Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2013

01-08-2013 | Forensic Medicine

Detection of residual packets in cocaine body packers: low accuracy of abdominal radiography—a prospective study

Authors: Pascal Rousset, Pierre-Fleury Chaillot, Etienne Audureau, Caroline Rey-Salmon, Bertrand Becour, Isabelle Fitton, Dominique Vadrot, Marie-Pierre Revel

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of abdominal radiography (AXR) for the detection of residual cocaine packets by comparison with computed tomography (CT).

Methods

Over a 1-year period unenhanced CT was systematically performed in addition to AXR for pre-discharge evaluation of cocaine body packers. AXR and CT were interpreted independently by two radiologists blinded to clinical outcome. Patient and packet characteristics were compared between the groups with residual portage and complete decontamination.

Results

Among 138 body packers studied, 14 (10 %) had one residual packet identified on pre-discharge CT. On AXR, at least one reader failed to detect the residual packet in 10 (70 %) of these 14 body packers. The sensitivity and specificity of AXR were 28.6 % (95 % CI: 8.4–58.1) and 100.0 % (95 % CI: 97.0–100.0) for reader 1 and 35.7 % (95 % CI: 12.8–64.9) and 97.6 % (95 % CI: 93.1–99.5) for reader 2. There were no significant patient or packet characteristics predictive of residual portage or AXR false negativity. All positive CT results were confirmed by delayed expulsion or surgical findings, while negative results were confirmed by further surveillance.

Conclusion

Given the poor performance of AXR, CT should be systematically performed to ensure safe hospital discharge of cocaine body packers.

Key Points

Both abdominal radiography and computed tomography can identify gastrointestinal cocaine packets.
Ten per cent of body packers had residual packets despite two packet-free stools.
Seventy per cent of these residual packets were missed on AXR.
No patient or packet characteristics predicted residual packets or AXR false negativity.
CT is necessary to ensure safe medical discharge of body packers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mandava N, Chang RS, Wang JH et al (2011) Establishment of a definitive protocol for the diagnosis and management of body packers (drug mules). Emerg Med J 28:98–101PubMedCrossRef Mandava N, Chang RS, Wang JH et al (2011) Establishment of a definitive protocol for the diagnosis and management of body packers (drug mules). Emerg Med J 28:98–101PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Traub SJ, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS (2003) Body packing–the internal concealment of illicit drugs. N Engl J Med 349:2519–2526PubMedCrossRef Traub SJ, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS (2003) Body packing–the internal concealment of illicit drugs. N Engl J Med 349:2519–2526PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gherardi RK, Baud FJ, Leporc P, Marc B, Dupeyron JP, Diamant-Berger O (1988) Detection of drugs in the urine of body-packers. Lancet 1:1076–1078PubMedCrossRef Gherardi RK, Baud FJ, Leporc P, Marc B, Dupeyron JP, Diamant-Berger O (1988) Detection of drugs in the urine of body-packers. Lancet 1:1076–1078PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goertemoeller S, Behrman A (2006) The risky business of body packers and body stuffers. J Emerg Nurs 32:541–544PubMedCrossRef Goertemoeller S, Behrman A (2006) The risky business of body packers and body stuffers. J Emerg Nurs 32:541–544PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference de Prost N, Lefebvre A, Questel F et al (2005) Prognosis of cocaine body-packers. Intensive Care Med 31:955–958PubMedCrossRef de Prost N, Lefebvre A, Questel F et al (2005) Prognosis of cocaine body-packers. Intensive Care Med 31:955–958PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pidoto RR, Agliata AM, Bertolini R, Mainini A, Rossi G, Giani G (2002) A new method of packaging cocaine for international traffic and implications for the management of cocaine body packers. J Emerg Med 23:149–153PubMedCrossRef Pidoto RR, Agliata AM, Bertolini R, Mainini A, Rossi G, Giani G (2002) A new method of packaging cocaine for international traffic and implications for the management of cocaine body packers. J Emerg Med 23:149–153PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Veyrie N, Servajean S, Aissat A, Corigliano N, Angelakov C, Bouillot JL (2008) Value of a systematic operative protocol for cocaine body packers. World J Surg 32:1432–1437PubMedCrossRef Veyrie N, Servajean S, Aissat A, Corigliano N, Angelakov C, Bouillot JL (2008) Value of a systematic operative protocol for cocaine body packers. World J Surg 32:1432–1437PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Algra PR, Brogdon BG, Marugg RC (2007) Role of radiology in a national initiative to interdict drug smuggling: the Dutch experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:331–336PubMedCrossRef Algra PR, Brogdon BG, Marugg RC (2007) Role of radiology in a national initiative to interdict drug smuggling: the Dutch experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:331–336PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hergan K, Kofler K, Oser W (2004) Drug smuggling by body packing: what radiologists should know about it. Eur Radiol 14:736–742PubMedCrossRef Hergan K, Kofler K, Oser W (2004) Drug smuggling by body packing: what radiologists should know about it. Eur Radiol 14:736–742PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Poletti PA, Canel L, Becker CD et al (2012) Screening of illegal intracorporeal containers (“body packing”): is abdominal radiography sufficiently accurate? A comparative study with Low-Dose CT. Radiology 265:772–779PubMedCrossRef Poletti PA, Canel L, Becker CD et al (2012) Screening of illegal intracorporeal containers (“body packing”): is abdominal radiography sufficiently accurate? A comparative study with Low-Dose CT. Radiology 265:772–779PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Flach PM, Ross SG, Ampanozi G et al (2012) “Drug mules” as a radiological challenge: sensitivity and specificity in identifying internal cocaine in body packers, body pushers and body stuffers by computed tomography, plain radiography and Lodox. Eur J Radiol 81:2518–2526PubMedCrossRef Flach PM, Ross SG, Ampanozi G et al (2012) “Drug mules” as a radiological challenge: sensitivity and specificity in identifying internal cocaine in body packers, body pushers and body stuffers by computed tomography, plain radiography and Lodox. Eur J Radiol 81:2518–2526PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Beauverd Y, Poletti PA, Wolff H, Ris F, Dumonceau JM, Elger BS (2011) A body-packer with a cocaine bag stuck in the stomach. World J Radiol 3:155–158PubMed Beauverd Y, Poletti PA, Wolff H, Ris F, Dumonceau JM, Elger BS (2011) A body-packer with a cocaine bag stuck in the stomach. World J Radiol 3:155–158PubMed
14.
go back to reference Schmidt S, Hugli O, Rizzo E et al (2008) Detection of ingested cocaine-filled packets–diagnostic value of unenhanced CT. Eur J Radiol 67:133–138PubMedCrossRef Schmidt S, Hugli O, Rizzo E et al (2008) Detection of ingested cocaine-filled packets–diagnostic value of unenhanced CT. Eur J Radiol 67:133–138PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference McCarron MM, Wood JD (1983) The cocaine ‘body packer’ syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment. Jama 250:1417–1420PubMedCrossRef McCarron MM, Wood JD (1983) The cocaine ‘body packer’ syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment. Jama 250:1417–1420PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Niewiarowski S, Gogbashian A, Afaq A, Kantor R, Win Z (2010) Abdominal X-ray signs of intra-intestinal drug smuggling. J Forensic Leg Med 17:198–202PubMedCrossRef Niewiarowski S, Gogbashian A, Afaq A, Kantor R, Win Z (2010) Abdominal X-ray signs of intra-intestinal drug smuggling. J Forensic Leg Med 17:198–202PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:1–332 The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:1–332
19.
go back to reference Jones DG, Shrimpton PC (1991) Survey of CT practice. Part 3: normalised organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. Document NRPB-R250. Chilton, UK: National Radiological Protection Board Jones DG, Shrimpton PC (1991) Survey of CT practice. Part 3: normalised organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. Document NRPB-R250. Chilton, UK: National Radiological Protection Board
20.
go back to reference Zankl M, Panzer W, Drexler G (1991) The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods. Part VI. Organ doses from computed tomographic examinations. GSF-Bericht 30/91. Munich, Germany: GSF Zankl M, Panzer W, Drexler G (1991) The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods. Part VI. Organ doses from computed tomographic examinations. GSF-Bericht 30/91. Munich, Germany: GSF
21.
22.
go back to reference Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF (1994) “Normalised organ doses for medical x-ray examinations calculated using Monte Carlo techniques”, NRPB-SR262 Chilton: NRPB Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF (1994) “Normalised organ doses for medical x-ray examinations calculated using Monte Carlo techniques”, NRPB-SR262 Chilton: NRPB
23.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2003) Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med 138:40–44PubMedCrossRef Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2003) Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med 138:40–44PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2003) The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 138:1–12CrossRef Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2003) The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 138:1–12CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Muhletaler CA, Gerlock AJ Jr, Shull HJ, Adkins RB Jr (1980) The pill bottle desiccant. A cause of partial gastrointestinal obstruction. Jama 243:1921–1922PubMedCrossRef Muhletaler CA, Gerlock AJ Jr, Shull HJ, Adkins RB Jr (1980) The pill bottle desiccant. A cause of partial gastrointestinal obstruction. Jama 243:1921–1922PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference White paper on radiation protection by the European Society of Radiology (2011). Insights Imaging 2:357–362 White paper on radiation protection by the European Society of Radiology (2011). Insights Imaging 2:357–362
28.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Maher MM, D’Souza RV et al (2005) Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies. Radiology 235:523–529PubMedCrossRef Kalra MK, Maher MM, D’Souza RV et al (2005) Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies. Radiology 235:523–529PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G (2008) Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:396–401PubMedCrossRef Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G (2008) Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:396–401PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Maurer MH, Niehues SM, Schnapauff D et al (2011) Low-dose computed tomography to detect body-packing in an animal model. Eur J Radiol 78:302–306PubMedCrossRef Maurer MH, Niehues SM, Schnapauff D et al (2011) Low-dose computed tomography to detect body-packing in an animal model. Eur J Radiol 78:302–306PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Detection of residual packets in cocaine body packers: low accuracy of abdominal radiography—a prospective study
Authors
Pascal Rousset
Pierre-Fleury Chaillot
Etienne Audureau
Caroline Rey-Salmon
Bertrand Becour
Isabelle Fitton
Dominique Vadrot
Marie-Pierre Revel
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2798-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

European Radiology 8/2013 Go to the issue