Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Development and feasibility of a function-based preventive intervention for lifestyle-related disorders

Authors: Lena Bornhöft, Daniel Arvidsson, Anna Bergenheim, Mats Börjesson, Jonatan Fridolfsson, Margareta Hellgren, Lena Nordeman, Maria EH Larsson

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Background

The enormous effect of lifestyle-related disorders on health of the global population warrants the development of preventive interventions. Focusing on musculoskeletal health and physical activity may be a way to encourage necessary lifestyle changes by making them more concrete and understandable. The aims of the current study were to develop a function-based preventive intervention aimed at lifestyle-related disorders in physically inactive 40-year-old people and to investigate the feasibility of the intervention. The feasibility study aimed to solve practical and logistical challenges and to develop the intervention based on the experiences of participants and involved clinical personnel according to defined criteria.

Methods

Development of the standardised functional examination was based on literature-validated tests and clinical reasoning. Development of a risk profile was based on the functional examination and similar profiles which have already proved feasible. The feasibility of the functional examination and risk profile, together with function-based lifestyle counselling was tested on 27 participants in a pilot study with two physiotherapist examinations over a four-month period. Practical results and feedback from participants and collaborating personnel were examined.

Results

The functional examination consists of 20 established tests not requiring specialised equipment or training which were deemed relevant for a middle-aged population and a sub-maximal ergometer test. The risk profile consists of seven functional dimensions: cardiovascular fitness, strength in upper extremity, lower extremity and trunk, mobility, balance and posture, and three non-functional dimensions: weight, self-assessed physical activity and pain. Each dimension contains at least two measures. The participants appreciated the intervention and found it motivating for making lifestyle changes. They found the tests and risk profile understandable and could see them as tools to help achieve concrete goals. The examination required 60–75 min for one physiotherapist. The recruitment rate was low and recruited participants were highly motivated to making lifestyle changes.

Conclusion

This project developed a functional test battery and risk profile aimed at inactive 40-year-olds which fulfilled our feasibility criteria. Functional screening and lifestyle counselling were found to be of value to a sub-group of inactive 40-year-olds who were already motivated to improve their health situations.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05535296 first posted on 10/09/2022.

Available only for authorised users

Lewis R, Gomez Alvarez CB, Rayman M, Lanham-New S, Woolf A, Mobasheri A. Strategies for optimising musculoskeletal health in the 21(St) century. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):164.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(10):e1077–e86.PubMedCrossRef

Life expectancy and disease burden in the. Nordic countries: results from the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors study 2017. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(12):e658–e69.CrossRef

Crosland P, Ananthapavan J, Davison J, Lambert M, Carter R. The economic cost of preventable disease in Australia: a systematic review of estimates and methods. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019;43(5):484–95.PubMedCrossRef

Schäfer I, Hansen H, Ruppel T, Lühmann D, Wagner HO, Kazek A, et al. Regional differences in reasons for consultation and general practitioners’ spectrum of services in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Jallinoja P, Absetz P, Kuronen R, Nissinen A, Talja M, Uutela A, et al. The dilemma of patient responsibility for lifestyle change: perceptions among primary care physicians and nurses. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007;25(4):244–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Korczak D, Dietl M, Steinhauser G. Effectiveness of programmes as part of primary prevention demonstrated on the example of cardiovascular diseases and the metabolic syndrome. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011;7:Doc02.PubMedPubMedCentral

Blomstedt Y, Norberg M, Stenlund H, Nyström L, Lönnberg G, Boman K, et al. Impact of a combined community and primary care prevention strategy on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a cohort analysis based on 1 million person-years of follow-up in Västerbotten County, Sweden, during 1990–2006. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009651.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Virtanen M, Ervasti J, Head J, Oksanen T, Salo P, Pentti J, et al. Lifestyle factors and risk of sickness absence from work: a multicohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3(11):e545–e54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

10.

Ayis S, Dieppe P. The natural history of disability and its determinants in adults with lower limb musculoskeletal pain. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(3):583–91.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Puthoff M. Participants’ perceptions and the implementation of a physical fitness screen for aging adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019.

12.

Merder-Coşkun D, Uzuner A, Keniş-Coşkun Ö, Çelenlioğlu AE, Akman M, Karadağ-Saygı E. Relationship between obesity and musculoskeletal system findings among children and adolescents. Turkish J Phys Med Rehabilitation. 2017;63(3):207–14.CrossRef

13.

WHO. Global recommendations on physical activity for health: World Health Organization; 2011 [2020-09-25]. Available from: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_adults/en/

14.

Onerup A, Arvidsson D, Blomqvist Å, Daxberg E-L, Jivegård L, Jonsdottir IH, et al. Physical activity on prescription in accordance with the Swedish model increases physical activity: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(6):383–8.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Atienza AA, Moser RP, Perna F, Dodd K, Ballard-Barbash R, Troiano RP, et al. Self-reported and objectively measured activity related to biomarkers using NHANES. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(5):815–21.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Dewi TK, Massar K, Ruiter RAC, Leonardi T. Determinants of breast self-examination practice among women in Surabaya, Indonesia: an application of the health belief model. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1581.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

17.

Rosenstock IM. Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(3):uppl.CrossRef

18.

Docherty B, Sheridan N, Kenealy T. Developing brief opportunistic interactions: practitioners facilitate patients to identify and change health risk behaviours at an early preventive stage. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016;17(4):319–32.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Miller SJ, Foran-Tuller K, Ledergerber J, Jandorf L. Motivational interviewing to improve health screening uptake: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(2):190–8.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Lee WW, Choi KC, Yum RW, Yu DS, Chair SY. Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on lifestyle modification and health outcomes of clients at risk or diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;53:331–41.PubMedCrossRef

21.

McGrane N, Galvin R, Cusack T, Stokes E. Addition of motivational interventions to exercise and traditional physiotherapy: a review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2015;101(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Ervin RB. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults 20 years of age and over, by sex, age, race and ethnicity, and body mass index: United States, 2003–2006. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2009;(13):1–7.

23.

Norberg M, Wall S, Boman K, Weinehall L. The Västerbotten intervention programme: background, design and implications. Global Health Action. 2010;3(1):4643.CrossRef

24.

Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

26.

Ericsson A, Nyström C, Mannerkorpi K. Psychometric properties of the stress and crisis inventory (SCI-93) in females with fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain. Nord J Psychiatry. 2015;69(1):28–34.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Grimby G, Börjesson M, Jonsdottir IH, Schnohr P, Thelle DS, Saltin B. The Saltin-Grimby physical activity level scale and its application to health research. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(Suppl 4):119–25.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Ekblom Ö, Ekblom-Bak E, Bolam KA, Ekblom B, Schmidt C, Söderberg S, et al. Concurrent and predictive validity of physical activity measurement items commonly used in clinical settings–data from SCAPIS pilot study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:978.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

30.

Rosengren A, Wilhelmsen L. Physical activity protects against coronary death and deaths from all causes in middle-aged men. Evidence from a 20-year follow-up of the primary prevention study in Göteborg. Ann Epidemiol. 1997;7(1):69–75.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Olsson SJ, Ekblom Ö, Andersson E, Börjesson M, Kallings LV. Categorical answer modes provide superior validity to open answers when asking for level of physical activity: a cross-sectional study. Scand J Public Health. 2016;44(1):70–6.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Ek A, Kallings LV, Ekström M, Börjesson M, Ekblom Ö. Subjective reports of physical activity levels and sedentary time prior to hospital admission can predict utilization of hospital care and all-cause mortality among patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020:1474515120921986.

33.

Kallings LV, Olsson SJG, Ekblom Ö, Ekblom-Bak E, Börjesson M. The SED-GIH: a single-item question for assessment of stationary behavior-a study of concurrent and convergent validity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(23).

34.

Hurst NP, Kind P, Ruta D, Hunter M, Stubbings A. Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D). Br J Rheumatol. 1997;36(5):551–9.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Linton SJ, Hallden K. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain. 1998;14(3):209–15.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(2):80–6.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Hockings RL, McAuley JH, Maher CG. A systematic review of the predictive ability of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(15):E494–500.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Borg G. Physical work and effort. Oxford: Pergamon; 1977.

39.

Björkman F, Ekblom-Bak E, Ekblom Ö, Ekblom B. Validity of the revised Ekblom Bak cycle ergometer test in adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(9):1627–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

40.

GIH. Referensvärden för maximal syreupptagning vid genomförande av Ekblom Bak-test. Stockholm: Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan/ The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences; 2017 [updated 2017-08-01; cited 2020 2020-09-21]. Available from: https://www.gih.se/ekblombaktest

41.

Rikli RE, Jones CJ. Development and validation of criterion-referenced clinically relevant fitness standards for maintaining physical independence in later years. Gerontologist. 2013;53(2):255–67.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Rikli RE, Jones CJ. Functional fitness normative scores for community-residing older adults, ages 60–94. J Aging Phys Activity. 1999;7(2):162.CrossRef

43.

Rikli RE, Jones CJ. Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. J Aging Phys Activity. 1999;7(2):129.CrossRef

44.

Freene N, Waddington G, Davey R, Cochrane T. Longitudinal comparison of a physiotherapist-led, home-based and group-based program for increasing physical activity in community-dwelling middle-aged adults. Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21(2):189–96.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Bohannon RW, Crouch RH. Two-minute step test of exercise capacity: systematic review of procedures, performance, and clinimetric properties. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019;42(2):105–12.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Kutty VR, Lanas F, Hui C, et al. Reference ranges of handgrip strength from 125,462 healthy adults in 21 countries: a prospective urban rural epidemiologic (PURE) study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7(5):535–46.PubMedCentralCrossRef

47.

Bohannon RW, Wang YC, Yen SC, Grogan KA, Handgrip Strength. A comparison of values obtained from the NHANES and NIH toolbox studies. Am J Occup Ther. 2019;73(2):7302205080p1–p9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

48.

Gerodimos V. Reliability of handgrip strength test in basketball players. J Hum Kinetics. 2012;31:25–36.CrossRef

49.

Savva C, Giakas G, Efstathiou M, Karagiannis C. Test-retest reliability of handgrip strength measurement using a hydraulic hand dynamometer in patients with cervical radiculopathy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014;37(3):206–10.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Avezum A Jr., Orlandini A et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the prospective urban rural epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015.

51.

Bohannon RW. Grip strength: an indispensable biomarker for older adults. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:1681–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

52.

Gurses HN, Zeren M, Denizoglu Kulli H, Durgut E. The relationship of sit-to-stand tests with 6-minute walk test in healthy young adults. Med (Baltim). 2018;97(1):e9489.CrossRef

53.

Jones CJ, Rikli RE, Beam WC. A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999;70(2):113–9.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Hébert-Losier K, Wessman C, Alricsson M, Svantesson U. Updated reliability and normative values for the standing heel-rise test in healthy adults. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(4):446–52.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Lunsford BR, Perry J. The standing heel-rise test for ankle plantar flexion: criterion for normal. Phys Ther. 1995;75(8):694–8.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Vårbakken K, Lorås H, Nilsson KG, Engdal M, Stensdotter AK. Relative difference in muscle strength between patients with knee osteoarthritis and healthy controls when tested bilaterally and joint-inclusive: an exploratory cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):593.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

57.

Schellenberg KL, Lang JM, Chan KM, Burnham RS. A clinical tool for office assessment of lumbar spine stabilization endurance: prone and supine bridge maneuvers. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(5):380–6.PubMedCrossRef

58.

De Blaiser C, De Ridder R, Willems T, Danneels L, Vanden Bossche L, Palmans T, et al. Evaluating abdominal core muscle fatigue: assessment of the validity and reliability of the prone bridging test. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(2):391–9.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Vanti C, Conti C, Faresin F, Ferrari S, Piccarreta R. The relationship between clinical instability and endurance tests, pain, and disability in nonspecific low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016;39(5):359–68.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Biering-Sørensen F. Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine. 1984;9(2):106–19.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Latimer J, Maher CG, Refshauge K, Colaco I. The reliability and validity of the Biering-Sorensen test in asymptomatic subjects and subjects reporting current or previous nonspecific low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(20):2085–9. discussion 90.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Coorevits P, Danneels L, Cambier D, Ramon H, Vanderstraeten G. Assessment of the validity of the Biering-Sørensen test for measuring back muscle fatigue based on EMG median frequency characteristics of back and hip muscles. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(6):997–1005.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Alaranta H, Hurri H, Heliövaara M, Soukka A, Harju R. Non-dynamometric trunk performance tests: reliability and normative data. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994;26(4):211–5.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Araújo CGS, Castro CLB, Franca JFC, Araújo DS. Sitting–rising test: sex- and age-reference scores derived from 6141 adults. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27(8):888–90.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Brito LB, de Araújo DS, de Araújo CG. Does flexibility influence the ability to sit and rise from the floor? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92(3):241–7.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Brito LB, Ricardo DR, Araújo DS, Ramos PS, Myers J, Araújo CG. Ability to sit and rise from the floor as a predictor of all-cause mortality. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(7):892–8.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Michel A, Kohlmann T, Raspe H. The association between clinical findings on physical examination and self-reported severity in back pain. Results of a population-based study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(3):296–303. discussion– 4.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Nicolaisen T, Jørgensen K. Trunk strength, back muscle endurance and low-back trouble. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1985;17(3):121–7.PubMedCrossRef

69.

Cougot B, Petit A, Paget C, Roedlich C, Fleury-Bahi G, Fouquet M, et al. Chronic low back pain among French healthcare workers and prognostic factors of return to work (RTW): a non-randomized controlled trial. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

70.

Mannion AF, Caporaso F, Pulkovski N, Sprott H. Spine stabilisation exercises in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a good clinical outcome is not associated with improved abdominal muscle function. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(7):1301–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

71.

Wakhlu A, Chandran V, Phumethum V, Shen H, Cook RJ, Gladman D. Comparison between INSPIRE and Domjan method for measuring lumbar lateral flexion in patients of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and correlation with radiographic damage. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(4):1063–6.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Domján L, Nemes T, Bálint GP, Tóth Z, Gömör B. A simple method for measuring lateral flexion of the dorsolumbar spine. J Rheumatol. 1990;17(5):663–5.PubMed

73.

Sadler SG, Spink MJ, Ho A, De Jonge XJ, Chuter VH. Restriction in lateral bending range of motion, lumbar lordosis, and hamstring flexibility predicts the development of low back pain: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):179.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

74.

Adams MA, Mannion AF, Dolan P. Personal risk factors for first-time low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(23):2497–505.PubMedCrossRef

75.

Alaranta H, Hurri H, Heliövaara M, Soukka A, Harju R. Flexibility of the spine: normative values of goniometric and tape measurements. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994;26(3):147–54.PubMedCrossRef

76.

Kumar B, Lenert P. Joint hypermobility syndrome: recognizing a commonly overlooked cause of chronic pain. Am J Med. 2017;130(6):640–7.PubMedCrossRef

77.

Engelbert RHH, Juul-Kristensen B, Pacey V, de Wandele I, Smeenk S, Woinarosky N, et al. The evidence-based rationale for physical therapy treatment of children, adolescents, and adults diagnosed with joint hypermobility syndrome/hypermobile Ehlers Danlos syndrome. American journal of medical genetics part C. Seminars Med Genet. 2017;175(1):158–67.

78.

Tidstrand J, Horneij E. Inter-rater reliability of three standardized functional tests in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

79.

Morioka S, Fukumoto T, Hiyamizu M, Matsuo A, Takebayashi H, Miyamoto K. Changes in the equilibrium of standing on one leg at various life stages. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2012;2012:516283.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

80.

Duncan PW, Studenski S, Chandler J, Prescott B. Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans. J Gerontol. 1992;47(3):M93–8.PubMedCrossRef

81.

Isles RC, Choy NLL, Steer M, Nitz JC. Normal values of balance tests in women aged 20–80. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(8):1367–72.PubMedCrossRef

82.

Holbein-Jenny MA, Billek-Sawhney B, Beckman E, Smith T. Balance in personal care home residents: a comparison of the Berg balance scale, the multi-directional reach test, and the activities-specific balance confidence scale. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2005;28(2):48–53.PubMedCrossRef

83.

Smith PS, Hembree JA, Thompson ME. Berg balance scale and functional reach: determining the best clinical tool for individuals post acute stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(7):811–8.PubMedCrossRef

84.

Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol. 1990;45(6):M192–7.PubMedCrossRef

85.

Weiner DK, Duncan PW, Chandler J, Studenski SA. Functional reach: a marker of physical frailty. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(3):203–7.PubMedCrossRef

86.

Brauer S, Burns Y, Galley P. Lateral reach: a clinical measure of medio-lateral postural stability. Physiother Res Int. 1999;4(2):81–8.PubMedCrossRef

87.

El-Kashlan HK, Shepard NT, Asher AM, Smith-Wheelock M, Telian SA. Evaluation of clinical measures of equilibrium. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(3):311–9.PubMedCrossRef

88.

Franchignoni F, Tesio L, Martino MT, Ricupero C. Reliability of four simple, quantitative tests of balance and mobility in healthy elderly females. Aging (Milano). 1998;10(1):26–31.PubMed

89.

Bohannon RW, Tudini F, Constantine D. Tragus-to-wall: a systematic review of procedures, measurements obtained, and clinimetric properties. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(1):179–89.PubMedCrossRef

90.

Menz HB, Dufour AB, Riskowski JL, Hillstrom HJ, Hannan MT. Foot posture, foot function and low back pain: the Framingham foot study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(12):2275–82.PubMedCrossRef

91.

Zuil-Escobar JC, Martínez-Cepa CB, Martín-Urrialde JA, Gómez-Conesa A. Medial longitudinal arch: accuracy, reliability, and correlation between Navicular drop test and footprint parameters. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018;41(8):672–9.PubMedCrossRef

92.

Cote KP, Brunet ME, Gansneder BM, Shultz SJ. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train. 2005;40(1):41–6.PubMedPubMedCentral

93.

Li JS, Tsai TY, Felson DT, Li G, Lewis CL. Six degree-of-freedom knee joint kinematics in obese individuals with knee pain during gait. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0174663.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

94.

Onate JA, Everhart JS, Clifton DR, Best TM, Borchers JR, Chaudhari AM. Physical exam risk factors for lower extremity injury in high school athletes: a systematic review. Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26(6):435–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

95.

Bonazza NA, Smuin D, Onks CA, Silvis ML, Dhawan A. Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the functional movement screen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(3):725–32.PubMedCrossRef

96.

Davis TC, Arnold CL, Mills G, Miele L. A qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators of enrolling underrepresented populations in clinical trials and biobanking. Front cell Dev Biology. 2019;7:74.CrossRef

97.

Sveriges_Regioner_i_Samverkan. Slutrapport avseende systematisk kunskapsgenomgång av den svenska modellen för Riktade hälsosamtal. NPO Levnadsvanor - Nationellt system för kunskapsstyrning Hälso- och sjukvård; 2022.

98.

Lawson PJ, Flocke SA. Teachable moments for health behavior change: a concept analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76(1):25–30.PubMedCrossRef

99.

Cunningham C, O’ Sullivan R, Caserotti P, Tully MA. Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;30(5):816–27.PubMedCrossRef

100.

Pampel FC, Krueger PM, Denney JT. Socioeconomic disparities in health behaviors. Annu Rev Sociol. 2010;36:349–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

101.

Lindgren M, Börjesson M, Ekblom Ö, Bergström G, Lappas G, Rosengren A. Physical activity pattern, cardiorespiratory fitness, and socioeconomic status in the SCAPIS pilot trial - A cross-sectional study. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4:44–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

102.

Vaduganathan M, Venkataramani AS, Bhatt DL. Moving toward global primordial prevention in cardiovascular disease: the heart of the matter. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(14):1535–7.PubMedCrossRef

103.

Greenberg H. An inflection point in global public health. Globalization Health. 2022;18(1):99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Title: Development and feasibility of a function-based preventive intervention for lifestyle-related disorders
Authors: Lena Bornhöft
Daniel Arvidsson
Anna Bergenheim
Mats Börjesson
Jonatan Fridolfsson
Margareta Hellgren
Lena Nordeman
Maria EH Larsson
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18017-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Development and feasibility of a function-based preventive intervention for lifestyle-related disorders

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Knowledge and attitude to HIV pre exposure prophylaxis among women in five sub-Saharan African countries: a multilevel model analysis of population-based survey 2021–2022

Longitudinal association of health behaviors and health-related quality of life with military spouse readiness

Impact of household income on the risk of overweight and obesity over time among preschool-aged children: a population-based cohort study

Pornography, sexual orientation and ambivalent sexism in young adults in Spain

Knowledge, protective behaviours, and perception of Lyme disease in an area of emerging risk: results from a cross-sectional survey of adults in Ottawa, Ontario

Do girls wash dishes and boys play sports? Gender inequalities in physical activity and in the use of screen-based devices among schoolchildren from urban and rural areas in Brazil