Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Methodology

Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Authors: Katie Biggs, Daniel Hind, Mike Bradburn, Lizzie Swaby, Steve Brown

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Increasingly, pragmatic randomised controlled trials are being used to evaluate surgical interventions, although they present particular difficulties in regards to recruitment and retention.

Methods

Procedures and processes related to implementation of a multi-centre pragmatic surgical randomised controlled trial are discussed. In this surgical trial, forecasting of consent rates based on similar trials and micro-costing of study activities with research partners were undertaken and a video was produced targeting recruiting staff with the aim of aiding recruitment. The baseline assessments were reviewed to ensure the timing did not impact on the outcome. Attrition due to procedure waiting time was monitored and data were triangulated for the primary outcome to ensure adequate follow-up data.

Results

Forecasting and costing ensured that the recruitment window was of adequate length and adequate resource was available for study procedures at multiple clinics in each hospital. Recruiting staff found the recruitment video useful. The comparison of patient-reported data collected prior to randomisation and prior to treatment provided confidence in the baseline data. Knowledge of participant dropout due to delays in treatment meant we were able to increase the recruitment target in a timely fashion, and along with the triangulation of data sources, this ensured adequate follow-up of randomised participants.

Conclusions

This paper provides a range of evidence-based and experience-based approaches which, collectively, resulted in meeting our study objectives and from which lessons may be transferable.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, ISRCTN41394716. Registered on 10 May 2012.
UKCRN Study ID: 12486.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Reeves B. Health-technology assessment in surgery. Lancet. 1999;353(SUPPL. 1):3–5.CrossRef Reeves B. Health-technology assessment in surgery. Lancet. 1999;353(SUPPL. 1):3–5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chapman SJ, Shelton B, Mahmood H, Fitzgerald JE, Harrison EM, Bhangu A. Discontinuation and non-publication of surgical randomised controlled trials: observational study. Bmj. 2014;349:g6870.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chapman SJ, Shelton B, Mahmood H, Fitzgerald JE, Harrison EM, Bhangu A. Discontinuation and non-publication of surgical randomised controlled trials: observational study. Bmj. 2014;349:g6870.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Treweek S, Lockhart P, Pitkethly M, Cook JA, Kjeldstrøm M, Johansen M, et al. Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002360.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Treweek S, Lockhart P, Pitkethly M, Cook JA, Kjeldstrøm M, Johansen M, et al. Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002360.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gul RB, Ali PA. Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:227–33.PubMedCrossRef Gul RB, Ali PA. Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:227–33.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marcellus L. Are we missing anything? Pursuing research on attrition. Canadian J Nurs Res. 2004;36(3):82-98. Marcellus L. Are we missing anything? Pursuing research on attrition. Canadian J Nurs Res. 2004;36(3):82-98.
8.
go back to reference Townsend D, Mills N, Savović J, Donovan JL. A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2015;16:432.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Townsend D, Mills N, Savović J, Donovan JL. A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2015;16:432.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Anvari M, Allen C, Marshall J, Armstrong D, Goeree R, Ungar W, et al. A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for treatment of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease: one-year follow-up. Surg Innov. 2006;13:238–49.PubMedCrossRef Anvari M, Allen C, Marshall J, Armstrong D, Goeree R, Ungar W, et al. A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for treatment of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease: one-year follow-up. Surg Innov. 2006;13:238–49.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. A systematic review of reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical randomized controlled trials. Surgery. 2006;139:469–83.PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. A systematic review of reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical randomized controlled trials. Surgery. 2006;139:469–83.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Howes N, Chagla L, Thorpe M, McCulloch P. Surgical practice is evidence based. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1220–3.PubMedCrossRef Howes N, Chagla L, Thorpe M, McCulloch P. Surgical practice is evidence based. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1220–3.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T, et al. Quality improvement report: improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: Protect (Prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. BMJ Br Med J. 2002;325:766–9.CrossRef Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T, et al. Quality improvement report: improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: Protect (Prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. BMJ Br Med J. 2002;325:766–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Paramasivan S, Huddart R, Hall E, Lewis R, Birtle A, Donovan JL. Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011). Trials. 2011;12:78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Paramasivan S, Huddart R, Hall E, Lewis R, Birtle A, Donovan JL. Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011). Trials. 2011;12:78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Diamant A, Cleghorn MC, Milner J, Sockalingam S, Okrainec A, Jackson TD, et al. Patient and operational factors affecting wait times in a bariatric surgery program in Toronto: a retrospective cohort study. C Open. 2015;3:E331–7.CrossRef Diamant A, Cleghorn MC, Milner J, Sockalingam S, Okrainec A, Jackson TD, et al. Patient and operational factors affecting wait times in a bariatric surgery program in Toronto: a retrospective cohort study. C Open. 2015;3:E331–7.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tiernan J, Hind D, Watson A, Wailoo AJ, Bradburn M, Shephard N, et al. The HubBLe trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for haemorrhoids. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:153.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tiernan J, Hind D, Watson A, Wailoo AJ, Bradburn M, Shephard N, et al. The HubBLe trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for haemorrhoids. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:153.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Brown S, Tiernan J, Biggs K, Hind D, Shephard N, Bradburn M, et al. The HubBLe trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for symptomatic second- and third-degree haemorrhoids: a multicentre randomised controlled trial and health-economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20:1–150. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20880.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brown S, Tiernan J, Biggs K, Hind D, Shephard N, Bradburn M, et al. The HubBLe trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for symptomatic second- and third-degree haemorrhoids: a multicentre randomised controlled trial and health-economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20:1–150. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3310/​hta20880.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Brown SR, Tiernan JP, Watson AJM, Biggs K, Shephard N, Wailoo AJ, et al. Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;6736:1–9. Brown SR, Tiernan JP, Watson AJM, Biggs K, Shephard N, Wailoo AJ, et al. Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;6736:1–9.
33.
go back to reference Gorringe JAL. Initial preparations for clinical trials. In: Harris EL, Fitzgerald JD, editors. The Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1970. p. 41–6. Gorringe JAL. Initial preparations for clinical trials. In: Harris EL, Fitzgerald JD, editors. The Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1970. p. 41–6.
34.
go back to reference Collins JF, Williford WO, Weiss DG, Bingham SF, Klett CJ. Planning patient recruitment: fantasy and reality. Stat Med. 1984;3:435–43.PubMedCrossRef Collins JF, Williford WO, Weiss DG, Bingham SF, Klett CJ. Planning patient recruitment: fantasy and reality. Stat Med. 1984;3:435–43.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lasagna L. Problems in publication of clinical trial methodology. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979;25(5 Pt 2):751–3.PubMedCrossRef Lasagna L. Problems in publication of clinical trial methodology. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979;25(5 Pt 2):751–3.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Lasagna L. The pharmaceutical revolution forty years later. Rev Farmacol Clin y Exp. 1984;1:157–61. Lasagna L. The pharmaceutical revolution forty years later. Rev Farmacol Clin y Exp. 1984;1:157–61.
39.
go back to reference Kahneman D, Tversky A. Intuitive prediction: biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Stud Manag Sci. 1977;12:313–27. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Intuitive prediction: biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Stud Manag Sci. 1977;12:313–27.
40.
go back to reference Flyvbjerg B. Curbing optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation in planning: reference class forecasting in practice. Eur Plan Stud. 2008;16:3–21.CrossRef Flyvbjerg B. Curbing optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation in planning: reference class forecasting in practice. Eur Plan Stud. 2008;16:3–21.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Simmons T. Attributing the costs of health and social care Research & Development (AcoRD). London: Department of Health; 2012. Simmons T. Attributing the costs of health and social care Research & Development (AcoRD). London: Department of Health; 2012.
42.
go back to reference Snooks H, Hutchings H, Seagrove A, Stewart-Brown S, Williams J, Russell I. Bureaucracy stifles medical research in Britain: a tale of three trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:122.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Snooks H, Hutchings H, Seagrove A, Stewart-Brown S, Williams J, Russell I. Bureaucracy stifles medical research in Britain: a tale of three trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:122.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Al-Shahi Salman R, Brock TM, Dennis MS, Sandercock PAG, White PM, Warlow C. Research governance impediments to clinical trials: a retrospective survey. J R Soc Med. 2007;100:101–4.PubMedCrossRef Al-Shahi Salman R, Brock TM, Dennis MS, Sandercock PAG, White PM, Warlow C. Research governance impediments to clinical trials: a retrospective survey. J R Soc Med. 2007;100:101–4.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Al-Shahi Salman R, Beller E, Kagan J, Hemminki E, Phillips RS, Savulescu J, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management. Lancet. 2014;383:176–85.PubMedCrossRef Al-Shahi Salman R, Beller E, Kagan J, Hemminki E, Phillips RS, Savulescu J, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management. Lancet. 2014;383:176–85.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Whitehead P, Drummond A, Fellows K. Research governance and bureaucracy for multisite studies: implications for occupational therapy research. Br J Occup Ther. 2011;74:355–8.CrossRef Whitehead P, Drummond A, Fellows K. Research governance and bureaucracy for multisite studies: implications for occupational therapy research. Br J Occup Ther. 2011;74:355–8.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Kearney A, McKay A, Hickey H, Balabanova S, Marson AG, Gamble C, et al. Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005874.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kearney A, McKay A, Hickey H, Balabanova S, Marson AG, Gamble C, et al. Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005874.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Bernhard J, Butow P, Aldridge J, Juraskova I, Ribi K, Brown R. Communication about standard treatment options and clinical trials: can we teach doctors new skills to improve patient outcomes? Communication about standard treatment options and clinical trials: can we teach doctors new skills to improve patient…. Psychooncology. 2012;21:1265–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2044.CrossRefPubMed Bernhard J, Butow P, Aldridge J, Juraskova I, Ribi K, Brown R. Communication about standard treatment options and clinical trials: can we teach doctors new skills to improve patient outcomes? Communication about standard treatment options and clinical trials: can we teach doctors new skills to improve patient…. Psychooncology. 2012;21:1265–74. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pon.​2044.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Kimmick GG, Peterson BL, Kornblith AB, Mandelblatt J, Johnson JL, Wheeler J, et al. Improving accrual of older persons to cancer treatment trials: a randomized trial comparing an educational intervention with standard information: CALGB 360001. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2201–7.PubMedCrossRef Kimmick GG, Peterson BL, Kornblith AB, Mandelblatt J, Johnson JL, Wheeler J, et al. Improving accrual of older persons to cancer treatment trials: a randomized trial comparing an educational intervention with standard information: CALGB 360001. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2201–7.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Wuensch A, Goelz T, Bertz H, Wirsching M, Fritzsche K. Disclosing information about randomised controlled trials in oncology: training concept and evaluation of an individualised communication skills training for physicians COM-ON-rct. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011;20:570–6.CrossRef Wuensch A, Goelz T, Bertz H, Wirsching M, Fritzsche K. Disclosing information about randomised controlled trials in oncology: training concept and evaluation of an individualised communication skills training for physicians COM-ON-rct. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011;20:570–6.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Crutzen R, Viechtbauer W, Kotz D, Spigt M. No differential attrition was found in randomized controlled trials published in general medical journals: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:948–54.PubMedCrossRef Crutzen R, Viechtbauer W, Kotz D, Spigt M. No differential attrition was found in randomized controlled trials published in general medical journals: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:948–54.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Bell ML, Kenward MG, Fairclough DL, Horton NJ. Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not. BMJ. 2013;346:e8668.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bell ML, Kenward MG, Fairclough DL, Horton NJ. Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not. BMJ. 2013;346:e8668.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Shanmugam V, Thaha MA, Rabindranath KS, Campbell KL, Steele RJC, Loudon MA. Systematic review of randomized trials comparing rubber band ligation with excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1481–7.PubMedCrossRef Shanmugam V, Thaha MA, Rabindranath KS, Campbell KL, Steele RJC, Loudon MA. Systematic review of randomized trials comparing rubber band ligation with excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1481–7.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Flyvbjerg B, Skamris Holm M, Buhl S. Underestimating costs in public works projects. APA J. 2002;68:279–95. Flyvbjerg B, Skamris Holm M, Buhl S. Underestimating costs in public works projects. APA J. 2002;68:279–95.
