Top

Published in:

13-03-2022 | Original Paper

Description and First Steps Toward the Empirical Validation of the Plan Formulation Method for Couples

Authors: Martina Rodomonti, Valeria Crisafulli, Sveva Angrisani, Emma De Luca, Silvia Mazzoni, Francesco Gazzillo

Published in: Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy | Issue 3/2022

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to empirically assess the reliability of the plan formulation method for couples, a procedure for formulating the case, planning, and monitoring the couple therapies according to control-mastery theory. We hypothesized that when couples are looking for couple therapy, they have an unconscious couple’s plan for the therapy, which includes the couple’s goals; the pathogenic beliefs that the partners want to disprove; the traumas from which these beliefs originated and that the partners want to master; the vicious relational circles that make the couple suffer and that the couple wants to break; the virtuous relational circles that are expressions of the couple’s resources and that the couple wants to fuel; and the relational insights that may help the couple get better. Our study involved 15 couples treated by four experienced therapists. Four raters independently formulated each couple’s plan based on the first three sessions following a standard procedure, and we calculated the intraclass correlation for pooled judges’ ratings. For a subsample of three couples—who before and after treatment had completed the dyadic adjustment scale (DAS) and the outcome questionnaire-45.2 (OQ-45.2)—the compatibility of the therapists’ interventions with the couples’ and partners’ plans was assessed. The relationship between the ratings of compatibility, DAS and OQ-45.2, was assessed. The results showed excellent interjudge reliability for each couple’s plan formulation (average ICC = 0.82), attesting to the validity of the procedure; and preliminary data on the therapeutic process suggested that therapists’ interventions compatible with couple’s plans could help partners achieve good outcomes.

Andolfi, M. (2011). The Couple: Evolution and Crisis in a Three-Generation Perspective: In Search of the Fundamentals. Thérapie Familiale, 32(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.3917/tf.111.0005CrossRef

Barbato, A., & D’Avanzo, B. (2020). The Findings of a Cochrane Meta-Analysis of Couple Therapy in Adult Depression: Implications for Research and Clinical Practice. Family Process, 59, 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12540CrossRefPubMed

Bargh, J. A. (2017). Before you know it: The unconscious reasons we do what we do. Touchstone.

Carr, A. (2019). Couple therapy, family therapy and systemic interventions for adult-focused problems: The current evidence base. Journal of Family Therapy, 41(4), 492–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12225CrossRef

Caston, J. (1980). Plan diagnosis reliability and studies on the effect of intervention (Bulletin Bo. 4). The Psychotherapy Research Group of Mount Zion Hospital and Medical Center.

Chiappelli, M., Coco, G. L., Gullo, S., Bensi, L., & Prestano, C. (2008). L’Outcome Questionnaire 45.2. Adattamento italiano di uno strumento per la valutazione dei trattamenti psicologici. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 17(2), 152CrossRef

Christensen, A., & Doss, B. D. (2017). Integrative behavioral couple therapy. Current opinion in psychology, 13, 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.022CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Crisafulli, V., & Rodomonti, M. (2017). Il metodo per la formulazione del piano di coppia (PFMC)/the couple plan formulation method (PFMC). In E. De Luca, F. Genova, & F. Gazzillo (Eds.), Esplorazioni teoriche-cliniche. Il primo anno del CMT-IG [theoretical and clinical explorations. The first year of the CMT-IG] (pp. 172–187). CMT-IG editions.

Curtis, J. T., Silberschatz, G., Sampson, H., & Weiss, J. (1994). The plan formulation method. Psychotherapy Research, 4, 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503309412331334032CrossRef

D’Aniello, C., & Fife, S. T. (2020). A 20-year review of common factors research in marriage and family therapy: A mixed methods content analysis. Journal of marital and family therapy, 46(4), 701–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12427CrossRefPubMed

Epstein, N. B., & Zheng, L. (2017). Cognitive-behavioral couple therapy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.09.004CrossRefPubMed

Ferguson, R. J., Robinson, A. B., & Splaine, M. (2002). Use of the reliable change index to evaluate clinical significance in SF-36 outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 11, 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016350431190.CrossRefPubMed

Fimiani, R., Gazzillo, F., Fiorenza, E., Rodomonti, M., & Silberschatz, G. (2020). Traumas and their consequences according to control-mastery theory. Psychodynamic psychiatry, 48(2), 113–139CrossRef

Gazzillo, F. (2021). Fidarsi dei pazienti. Introduzione alla control-mastery theory. Raffaello Cortina editore.

Gazzillo, F., Dimaggio, G., & Curtis, J. T. (2021). Case formulation and treatment planning: How to take care of relationship and symptoms together. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 31(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000185CrossRef

Gazzillo, F., Genova, F., Fedeli, F., Dazzi, N., Bush, M., Curtis, J. T., & Silberschatz, G. (2019). Patients unconscious testing activity in psychotherapy: A theoretical an empirical overview. Psychoanalytic Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000227.CrossRef

Gentili, P., Contreras, L., Cassaniti, M., & D’Arista, F. (2002). La dyadic adjustment scale: Una misura dell’adattamento di coppia. Minerva Psichiatrica, 43(2), 107–116.

Gurman, A. S., Lebow, J. L., & Snyder, D. K. (2015). Clinical handbook of couple therapy (5th ed.). Guilford Publication.

Halford, W. K., Pepping, C. A., & Petch, J. (2016). The gap between couple therapy research efficacy and practice effectiveness. Journal of marital and family therapy, 42(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12120CrossRefPubMed

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of chiropractic medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., Umphress, V., Lunnen, K., Okiishi, J., Burlingame, G. M., & Reisinger, C. W. (1996). Administration and scoring manual for the outcome questionnaire (OQ-45.2). American Professional Credentialing Services.

Lebow, J. L. (2019). Current issues in the practice of integrative couple and family therapy. Family process, 58(3), 610–628. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12473CrossRefPubMed

O’Connor, L. E., Edelstein, S., Berry, J., & Weiss, J. (1994). The pattern of insight in brief psychotherapy: two pilot studies. Psychotherapy, 31, 51–74

Rodomonti, M., Crisafulli, V., Mazzoni, S., & Gazzillo, F. (2018). Una bussola per la comprensione delle dinamiche di coppia: il metodo per la formulazione del piano della coppia (MFPc). Ricerche di Psicologia, 4, 659–677. https://doi.org/10.3280/RIP2018-004007.CrossRef

Rodomonti, M., Crisafulli, V., Mazzoni, S., Curtis, J. T., & Gazzillo, F. (2019). The plan formulation method for couples. Psychoanalytic Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000246.CrossRef

Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420CrossRefPubMed

Silberschatz, G. (2008). How patients work on their plans and test their therapists in psychotherapy. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 78(2–3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377310802114528CrossRef

Silberschatz, G. (2017). Improving the yield of psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1076202CrossRefPubMed

Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547CrossRef

Weiss, J. (1986). The patient’s unconscious work. In J. Weiss, H. Sampson, & The Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group (Eds.), The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation, and empirical research (pp. 101–116). The Guilford Press.

Weiss, J. (1990). The centrality of adaptation. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 26, 660–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.1990.10746684CrossRef

Weiss, J. (1993). How psychotherapy works: Process and technique. The Guilford Press.

Weiss, J., Sampson, H., The Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group. (1986). The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation, and empirical research. The Guilford Press.

Zeitlin, D. J. (1991). Control-mastery theory in couples therapy. Family Therapy, 18, 201.

Title: Description and First Steps Toward the Empirical Validation of the Plan Formulation Method for Couples
Authors: Martina Rodomonti
Valeria Crisafulli
Sveva Angrisani
Emma De Luca
Silvia Mazzoni
Francesco Gazzillo
Publication date: 13-03-2022
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0022-0116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3564
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-022-09534-x

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Description and First Steps Toward the Empirical Validation of the Plan Formulation Method for Couples

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

The 5th Annual psyche awards: celebrating excellence in scholarship

Correction to: Comparison Study of the Effects of Resistance and Endurance Exercise Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: A Meta-Analytical Review

Using Motivational Monitoring to Evaluate the Efficacy of Self-disclosure and Self-involving Interventions

Patient Perspectives on Co-Therapists’ Behaviors in Group CBT

Comparison Study of the Effects of Resistance and Endurance Exercise Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: A Meta-Analytical Review

Patients’ Tests and Clinicians’ Emotions: A Clinical Illustration