the Chinese version of dry eye related quality of life scale

Authors: Bang Zheng, Xiao-jing Liu, Yue-qian Fiona Sun, Jia-zeng Su, Yang Zhao, Zheng Xie, Guang-yan Yu

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To develop the Chinese version of quality of life scale for dry eye patients based on the Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) questionnaire and to assess the reliability and validity of the developed scale.

Methods

The original IDEEL was adapted cross-culturally to Chinese language and further developed following standard procedures. A total of 100 Chinese patients diagnosed with dry eye syndrome were included to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of scale. Psychometric tests included internal consistency (Cronbach’s ɑ coefficients), construct validity (exploratory factor analysis), and known-groups validity (the analysis of variance).

Results

The Chinese version of Dry Eye Related Quality of Life (CDERQOL) Scale contains 45 items classified into 5 domains. Good to excellent internal consistency reliability was demonstrated for all 5 domains (Cronbach’s ɑ coefficients range from 0.716 to 0.913). Construct validity assessment indicated a consistent factorial structure of the CDERQOL scale with hypothesized construct, with the exception of “Dry Eye Symptom-Bother” domain. All domain scores were detected with significant difference across three severity groups of dry eye patients (P < 0.05) except for “Satisfaction with Treatment” domain, indicating good known-groups validity.

Conclusions

The results indicated that the CDERQOL scale is a reliable and valid instrument for patients with dry eye syndrome among Chinese population, and could be used as a supplementary diagnostic and treatment-effectiveness measure.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Perry HD. Dry eye disease: pathophysiology, classification, and diagnosis. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(Suppl 3):S79–87.PubMed Perry HD. Dry eye disease: pathophysiology, classification, and diagnosis. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(Suppl 3):S79–87.PubMed
2.
go back to reference The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5(2):75–92. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5(2):75–92.
3.
go back to reference Li J, Zheng K, Deng Z, Zheng J, Ma H, Sun L, Chen W. Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye disease among a hospital-based population in southeast China. Eye Contact Lens. 2015;41(1):44–50.CrossRefPubMed Li J, Zheng K, Deng Z, Zheng J, Ma H, Sun L, Chen W. Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye disease among a hospital-based population in southeast China. Eye Contact Lens. 2015;41(1):44–50.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, Liu JH, Chou P, Hsu WM. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai eye study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(6):1096–101.CrossRefPubMed Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, Liu JH, Chou P, Hsu WM. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai eye study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(6):1096–101.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Liu NN, Liu L, Li J, Sun YZ. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye symptom in mainland china: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:748654.PubMedPubMedCentral Liu NN, Liu L, Li J, Sun YZ. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye symptom in mainland china: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:748654.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Yu GY, Zhu ZH, Mao C, Cai ZG, Zou LH, Lu L, Zhang L, Peng X, Li N, Huang Z. Microvascular autologous submandibular gland transfer in severe cases of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33(3):235–9.CrossRefPubMed Yu GY, Zhu ZH, Mao C, Cai ZG, Zou LH, Lu L, Zhang L, Peng X, Li N, Huang Z. Microvascular autologous submandibular gland transfer in severe cases of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33(3):235–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Qin J, Zhang L, Cai ZG, Mao C, Liu XJ, Lv L, Zou LH, Peng X, Su JZ, Wu J, et al. Microvascular autologous transplantation of partial submandibular gland for severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(9):1123–8.CrossRefPubMed Qin J, Zhang L, Cai ZG, Mao C, Liu XJ, Lv L, Zou LH, Peng X, Su JZ, Wu J, et al. Microvascular autologous transplantation of partial submandibular gland for severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(9):1123–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Borrelli M, Schröder C, Dart JK, Collin JR, Sieg P, Cree IA, Matheson MA, Tiffany JM, Proctor G, van Best J, et al. Long–term follow–up after submandibular gland transplantation in severe dry eyes secondary to cicatrizing conjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(6):894–904.CrossRefPubMed Borrelli M, Schröder C, Dart JK, Collin JR, Sieg P, Cree IA, Matheson MA, Tiffany JM, Proctor G, van Best J, et al. Long–term follow–up after submandibular gland transplantation in severe dry eyes secondary to cicatrizing conjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(6):894–904.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jacobsen HC, Hakim SG, Lauer I, Dendorfer A, Wedel T, Sieg P. Long-term results of autologous submandibular gland transfer for the surgical treatment of severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36(4):227–33.CrossRefPubMed Jacobsen HC, Hakim SG, Lauer I, Dendorfer A, Wedel T, Sieg P. Long-term results of autologous submandibular gland transfer for the surgical treatment of severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36(4):227–33.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mizuno Y, Yamada M, Miyake Y. Association between clinical diagnostic tests and health-related quality of life surveys in patients with dry eye syndrome. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54(4):259–65.CrossRefPubMed Mizuno Y, Yamada M, Miyake Y. Association between clinical diagnostic tests and health-related quality of life surveys in patients with dry eye syndrome. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54(4):259–65.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lin PY, Cheng CY, Hsu WM, Tsai SY, Lin MW, Liu JH, Chou P. Association between symptoms and signs of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(5):1593–8.CrossRefPubMed Lin PY, Cheng CY, Hsu WM, Tsai SY, Lin MW, Liu JH, Chou P. Association between symptoms and signs of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(5):1593–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(5):615–21.CrossRefPubMed Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(5):615–21.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Abetz L, Rajagopalan K, Mertzanis P, Begley C, Barnes R, Chalmers R. Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abetz L, Rajagopalan K, Mertzanis P, Begley C, Barnes R, Chalmers R. Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Grubbs JJ, Huynh K, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Weaver MA, Williamson J, Lefebvre C, Davis RM. Instrument development of the UNC dry eye management scale. Cornea. 2014;33(11):1186–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grubbs JJ, Huynh K, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Weaver MA, Williamson J, Lefebvre C, Davis RM. Instrument development of the UNC dry eye management scale. Cornea. 2014;33(11):1186–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–32.CrossRefPubMed Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–32.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Jane R, Jane L. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2003. Jane R, Jane L. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2003.
19.
go back to reference Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychology. 1932;22(140):55. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychology. 1932;22(140):55.
21.
go back to reference Hays RD, Hayashi T. Beyond internal consistency reliability: rationale and user’s guide for multitrait analysis program on the microcomputer. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1990;22(2):167–75.CrossRef Hays RD, Hayashi T. Beyond internal consistency reliability: rationale and user’s guide for multitrait analysis program on the microcomputer. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1990;22(2):167–75.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273(1):59–65.CrossRefPubMed Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273(1):59–65.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Shikiar R, Rentz AM. Satisfaction with medication: an overview of conceptual, methodologic, and regulatory issues. Value Health. 2004;7(2):204–15.CrossRefPubMed Shikiar R, Rentz AM. Satisfaction with medication: an overview of conceptual, methodologic, and regulatory issues. Value Health. 2004;7(2):204–15.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.CrossRef Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference CRONBACH LJ. A case study of the split-half reliability coefficient. J Educ Psychol. 1946;37(8):473–80.CrossRefPubMed CRONBACH LJ. A case study of the split-half reliability coefficient. J Educ Psychol. 1946;37(8):473–80.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15(5):625–32.CrossRefPubMed Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15(5):625–32.CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
go back to reference Carifio J, Perla R. Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Med Educ. 2008;42(12):1150–2.CrossRefPubMed Carifio J, Perla R. Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Med Educ. 2008;42(12):1150–2.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
go back to reference Lee JW, Jones PS, Mineyama Y, Zhang XE. Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Res Nurs Health. 2002;25(4):295–306.CrossRefPubMed Lee JW, Jones PS, Mineyama Y, Zhang XE. Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Res Nurs Health. 2002;25(4):295–306.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Heine SJ, Lehman DR, Peng K, Greenholtz J. What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: the reference-group effect. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(6):903–18.CrossRefPubMed Heine SJ, Lehman DR, Peng K, Greenholtz J. What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: the reference-group effect. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(6):903–18.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of the Chinese version of dry eye related quality of life scale
Authors
Bang Zheng
Xiao-jing Liu
Yue-qian Fiona Sun
Jia-zeng Su
Yang Zhao
Zheng Xie
Guang-yan Yu
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0718-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2017 Go to the issue