Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2007

01-09-2007 | Breast Oncology

Development and Trends of Surgical Modalities for Breast Cancer in China: A Review of 16-Year Data

Authors: Ke-Da Yu, Gen-Hong Di, Jiong Wu, Jin-Song Lu, Kun-Wei Shen, Zhen-Zhou Shen, Zhi-Min Shao

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgery is the most important treatment for nonmetastatic breast cancer; however, the utilization of modern surgical techniques in management of breast cancer in mainland China has not been reported.

Methods

The medical records of 5887 consecutive breast cancer patients treated surgically in the past 16 years were reviewed retrospectively; the utilization of different surgical modalities and associated clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Median age of all patients was 50 (range 16–92). About 1015 patients were staged as 0–I, 3569 stage II, 517 stage III, and 786 cases could not be staged. Extensive radical mastectomy (ERM), radical mastectomy (RM), modified radical mastectomy (MRM), simple mastectomy (SM), and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were used in 8%, 27.2%, 55.7%, 1.5%, and 6.3% of patients, respectively. In addition, 1.3% of patients received breast reconstruction. The proportion of early-stage breast cancer increased, and the surgery patterns varied. MRM gradually replaced ERM and RM. The prevalence of BCS began to increase from the mid-1990s and currently represents about 12%. The prevalence of reconstruction also increased and now accounts for 5%. Age, pathologic pattern, and TNM staging affected the choice of surgery modalities markedly. Although patients receiving RM/ERM had worse survival than those receiving BCS/MRM, the survival outcomes of these four groups were similar in the early-stage population.

Conclusions

MRM remains the most-used surgical modality in operable breast cancer, although the utilization of BCS for early-stage disease has increased rapidly in last decade. Reconstruction following mastectomy as an alternative to BCS is available. Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and MRM provide similar local controls and long-term survival for breast cancer. Selection of appropriate candidates for a certain surgery requires an assessment of the patient’s age and clinical and pathological characteristics of the tumor.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56:106–130PubMed Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56:106–130PubMed
2.
go back to reference Parkin D, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:74–108PubMedCrossRef Parkin D, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:74–108PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yang L, Parkin DM, Ferlay J, Li L, Chen Y. Estimates of cancer incidence in China for 2000 and projections for 2005. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14:243–50PubMedCrossRef Yang L, Parkin DM, Ferlay J, Li L, Chen Y. Estimates of cancer incidence in China for 2000 and projections for 2005. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14:243–50PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Newman LA. Locoregional control of breast cancer: surgical technique does matter. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11:11–3PubMedCrossRef Newman LA. Locoregional control of breast cancer: surgical technique does matter. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11:11–3PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rohrich RJ. Minimally invasive, limited incision breast surgery: passing fad or emerging trend? Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110:1315–7PubMedCrossRef Rohrich RJ. Minimally invasive, limited incision breast surgery: passing fad or emerging trend? Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110:1315–7PubMedCrossRef
6.
8.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, et al. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1456–61PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, et al. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1456–61PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1233–41PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1233–41PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1227–32PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1227–32PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Martin MA, Meyricke R, O’Neill T, Roberts S. Breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy for survival from breast cancer: the Western Australian experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:157–64PubMedCrossRef Martin MA, Meyricke R, O’Neill T, Roberts S. Breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy for survival from breast cancer: the Western Australian experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:157–64PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jatoi I, Proschan MA. Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. Am J Clin Oncol 2005; 28:289–94PubMedCrossRef Jatoi I, Proschan MA. Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. Am J Clin Oncol 2005; 28:289–94PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer 2003; 98:697–702PubMedCrossRef Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer 2003; 98:697–702PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pomahac B, Recht A, May JW, Hergrueter CA, Slavin SA. New trends in breast cancer management: is the era of immediate breast reconstruction changing? Ann Surg 2006; 244:282–8PubMedCrossRef Pomahac B, Recht A, May JW, Hergrueter CA, Slavin SA. New trends in breast cancer management: is the era of immediate breast reconstruction changing? Ann Surg 2006; 244:282–8PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fan J, Wang L, Wang XJ, et al. Breast conservative therapy in east part of China: a retrospective cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2006; 132:573–8PubMedCrossRef Fan J, Wang L, Wang XJ, et al. Breast conservative therapy in east part of China: a retrospective cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2006; 132:573–8PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ganz PA, Schag AC, Lee JJ, Polinsky ML, Tan SJ. Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer 1992; 69:1729–38PubMedCrossRef Ganz PA, Schag AC, Lee JJ, Polinsky ML, Tan SJ. Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer 1992; 69:1729–38PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zhang BN, Shao ZM, Qiao XM, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer in China. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2005; 27:680–4PubMed Zhang BN, Shao ZM, Qiao XM, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer in China. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2005; 27:680–4PubMed
18.
go back to reference Dian D, Schwenn K, Mylonas I, et al. Quality of life among breast cancer patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction versus breast conserving therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2007; 133:247–52PubMedCrossRef Dian D, Schwenn K, Mylonas I, et al. Quality of life among breast cancer patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction versus breast conserving therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2007; 133:247–52PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference O’Brien W, Hasselgren PO, Hummel RP, et al. Comparison of postoperative wound complications and early cancer recurrence between patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 1993; 166:1–5PubMedCrossRef O’Brien W, Hasselgren PO, Hummel RP, et al. Comparison of postoperative wound complications and early cancer recurrence between patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 1993; 166:1–5PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Smith I, Chua S. Medical treatment of early breast cancer. IV: neoadjuvant treatment. BMJ 2006; 332:223–4PubMedCrossRef Smith I, Chua S. Medical treatment of early breast cancer. IV: neoadjuvant treatment. BMJ 2006; 332:223–4PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ananian P, Houvenaeghel G, Protiere C, et al. Determinants of patients’ choice of reconstruction with mastectomy for primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11:762–71PubMedCrossRef Ananian P, Houvenaeghel G, Protiere C, et al. Determinants of patients’ choice of reconstruction with mastectomy for primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11:762–71PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and Trends of Surgical Modalities for Breast Cancer in China: A Review of 16-Year Data
Authors
Ke-Da Yu
Gen-Hong Di
Jiong Wu
Jin-Song Lu
Kun-Wei Shen
Zhen-Zhou Shen
Zhi-Min Shao
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2007
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9436-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2007

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2007 Go to the issue