Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Design and validation of a conceptual model regarding impact of open science on healthcare research processes

Authors: Maryam Zarghani, Leila Nemati-Anaraki, Shahram Sedghi, Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli, Anisa Rowhani-Farid

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The development and use of digital tools in various stages of research highlight the importance of novel open science methods for an integrated and accessible research system. The objective of this study was to design and validate a conceptual model of open science on healthcare research processes.

Methods

This research was conducted in three phases using a mixed-methods approach. The first phase employed a qualitative method, namely purposive sampling and semi-structured interview guides to collect data from healthcare researchers and managers. Influential factors of open science on research processes were extracted for refining the components and developing the proposed model; the second phase utilized a panel of experts and collective agreement through purposive sampling. The final phase involved purposive sampling and Delphi technique to validate the components of the proposed model according to researchers’ perspectives.

Findings

From the thematic analysis of 20 interview on the study topic, 385 codes, 38 sub-themes, and 14 main themes were extracted for the initial proposed model. These components were reviewed by expert panel members, resulting in 31 sub-themes, 13 main themes, and 4 approved themes. Ultimately, the agreed-upon model was assessed in four layers for validation by the expert panel, and all the components achieved a score of > 75% in two Delphi rounds. The validated model was presented based on the infrastructure and culture layers, as well as supervision, assessment, publication, and sharing.

Conclusion

To effectively implement these methods in the research process, it is essential to create cultural and infrastructural backgrounds and predefined requirements for preventing potential abuses and privacy concerns in the healthcare system. Applying these principles will lead to greater access to outputs, increasing the credibility of research results and the utilization of collective intelligence in solving healthcare system issues.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, et al. Promoting open Res Cult Sci. 2015;26(3486242):1422–5. Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, et al. Promoting open Res Cult Sci. 2015;26(3486242):1422–5.
2.
go back to reference Banks GC, Field JG, Oswald FL. Answers to 18 questions about Open Science practices. J Bus Psychol. 2019;34(3):257–70.CrossRef Banks GC, Field JG, Oswald FL. Answers to 18 questions about Open Science practices. J Bus Psychol. 2019;34(3):257–70.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference OECD. Making Open Science a Reality. Paris: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers.; 2015. Report No.: No. 25. OECD. Making Open Science a Reality. Paris: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers.; 2015. Report No.: No. 25.
4.
go back to reference Qian D, Eunjung S. S. C. Open and inclusive collaboration in science: a framework e. Sci Technol Policy Inst 2018. Qian D, Eunjung S. S. C. Open and inclusive collaboration in science: a framework e. Sci Technol Policy Inst 2018.
5.
go back to reference Commission E. Evaluation of Research Careers fully acknowledging Open Science practices rewards, incentives and/or recognition for researchers practicing Open Science. European Commission B-1049. Brussels: European Commission; 2017. Commission E. Evaluation of Research Careers fully acknowledging Open Science practices rewards, incentives and/or recognition for researchers practicing Open Science. European Commission B-1049. Brussels: European Commission; 2017.
6.
go back to reference Lyon L, Transparency. The emerging third dimension of open science and open data. LIBER Q. 2016;25(4):153–71.CrossRef Lyon L, Transparency. The emerging third dimension of open science and open data. LIBER Q. 2016;25(4):153–71.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Commission E. Six Recommendations for Implementation of FAIR Practice. FAIR in Practice Task Force of the European Open Science Cloud FAIR Working Group; 2020. Report No.: KI-01-20-580-EN-N. Commission E. Six Recommendations for Implementation of FAIR Practice. FAIR in Practice Task Force of the European Open Science Cloud FAIR Working Group; 2020. Report No.: KI-01-20-580-EN-N.
8.
go back to reference Vicente-Saez R, Gustafsson R, VdB L. The dawn of an open exploration era: emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world. Technological Forecast Social Change. 2020;1(156):120037.CrossRef Vicente-Saez R, Gustafsson R, VdB L. The dawn of an open exploration era: emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world. Technological Forecast Social Change. 2020;1(156):120037.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Aguinis H, Banks GC, Rogelberg SG, Cascio WFJOB. HD. P. actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2020;158:27–35.CrossRef Aguinis H, Banks GC, Rogelberg SG, Cascio WFJOB. HD. P. actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2020;158:27–35.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Potterbusch M, Lotrecchiano G. Shifting paradigms in information flow: an open science framework (OSF) for knowledge sharing teams. Int J Emerg Transdisciplin. 2018;21. Potterbusch M, Lotrecchiano G. Shifting paradigms in information flow: an open science framework (OSF) for knowledge sharing teams. Int J Emerg Transdisciplin. 2018;21.
11.
go back to reference Dai Q, Shin E. C. S. Open and inclusive collaboration in science: a framework. the OECD Going Digital project; 2018. Dai Q, Shin E. C. S. Open and inclusive collaboration in science: a framework. the OECD Going Digital project; 2018.
12.
go back to reference JS. R. Clinical research data sharing: what an open science world means for researchers involved in evidence synthesis. J Syst Reviews 2016;5 (1):1–4. JS. R. Clinical research data sharing: what an open science world means for researchers involved in evidence synthesis. J Syst Reviews 2016;5 (1):1–4.
13.
go back to reference Pontika N, Knoth P, Cancellieri M. PearceS. Fostering Open Science to Research using a Taxonomy and an eLearning Portal. InProceedings of the 15th international conference on knowledge technologies and data-driven business 2015 p. 1–8. Pontika N, Knoth P, Cancellieri M. PearceS. Fostering Open Science to Research using a Taxonomy and an eLearning Portal. InProceedings of the 15th international conference on knowledge technologies and data-driven business 2015 p. 1–8.
14.
go back to reference Hrynaszkiewicz I. Publishers’ Responsibilities in Promoting Data Quality and Reproducibility. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2019/11/07;257:319–48. ed2020. Hrynaszkiewicz I. Publishers’ Responsibilities in Promoting Data Quality and Reproducibility. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2019/11/07;257:319–48. ed2020.
15.
go back to reference Austin C, Bloom T, Dallmeier-Tiessen S, Khodiyar V, Murphy F, Nurnberger A, et al. Key components of data publishing: using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing. Int J Digit Libr. 2017;18(2):77–92.CrossRef Austin C, Bloom T, Dallmeier-Tiessen S, Khodiyar V, Murphy F, Nurnberger A, et al. Key components of data publishing: using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing. Int J Digit Libr. 2017;18(2):77–92.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Payne P, Lele O, Johnson B, Holve E. Enabling Open Science for Health Research: Collaborative Informatics Environment for Learning on Health Outcomes (CIELO). J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(7):e276.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Payne P, Lele O, Johnson B, Holve E. Enabling Open Science for Health Research: Collaborative Informatics Environment for Learning on Health Outcomes (CIELO). J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(7):e276.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Xafis V, Labude M. Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019;11(3):255–73. Openness in Big Data and Data Repositories. Xafis V, Labude M. Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019;11(3):255–73. Openness in Big Data and Data Repositories.
18.
go back to reference Besançon L, Peiffer-Smadja N, Segalas C, Jiang H, Masuzzo P, Smout C et al. Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. 2021;21(1):1–18. Besançon L, Peiffer-Smadja N, Segalas C, Jiang H, Masuzzo P, Smout C et al. Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. 2021;21(1):1–18.
19.
go back to reference Ayris P, de López A. MK. Open science and its role in universities: a roadmap for cultural change. Leuven:: LERU Office; 2019. Ayris P, de López A. MK. Open science and its role in universities: a roadmap for cultural change. Leuven:: LERU Office; 2019.
20.
go back to reference Guzzo RA, Nalbantian HR, Schneider B. Open science, closed doors: the perils and potential of open science for research in practice. Industrial Organizational Psychol. 2022;15(4):495–515.CrossRef Guzzo RA, Nalbantian HR, Schneider B. Open science, closed doors: the perils and potential of open science for research in practice. Industrial Organizational Psychol. 2022;15(4):495–515.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Han C, Chaineau M, Chen CX-Q, Beitel LK, Durcan TMJFN. Open science meets stem cells: a new drug discovery approach for neurodegenerative disorders. 2018;12:47. Han C, Chaineau M, Chen CX-Q, Beitel LK, Durcan TMJFN. Open science meets stem cells: a new drug discovery approach for neurodegenerative disorders. 2018;12:47.
22.
go back to reference Tahzibi K, Keshishyan Siraki G. Design and validation of the optimal model of Corona Environmental Crisis Management on International Security. iauh-ipsj. 2022;2(1):155–77. Tahzibi K, Keshishyan Siraki G. Design and validation of the optimal model of Corona Environmental Crisis Management on International Security. iauh-ipsj. 2022;2(1):155–77.
23.
go back to reference Sarukhani B. Research methods in social sciences. Tehran, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2 vols. 2015. Sarukhani B. Research methods in social sciences. Tehran, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2 vols. 2015.
24.
go back to reference Bhattacharya K. Fundamentals of qualitative research: a practical guide. Taylor & Francis; 2017. Bhattacharya K. Fundamentals of qualitative research: a practical guide. Taylor & Francis; 2017.
25.
26.
go back to reference Agumba JN. Validating and identifying health and safety performance improvement indicators: experience of using delphi technique. J J Econ Behav Stud. 2015;7(3):14–22.CrossRef Agumba JN. Validating and identifying health and safety performance improvement indicators: experience of using delphi technique. J J Econ Behav Stud. 2015;7(3):14–22.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rowe G, Wright GJI. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. 1999;15(4):353–75. Rowe G, Wright GJI. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. 1999;15(4):353–75.
28.
go back to reference Woudenberg, FJTf. change s. An evaluation of Delphi. 1991;40(2):131– 50. Woudenberg, FJTf. change s. An evaluation of Delphi. 1991;40(2):131– 50.
29.
go back to reference Rogers MR. Identifying critical cross-cultural school psychology competencies. J J School Psychol. 2002;40(2):115–41.CrossRef Rogers MR. Identifying critical cross-cultural school psychology competencies. J J School Psychol. 2002;40(2):115–41.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hsu CC. Minimizing non-response in the Delphi process: how to respond to non-response. PARE. 2007;12(1):17. Hsu CC. Minimizing non-response in the Delphi process: how to respond to non-response. PARE. 2007;12(1):17.
31.
go back to reference Manca DP, Varnhagen S, Brett MP, Allan GM, Szafran O, Ausford A, et al. Rewards and challenges of family practice: web-based survey using the Delphi method. J Can Family Physician. 2007;53(2):277–86. Manca DP, Varnhagen S, Brett MP, Allan GM, Szafran O, Ausford A, et al. Rewards and challenges of family practice: web-based survey using the Delphi method. J Can Family Physician. 2007;53(2):277–86.
32.
go back to reference Linstone HA. M. T. The delphi method. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA; 1975. Linstone HA. M. T. The delphi method. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA; 1975.
33.
go back to reference Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, McKee CM, Sanderson CF, Askham J, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. J Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i–88. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, McKee CM, Sanderson CF, Askham J, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. J Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i–88.
34.
go back to reference Cottam H, Roe M. Outsourcing of trucking activities by relief organisations. J Humanitarian Assistance. 2004;1(1):1–26. Cottam H, Roe M. Outsourcing of trucking activities by relief organisations. J Humanitarian Assistance. 2004;1(1):1–26.
35.
go back to reference Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. J Technol Forecas Social Change. 2006;73(5):467–82.CrossRef Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. J Technol Forecas Social Change. 2006;73(5):467–82.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Chu HC. A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. J Expert Syst Appl. 2008;34(4):2826–40.CrossRef Chu HC. A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. J Expert Syst Appl. 2008;34(4):2826–40.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Fry M. Using the Delphi technique to design a self-reporting triage survey tool. J Accid Emerg Nurs. 2001;9(4):235–41.CrossRef Fry M. Using the Delphi technique to design a self-reporting triage survey tool. J Accid Emerg Nurs. 2001;9(4):235–41.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J. The Delphi method for graduate research. J Inform Technol Education: Res. 2007;6(1):1–21. Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J. The Delphi method for graduate research. J Inform Technol Education: Res. 2007;6(1):1–21.
39.
go back to reference Rahmani A, Vaziri Nezhad R, Ahmadi Nia H. Methodological principles and applications of the Delphi Method: a narrative review. J J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2020;19(5):515–38. Rahmani A, Vaziri Nezhad R, Ahmadi Nia H. Methodological principles and applications of the Delphi Method: a narrative review. J J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2020;19(5):515–38.
40.
go back to reference Toelch U, Ostwald D. Digital open science teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(7). Toelch U, Ostwald D. Digital open science teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(7).
41.
go back to reference Bezuidenhout L, Quick R, Shanahan H. Ethics when you least expect it: a Modular Approach to Short Course Data Ethics instruction. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020;26(4):2189–213.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bezuidenhout L, Quick R, Shanahan H. Ethics when you least expect it: a Modular Approach to Short Course Data Ethics instruction. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020;26(4):2189–213.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Penev L. From Open Access to Open Science from the viewpoint of a scholarly publisher. RIO. 2017;3. Penev L. From Open Access to Open Science from the viewpoint of a scholarly publisher. RIO. 2017;3.
43.
go back to reference Lacey J, Coates R, Herington M. Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers. J Responsible Innov. 2020;7(3):427–49.CrossRef Lacey J, Coates R, Herington M. Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers. J Responsible Innov. 2020;7(3):427–49.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Zhu Y. Do new forms of scholarly communication provide a pathway to open science? [Electronic Thesis or Dissertation]: University of Manchester; 2015. Zhu Y. Do new forms of scholarly communication provide a pathway to open science? [Electronic Thesis or Dissertation]: University of Manchester; 2015.
45.
go back to reference Rowhani-Farid A. Towards a culture of open science and data sharing in health and medical research. Queensland University of Technology; 2018. Rowhani-Farid A. Towards a culture of open science and data sharing in health and medical research. Queensland University of Technology; 2018.
Metadata
Title
Design and validation of a conceptual model regarding impact of open science on healthcare research processes
Authors
Maryam Zarghani
Leila Nemati-Anaraki
Shahram Sedghi
Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli
Anisa Rowhani-Farid
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10764-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Health Services Research 1/2024 Go to the issue