Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Paper

Determination of culprit coronary artery branches using hemodynamic indices from angiographic images

Authors: Zhang Zhang, Jun Chen, Shigeho Takarada, Sabee Molloi

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

A recently reported angiographic technique for hemodynamic indices based on first-pass distribution analysis (FPA) could potentially be helpful for determining the culprit artery responsible for myocardial ischemia. The purpose of this study was to determinate the culprit coronary arterial branches based on coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) using only angiographic images. The study was performed in 14 anesthetized swine. Microspheres were injected into coronary arterial branches to create microvascular disruption. Stenosis was also created by inserting plastic tubings in LAD and LCX arterial branches. Adenosine was used to produce maximum hyperemia. Angiographic CFR (CFRa), relative angiographic CFR (rCFRa), and angiographic FFR (FFRa) were calculated by FPA. The diagnostic abilities of CFRa, rCFRa, and FFRa were compared in three models: (1) epicardial stenosis model (S), (2) microcirculation disruption model (M), and (3) combined(S + M) model by using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The mean differences between FFRa and the pressure-derived FFR (FFRp) measurements were −0.01 ± 0.21 in S model (N = 37) and 0.01 ± 0.18 in M model (N = 53). From 225 measurements in S model, the AUCs for CFRa and FFRa were 0.720 and 0.918, respectively. From 262 measurements in M model and 238 measurements in (S + M) model, the AUCs for CFRa, rCFRa, FFRa were 0.744, 0.715, 0.959 and 0.806, 0.738, 0.995, respectively. The hemodynamic indices of the small branches (down to ~0.7 mm) could be measured using only angiographic image data. The application of FFRa could potentially provide a useful method to assess the severity of disease in coronary arterial branches.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Molloi S, Kassab GS, Zhou Y (2001) Quantification of coronary artery lumen volume by digital angiography: in vivo validation. Circulation 104(19):2351–2357PubMedCrossRef Molloi S, Kassab GS, Zhou Y (2001) Quantification of coronary artery lumen volume by digital angiography: in vivo validation. Circulation 104(19):2351–2357PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Spaan JA (2009) Coronary flow is not that simple! Heart 95(9):761–762 (author reply 762)PubMed Spaan JA (2009) Coronary flow is not that simple! Heart 95(9):761–762 (author reply 762)PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW (1974) Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 33(1):87–94PubMedCrossRef Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW (1974) Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 33(1):87–94PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pawlowski T, Prati F, Kulawik T, Ficarra E, Bil J, Gil R (2013) Optical coherence tomography criteria for defining functional severity of intermediate lesions: a comparative study with FFR. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(8):1685–1691. doi:10.1007/s10554-013-0283-x PubMedCrossRef Pawlowski T, Prati F, Kulawik T, Ficarra E, Bil J, Gil R (2013) Optical coherence tomography criteria for defining functional severity of intermediate lesions: a comparative study with FFR. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(8):1685–1691. doi:10.​1007/​s10554-013-0283-x PubMedCrossRef
16.
19.
go back to reference Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo BK, van Mieghem C, Erglis A, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Apruzzese P, Budoff MJ, Cole JH, Jaffer FA, Leon MB, Malpeso J, Mancini GB, Park SJ, Schwartz RS, Shaw LJ, Mauri L (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 308(12):1237–1245. doi:10.1001/2012.jama.11274 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo BK, van Mieghem C, Erglis A, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Apruzzese P, Budoff MJ, Cole JH, Jaffer FA, Leon MB, Malpeso J, Mancini GB, Park SJ, Schwartz RS, Shaw LJ, Mauri L (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 308(12):1237–1245. doi:10.​1001/​2012.​jama.​11274 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wu Z, Ye F, You W, Zhang J, Xie D, Chen S (2014) Microcirculatory significance of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.1007/s10554-014-0444-6 PubMedCentral Wu Z, Ye F, You W, Zhang J, Xie D, Chen S (2014) Microcirculatory significance of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.​1007/​s10554-014-0444-6 PubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Determination of culprit coronary artery branches using hemodynamic indices from angiographic images
Authors
Zhang Zhang
Jun Chen
Shigeho Takarada
Sabee Molloi
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0521-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2015 Go to the issue