Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2019

01-06-2019

Development and face validation of a virtual camera navigation task trainer

Authors: Venkata Arikatla, Sam Horvath, Yaoyu Fu, Lora Cavuoto, Suvranu De, Steve Schwaitzberg, Andinet Enquobahrie

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) trainer box, which is now established as a standard for evaluating minimally invasive surgical skills, consists of five tasks: peg transfer, pattern cutting, ligation, intra- and extracorporeal suturing. Virtual simulators of these tasks have been developed and validated as part of the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST) (Arikatla et al. in Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 10:344–355, 2014; Zhang et al. in Surg Endosc 27(10):3603–3615, 2013; Sankaranarayanan et al. in J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 20(2):153–157, 2010; Qi et al. J Biomed Inform 75:48–62, 2017). The virtual task trainers have many advantages including automatic real-time objective scoring, reduced costs, and eliminating human proctors. In this paper, we extend VBLaST by adding two camera navigation system tasks: (a) pattern matching and (b) path tracing.

Methods

A comprehensive camera navigation simulator with two virtual tasks, simplified and cheaper hardware interface (compared to the prior version of VBLaST), graphical user interface, and automated metrics has been designed and developed. Face validity of the system is tested with medical students and residents from the University at Buffalo’s medical school.

Results

The subjects rated the simulator highly in all aspects including its usefulness in training to center the target and to teach sizing skills. The quality and usefulness of the force feedback scored the lowest at 2.62.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vanounou T et al (2010) Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol 17(4):998–1009CrossRefPubMed Vanounou T et al (2010) Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol 17(4):998–1009CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Peters JH et al (2004) Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 135(1):21–27CrossRefPubMed Peters JH et al (2004) Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 135(1):21–27CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fraser SA, Klassen DR, Feldman LS, Ghitulescu GA, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2003) Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg Endosc 17(6):964–967CrossRefPubMed Fraser SA, Klassen DR, Feldman LS, Ghitulescu GA, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2003) Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg Endosc 17(6):964–967CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Vassiliou MC et al (2006) The MISTELS program to measure technical skill in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20(5):744–747CrossRefPubMed Vassiliou MC et al (2006) The MISTELS program to measure technical skill in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20(5):744–747CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Liu A, Tendick F, Cleary K, Kaufmann C (2003) A survey of surgical simulation: applications, technology, and education. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 12(6):599–614CrossRef Liu A, Tendick F, Cleary K, Kaufmann C (2003) A survey of surgical simulation: applications, technology, and education. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 12(6):599–614CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Satava RM (2007) Historical review of surgical simulation—a personal perspective. World J Surg 32(2):141–148CrossRef Satava RM (2007) Historical review of surgical simulation—a personal perspective. World J Surg 32(2):141–148CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Larsen CR, Oestergaard J, Ottesen BS, Soerensen JL (2012) The efficacy of virtual reality simulation training in laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91(9):1015–1028CrossRefPubMed Larsen CR, Oestergaard J, Ottesen BS, Soerensen JL (2012) The efficacy of virtual reality simulation training in laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91(9):1015–1028CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ahlberg G et al (2007) Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 193(6):797–804CrossRefPubMed Ahlberg G et al (2007) Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 193(6):797–804CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, McClure N (2001) Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 15(10):1080–1084CrossRefPubMed Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, McClure N (2001) Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 15(10):1080–1084CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Maciel A, Liu Y, Ahn W, Singh TP, Dunnican W, De S (2008) Development of the VBLaST™: a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 4(2):131–138CrossRef Maciel A, Liu Y, Ahn W, Singh TP, Dunnican W, De S (2008) Development of the VBLaST™: a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 4(2):131–138CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Arikatla VS, Ahn W, Sankaranarayanan G, De S (2014) Towards virtual FLS: development of a peg transfer simulator. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 10:344–355CrossRef Arikatla VS, Ahn W, Sankaranarayanan G, De S (2014) Towards virtual FLS: development of a peg transfer simulator. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 10:344–355CrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Sankaranarayanan G et al (2010) Preliminary face and construct validation study of a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 20(2):153–157CrossRef Sankaranarayanan G et al (2010) Preliminary face and construct validation study of a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 20(2):153–157CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Qi D, Panneerselvam K, Ahn W, Arikatla V, Enquobahrie A, De S (2017) Virtual interactive suturing for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS). J Biomed Inform 75:48–62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Qi D, Panneerselvam K, Ahn W, Arikatla V, Enquobahrie A, De S (2017) Virtual interactive suturing for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS). J Biomed Inform 75:48–62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Stefanidis D et al (2007) Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center. Surg Endosc 21(7):1158–1164CrossRefPubMed Stefanidis D et al (2007) Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center. Surg Endosc 21(7):1158–1164CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nilsson C et al (2017) Simulation-based camera navigation training in laparoscopy—a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 31(5):2131–2139CrossRefPubMed Nilsson C et al (2017) Simulation-based camera navigation training in laparoscopy—a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 31(5):2131–2139CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ganai S, Donroe JA, St. Louis MR, Lewis GM, Seymour NE (2007) Virtual-reality training improves angled telescope skills in novice laparoscopists. Am J Surg 193(2):260–265CrossRefPubMed Ganai S, Donroe JA, St. Louis MR, Lewis GM, Seymour NE (2007) Virtual-reality training improves angled telescope skills in novice laparoscopists. Am J Surg 193(2):260–265CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Korndorffer JR et al (2005) Development and transferability of a cost-effective laparoscopic camera navigation simulator. Surg Endosc 19(2):161–167CrossRefPubMed Korndorffer JR et al (2005) Development and transferability of a cost-effective laparoscopic camera navigation simulator. Surg Endosc 19(2):161–167CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bennett A, Birch DW, Menzes C, Vizhul A, Karmali S (2011) Assessment of medical student laparoscopic camera skills and the impact of formal camera training. Am J Surg 201(5):655–659CrossRefPubMed Bennett A, Birch DW, Menzes C, Vizhul A, Karmali S (2011) Assessment of medical student laparoscopic camera skills and the impact of formal camera training. Am J Surg 201(5):655–659CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Richstone L, Schwartz MJ, Seideman C, Cadeddu J, Marshall S, Kavoussi LR (2010) Eye metrics as an objective assessment of surgical skill. Ann Surg 252(1):177–182CrossRef Richstone L, Schwartz MJ, Seideman C, Cadeddu J, Marshall S, Kavoussi LR (2010) Eye metrics as an objective assessment of surgical skill. Ann Surg 252(1):177–182CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mori M, Liao A, Hagopian TM, Perez SD, Pettitt BJ, Sweeney JF (2015) Medical students impact laparoscopic surgery case time. J Surg Res 197(2):277–282CrossRefPubMed Mori M, Liao A, Hagopian TM, Perez SD, Pettitt BJ, Sweeney JF (2015) Medical students impact laparoscopic surgery case time. J Surg Res 197(2):277–282CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Franzeck FM et al (2012) Prospective randomized controlled trial of simulator-based versus traditional in-surgery laparoscopic camera navigation training. Surg Endosc 26(1):235–241CrossRefPubMed Franzeck FM et al (2012) Prospective randomized controlled trial of simulator-based versus traditional in-surgery laparoscopic camera navigation training. Surg Endosc 26(1):235–241CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Roch PJ et al (2018) Impact of visual–spatial ability on laparoscopic camera navigation training. Surg Endosc 32(3):1174–1183CrossRefPubMed Roch PJ et al (2018) Impact of visual–spatial ability on laparoscopic camera navigation training. Surg Endosc 32(3):1174–1183CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Dawson SL, Kaufman JA (1998) The imperative for medical simulation. Proc IEEE 86(3):479–483CrossRef Dawson SL, Kaufman JA (1998) The imperative for medical simulation. Proc IEEE 86(3):479–483CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Watanabe Y et al (2015) Camera navigation and cannulation: validity evidence for new educational tasks to complement the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Program. Surg Endosc 29(3):552–557CrossRefPubMed Watanabe Y et al (2015) Camera navigation and cannulation: validity evidence for new educational tasks to complement the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Program. Surg Endosc 29(3):552–557CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kothari LG, Shah K, Barach P (2017) Simulation based medical education in graduate medical education training and assessment programs. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 44:33–42CrossRef Kothari LG, Shah K, Barach P (2017) Simulation based medical education in graduate medical education training and assessment programs. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 44:33–42CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Zhang A, Hünerbein M, Dai Y, Schlag P, Beller S (2008) Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor®). Surg Endosc 22(6):1440–1444CrossRefPubMed Zhang A, Hünerbein M, Dai Y, Schlag P, Beller S (2008) Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor®). Surg Endosc 22(6):1440–1444CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
go back to reference Iwata N et al (2011) Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 25(2):423–428CrossRefPubMed Iwata N et al (2011) Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 25(2):423–428CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Chellali A et al (2015) Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers. Surg Endosc 29(4):815–821CrossRefPubMed Chellali A et al (2015) Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers. Surg Endosc 29(4):815–821CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Arikatla VS et al (2013) Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 27(5):1721–1729CrossRef Arikatla VS et al (2013) Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 27(5):1721–1729CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Hwang H et al (2005) Correlating motor performance with surgical error in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20:651–655CrossRefPubMed Hwang H et al (2005) Correlating motor performance with surgical error in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20:651–655CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development and face validation of a virtual camera navigation task trainer
Authors
Venkata Arikatla
Sam Horvath
Yaoyu Fu
Lora Cavuoto
Suvranu De
Steve Schwaitzberg
Andinet Enquobahrie
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6476-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2019 Go to the issue