Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Palliative Care
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Developing research priorities for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe: a consultation process using nominal group technique

Authors: I. Tuffrey-Wijne, M. Wicki, P. Heslop, M. McCarron, S. Todd, D. Oliver, A. de Veer, G. Ahlström, S. Schäper, G. Hynes, J. O’Farrell, J. Adler, F. Riese, L. Curfs

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Empirical knowledge around palliative care provision and needs of people with intellectual disabilities is extremely limited, as is the availability of research resources, including expertise and funding. This paper describes a consultation process that sought to develop an agenda for research priorities for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe.

Methods

A two-day workshop was convened, attended by 16 academics and clinicians in the field of palliative care and intellectual disability from six European countries. The first day consisted of round-table presentations and discussions about the current state of the art, research challenges and knowledge gaps. The second day was focused on developing consensus research priorities with 12 of the workshop participants using nominal group technique, a structured method which involved generating a list of research priorities and ranking them in order of importance.

Results

A total of 40 research priorities were proposed and collapsed into eleven research themes. The four most important research themes were: investigating issues around end of life decision making; mapping the scale and scope of the issue; investigating the quality of palliative care for people with intellectual disabilities, including the challenges in achieving best practice; and developing outcome measures and instruments for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities.

Conclusions

The proposal of four major priority areas and a range of minor themes for future research in intellectual disability, death, dying and palliative care will help researchers to focus limited resources and research expertise on areas where it is most needed and support the building of collaborations. The next steps are to cross-validate these research priorities with people with intellectual disabilities, carers, clinicians, researchers and other stakeholders across Europe; to validate them with local and national policy makers to determine how they could best be incorporated in policy and programmes; and to translate them into actual research studies by setting up European collaborations for specific studies that require such collaboration, develop research proposals and attract research funding.
Literature
1.
Michael J. Healthcare for all: report of the independent inquiry into access to healthcare for people with learning disabilities. London: Aldrick Press; 2008
2.
Tuffrey-Wijne I, Curfs L, Hollins S. Access to palliative care services by people with learning disabilities: is there equity? Adv Ment Heal Learn Disabil. 2008;2(2):42–8.CrossRef
3.
Emerson E, Hatton C. Health inequalities and people with intellectual disabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.CrossRef
4.
Emerson E. Better Health, Better Lives: Research Priorities. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe; 2012.
5.
Cobigo V, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Balogh R, Leung F, Lin E, Lunsky Y. Are cervical and breast cancer screening programmes equitable? The case of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013;57(5):478–88.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Heslop P, Blair P, Fleming P, Hoghton M, Marriott A, Russ L. The Confidential Inquiry into premature deaths of people with intellectual disabilities in the UK: a population-based study. Lancet. 2014;383:889–95.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Tuffrey-Wijne I, Whelton R, Curfs L, Hollins S. Palliative care provision for people with intellectual disabilities: a questionnaire survey of specialist palliative care professionals. Palliat Med. 2008;22(3):281–90.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Cartlidge D, Read S. Exploring the needs of hospice staff supporting people with an intellectual disability: a UK perspective. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2010;16(2):93–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Ryan K, McEvoy J, Guerin S, Dodd P. An exploration of the experience, confidence and attitudes of staff to the provision of palliative care to people with intellectual disabilities. Palliat Med. 2010;24(6):566–72.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Reiss S, Syzszko J. Diagnostic overshadowing and professional experience with mentally retarded persons. Am Ment Defic. 1983;87:396–402.
11.
Mash E, Wolfe D. Abnormal child psychology. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth; 2004.
12.
13.
14.
Oswin M. Am I, allowed to cry? A study of bereavement amongst people who have learning difficulties. London: WBC Print; 1991.
15.
Carter G, Jancar J. Mortality in the mentally handicapped: a fifty year survey at the Stoke Park Group of Hospitals (1930-1980). J Ment Defic Res. 1983;27(2):143–56.PubMed
16.
Patja K, Mölsä P, Iivanainen M. Cause-specific mortality of people with intellectual disability in a population-based, 35-year follow-up study. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2001;45(1):30–40.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Lavin K, McGuire B, Hogan M. Age at death of people with an intellectual disability in Ireland. J Intellect Disabil. 2006;10(2):155–46.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Hollins S, Attard MT, von Fraunhofer N, McGuigan S, Sedgwick P. Mortality in people with learning disability: risks, causes, and death certification findings in London. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40(1):50–6.PubMed
19.
Tyrer F, McGrother C. Cause-specific mortality and death certificate reporting in adults with moderate to profound intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009;53(11):898–904.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Bycroft L. Care of a handicapped woman with metastatic breast cancer. Br J Nurs. 1994;3(3):126–33.PubMed
21.
Tuffrey-Wijne I. Palliative care and learning disabilities. Nurs Times. 1997;93(31):50–1.PubMed
22.
Tuffrey-Wijne I, Hogg J, Curfs L. End-of-life and palliative care for people with intellectual disabilities who have cancer or other life-limiting illness: a review of the literature and available resources. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2007;20(4):331–44.CrossRef
23.
Read S. Palliative care for people with intellectual disabilities: Pitfalls and potential. Palliat Med. 2013;27(1):3–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Todd S. Death does not become us: death and intellectual disability research. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2002;38(1/2):225–40.
25.
Todd S, Bernal J, Forrester-Jones R. Death, dying and intellectual disability research. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013;26(3):183–5.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Friedman SL, Helm DT, Woodman AC. Unique and universal barriers: Hospice care for aging adults with intellectual disability. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012;117(6):509–32.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Read S. Communication in the dying context. In: Read S, editor. Palliative care for people with learning disabilities. London: Quay Books; 2006. p. 93–106.
28.
Tuffrey-Wijne I, McEnhill L. Communication difficulties and intellectual disability in end-of-life care. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2008;14(4):189–94.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Wagemans A, van Schrojenstein L-de-V H, Tuffrey-Wijne I, Widdershoven G, Curfs L. End-of-life decisions: an important theme in the care for people with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54(6):516–24.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Bekkema N, de Veer A, Wagemans A, Hertogh C, Francke A. “To move or not to move”: a national survey among professionals on beliefs and considerations about the place of end-of-life care for people with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015;59(3):226–37.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Bekkema N, de Veer A, Wagemans A, Hertogh C, Francke A. Decision making about medical interventions in the end-of-life care of people with intellectual disabilities: A national survey of the considerations and beliefs of GPs, ID physicians and care staff. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96:204–9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Tuffrey-Wijne I, Hollins S, Curfs L. Supporting patients who have intellectual disabilities: a survey investigating staff training needs. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2005;11(4):182–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Stein G. Providing palliative care to people with intellectual disabilities: service, staff knowledge and challenges. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(9):1241–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Fahey-McCarthy E, McCarron M, Connaire K, McCallion P. Developing an education intervention for staff supporting persons with an intellectual disability and advanced dementia. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2009;6(4):267–75.CrossRef
36.
Bekkema N, de Veer A, Hertogh C, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Francke A. Training needs of nurses and social workers in the end-of-life care for people with intellectual disabilities: a national survey. Nurse Educ Today. 2014;34:494–500.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Radbruch L, Payne S. White Paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: part 1: Recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care. Eur J Palliat Care. 2009;16(6):278–89.
38.
Centeno C, Lynch T, Doneo O, Rocafort J, Clark D. Atlas of palliative care in Europe 2013 - full edition. EAPC: Milan; 2013.
39.
Schalock R, Luckasson R. American association on mental retardation’s definition, classification, and system of supports and its relation to international trends and issues in the field of intellectual disabilities. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2005;1(3-4):136–46.CrossRef
40.
Lynch T, Connor S, Clark D. Mapping levels of palliative care development: a global update. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;45(6):1096–106.CrossRef
41.
Tuffrey-Wijne I, Bernal J, Hollins S. Doing research on people with learning disabilities, cancer and dying: ethics, possibilities and pitfalls. Br J Learn Disabil. 2008;36(3):185–90.CrossRef
42.
Tuffrey-Wijne I, Bernal J, Hubert J, Butler G, Hollins S. People with learning disabilities who have cancer: an ethnographic study. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(July):503–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Todd S, Read S. Thinking about death and what it means: the perspectives of people with intellectual disability. Int J Child Heal Hum Dev. 2010;3(2):207–14.
44.
Powell R, Harding R, Namisango E, Katabira E, Gwyther L, Radbruch L, et al. Palliative care research in Africa: consensus building for a prioritized agenda. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;47(2):315–24.CrossRefPubMed
45.
McEnhill L. Widening access to palliative care for people with learning disabilities: guidance and resources for professionals. London: Help the Hospices; 2013.
46.
47.
Delbecq A, van de Ven A. A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J Appl Behav Sci. 1971;7(4):466–92.CrossRef
48.
Harvey N, Holmes CA. Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18:188–94.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Amini M, Kojuri J, Lotfi F, Karimian Z, Abadi AS. Research priorities in medical education in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. East Mediterr Heal J. 2012;18(7):687–92.
50.
Rothman RE, Hsu EB, Kahn CA, Kelen GD. Research priorities for surge capacity. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(11):1160–8.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Uscher-Pines L, Babin S, Farrell C, Hsieh Y, Moskal M, Gaydos C, et al. Research priorities for syndromic surveillance systems response: consensus development using nominal group technique. J Public Heal Manag Pract. 2010;16(6):529–34.CrossRef
52.
D’Haene I, Pasman HRW, Deliens L, Bilsen J, Mortier F, Vander SR. End-of-life care policies in Flemish residential care facilities accommodating persons with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54(12):1067–77.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Stolper E, van Leeuwen Y, van Royen P, van de Wiel M, van Bokhoven M, Houben P, et al. Establishing a European research agenda on “gut feelings” in general practice. A qualitative study using the nominal group technique. Eur J Gen Pract. 2010;16(2):75–9.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Pastrana T, Radbruch L, Nauck F, Höver G, Fegg M, Pestinger M, et al. Outcome indicators in palliative care-how to assess quality and success. Focus group and nominal group technique in Germany. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:859–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Tuffrey-Wijne I, Bernal J, Butler G, Hollins S, Curfs L. Using Nominal Group Technique to investigate the views of people with intellectual disabilities on end-of-life care provision. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58(1):80–9.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Dening KH, Jones L, Sampson EL. Preferences for end-of-life care: a nominal group study of people with dementia and their family carers. Palliat Med. 2013;27(5):409–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Aspinal F, Hughes R, Dunckley M, Addington-Hall J. What is important to measure in the last months and weeks of life?: A modified nominal group study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43:393–403.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Angelo J, Egan R, Reid K. Essential knowledge for family caregivers: a qualitative study. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2013;19(8):383–8.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Murphy M, Black N, Lamping D, McKee C, Sanderson C, Askham J, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development: a review. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):1–88.
60.
Allen J, Dyas J, Jones M. Building consensus in health care: a guide to using the nominal group technique. Br J Community Nurs. 2004;9(3):110–4.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Best S, Tate T, Noble B, Smith R, Tuft J, Tracey N, et al. Research priority setting in palliative and end of life care: the James Lind Alliance approach consulting patients, carers and clinicians. BMC Support Palliat Care. 2015;5(1):102.
62.
Wagemans A, van Schrojenstein L-de-V H, Proot I, Metsemakers J, Tuffrey-Wijne I, Curfs L. The factors affecting end-of-life decision making by physicians of patients with intellectual disabilities in the Netherlands: a qualitative study. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013;57(4):380–9.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Tuffrey-Wijne I, Giatras N, Goulding L, Abraham E, Fenwick L, Edwards C, et al. Identifying the factors affecting the implementation of strategies to promote a safer environment for patients with learning disabilities in NHS hospitals: a mixed-methods study. Heal Serv Deliv Res. 2013;1(13):1–248.CrossRef
64.
65.
Tuffrey-Wijne I, McLaughlin D, Curfs L, Dusart A, Hoenger C, McEnhill L, et al. Defining consensus norms for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe, using Delphi methods: A White Paper from the European Association of Palliative Care (EAPC). Palliat Med 2015; online first. doi:10.​1177/​0269216315600993​
66.
Hanson L, Scheunemann L, Zimmerman S, Rokoske F, Schenck A. The PEACE project review of clinical instruments for hospice and palliative care. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(10):1253–60.CrossRefPubMed
67.
de Roo M, Leemans K, Claessen S, Cohen J, Francke A. Quality indicators for palliative care: update of a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;46(4):556–72.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Developing research priorities for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe: a consultation process using nominal group technique
Authors
I. Tuffrey-Wijne
M. Wicki
P. Heslop
M. McCarron
S. Todd
D. Oliver
A. de Veer
G. Ahlström
S. Schäper
G. Hynes
J. O’Farrell
J. Adler
F. Riese
L. Curfs
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0108-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Palliative Care 1/2016 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Effectiveness of the “Cancer Home-Life Intervention” on everyday activities and quality of life in people with advanced cancer living at home: a randomised controlled trial and an economic evaluation

Research article

Symptom severity of patients with advanced cancer in palliative care unit: longitudinal assessments of symptoms improvement

Research article

How different is the care of terminal pancreatic cancer patients in inpatient palliative care units and acute hospital wards? A nationwide population-based study

Study protocol

The last phase of life with dementia in Swiss nursing homes: the study protocol of the longitudinal and prospective ZULIDAD study

Debate

Of apples and oranges: Lessons learned from the preparation of research protocols for systematic reviews exploring the effectiveness of Specialist Palliative Care

Research article

Correlation between patient quality of life in palliative care and burden of their family caregivers: a prospective observational cohort study