61.
62.
go back to reference Gohel MS, Chetter I. Are clinical trials units essential for a successful trial? Bmj. 2015;350:h2823.PubMedCrossRef Gohel MS, Chetter I. Are clinical trials units essential for a successful trial? Bmj. 2015;350:h2823.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference de Salis I, Tomlin Z, Toerien M, Donovan J. Using qualitative research methods to improve recruitment to randomized controlled trials: the Quartet study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13 Suppl 3:92–6.PubMedCrossRef de Salis I, Tomlin Z, Toerien M, Donovan J. Using qualitative research methods to improve recruitment to randomized controlled trials: the Quartet study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13 Suppl 3:92–6.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Huang GD, Bull J, McKee KJ, Mahon E, Harper B, Roberts JN. Clinical trials recruitment planning: a proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018;66:74-9.PubMedCrossRef Huang GD, Bull J, McKee KJ, Mahon E, Harper B, Roberts JN. Clinical trials recruitment planning: a proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018;66:74-9.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Gehring M, Taylor RS, Mellody M, Casteels B, Piazzi A, Gensini G, et al. Factors influencing clinical trial site selection in Europe: the Survey of Attitudes towards trial sites in Europe (the SAT-EU Study). BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002957.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gehring M, Taylor RS, Mellody M, Casteels B, Piazzi A, Gensini G, et al. Factors influencing clinical trial site selection in Europe: the Survey of Attitudes towards trial sites in Europe (the SAT-EU Study). BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002957.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Levett KM, Roberts CL, Simpson JM, Morris JM. Site-specific predictors of successful recruitment to a perinatal clinical trial. Clin Trials. 2014;11:584–9.PubMedCrossRef Levett KM, Roberts CL, Simpson JM, Morris JM. Site-specific predictors of successful recruitment to a perinatal clinical trial. Clin Trials. 2014;11:584–9.PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Zon R, Meropol NJ, Catalano RB, Schilsky RL. American Society of Clinical Oncology statement on minimum standards and exemplary attributes of clinical trial sites. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2562–7.PubMedCrossRef Zon R, Meropol NJ, Catalano RB, Schilsky RL. American Society of Clinical Oncology statement on minimum standards and exemplary attributes of clinical trial sites. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2562–7.PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Gheorghe A, Roberts T, Pinkney TD, Morton DG, Calvert M. Rational centre selection for RCTs with a parallel economic evaluation–the next step towards increased generalisability? Health Econ. 2015;24:498–504.PubMedCrossRef Gheorghe A, Roberts T, Pinkney TD, Morton DG, Calvert M. Rational centre selection for RCTs with a parallel economic evaluation–the next step towards increased generalisability? Health Econ. 2015;24:498–504.PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Beard D, Price A, Cook J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Campbell M, et al. Total or partial knee arthroplasty trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:292.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Beard D, Price A, Cook J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Campbell M, et al. Total or partial knee arthroplasty trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:292.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
go back to reference McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, Elbourne DR, Francis D, Garcia J, Roberts I, Snowdon C. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7(1):9. McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, Elbourne DR, Francis D, Garcia J, Roberts I, Snowdon C. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7(1):9.
72.
go back to reference Amirfeyz R, Cook J, Gargan M, Bannister G. The role of physiotherapy in the treatment of whiplash associated disorders: a prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:973–7.PubMedCrossRef Amirfeyz R, Cook J, Gargan M, Bannister G. The role of physiotherapy in the treatment of whiplash associated disorders: a prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:973–7.PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Cook JA, Campbell MK, Gillies K, Skea Z. Surgeons’ and methodologists’ perceptions of utilising an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design: a qualitative study. Trials. 2018;19:478.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cook JA, Campbell MK, Gillies K, Skea Z. Surgeons’ and methodologists’ perceptions of utilising an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design: a qualitative study. Trials. 2018;19:478.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Roche K. Factors affecting workload of cancer clinical trials: results of a multicenter study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:545–56.PubMedCrossRef Roche K. Factors affecting workload of cancer clinical trials: results of a multicenter study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:545–56.PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Berridge J, Coffey M. Workload measurement. Appl Clin Trials. 2008;6:98–101. Berridge J, Coffey M. Workload measurement. Appl Clin Trials. 2008;6:98–101.
76.
go back to reference Smuck B, Bettello P, Berghout K, Hanna T, Kowaleski B, Phippard L, et al. Ontario protocol assessment level: clinical trial complexity rating tool for workload planning in oncology clinical trials. J Oncol Pract. 2011;7:80–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Smuck B, Bettello P, Berghout K, Hanna T, Kowaleski B, Phippard L, et al. Ontario protocol assessment level: clinical trial complexity rating tool for workload planning in oncology clinical trials. J Oncol Pract. 2011;7:80–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Fowler D, Thomas C. Protocol acuity scoring as a rational approach to clinical research management. Res Pract. 2003;4:64–71. Fowler D, Thomas C. Protocol acuity scoring as a rational approach to clinical research management. Res Pract. 2003;4:64–71.
78.
go back to reference James P, Bebee P, Beekman L, Browning D, Innes M, Kain J, et al. Creating an effort tracking tool to improve therapeutic cancer clinical trials workload management and budgeting. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2011;9:1228–33.CrossRef James P, Bebee P, Beekman L, Browning D, Innes M, Kain J, et al. Creating an effort tracking tool to improve therapeutic cancer clinical trials workload management and budgeting. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2011;9:1228–33.CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Gwede CK, Johnson DJ, Roberts C, Cantor AB. Burnout in Clinical Research Coordinators in the United States. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32:1123–30.PubMedCrossRef Gwede CK, Johnson DJ, Roberts C, Cantor AB. Burnout in Clinical Research Coordinators in the United States. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32:1123–30.PubMedCrossRef
81.
go back to reference Friesema D. Workload assessment in clinical trials. CALGAB Q Newsl Cancer Leuk Gr B. 2010;19:3–8. Friesema D. Workload assessment in clinical trials. CALGAB Q Newsl Cancer Leuk Gr B. 2010;19:3–8.
82.
go back to reference Hind D, Reeves BC, Bathers S, Bray C, Corkhill A, Hayward C, et al. Comparative costs and activity from a sample of UK clinical trials units. Trials. 2017;18:203.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hind D, Reeves BC, Bathers S, Bray C, Corkhill A, Hayward C, et al. Comparative costs and activity from a sample of UK clinical trials units. Trials. 2017;18:203.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Bhangu A, Kolias AG, Pinkney T, Hall NJ, Fitzgerald JE. Surgical research collaboratives in the UK. Lancet. 2013;382:1091–2.PubMedCrossRef Bhangu A, Kolias AG, Pinkney T, Hall NJ, Fitzgerald JE. Surgical research collaboratives in the UK. Lancet. 2013;382:1091–2.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial
Authors
Katie Biggs
Daniel Hind
Mike Bradburn
Lizzie Swaby
Steve Brown
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3649-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Trials 1/2019 Go to the issue