Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 3/2016

01-05-2016 | Guest Editorial

Designing Health Information Technologies for Uptake: Development and Implementation of Measurement Feedback Systems in Mental Health Service Delivery

Introduction to the Special Section

Authors: Aaron R. Lyon, Cara C. Lewis

Published in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

Driven by recent policy developments that emphasize accountability and data sharing (e.g., Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 2010; HITECH Act 2009), health information technologies (HIT) are rapidly becoming ubiquitous within the contemporary healthcare landscape. Specific subtypes of HIT support service quality monitoring and can be classified within the “quality management” set of implementation strategies articulated by Powell et al. (2012, 2015). Despite their potential to function as an implementation strategy, these technologies often require their own strategic implementation supports to be successfully installed and effectively used in new service systems (Cohen 2015; Ruud 2015). Although there is widespread recognition of the potential for HIT to usher in new cost savings in healthcare, issues related to technology design and implementation processes have interfered with the extent to which those savings have been realized (Carroll 2015; Leviss 2011; Ribitzky et al. 2010). …
Literature
Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 4–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Bernstein, P. A. (1996). Middleware: A model for distributed system services. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 39(2), 86–98.CrossRef
Bickman, L. (2008). A measurement feedback system (MFS) is necessary to improve mental health outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(10), 1114–1119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Bickman, L., Douglas, S. R., De Andrade, A. R. V., Tomlinson, M., Gleacher, A., Olin, S., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Implementing a measurement feedback system: A tale of two sites. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1, 1–16.CrossRef
Bickman, L., Kelley, S. D., & Athay, M. (2012). The technology of measurement feedback systems. Couple and Family Psychology: Review and Practice, 1, 274–284.CrossRef
Bruns, E. J., Hyde, K. L., Sather, A., Hook, A. N., & Lyon, A. R. (2015). Applying user input to the design and testing of an electronic behavioral health information system for wraparound care coordination. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1, 1–19.
Carroll, A. E. (2015). How health information technology is failing to achieve Its full potential. Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics, 169(3), 201–202.PubMed
Chorpita, B. F., Daleiden, E. L., & Bernstein, A. (this issue). At the intersection of health information technology and decision support: Measurement feedback systems…and beyond. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.
Clauson, K. A., Marsh, W. A., Polen, H. H., Seamon, M. J., & Ortiz, B. I. (2007). Clinical decision support tools: Analysis of online drug information databases. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 7(1), 7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Cohen, D. (2015). Assessing the effect of an electronic decision support system on children’s mental health service outcomes. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 33(3), 225–240.CrossRef
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
de Jong, K. (2015). Challenges in the implementation of measurement feedback systems. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1, 1–4.
Douglas, S., Button, S., & Casey, S. E. (2014). Implementing for sustainability: Promoting use of a measurement feedback system for innovation and quality improvement. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1, 1–6.
Edbrooke-Childs, J., Wolpert, M., & Deighton, J. (this issue). Introduction to the special section on implementing routine outcome monitoring in child and adult mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.
Flanagan, M. E., Saleem, J. J., Millitello, L. G., Russ, A. L., & Doebbeling, B. N. (2013). Paper-and computer-based workarounds to electronic health record use at three benchmark institutions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(e1), e59–e66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Garland, A. F., Haine-Schlagel, R., Brookman-Frazee, L., Baker-Ericzen, M., Trask, E., & Fawley-King, K. (2013). Improving community-based mental health care for children: Translating knowledge into action. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 40(1), 6–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Glasgow, R. E., Fisher, L., Strycker, L. A., Hessler, D., Toobert, D. J., King, D. K., & Jacobs, T. (2014). Minimal intervention needed for change: Definition, use, and value for improving health and health research. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 26–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Gleacher, A. A., Olin, S. S., Nadeem, E., Pollock, M., Ringle, V., Bickman, L., … & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Implementing a measurement feedback system in community mental health clinics: A case study of multilevel barriers and facilitators. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1–15.
Halford, W. K., Hayes, S., Christensen, A., Lambert, M., Baucom, D. H., & Atkins, D. C. (2012). Toward making progress feedback an effective common factor in couple therapy. Behavior Therapy, 43(1), 49–60.CrossRefPubMed
Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, Title XIII of Division A and Title IV of Division B of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ARRA), Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 226 (Feb. 17, 2009), codified at 42 U.S.C. §§300jj et seq.; §§17901 et seq.
Johnson, C. M., Johnson, T. R., & Zhang, J. (2005). A user-centered framework for redesigning health care interfaces. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 38(1), 75–87.CrossRefPubMed
Karsh, B. T. (2004). Beyond usability: Designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(5), 388–394.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254.CrossRef
Littlejohns, P., Wyatt, J. C., & Garvican, L. (2003). Evaluating computerised health information systems: Hard lessons still to be learnt. British Medical Journal, 326(7394), 860–863.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Lyon, A. R., Lewis, C. C., Boyd, M. R., Hendrix, E., & Liu, F. (this issue). Capabilities and characteristics of digital measurement feedback systems: Results from a comprehensive review. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.
Lyon, A. R., Wasse, J. K., Ludwig, K., Zachry, M., Bruns, E. J., Unützer, J., & McCauley, E. (2015). The contextualized technology adaptation process (CTAP): Optimizing health information technology to improve mental health systems. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1, 1–16.
Maguire, M. (2001). Methods to support human-centred design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(4), 587–634.CrossRef
Nadeem, E., Cappella, E., Holland, S., Coccaro, C., & Crisonino, G. (2015). Development and piloting of a classroom-focused measurement feedback system. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1, 1–15.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. (2010). Pub. L. No. 111–148, § 6301, 124 Stat. 727.
Powell, B. J., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., Carpenter, C. R., Griffey, R. T., Bunger, A. C., … & York, J. L. (2012). A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Medical Care Research and Review, 69(2), 123–157.
Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., … & Kirchner, J. E. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implementation Science, 10(1), 21.
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., … & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76.
Ribitzky, R., Sterling, M. A., & Bradley, V. (2010, March). EHR usability pain points survey Q4 2009. In Presentation at the 2010 annual HIMSS conference & exhibition.
Riemer, M., Rosof-Williams, J., & Bickman, L. (2005). Theories related to changing clinician practice. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14(2), 241–254.CrossRefPubMed
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Ruud, T. (2015). Routine outcome measures in Norway: Only partly implemented. International Review of Psychiatry, 27(4), 338–344.CrossRefPubMed
Scott, K., & Lewis, C. C. (2015). Using measurement-based care to enhance any treatment. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 22(1), 49–59.CrossRef
Steinfeld, B., Franklin, A., Mercer, B., Fraynt, R., & Simon, G. (2015). Progress monitoring in an integrated health care system: Tracking behavioral health vital signs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1, 1–10.
Steinfeld, B., Scott, J., Vilander, G., Marx, L., Quirk, M., Lindberg, J., & Koerner, K. (2014). The role of lean process improvement in implementation of evidence-based practices in behavioral health care. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 1, 1–15.
Stirman, S. W., Miller, C. J., Toder, K., & Calloway, A. (2013). Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implementation Science, 8(1), 65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Unützer, J., Chan, Y. F., Hafer, E., Knaster, J., Shields, A., Powers, D., & Veith, R. C. (2012). Quality improvement with pay-for-performance incentives in integrated behavioral health care. American Journal of Public Health, 102(6), e41–e45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Unützer, J., Katon, W., Callahan, C. M., Williams Jr, J. W., Hunkeler, E., Harpole, L., … & Impact Investigators. (2002). Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(22), 2836–2845.
Metadata
Title
Designing Health Information Technologies for Uptake: Development and Implementation of Measurement Feedback Systems in Mental Health Service Delivery
Introduction to the Special Section
Authors
Aaron R. Lyon
Cara C. Lewis
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0894-587X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3289
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0704-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 3/2016 Go to the issue

Original Article

Implementing a Measurement Feedback System in Community Mental Health Clinics: A Case Study of Multilevel Barriers and Facilitators

Commentary

Challenges in the Implementation of Measurement Feedback Systems

Point of View

Leading Horses to Water: Lessons from a Decade of Helping Psychological Therapy Services Use Routine Outcome Measurement to Improve Practice

Original Paper

When is Sessional Monitoring More Likely in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services?

Commentary

At the Intersection of Health Information Technology and Decision Support: Measurement Feedback Systems…and Beyond

Original Article

Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review