Top

Clinical Oral Investigations

Published in:

Open Access 01-04-2021 | Denture | Original Article

Oral health-related impact profile of patients treated with fixed, removable, and telescopic dental prostheses in student courses—a prospective bicenter clinical trial

Authors: Anja Liebermann, K. Erdelt, I. Lente, D. Edelhoff, M. Schmitter, A. Winter

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 4/2021

Abstract

Objectives

To analyze the oral health-related impact profile in patients treated with three different types of dental prosthesis in student courses.

Materials and Methods

This prospective bicenter clinical trial was conducted with 151 patients being treated with fixed (n = 70), removable (n = 61), or telescopic dental prostheses (n = 20) in clinical student courses of two German universities from October 2018 to October 2019. All patients completed three standardized German versions of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G49/53) before prosthetic treatment (T0), at control after 1 week (T1), and after 3 months (T2), divided into five dimensions: (a) appearance, (b) oral function, (c) psychosocial impact, (d) linguistic limitations, and (e) orofacial pain. Data were analyzed with Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Wilcoxon signed-rank, Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney, and Cronbach’s alpha tests.

Results

Within T0–T1 and T0–T2, greater improvements were determined for removable compared with fixed dental prostheses for the dimensions’ oral function (p ≤ 0.014), linguistic limitations (p ≤ 0.016), and appearance (p ≤ 0.003). No significant differences were found between fixed and telescopic dental prostheses (p ≥ 0.104) or between removable (partial dental prosthesis with clasps and complete dental prosthesis) and telescopic dental prostheses (p ≥ 0.100). Within T1–T2, a significant improvement in orofacial pain could be determined (p = 0.007).

Conclusions

Restorations presented an improvement in oral health-related quality of life. Removable dental prostheses showed better improvement than fixed ones in various dimensions.

Clinical relevance

Knowledge about the influence of oral health-related quality of life on the three different types of prosthesis used in student courses can be of decisive help in dental consultations.

Gift HC, Atchison KA (1995) Oral health, health, and health-related quality of life. Med Care 33:NS57–NS77 ReviewCrossRef

John MT, Rener-Sitar K, Baba K, Čelebić A, Larsson P, Szabo G, Norton WE, Reissmann DR (2016) Patterns of impaired oral health-related quality of life dimensions. J Oral Rehabil 43:519–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12396CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

John MT, Reißmann DR, Feuerstahler L, Waller N, Baba K, Larsson P, Čelebić A, Szabo G, Rener-Sitar K (2014) Factor analyses of the Oral Health Impact Profile - overview and studied population. J Prosthodont Res 58:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2013.11.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ellis JS, Pelekis ND, Thomason JM (2007) Conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patients: the impact on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction. J Prosthodont 16:37–42CrossRef

McKenna G, Allen PF, O’Mahony D, Cronin M, DaMata C, Woods N (2015) The impact of rehabilitation using removable partial dentures and functionally orientated treatment on oral health-related quality of life: a randomised controlled clinical trial. J Dent 43:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.006CrossRefPubMed

Kende D, Szabó G, Marada G, Szentpétery A (2008) Impact of prosthetic care on oral health related quality of life. Fogorv Sz 101:49–57 HungarianPubMed

Jenei Á, Sándor J, Hegedűs C, Bágyi K, Nagy L, Kiss C, Szabó G, Márton IJ (2015) Oral health-related quality of life after prosthetic rehabilitation: a longitudinal study with the OHIP questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 13:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0289-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mehl C, Kern M, Freitag-Wolf S, Wolfart M, Brunzel S, Wolfart S (2009) Does the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire measure dental appearance? Int J Prosthodont 22:87–93PubMed

Alrumyyan A, Quwayhis S, Meaigel S, Almedlej R, Alolaiq R, Bin Nafesah R, Almutairi M, Alzamil S (2020) Oral health-related quality of life and oral hygiene practice of adults with fixed dental prostheses in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dent 10:62–68. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_347_19 eCollection 2020 Jan-FebCrossRef

10.

John MT, Feuerstahler L, Waller N, Baba K, Larsson P, Celebić A, Kende D, Rener-Sitar K, Reissmann DR (2014) Confirmatory factor analysis of the Oral Health Impact Profile. J Oral Rehabil 41:644–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Bassetti RG, Mericske-Stern R, Enkling N (2016) Are there differences in the changes in oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) depending on the type (rigidity) of prosthetic treatment? Quintessence Int 47:749–757. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a36384CrossRefPubMed

12.

Szabó G, John MT, Szántó I, Marada G, Kende D, Szentpétery A (2011) Impaired oral health-related quality of life in Hungary. Acta Odontol Scand 69:108–117. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.538717CrossRefPubMed

13.

AlZarea BK (2017) Oral health related quality-of-life outcomes of partially edentulous patients treated with implant-supported single crowns or fixed partial dentures. J Clin Exp Dent 9:e666–e671. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53661 eCollection 2017 MayCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Sischo L, Broder HL (2011) Oral health-related quality of life: what, why, how, and future implications. J Dent Res 90:1264–1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511399918CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Liebermann A, Edelhoff D, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Grünewald E (2018) Oral health-related impact profile in full-mouth restored patients with two different tooth-colored restoration materials. Clin Oral Investig 23:1625–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2580-1CrossRefPubMed

16.

Locker D (1988) Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Commun Dent Health 5:3–18 Review

17.

Viola AP, Takamiya AS, Monteiro DR, Barbosa DB (2013) Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction before and after treatment with complete dentures in a Dental School in Brazil. J Prosthodont Res 57:36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2012.08.003CrossRefPubMed

18.

Grossmann AC, Hassel AJ, Schilling O, Lehmann F, Koob A, Rammelsberg P (2007) Treatment with double crown-retained removable partial dentures and oral health-related quality of life in middle- and high-aged patients. Int J Prosthodont 20:576–578PubMed

19.

Petricevic N, Celebic A, Rener-Sitar (2012) A 3-year longitudinal study of quality-of-life outcomes of elderly patients with implant- and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures in posterior dental regions. Gerodontology 29:e956–e963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00592.xCrossRefPubMed

20.

Øzhayat EB, Gotfredsen K (2019) Patient-reported effect of oral rehabilitation. J Oral Rehabil 46:369–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12756CrossRefPubMed

21.

Klink A, Groten M, Huettig (2018) Complete rehabilitation of compromised full dentitions with adhesively bonded all-ceramic single-tooth restorations: Long-term outcome in patients with and without amelogenesis imperfecta. J Dent 70:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.011CrossRefPubMed

22.

Özhayat EB, Gotfredsen K (2012) Effect of treatment with fixed and removable dental prostheses. An oral health-related quality of life study. J Oral Rehabil 39:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02245.xCrossRefPubMed

23.

Knipfer C, Bocklet T, Noeth E, Schuster M, Sokol B, Eitner S, Nkenke E, Stelzle F (2012) Speech intelligibility enhancement through maxillary dental rehabilitation with telescopic prostheses and complete dentures: a prospective study using automatic, computer-based speech analysis. Int J Prosthodont 25:24–32PubMed

24.

Broka K, Vidzis A, Grigorjevs J, Sokolovs J, Zigurs G (2013) The influence of the design of removable dentures on patient’s voice quality. Stomatologija 15:20–25PubMed

25.

John MT, LeResche L, Koepsell TD, Hujoel P, Miglioretti DL, Micheelis W (2003) Oral health-related quality of life in Germany. Eur J Oral Sci 111:483–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0909-8836.2003.00079.xCrossRefPubMed

26.

Bae KH, Kim C, Paik DI, Kim JB (2006) A comparison of oral health related quality of life between complete and partial removable denture-wearing older adults in Korea. J Oral Rehabil 33:317–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01565.xCrossRefPubMed

27.

Schierz O, Reissmann D (2016) Influence of guidance concept in complete dentures on oral health related quality of life - canine guidance vs. bilateral balanced occlusion. J Prosthodont Res 60:315–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.03.005CrossRefPubMed

28.

Al-Omiri MK, Karasneh J (2010) Relationship between oral health-related quality of life, satisfaction, and personality in patients with prosthetic rehabilitations. J Prosthodont 19:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00518.xCrossRefPubMed

29.

Deeb MA, Abduljabbar T, Vohra F, Zafar MS, Hussain M (2020) Assessment of factors influencing oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with removable dental prosthesis. Pak J Med Sci 36:213–218. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.1257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Stober T, Danner D, Bömicke W, Hassel AJ (2016) Improvement of oral health-related quality-of-life by use of different kinds of double-crown-retained removable partial dentures. Acta Odontol Scand 74:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.976262CrossRefPubMed

31.

Waller N, John MT, Feuerstahler L, Baba K, Larsson P, Peršić S, Kende D, Reißmann DR, Rener-Sitar K (2016) A 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral health impact profile questionnaire. Clin Oral Investig 20:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1484-6CrossRefPubMed

32.

Stoll R, Cappel I, Jablonski-Momeni A, Pieper K, Stachniss V (2007) Survival of inlays and partial crowns made of IPS empress after a 10-year observation period and in relation to various treatment parameters. Oper Dent 32:556–563CrossRef

Title: Oral health-related impact profile of patients treated with fixed, removable, and telescopic dental prostheses in student courses—a prospective bicenter clinical trial
Authors: Anja Liebermann
K. Erdelt
I. Lente
D. Edelhoff
M. Schmitter
A. Winter
Publication date: 01-04-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword: Denture
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03532-w

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Oral health-related impact profile of patients treated with fixed, removable, and telescopic dental prostheses in student courses—a prospective bicenter clinical trial

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and Methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and Methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Combination of etodolac and dexamethasone improves preemptive analgesia in third molar surgery: a randomized study

Comparison of marginal adaptation and internal fit of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns produced by 4 different CAD/CAM systems

Assessment of gingival thickness using digital file superimposition versus direct clinical measurements

Massive data analyses show negative impact of type 1 and 2 diabetes on the outcome of periodontal treatment

Efficacy of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in reducing inflammation around the teeth and implants: a randomized clinical trial

A novel method for alveolar bone grafting assessment in cleft lip and palate patients: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation