Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research article

Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients

Authors: Maximino Redondo, Rafael Funez, Francisco Medina-Cano, Isabel Rodrigo, Mercedes Acebal, Teresa Tellez, M Jose Roldan, M Luisa Hortas, Ana Bellinvia, Teresa Pereda, Laia Domingo, María Morales-Suarez Varela, Maria Sala, Antonio Rueda

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to measure the biological characteristics involved in tumorigenesis and the progression of breast cancer in symptomatic and screen-detected carcinomas to identify possible differences.

Methods

For this purpose, we evaluated clinical-pathological parameters and proliferative and apoptotic activities in a series of 130 symptomatic and 161 screen-detected tumors.

Results

After adjustment for the smaller size of the screen-detected carcinomas compared with symptomatic cancers, those detected in the screening program presented longer disease-free survival (RR = 0.43, CI = 0.19-0.96) and had high estrogen and progesterone receptor concentrations more often than did symptomatic cancers (OR = 3.38, CI = 1.72-6.63 and OR = 3.44, CI = 1.94-6.10, respectively). Furthermore, the expression of bcl-2, a marker of good prognosis in breast cancer, was higher and HER2/neu expression was lower in screen-detected cancers than in symptomatic cancers (OR = 1.77, CI = 1.01-3.23 and OR = 0.64, CI = 0.40-0.98, respectively). However, when comparing prevalent vs incident screen-detected carcinomas, prevalent tumors were larger (OR = 2.84, CI = 1.05-7.69), were less likely to be HER2/neu positive (OR = 0.22, CI = 0.08-0.61) and presented lower Ki67 expression (OR = 0.36, CI = 0.17-0.77). In addition, incident tumors presented a shorter survival time than did prevalent ones (RR = 4.88, CI = 1.12-21.19).

Conclusions

Incident carcinomas include a variety of screen-detected carcinomas that exhibit differences in biology and prognosis relative to prevalent carcinomas. The detection method is important and should be taken into account when making therapy decisions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vainio H: IARC Handbooks of cancer prevention: breast cancer screening. 2002, IARC press, Lyon Vainio H: IARC Handbooks of cancer prevention: breast cancer screening. 2002, IARC press, Lyon
3.
go back to reference Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, O'Doherty A, Crown J, Fleming FJ, McDermott EW, O'Higgins N: Surgical intervention in screen-detected patients versus symptomatic patients with breast cancer. J Med Screen. 2004, 11: 130-134.CrossRefPubMed Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, O'Doherty A, Crown J, Fleming FJ, McDermott EW, O'Higgins N: Surgical intervention in screen-detected patients versus symptomatic patients with breast cancer. J Med Screen. 2004, 11: 130-134.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Welch HG, Black WC: Using autopsy series to estimate the disease "reservoir" for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: how much more breast cancer can we find?. Ann Intern Med. 1997, 127: 1023-1028.CrossRefPubMed Welch HG, Black WC: Using autopsy series to estimate the disease "reservoir" for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: how much more breast cancer can we find?. Ann Intern Med. 1997, 127: 1023-1028.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Lehtimäki T, Holli K, Elomaa L, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Kataja V, Anttila A, Lundin M, Isola J, Lundin J: Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. JAMA. 2004, 292: 1064-1073.CrossRefPubMed Joensuu H, Lehtimäki T, Holli K, Elomaa L, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Kataja V, Anttila A, Lundin M, Isola J, Lundin J: Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. JAMA. 2004, 292: 1064-1073.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Weaver DL, Rosenberg RD, Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Geller BM, Key CR, Maygarden SJ, Ballard-Barbash R: Pathologic findings from the breast cancer surveillance consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography. Cancer. 2006, 106: 732-42.CrossRefPubMed Weaver DL, Rosenberg RD, Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Geller BM, Key CR, Maygarden SJ, Ballard-Barbash R: Pathologic findings from the breast cancer surveillance consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography. Cancer. 2006, 106: 732-42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Shen Y, Yang Y, Inoue LY, Munsell MF, Miller AB, Berry DA: Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005, 97: 1195-1203.CrossRefPubMed Shen Y, Yang Y, Inoue LY, Munsell MF, Miller AB, Berry DA: Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005, 97: 1195-1203.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wishart GC, Greenberg DC, Britton PD, Chou P, Brown CH, Purushotham AD, Duffy SW: Screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancer: is improved survival due to stage migration alone?. Br J Cancer. 2008, 98: 1741-1744.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wishart GC, Greenberg DC, Britton PD, Chou P, Brown CH, Purushotham AD, Duffy SW: Screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancer: is improved survival due to stage migration alone?. Br J Cancer. 2008, 98: 1741-1744.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Dawson SJ, Duffy SW, Blows FM, Driver KE, Provenzano E, LeQuesne J, Greenberg DC, Pharoah P, Caldas C, Wishart GC: Molecular characteristics of screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancers and their impact on survival. Br J Cancer. 2009, 101: 1338-1344.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dawson SJ, Duffy SW, Blows FM, Driver KE, Provenzano E, LeQuesne J, Greenberg DC, Pharoah P, Caldas C, Wishart GC: Molecular characteristics of screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancers and their impact on survival. Br J Cancer. 2009, 101: 1338-1344.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Burrell HC, Sibbering DM, Wilson AR, Pinder SE, Evans AJ, Yeoman LJ, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Blamey RW, Robertson JF: Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors. Radiology. 1996, 199: 811-817.CrossRefPubMed Burrell HC, Sibbering DM, Wilson AR, Pinder SE, Evans AJ, Yeoman LJ, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Blamey RW, Robertson JF: Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors. Radiology. 1996, 199: 811-817.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Brekelmans CT, Peeters PH, Deurenberg JJ, Collette HJ: Survival in interval breast cancer in the DOM screening programme. Eur J Cancer. 1995, 31A: 1830-1835.CrossRefPubMed Brekelmans CT, Peeters PH, Deurenberg JJ, Collette HJ: Survival in interval breast cancer in the DOM screening programme. Eur J Cancer. 1995, 31A: 1830-1835.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Redondo M, García J, Villar E, Rodrigo I, Perea-Milla E, Serrano A, Morell M: Major histocompatibility complex status in breast carcinogenesis and relationship to apoptosis. Hum Pathol. 2003, 34: 1283-9.CrossRefPubMed Redondo M, García J, Villar E, Rodrigo I, Perea-Milla E, Serrano A, Morell M: Major histocompatibility complex status in breast carcinogenesis and relationship to apoptosis. Hum Pathol. 2003, 34: 1283-9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lacroix M, Toillon RA, Leclercq G: Stable portrait of breast tumours during progression: data from biology, pathology and genetics. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004, 11: 497-522.CrossRefPubMed Lacroix M, Toillon RA, Leclercq G: Stable portrait of breast tumours during progression: data from biology, pathology and genetics. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004, 11: 497-522.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference McGuire WL: Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1987, 10: 5-9.CrossRefPubMed McGuire WL: Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1987, 10: 5-9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference American Society of Clinical Oncology: Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumour markers in breast and colorectal cancers. J Clin Oncol. 1996, 14: 2843-2877. American Society of Clinical Oncology: Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumour markers in breast and colorectal cancers. J Clin Oncol. 1996, 14: 2843-2877.
17.
go back to reference Lipponen P, Aaltomaa S, Kosma VM, Syrjänen K: Apoptosis in breast cancer as related to histopathological characteristics and prognosis. Eur J Cancer. 1994, 30A: 2068-2073.CrossRefPubMed Lipponen P, Aaltomaa S, Kosma VM, Syrjänen K: Apoptosis in breast cancer as related to histopathological characteristics and prognosis. Eur J Cancer. 1994, 30A: 2068-2073.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Villar E, Redondo M, Rodrigo I, García J, Avila E, Matilla A: bcl-2 expression and apoptosis in primary and metastatic breast carcinomas. Tumour Biol. 2001, 22: 137-145.CrossRefPubMed Villar E, Redondo M, Rodrigo I, García J, Avila E, Matilla A: bcl-2 expression and apoptosis in primary and metastatic breast carcinomas. Tumour Biol. 2001, 22: 137-145.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bhargava V, Kell DL, van de Rijn M, Warnke RA: Bcl2 immunoreactivity in breast carcinoma correlates with hormone receptor positivity. Am J Pathol. 1994, 145: 535-540.PubMedPubMedCentral Bhargava V, Kell DL, van de Rijn M, Warnke RA: Bcl2 immunoreactivity in breast carcinoma correlates with hormone receptor positivity. Am J Pathol. 1994, 145: 535-540.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Callagy GM, Pharoah PD, Pinder SE, Hsu FD, Nielsen TO, Ragaz J, Ellis IO, Huntsman D, Caldas C: Bcl-2 is a prognostic marker in breast cancer independently of the Nottingham Prognostic Index. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 2468-2475.CrossRefPubMed Callagy GM, Pharoah PD, Pinder SE, Hsu FD, Nielsen TO, Ragaz J, Ellis IO, Huntsman D, Caldas C: Bcl-2 is a prognostic marker in breast cancer independently of the Nottingham Prognostic Index. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 2468-2475.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Callagy GM, Webber MJ, Pharoah PD, Caldas C: Meta-analysis confirms BCL2 is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008, 8: 153-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Callagy GM, Webber MJ, Pharoah PD, Caldas C: Meta-analysis confirms BCL2 is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008, 8: 153-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Kallioniemi OP, Kärkkäinen A, Auvinen O, Mattila J, Koivula T, Hakama M: DNA flow cytometric analysis indicates that many breast cancers detected in the first round of mammographic screening have a low malignant potential. Int J Cancer. 1988, 42: 697-702.CrossRefPubMed Kallioniemi OP, Kärkkäinen A, Auvinen O, Mattila J, Koivula T, Hakama M: DNA flow cytometric analysis indicates that many breast cancers detected in the first round of mammographic screening have a low malignant potential. Int J Cancer. 1988, 42: 697-702.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Uyterlinde AM, Baak JP, Schipper NW, Peterse HJ, Meijer JW, Vooys PG, Matze E: Prognostic value of morphometry and DNA flow-cytometry features of invasive breast cancers detected by population screening: comparison with control group of hospital patients. Int J Cancer. 1991, 48: 173-181.CrossRefPubMed Uyterlinde AM, Baak JP, Schipper NW, Peterse HJ, Meijer JW, Vooys PG, Matze E: Prognostic value of morphometry and DNA flow-cytometry features of invasive breast cancers detected by population screening: comparison with control group of hospital patients. Int J Cancer. 1991, 48: 173-181.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Crosier M, Scott D, Wilson RG, Griffiths CD, May FE, Westley BR: Differences in Ki67 and c-erbB2 expression between screen-detected and true interval breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 1999, 5: 2682-2688.PubMed Crosier M, Scott D, Wilson RG, Griffiths CD, May FE, Westley BR: Differences in Ki67 and c-erbB2 expression between screen-detected and true interval breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 1999, 5: 2682-2688.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Olivotto IA, Mates D, Kan L, Fung J, Samant R, Burhenne LJ: Prognosis, treatment, and recurrence of breast cancer for women attending or not attending the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999, 54: 73-81.CrossRefPubMed Olivotto IA, Mates D, Kan L, Fung J, Samant R, Burhenne LJ: Prognosis, treatment, and recurrence of breast cancer for women attending or not attending the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999, 54: 73-81.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Magee B, Stewart AL, Swindell R: Outcome of radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery in screen detected breast cancers. Clin Oncol. 1999, 11: 40-45.CrossRef Magee B, Stewart AL, Swindell R: Outcome of radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery in screen detected breast cancers. Clin Oncol. 1999, 11: 40-45.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wintzer HO, Zipfel I, Schulte-Mönting J, Hellerich U, von Kleist S: Ki-67 immunostaining in human breast tumours and its relationship to prognosis. Cancer. 1991, 67: 421-428.CrossRefPubMed Wintzer HO, Zipfel I, Schulte-Mönting J, Hellerich U, von Kleist S: Ki-67 immunostaining in human breast tumours and its relationship to prognosis. Cancer. 1991, 67: 421-428.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Merkel DE, McGuire WL: Ploidy, proliferative activity and prognosis. DNA flow cytometry of solid tumours. Cancer. 1990, 65: 1194-1205.CrossRefPubMed Merkel DE, McGuire WL: Ploidy, proliferative activity and prognosis. DNA flow cytometry of solid tumours. Cancer. 1990, 65: 1194-1205.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Redondo M, Rodrigo I, Pereda T, Funez R, Acebal M, Perea-Milla E, Jimenez E: Effects of emergency admission and delays on prognosis in patients with breast carcinoma. Supp Care Cancer. 2009, 17: 595-599.CrossRef Redondo M, Rodrigo I, Pereda T, Funez R, Acebal M, Perea-Milla E, Jimenez E: Effects of emergency admission and delays on prognosis in patients with breast carcinoma. Supp Care Cancer. 2009, 17: 595-599.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients
Authors
Maximino Redondo
Rafael Funez
Francisco Medina-Cano
Isabel Rodrigo
Mercedes Acebal
Teresa Tellez
M Jose Roldan
M Luisa Hortas
Ana Bellinvia
Teresa Pereda
Laia Domingo
María Morales-Suarez Varela
Maria Sala
Antonio Rueda
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-604

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Cancer 1/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine