Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 6/2012

Open Access 01-06-2012 | Genetics

Delivery of a chromosomally normal child from an oocyte with reciprocal aneuploid polar bodies

Authors: Richard T. Scott Jr, Nathan R. Treff, John Stevens, Eric J. Forman, Kathleen H. Hong, Mandy G. Katz-Jaffe, William B. Schoolcraft

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To demonstrate that a euploid embryo derived from an oocyte with reciprocal aneuploid polar bodies is capable of producing a chromosomally normal child.

Methods

A case report of maternal MI error compensation where single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray based comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) was performed on the 1st and 2nd polar body, the resulting embryo, and newborn DNA.

Results

CCS performed after embryo transfer identified a chromosomally normal embryo that resulted from an oocyte with reciprocal aneuploid polar bodies. The first polar body was found to be missing a single chromatid derived from chromosome 21 and the second polar body possessed an extra chromatid derived from chromosome 21. Compensation of the maternal meiotic error was verified by CCS analysis of a trophectoderm biopsy from the resulting blastocyst which was euploid for all 23 pairs of chromosomes. DNA fingerprinting and CCS of the resulting newborn confirmed a chromosomally normal child, demonstrating the developmental potential of an oocyte with reciprocal aneuploid polar bodies.

Conclusions

This is the first case report demonstrating the reproductive potential of a chromosomally normal embryo derived from an oocyte which had undergone meiosis I error. Systematic investigation into the frequency of meiosis I error compensation and the negative predictive value of polar body aneuploidy screening for reproductive potential should be conducted in order to confirm clinical relevance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, Levy B, Scott Jr RT. Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2017–21.PubMedCrossRef Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, Levy B, Scott Jr RT. Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2017–21.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Treff NR, Levy B, Su J, Northrop LE, Tao X, Scott Jr RT. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:583–9.PubMedCrossRef Treff NR, Levy B, Su J, Northrop LE, Tao X, Scott Jr RT. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:583–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Northrop LE, Treff NR, Levy B, Scott Jr RT. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:590–600.PubMedCrossRef Northrop LE, Treff NR, Levy B, Scott Jr RT. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:590–600.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Magli MC, Montag M, Koster M, Muzi L, Geraedts J, Collins J et al. Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part II: technical aspects. Human reproduction 2011. Magli MC, Montag M, Koster M, Muzi L, Geraedts J, Collins J et al. Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part II: technical aspects. Human reproduction 2011.
5.
go back to reference Geraedts J, Montag M, Magli MC, Repping S, Handyside A, Staessen C et al. Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results. Human reproduction 2011. Geraedts J, Montag M, Magli MC, Repping S, Handyside A, Staessen C et al. Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results. Human reproduction 2011.
6.
go back to reference Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, Ryan A, Cinnioglu C, Banjevic M, et al. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1066–75.PubMedCrossRef Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, Ryan A, Cinnioglu C, Banjevic M, et al. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1066–75.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schoolcraft WB, Treff NR, Stevens JM, Ferry K, Katz-Jaffe M, Scott RT, Jr. Live birth outcome with trophectoderm biopsy, blastocyst vitrification, and single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based comprehensive chromosome screening in infertile patients. Fertility and sterility 2011;96:638–40.CrossRef Schoolcraft WB, Treff NR, Stevens JM, Ferry K, Katz-Jaffe M, Scott RT, Jr. Live birth outcome with trophectoderm biopsy, blastocyst vitrification, and single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based comprehensive chromosome screening in infertile patients. Fertility and sterility 2011;96:638–40.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Forman EJ, Tao X, Ferry KM, Taylor D, Treff NR, Scott RT, Jr. Single Embryo Transfer with Comprehensive Chromosome Screening Results in Improved Ongoing Pregnancy Rates and Decreased Miscarriage Rates. Human Reproduction 2012;27(4):1217–22.PubMedCrossRef Forman EJ, Tao X, Ferry KM, Taylor D, Treff NR, Scott RT, Jr. Single Embryo Transfer with Comprehensive Chromosome Screening Results in Improved Ongoing Pregnancy Rates and Decreased Miscarriage Rates. Human Reproduction 2012;27(4):1217–22.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Geraedts J, Collins J, Gianaroli L, Goossens V, Handyside A, Harper J, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! Hum Reprod. 2010;25:575–7.PubMedCrossRef Geraedts J, Collins J, Gianaroli L, Goossens V, Handyside A, Harper J, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! Hum Reprod. 2010;25:575–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21:767–80.PubMedCrossRef De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21:767–80.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fishel S, Gordon A, Lynch C, Dowell K, Ndukwe G, Kelada E, et al. Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy-the future of IVF? Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1006e7–e10.CrossRef Fishel S, Gordon A, Lynch C, Dowell K, Ndukwe G, Kelada E, et al. Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy-the future of IVF? Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1006e7–e10.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fishel S, Craig A, Lynch C, Dowell K, Ndukwe G, Jenner L, et al. Assessment of 19,803 paired chromosomes and clinical outcome from first 150 cycles using array CGH of the first polar body for embryo selection and transfer. J Fertiliz In Vitro. 2011;1:1–8. Fishel S, Craig A, Lynch C, Dowell K, Ndukwe G, Jenner L, et al. Assessment of 19,803 paired chromosomes and clinical outcome from first 150 cycles using array CGH of the first polar body for embryo selection and transfer. J Fertiliz In Vitro. 2011;1:1–8.
13.
go back to reference Fragouli E, Jaffe-Katz M, Alfarawati M, Stevens J, Colls P, Goodall N, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening of polar bodies and blastocysts from couples experiencing repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:875–87.PubMedCrossRef Fragouli E, Jaffe-Katz M, Alfarawati M, Stevens J, Colls P, Goodall N, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening of polar bodies and blastocysts from couples experiencing repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:875–87.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Treff NR, Scott Jr RT, Su J, Campos J, Stevens J, Schoolcraft W, et al. Polar body morphology is not predictive of its cell division origin. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:137–9.PubMedCrossRef Treff NR, Scott Jr RT, Su J, Campos J, Stevens J, Schoolcraft W, et al. Polar body morphology is not predictive of its cell division origin. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:137–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Treff NR, Su J, Kasabwala N, Tao X, Miller KA, Scott Jr RT. Robust embryo identification using first polar body single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based DNA fingerprinting. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2453–5.PubMedCrossRef Treff NR, Su J, Kasabwala N, Tao X, Miller KA, Scott Jr RT. Robust embryo identification using first polar body single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based DNA fingerprinting. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2453–5.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, Miller KA, Levy B, Scott Jr RT. A novel single-cell DNA fingerprinting method successfully distinguishes sibling human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:477–84.PubMedCrossRef Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, Miller KA, Levy B, Scott Jr RT. A novel single-cell DNA fingerprinting method successfully distinguishes sibling human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:477–84.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Delhanty JD. Is the polar body approach best for pre-implantation genetic screening? Placenta. 2011;32 Suppl 3:S268–70.PubMedCrossRef Delhanty JD. Is the polar body approach best for pre-implantation genetic screening? Placenta. 2011;32 Suppl 3:S268–70.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Delivery of a chromosomally normal child from an oocyte with reciprocal aneuploid polar bodies
Authors
Richard T. Scott Jr
Nathan R. Treff
John Stevens
Eric J. Forman
Kathleen H. Hong
Mandy G. Katz-Jaffe
William B. Schoolcraft
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9746-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 6/2012 Go to the issue