Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2008

01-06-2008 | Original Article

Delivery of Preventive Services to Adults Aged 50–64: Monitoring Performance Using a Composite Measure, 1997–2004

Authors: Douglas Shenson, MD, MPH, MS, Mary Adams, MPH, Julie Bolen, PhD, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Summary

Objective

Population-based rates for the delivery of adult vaccinations or screenings are typically tracked as individual services. The current approach is useful in monitoring progress toward national health goals but does not yield information regarding how many U.S. adults receive a combination of preventive services routinely recommended based on a person’s age and gender. A composite measure is important for policymaking, for developing public health interventions, and for monitoring the quality of clinical care. During the period under study, influenza vaccination was newly recommended (2000) to be routinely delivered to adults in this age range. The objective of the study was to compare the delivery of routine clinical preventive services to U.S. adults aged 50–64 years between 1997 and 2004 using a composite measure that includes cancer screenings and vaccinations.

Design

Data were collected via telephone surveys in 1997, 2002, and 2004 as part of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Participants

The participants were randomly selected adults aged 50–64 years in the 50 states and the District of Columbia in the selected years. Sample sizes ranged from 24,917 to 77,244.

Measurements and Main Results

The composite measure includes screening for colorectal cancer, cervical cancer, breast cancer, and vaccination against influenza (2002 and 2004 only). The composite measure quantifies the percentage of adults who are up-to-date with the complete set according to recommended schedules. With the inclusion of newly recommended influenza vaccination, the percentage of men and women aged 50–64 who were up-to-date on all selected measures in 2004 was 23.4% and 23.0%, respectively, compared with 37.6% and 30.5% in 1997. Without including influenza vaccination, the percentage of up-to-date adults aged 50–64 would have risen in 2004 to 50.5% (men) and to 44.7% (women). For both sexes, results varied by education, race/ethnicity, marriage status, insurance status, health status, and state.

Conclusion

In 2004, the percentage of adults aged 50–64 years receiving routinely recommended cancer screenings and influenza vaccination was low with fewer than 1 in 4 being up to date.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of influenza. Morb Mort Wkly Rep Recomm Rep. 2000;49(RR03):1–38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of influenza. Morb Mort Wkly Rep Recomm Rep. 2000;49(RR03):1–38.
3.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000.
4.
go back to reference U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Clinical Preventive Services for Normal-Risk Adults Recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Put Prevention into Practice, January 2004. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/pocketgd07/. Accessed October 29, 2007. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Clinical Preventive Services for Normal-Risk Adults Recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Put Prevention into Practice, January 2004. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004Available at: http://​www.​ahrq.​gov/​clinic/​pocketgd07/​. Accessed October 29, 2007.
7.
go back to reference Bolen JC, Rhodes L, Powell-Griner EE, Bland SD, Holtzman D. State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000;49(SS-2):1–60. Bolen JC, Rhodes L, Powell-Griner EE, Bland SD, Holtzman D. State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000;49(SS-2):1–60.
10.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State-specific trends in self-reported blood pressure screening and high blood pressure—United States, 1991–1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:456−60. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State-specific trends in self-reported blood pressure screening and high blood pressure—United States, 1991–1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:456−60.
11.
go back to reference Pascual FB, McGinley EL, Zanardi L, Cortese MM, Murphy TV. Tetanus surveillance—United States, 1998–2000. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(SS03):1–8. Pascual FB, McGinley EL, Zanardi L, Cortese MM, Murphy TV. Tetanus surveillance—United States, 1998–2000. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(SS03):1–8.
12.
go back to reference Shenson D, Bolen J, Adams M. Receipt of preventive services by elders based on composite measures, 1997–2004. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(1):11–8.PubMedCrossRef Shenson D, Bolen J, Adams M. Receipt of preventive services by elders based on composite measures, 1997–2004. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(1):11–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nelson DE, Bland S, Powell-Griner E, et al. State trends in health risk factors and receipt of clinical preventive services among US adults during the 1990s. JAMA. 2002;287:2659–67.PubMedCrossRef Nelson DE, Bland S, Powell-Griner E, et al. State trends in health risk factors and receipt of clinical preventive services among US adults during the 1990s. JAMA. 2002;287:2659–67.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1704–13.PubMedCrossRef Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1704–13.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45.PubMedCrossRef McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shenson D. Putting prevention in its place: the shift from clinic to community. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(4):1012–15 (Jul–Aug).CrossRef Shenson D. Putting prevention in its place: the shift from clinic to community. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(4):1012–15 (Jul–Aug).CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Davis RL, Lieu TA, Mell LK, et al. Impact of the change in polio vaccination schedule on immunization coverage rates: a study in two large health maintenance organizations. Pediatrics. 2001;107(4):671–6.PubMedCrossRef Davis RL, Lieu TA, Mell LK, et al. Impact of the change in polio vaccination schedule on immunization coverage rates: a study in two large health maintenance organizations. Pediatrics. 2001;107(4):671–6.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Introducing the guide to community preventive services: methods, first recommendations and expert testimony. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(1S):35–43. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Introducing the guide to community preventive services: methods, first recommendations and expert testimony. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(1S):35–43.
19.
go back to reference Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:635–1.PubMedCrossRef Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:635–1.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sudman SN, Bradburn NM. Effects of time and memory on response in surveys. J Am Stat Assoc. 1973;68:805–5.CrossRef Sudman SN, Bradburn NM. Effects of time and memory on response in surveys. J Am Stat Assoc. 1973;68:805–5.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Newell SA, Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW, Savolainen NJ. The accuracy of self-reported health behaviors and risk factors relating to cancer and cardiovascular disease in the general population: a critical review. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17:211–29.PubMedCrossRef Newell SA, Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW, Savolainen NJ. The accuracy of self-reported health behaviors and risk factors relating to cancer and cardiovascular disease in the general population: a critical review. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17:211–29.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Thornberry OT, Massey JT. Trends in the United States telephone coverage across time and subgroup. In: Groves RM, Biemer PP, Lyberg L, Massey JT, Nichols WL, eds. Telephone Survey Methodology. New York, NY: Wiley; 1988:25–49. Thornberry OT, Massey JT. Trends in the United States telephone coverage across time and subgroup. In: Groves RM, Biemer PP, Lyberg L, Massey JT, Nichols WL, eds. Telephone Survey Methodology. New York, NY: Wiley; 1988:25–49.
23.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in screening for colorectal cancer, US 1997 and 1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50(9):162–6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in screening for colorectal cancer, US 1997 and 1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50(9):162–6.
Metadata
Title
Delivery of Preventive Services to Adults Aged 50–64: Monitoring Performance Using a Composite Measure, 1997–2004
Authors
Douglas Shenson, MD, MPH, MS
Mary Adams, MPH
Julie Bolen, PhD, MPH
Publication date
01-06-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0555-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine