Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2010

01-04-2010 | Original Article

Development and feasibility assessment of telephone-delivered supportive care to improve outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer: pilot study of the CONNECT intervention

Authors: Jane Young, James Harrison, Michael Solomon, Phyllis Butow, Rebecca Dennis, Daine Robson, Sally Auld

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Goals of work

This study aims to describe a pilot study of the feasibility, acceptability and likely impact of a nurse-delivered, telephone intervention to reduce unmet need and improve quality of life for surgical patients with colorectal cancer.

Materials and methods

The CONNECT intervention comprises five standardised calls over 6 months commencing on day 3 post-discharge. A prospective non-randomised control trial with patients who had surgery for colorectal cancer at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney between July and December 2006 was conducted. Patients completed a telephone interview with an independent researcher at 1, 3 and 6 months to assess study outcomes, including unmet need (Supportive Care Needs Survey), psychological distress and quality of life (FACT-C). Patients’ views of the intervention were ascertained.

Main results

Forty-one patients participated, 20 in the intervention period. Intervention calls were successfully completed with 85% or more of patients at each of the five time points. Mean call duration ranged from 14–19 min with the highest number of needs (27 for 20 patients) identified on day 3. Patients indicated that the timing of the calls was appropriate and the majority (85%) felt the number of calls was sufficient. There were promising trends in outcomes. For both patient groups, there were clinically meaningful improvements in FACT-C scores over time, with a larger improvement in the intervention group (20.4 points) than the control group (11.7).

Conclusions

The CONNECT intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable to patients. A larger randomised trial is underway to establish its effectiveness to improve patient outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) & AACR (Australasian Association of Cancer Registries) (2007) Cancer in Australia: an overview, 2006. Cancer series no. 37. Cat. no. CAN 32.Canberra: AIHW AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) & AACR (Australasian Association of Cancer Registries) (2007) Cancer in Australia: an overview, 2006. Cancer series no. 37. Cat. no. CAN 32.Canberra: AIHW
2.
go back to reference Birgisson H, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U, Glimelius B (2005) Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial Group. Adverse effects of preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer: long Term follow-up of the Swedish rectal cancer trial. J Clin Oncol 23:8697–8705CrossRefPubMed Birgisson H, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U, Glimelius B (2005) Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial Group. Adverse effects of preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer: long Term follow-up of the Swedish rectal cancer trial. J Clin Oncol 23:8697–8705CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bonevski B, Sanson Fisher R, Girgis A et al (2000) Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:217–225CrossRefPubMed Bonevski B, Sanson Fisher R, Girgis A et al (2000) Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:217–225CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Breast Services Enhancement Program (2005) Learning from the past-informing the future: continuity and coordination of care-improving the ‘cancer journey’. Cancer and Palliative Care Programs Branch, Victorian Government Department of Human Services, Melbourne Breast Services Enhancement Program (2005) Learning from the past-informing the future: continuity and coordination of care-improving the ‘cancer journey’. Cancer and Palliative Care Programs Branch, Victorian Government Department of Human Services, Melbourne
5.
go back to reference Cella D (2006) The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT) measurement system: version 4. Elmhurst, USA Cella D (2006) The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT) measurement system: version 4. Elmhurst, USA
6.
go back to reference Christ G, Siegel K (1990) Monitoring the quality of life needs of cancer patients. Cancer 65:760–765CrossRefPubMed Christ G, Siegel K (1990) Monitoring the quality of life needs of cancer patients. Cancer 65:760–765CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Clark MA, Plank LD, Hill GL (2000) Wound healing associated with severe surgical illness. World J Surg 24:648–654CrossRefPubMed Clark MA, Plank LD, Hill GL (2000) Wound healing associated with severe surgical illness. World J Surg 24:648–654CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Clinical Governance Unit: The National Colorectal Cancer Survey (2002) Australian clinical practice in 2000. National Cancer Control Initiative, Melbourne, pp 1–124 Clinical Governance Unit: The National Colorectal Cancer Survey (2002) Australian clinical practice in 2000. National Cancer Control Initiative, Melbourne, pp 1–124
9.
go back to reference Dubay DA, Franz MG (2006) Acute wound healing: the biology of acute wound failure. Surg Clin N Am 83:463–481CrossRef Dubay DA, Franz MG (2006) Acute wound healing: the biology of acute wound failure. Surg Clin N Am 83:463–481CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dunn J, Lynch B, Rinaldis M et al (2006) Dimensions of quality of life and psychosocial variables most salient to colorectal cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology 15:20–30CrossRefPubMed Dunn J, Lynch B, Rinaldis M et al (2006) Dimensions of quality of life and psychosocial variables most salient to colorectal cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology 15:20–30CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Girgis A, Boyes A, Sanson-Fisher RW, Burrows S (2000) Perceived needs of women diagnosed with breast cancer: rural versus urban location. Aust N Z J Public Health 24:166–173CrossRefPubMed Girgis A, Boyes A, Sanson-Fisher RW, Burrows S (2000) Perceived needs of women diagnosed with breast cancer: rural versus urban location. Aust N Z J Public Health 24:166–173CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, Butow PN, Solomon MJ (2008) What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer . doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0615-5 Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, Butow PN, Solomon MJ (2008) What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer . doi:10.​1007/​s00520-009-0615-5
13.
go back to reference Howell DM, Sussman J, Wiernikowski J, Pyette N, Bainbridge D, O’Brien M, Whelan T (2008) A mixed-method evaluation of nurse-led community-based supportive cancer care. Support Care Cancer . doi:10.1007/s00520-008-0416-2 PubMed Howell DM, Sussman J, Wiernikowski J, Pyette N, Bainbridge D, O’Brien M, Whelan T (2008) A mixed-method evaluation of nurse-led community-based supportive cancer care. Support Care Cancer . doi:10.​1007/​s00520-008-0416-2 PubMed
14.
go back to reference Leventhal H, Nerenz DR, Steele DJ (1984) Illness representations and coping with health threats. In: Baum A, Taylor SE, Singer JE (eds) Handbook of psychology and health, vol 4. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 219–252 Leventhal H, Nerenz DR, Steele DJ (1984) Illness representations and coping with health threats. In: Baum A, Taylor SE, Singer JE (eds) Handbook of psychology and health, vol 4. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 219–252
15.
go back to reference Macvean ML, White VM, Pratt S, Grogan S, Sanson-Fisher R (2007) Reducing the unmet needs of patients with colorectal cancer: a feasibility study of The Pathfinder Volunteer Program. Support Care Cancer 15:293–299CrossRefPubMed Macvean ML, White VM, Pratt S, Grogan S, Sanson-Fisher R (2007) Reducing the unmet needs of patients with colorectal cancer: a feasibility study of The Pathfinder Volunteer Program. Support Care Cancer 15:293–299CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Marijnen C, van de Velde CJ, Putter H et al (2005) Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexually functioning in primary rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:1847–1858CrossRefPubMed Marijnen C, van de Velde CJ, Putter H et al (2005) Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexually functioning in primary rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:1847–1858CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference McElduff P, Boyes A, Zucca A, Girgis A (2004) The supportive care needs survey: a guide to administration, scoring and analysis. Centre for Health Research & Psycho-Oncology, Newcastle McElduff P, Boyes A, Zucca A, Girgis A (2004) The supportive care needs survey: a guide to administration, scoring and analysis. Centre for Health Research & Psycho-Oncology, Newcastle
18.
go back to reference McIllMurray MB (2001) The psychosocial needs of cancer patients: findings from an observational study. Eu J Cancer Care 10:261–269CrossRef McIllMurray MB (2001) The psychosocial needs of cancer patients: findings from an observational study. Eu J Cancer Care 10:261–269CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Osse BHP, Vernooij-Dassen MJFJ, Schade E, Grol RPTM (2005) The problems experienced by patients with cancer and their needs for palliative care. Support Care Cancer 13:722–732CrossRefPubMed Osse BHP, Vernooij-Dassen MJFJ, Schade E, Grol RPTM (2005) The problems experienced by patients with cancer and their needs for palliative care. Support Care Cancer 13:722–732CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pringle W, Swan E (2001) Continuing care after discharge from hospital for stoma patients. Br J Nurs 10:1275–1288PubMed Pringle W, Swan E (2001) Continuing care after discharge from hospital for stoma patients. Br J Nurs 10:1275–1288PubMed
21.
go back to reference Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L et al (2002) Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer 1998:1904–1908 Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L et al (2002) Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer 1998:1904–1908
22.
go back to reference Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Boneveski B, Burton L, Cook P (2000) The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:225–236CrossRef Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Boneveski B, Burton L, Cook P (2000) The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:225–236CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Siegel K, Mesagno FP, Karus DG, Christ G (1992) Reducing the prevalence of unmet needs for concrete services of patients with cancer. Cancer 69:1873–1883CrossRefPubMed Siegel K, Mesagno FP, Karus DG, Christ G (1992) Reducing the prevalence of unmet needs for concrete services of patients with cancer. Cancer 69:1873–1883CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Skilbeck J, Seymour J (2002) Meeting complex needs: an analysis of Macmillan nurses’ work with patients. Int J Palliat Nurs 8:574PubMed Skilbeck J, Seymour J (2002) Meeting complex needs: an analysis of Macmillan nurses’ work with patients. Int J Palliat Nurs 8:574PubMed
25.
go back to reference Ward WL, Hahn EA, Mo F et al (1999) Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res 8:181–195CrossRefPubMed Ward WL, Hahn EA, Mo F et al (1999) Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res 8:181–195CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Yost KJ, Cella D, Chawla A et al (2005) Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based methods. J Clin Epidemiol 58:1241–1251CrossRefPubMed Yost KJ, Cella D, Chawla A et al (2005) Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based methods. J Clin Epidemiol 58:1241–1251CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development and feasibility assessment of telephone-delivered supportive care to improve outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer: pilot study of the CONNECT intervention
Authors
Jane Young
James Harrison
Michael Solomon
Phyllis Butow
Rebecca Dennis
Daine Robson
Sally Auld
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0689-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine