Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2003

Open Access 01-12-2003 | Research article

Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities

Authors: L Douglas Case, Timothy M Morgan

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Phase II cancer studies are undertaken to assess the activity of a new drug or a new treatment regimen. Activity is sometimes defined in terms of a survival probability, a binary outcome such as one-year survival that is derived from a time-to-event variable. Phase II studies are usually designed with an interim analysis so they can be stopped if early results are disappointing. Most designs that allow for an interim look are not appropriate for monitoring survival probabilities since many patients will not have enough follow-up by the time of the interim analysis, thus necessitating an inconvenient suspension of accrual while patients are being followed.

Methods

Two-stage phase II clinical trial designs are developed for evaluating survival probabilities. These designs are compared to fixed sample designs and to existing designs developed to monitor binomial probabilities to illustrate the expected reduction in sample size or study length possible with the use of the proposed designs.

Results

Savings can be realized in both the duration of accrual and the total study length, with the expected savings increasing as the accrual rate decreases. Misspecifying the underlying survival distribution and the accrual rate during the planning phase can adversely influence the operating characteristics of the designs.

Conclusion

Two-stage phase II trials for assessing survival probabilities can be designed that do not require prolonged suspension of patient accrual. These designs are more efficient than single stage designs and more practical than existing two-stage designs developed for binomial outcomes, particularly in trials with slow accrual.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gehan EA: The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1961, 13: 346-353.CrossRefPubMed Gehan EA: The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1961, 13: 346-353.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Fleming TR: One sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 1982, 38: 143-151.CrossRefPubMed Fleming TR: One sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 1982, 38: 143-151.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chang MN, Therneau TM, Wieand HS, Cha SS: Designs for group sequential phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 1987, 43: 865-874.CrossRefPubMed Chang MN, Therneau TM, Wieand HS, Cha SS: Designs for group sequential phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 1987, 43: 865-874.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Simon R: Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1989, 10: 1-10. 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9.CrossRefPubMed Simon R: Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1989, 10: 1-10. 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Green SJ, Dahlberg S: Planned versus attained design in phase II clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1992, 11: 853-862.CrossRefPubMed Green SJ, Dahlberg S: Planned versus attained design in phase II clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1992, 11: 853-862.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Thall PF, Richard Simon: Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials. Biometrics. 1994, 50: 337-349.CrossRefPubMed Thall PF, Richard Simon: Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials. Biometrics. 1994, 50: 337-349.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chen TT: Optimal three-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1997, 16: 2701-2711. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19971215)16:23<2701::AID-SIM704>3.0.CO;2-1.CrossRefPubMed Chen TT: Optimal three-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1997, 16: 2701-2711. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19971215)16:23<2701::AID-SIM704>3.0.CO;2-1.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Heitjan DF: Bayesian interim analysis of phase II cancer clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1997, 16: 1791-1802. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970830)16:16<1791::AID-SIM609>3.3.CO;2-5.CrossRefPubMed Heitjan DF: Bayesian interim analysis of phase II cancer clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1997, 16: 1791-1802. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970830)16:16<1791::AID-SIM609>3.3.CO;2-5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Herndon JE: A design alternative for two-stage, phase II, multicenter cancer clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1998, 19: 440-450. 10.1016/S0197-2456(98)00012-9.CrossRefPubMed Herndon JE: A design alternative for two-stage, phase II, multicenter cancer clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1998, 19: 440-450. 10.1016/S0197-2456(98)00012-9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chen TT, Ng T-H: Optimal flexible designs in phase II clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1998, 17: 2301-2312. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981030)17:20<2301::AID-SIM927>3.0.CO;2-X.CrossRefPubMed Chen TT, Ng T-H: Optimal flexible designs in phase II clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1998, 17: 2301-2312. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981030)17:20<2301::AID-SIM927>3.0.CO;2-X.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Colton T, McPherson K: Two-stage plans compared with fixed-sample-size and Wald SPRT plans. J Am Stat Assoc. 1976, 71: 80-86.CrossRef Colton T, McPherson K: Two-stage plans compared with fixed-sample-size and Wald SPRT plans. J Am Stat Assoc. 1976, 71: 80-86.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA: Cancer Statistics, 1998. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 1998, 48: 6-29. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA: Cancer Statistics, 1998. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 1998, 48: 6-29.
13.
go back to reference Lawrence T: Gemcitabine as a radiation sensitizer. Sem Oncol. 1995, 22: 68-71. Lawrence T: Gemcitabine as a radiation sensitizer. Sem Oncol. 1995, 22: 68-71.
14.
go back to reference Casper ES, Green MR, Kelsen DP, Heelan RT, Brown TD, Flombaum CD, Trochanowski B, Tarassoff PG: Phase II trial of gemcitabine (2'2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Investigational New Drugs. 1994, 12: 29-34.CrossRefPubMed Casper ES, Green MR, Kelsen DP, Heelan RT, Brown TD, Flombaum CD, Trochanowski B, Tarassoff PG: Phase II trial of gemcitabine (2'2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Investigational New Drugs. 1994, 12: 29-34.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Burris HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, Cripps MC, Portenoy RK, Storniolo AM, Tarassoff R, Nelson R, Dorr FA, Stephens CD, Von Hoff DD: Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997, 15: 2403-2413.PubMed Burris HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, Cripps MC, Portenoy RK, Storniolo AM, Tarassoff R, Nelson R, Dorr FA, Stephens CD, Von Hoff DD: Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997, 15: 2403-2413.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Blackstock AW, Bernard SA: Twice weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiation: laboratory studies supporting phase I clinical trials in pancreatic cancer. Can Conf. 1999, 3: 2-6. Blackstock AW, Bernard SA: Twice weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiation: laboratory studies supporting phase I clinical trials in pancreatic cancer. Can Conf. 1999, 3: 2-6.
17.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958, 53: 457-481.CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958, 53: 457-481.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nelson W: Hazard plotting for incomplete failure data. J Quality Technology. 1969, 1: 27-52. Nelson W: Hazard plotting for incomplete failure data. J Quality Technology. 1969, 1: 27-52.
19.
go back to reference Jennison C, Turnbull BW: Group Sequential Designs with Applications to Clinical Trials. Boca Raton, Chapman & Hall/CRC. 2000 Jennison C, Turnbull BW: Group Sequential Designs with Applications to Clinical Trials. Boca Raton, Chapman & Hall/CRC. 2000
20.
go back to reference Lan KKG, DeMets DL: Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials. Biometrika. 1983, 70: 659-663.CrossRef Lan KKG, DeMets DL: Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials. Biometrika. 1983, 70: 659-663.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lin DY, Shen L, Ying Z, Breslow NE: Group sequential designs for monitoring survival probabilities. Biometrics. 1996, 52: 1033-1042.CrossRefPubMed Lin DY, Shen L, Ying Z, Breslow NE: Group sequential designs for monitoring survival probabilities. Biometrics. 1996, 52: 1033-1042.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Donnely TG: Algorithm 462 – Bivariate normal distribution [S15]. Comm ACM. 1973, 16: 638-10.1145/362375.362414.CrossRef Donnely TG: Algorithm 462 – Bivariate normal distribution [S15]. Comm ACM. 1973, 16: 638-10.1145/362375.362414.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Brent R: Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall. 1973 Brent R: Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall. 1973
24.
go back to reference Follmann DA, Albert PS: Bayesian monitoring of event rates with censored data. Biometrics. 1999, 55: 603-607.CrossRefPubMed Follmann DA, Albert PS: Bayesian monitoring of event rates with censored data. Biometrics. 1999, 55: 603-607.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cheung YK, Thall PF: Monitoring the rates of composite events with censored data in phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 2002, 58: 89-97.CrossRefPubMed Cheung YK, Thall PF: Monitoring the rates of composite events with censored data in phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 2002, 58: 89-97.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Case LD, Morgan TM: Duration of accrual and follow-up for two-stage clinical trials. Lifetime Data Analysis. 2001, 7: 21-37. 10.1023/A:1009621009283.CrossRefPubMed Case LD, Morgan TM: Duration of accrual and follow-up for two-stage clinical trials. Lifetime Data Analysis. 2001, 7: 21-37. 10.1023/A:1009621009283.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities
Authors
L Douglas Case
Timothy M Morgan
Publication date
01-12-2003
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2003
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2003

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2003 Go to the issue