Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Medical Systems
Published in: Journal of Medical Systems 1/2023

01-12-2023 | Original Paper

Developing a minimum data set for cardiovascular Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and mapping the data set to FHIR: A multi-method approach

Authors: Mahdieh Montazeri, Reza Khajouei, Amin Mahdavi, Leila Ahmadian

Published in: Journal of Medical Systems | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Many medical errors occur in the process of treating cardiovascular patients, and most of these errors are related to prescription errors. There are several, one of the methods to prevent prescription errors is the use of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system. One of the obstacles of implementing this system is improper design and non-compliance with user needs. one of the issues that should be considered in designing information systems is having a standard minimum data set (MDS). Although many computerized physicians order entry (CPOE) systems have been developed in the world, no study has identified the necessary data and minimum data set (MDS) of CPOE system, and published the process of creating this MDS. This study aimed to develop an MDS for cardiovascular CPOE and standardize it with Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR). A multi-method approach including systematic review for identifying data elements of CPOE, reviewing the content of medical records, validation of the data elements using the expert panel and, determination of the necessary data elements using a survey was conducted. Classification of the data elements and mapping them to FHIR were done to facilitate data sharing and integration with the electronic health record (EHR) system as well as to reduce data diversity. The final data elements of MDS were categorized into 5 main categories of FHIR (foundation, base, clinical, financial, and specialized) and 146 resources, where possible. Mapping was done by one of the researchers and checked and verified by the second researcher. Non-mapped data elements were added to relevant resources as extensions of existing FHIR resources. In total, 270 data elements were identified from the systematic review. After reviewing the content of 20 patients’ medical records, 28 data elements were identified. After combination of data elements of two previous phases and removing duplication, 282 data elements remained. Data elements that were considered necessary to be included in CPOE by conducting a survey among cardiovascular physicians were 109 elements. From 146 resources of FHIR, the data elements of this MDS are covered by 5 resources. This study introduced an MDS for cardiovascular CPOE by combining suggested data elements of previous research, and the practical and local requirements identified in patients' medical records. To facilitate data sharing and integration with EHR, reduce data diversity, and also to categorize data, this MDS was standardized with FHIR. The steps we used to develop this MDS could be a model for creating MDS in other CPOEs and health information systems. This is the first time that the process of developing an MDS for cardiovascular CPOE has been presented in the literature.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Bates, D. W., Cullen, D. J., Laird, N., Petersen, L. A., Small, S. D., Servi, D., et al., Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. 274(1):29-34, 1995.
3.
Valentin, A., Capuzzo, M., Guidet, B., Moreno, R. P., Dolanski, L., Bauer, P., et al., Patient safety in intensive care: results from the multinational Sentinel Events Evaluation (SEE) study. Intensive Care Med. 32(10):1591–1598, 2006.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zheng, W. Y., Richardson, L., Li, L., Day, R., Westbrook, J., Baysari, M., Drug-drug interactions and their harmful effects in hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 74(1):15-27, 2018.
5.
Nuckols, T. K., Smith-Spangler, C., Morton, S. C., Asch, S. M., Patel, V. M., Anderson, L. J., et al., The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 3(1):56, 2014.
6.
Reckmann, M. H., Westbrook, J. I., Koh, Y., Lo, C., Day, R. O., Does computerized provider order entry reduce prescribing errors for hospital inpatients? A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 16(5):613–623, 2009. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Osmani, F., Arab-Zozani, M., Osmani, M., (Eds.), Evaluation of The Effectiveness of Electronic Prescription In Reducing Medical And Medical Errors (Systematic Review Study). Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises. Elsevier, 2022.
8.
update: NQFNSpfbh, a consensus report. Washington DNWS.
9.
Donaldson, M. S., Corrigan, J. M., Kohn, L. T., To err is human: building a safer health system. 2000.
10.
Ammenwerth, E., Schnell-Inderst, P., Machan, C., Siebert, U., The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 15(5):585–600, 2008. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Moghadam, S. T., Sadoughi, F., Velayati, F., Ehsanzadeh, S. J., Poursharif, S., The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing medication on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 21(1):1–26, 2021.
12.
Ip, I. K., Schneider, L. I., Hanson, R., Marchello, D., Hultman, P., Viera, M. et al., Adoption and meaningful use of computerized physician order entry with an integrated clinical decision support system for radiology: ten-year analysis in an urban teaching hospital. J Am Coll Radiol. 9(2):129–136, 2012. CrossRefPubMed
13.
Khajouei, R., Jaspers, M., The impact of CPOE medication systems’ design aspects on usability, workflow and medication orders. Methods Inf Med. 49(01):03–19, 2010.CrossRef
14.
Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T. A., Zhang, X. (Eds), 'Just what the doctor ordered': a revised UTAUT for EMR system adoption and use by doctors. 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE, 2011. 
15.
Hsieh, P.-J., Lai, H.-M., Kuo, P.-Y., (Eds), Physician Acceptance Behavior of the Electronic Medical Records Exchange: An Extended Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior. PACIS, 2013.
16.
Ahmadi, M., Alipour, J., Mohammadi, A., Khorami, F., Development a minimum data set of the information management system for burns. Burns. 41(5):1092–1099, 2015. CrossRefPubMed
17.
Hsieh, P.-J., Lai, H.-M,, Kuo, P.-Y., Physician acceptance behavior of the electronic medical records exchange: An extended decomposed theory of planned behavior. 2013.
18.
Mahmoudvand, Z., Kamkar, M., Shahmoradi, L., Nejad, A. F., Determination of minimum data set (msd) in echocardiography reporting system to exchange with iran’s electronic health record (ehr) system. Acta Inform Med. 24(2):116, 2016. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Jahanbakhsh, M., Moghaddasi, H., Hosseini, A., Designing of diabetic mellitus minimum data sets: indicator basis of diabetic management effectiveness. Health Inform Manag. 7(3):330–340, 2010.
20.
Ahmadian, L., Cornet, R., Van Klei, W. A., de Keizer, N. F., Data collection variation in preoperative assessment: a literature review. CIN: Comput Inform Nurs. 29(11):662–70, 2011.
21.
22.
Mavrogiorgou, A., Kiourtis, A., Touloupou, M., Kapassa, E., Kyriazis, D., Internet of medical things (IoMT): acquiring and transforming data into HL7 FHIR through 5G network slicing. Emerg Sci J. 3(2):64–77, 2019. CrossRef
23.
Chatterjee, A., Pahari, N., Prinz, A., HL7 FHIR with SNOMED-CT to achieve semantic and structural interoperability in personal health data: a proof-of-concept study. Sensors. 22(10):3756, 2022. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Dimopoulou, S., Symvoulidis, C., Koutsoukos, K., Kiourtis, A., Mavrogiorgou, A., Kyriazis, D., (Eds.), Mobile Anonymization and Pseudonymization of Structured Health Data for Research. 2022 Seventh International Conference On Mobile And Secure Services (MobiSecServ). IEEE, 2022.
25.
Kiourtis, A., Nifakos, S., Mavrogiorgou, A., Kyriazis, D., Aggregating the syntactic and semantic similarity of healthcare data towards their transformation to HL7 FHIR through ontology matching. Int J Med Inform. 132:104002, 2019.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Bender, D., Sartipi, K., (Eds.), HL7 FHIR: An Agile and RESTful approach to healthcare information exchange. Proceedings of the 26th IEEE international symposium on computer-based medical systems. IEEE, 2013
27.
Lete, S. A., Cavero, C., Lustrek, M., Kyriazis, D., Kiourtis, A., Mantas, J. et al., Interoperability Techniques in CrowdHEALTH project: The Terminology Service. Acta Inform Med. 27(5):355, 2019.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Boris, J. R., Béland, M. J., Bergensen, L. J., Colan, S. D., Dangel, J., Daniels, C. J., et al., 2017 AHA/ACC key data elements and definitions for ambulatory electronic health records in pediatric and congenital cardiology: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 10(8):e000027, 2017.
29.
Members, W. C., Weintraub, W. S., Karlsberg, R. P., Tcheng, J. E,, Boris, J. R., Buxton, A. E. et al., ACCF/AHA 2011 key data elements and definitions of a base cardiovascular vocabulary for electronic health records: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards. Circulation. 124(1):103–123, 2011. CrossRef
30.
Douglas, P. S., Carabello, B. A., Lang, R. M., Lopez, L., Pellikka, P. A., Picard, M. H., et al., 2019 ACC/AHA/ASE key data elements and definitions for transthoracic echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical data standards (writing committee to develop clinical data standards for transthoracic echocardiography) and the American Society of Echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 12(7):e000027, 2019.
31.
Asselbergs, F. W., Visseren, F. L., Bots, M. L., de Borst, G. J., Buijsrogge, M. P., Dieleman, J. M. et al., Uniform data collection in routine clinical practice in cardiovascular patients for optimal care, quality control and research: The Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 24(8):840–847, 2017. CrossRefPubMed
32.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., et al., The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. 151(4):W-65-W-94, 2009.
33.
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., Elmagarmid, A. J. Sr., Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. 5(1):210, 2016.
34.
Kazemi-Arpanahi, H., Vasheghani-Farahani, A., Baradaran, A., Mohammadzadeh, N., Ghazisaeedi, M., Developing a minimum data set (MDS) for cardiac electronic implantable devices implantation. Acta Inform Med. 26(3):164, 2018.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Abbasi, M., Ahmadian, L., Amirian, M., Tabesh, H., Eslami, S., The development of a minimum data set for an infertility registry. Perspectives in health information management. 15(Winter), 2018.
36.
Jones, D., Smart cards—The key to secure and flexible health care provision. Card Technol Today. 15(11):8, 2003.CrossRef
37.
Pollock, D. A., Adams, D. L., Bernardo, L. M., Bradley, V., Brandt, M. D., Davis, T. E. et al., Data elements for emergency department systems, Release 1.0 (DEEDS): a summary report. J Emerg Nurs. 24(1):35–44, 1998.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Maryam, A., Azadeh, B., A Minimum Data Set Of Radiology Reporting System For Exchanging With Electronic Health Record System In Iran. Payavard Salamat. 8(2), 2014.
39.
Hayrinen, K., Saranto, K., The core data elements of electronic health record in Finland. Stud Health Technol Inform. 116:131–136, 2005. PubMed
40.
Abbasi, R., Khajouei, R., Mirzaee, M., Evaluating the demographic and clinical minimum data sets of Iranian National Electronic Health Record. BMC Health Serv Res. 19(1):1–10, 2019.CrossRef
41.
Silverio, A., Cavallo, P., De Rosa. R., Galasso, G., Big health data and cardiovascular diseases: a challenge for research, an opportunity for clinical care. Front Med. 6:36, 2019. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Williams, K., Robinson, K., Toth, A., Data quality maintenance of the Patient Master Index (PMI): a'snap-shot'of public healthcare facility PMI data quality and linkage activities. Health Inform Manag J. 35(1):10–26, 2006. CrossRefPubMed
43.
Latha, N. A., Murthy, B. R., Sunitha, U., Smart card based integrated electronic health record system for clinical practice. IJACSA Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2012.
44.
Abdolkhani, R., Halabchi, F., Safdari, R., Dargahi, H., Shadanfar, K., Designing an electronic personal health record for professional Iranian athletes. Asian J Sports Med. 5(4), 2014.
45.
Anderson, J. G., Jay, S. J., Clevenger, S. J., Kassing, D. R., Perry, J., Anderson, M. M., (Eds), Physician utilization of a hospital information system: A computer simulation model. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care. American Medical Informatics Association, 1988.
46.
Henricks, W. H., “Meaningful use” of electronic health records and its relevance to laboratories and pathologists. J Pathol Inform. 2, 2011.
47.
Barnicot, K., Insua-Summerhayes, B., Plummer, E., Hart, A., Barker, C., Priebe, S., Staff and patient experiences of decision-making about continuous observation in psychiatric hospitals. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 52(4):473, 2017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Pagetti C, Mazini M, Pierantoni M, Gualandi G, Schepel H. European Parliament, directorate general for research, document for STOA panel. 2001. A european health card final study; pp. 16–22
49.
Kuo G, Phillips R, Graham D, Hickner J. Medication errors reported by US family physicians and their office staff. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2008;17(4):286-90. CrossRef
50.
Kuo, G. M., Touchette, D. R., Marinac, J. S., Collaborative ACoCPPBRN., Drug Errors and Related Interventions Reported by U nited S tates Clinical Pharmacists: The American College of Clinical Pharmacy Practice‐Based Research Network Medication Error Detection, Amelioration and Prevention Study. Pharmacother J Human Pharmacol Drug Ther. 33(3):253–65, 2013.
51.
Snyder, R. A., Abarca, J., Meza, J. L., Rothschild, J. M., Rizos, A., Bates, D. W., Reliability evaluation of the adapted national coordinating council medication error reporting and prevention (NCC MERP) index. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 16(9):1006–1013, 2007.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Bates, D. W., Cullen, D. J., Laird, N., Petersen, L. A., Small, S. D., Servi, D. et al., Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. Jama. 274(1):29–34, 1995. CrossRefPubMed
53.
Johnson JA, Bootman JL. Drug-related morbidity and mortality. A cost-of-illness model. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Oct 9;155(18):1949-56. CrossRefPubMed
54.
Bishop, M. A., Cohen, B. A., Billings, L. K., Thomas, E. V., Reducing errors through discharge medication reconciliation by pharmacy services. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 72(17_Supplement_2):S120-S6, 2015.
55.
Pippins, J. R., Gandhi, T. K., Hamann, C., Ndumele, C. D., Labonville, S. A., Diedrichsen, E. K., et al., Classifying and predicting errors of inpatient medication reconciliation. J Gen Intern Med. 23(9):1414–1422, 2008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Kardas, G., Tunali, E. T., Design and implementation of a smart card based healthcare information system. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 81(1):66–78, 2006.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Royal.Australian.College.of. General.Practitioners.: Standards for general practices (4th edition). 2013.
58.
Metadata
Title
Developing a minimum data set for cardiovascular Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and mapping the data set to FHIR: A multi-method approach
Authors
Mahdieh Montazeri
Reza Khajouei
Amin Mahdavi
Leila Ahmadian
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0148-5598
Electronic ISSN: 1573-689X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01943-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Journal of Medical Systems 1/2023 Go to the issue

Original Paper

An AI-Enabled Dynamic Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients with ECG and CXR Integration

Brief Report

Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT in Healthcare: An Analysis of Multiple Clinical and Research Scenarios

Review

mHealth Impact on Gait and Dynamic Balance Outcomes in Neurorehabilitation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Original Paper

Validity of the Paediatric Canadian Triage Acuity Scale in a Tertiary Hospital: An Analysis of Severity Markers' Variability

Original Paper

Automatic Diagnostic Tool for Detection of Regional Wall Motion Abnormality from Echocardiogram

Original Paper

Detection of Pacemaker and Identification of MRI-conditional Pacemaker Based on Deep-learning Convolutional Neural Networks to Improve Patient Safety