Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 5/2010

01-10-2010 | Original Clinical Article

Deformity and functional outcome after treatment for supracondylar humerus fractures in children: a 5- to 10-year follow-up of 139 supracondylar humerus fractures treated by plaster cast, skeletal traction or crossed wire fixation

Authors: Sven Young, Jonas M. Fevang, Gunnar Gullaksen, Per T. Nilsen, Lars B. Engesæter

Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

At Haukeland University Hospital (HUH), we used overhead skeletal traction for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF) in children until closed reduction and crossed wire fixation was introduced in the early 1990s. Though there are obvious and well-documented benefits of wire fixation, the aim of this study was to document and compare the results and complication rates for both methods.

Patients and methods

One hundred and thirty-nine patients treated for SCHF between 1988 and 1998 were available for follow-up. Of these, 40 children were treated with a plaster cast, 46 with overhead skeletal traction and 45 with crossed wire fixation. Eight children were treated with open reduction and crossed wires. The mean time to follow-up was 7.1 years [standard deviation (SD) 3.2].

Results

The length of hospital stay was 2 days for those treated with crossed wire fixation compared to 11 days for traction (P < 0.001). The rate of nerve injury in Gartland type 3 fractures was 19%. There was no significant difference in the number of complications or in the functional outcome after skeletal traction or wire fixation, but there were more reoperations in the traction group (P = 0.04). Patients treated solely with a plaster cast had a mean of 4° increased extension of the affected elbow compared to 1° in the crossed pin fixation group (P = 0.02). Though this has little clinical relevance, it does indicate improved reduction in the operated patients, as one would expect.

Conclusions

The introduction of crossed wire fixation has significantly reduced the number of days for which patients are hospitalised for SCHF. The rate of nerve injuries in Gartland type 3 fractures is high. Despite the fact that this study includes the first patients to be treated with crossed wire fixation at our institution, no significant increase in the risk of complications could be found compared to skeletal traction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Culp RW, Osterman AL, Davidson RS, Skirven T, Bora FW Jr (1990) Neural injuries associated with supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1211–1215 Culp RW, Osterman AL, Davidson RS, Skirven T, Bora FW Jr (1990) Neural injuries associated with supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1211–1215
2.
go back to reference Dormans JP, Squillante R, Sharf H (1995) Acute neurovascular complications with supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Hand Surg Am 20:1–4CrossRef Dormans JP, Squillante R, Sharf H (1995) Acute neurovascular complications with supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Hand Surg Am 20:1–4CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kasser JR, Beaty JH (2006) Supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus. In: Beaty JH, Kasser JR (eds) Rockwood and Wilkins’ fractures in children. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 543–589 Kasser JR, Beaty JH (2006) Supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus. In: Beaty JH, Kasser JR (eds) Rockwood and Wilkins’ fractures in children. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 543–589
4.
go back to reference Mubarak SJ, Carroll NC (1979) Volkmann’s contracture in children: aetiology and prevention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 61:285–293 Mubarak SJ, Carroll NC (1979) Volkmann’s contracture in children: aetiology and prevention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 61:285–293
5.
go back to reference Gartland JJ (1959) Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 109:145–154 Gartland JJ (1959) Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 109:145–154
6.
go back to reference Wilkins KE (1997) Supracondylar fractures: what’s new? J Pediatr Orthop B 6:110–116CrossRef Wilkins KE (1997) Supracondylar fractures: what’s new? J Pediatr Orthop B 6:110–116CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dunlop J (1939) Transcondylar fractures of the humerus in childhood. J Bone Joint Surg 21:59–73 Dunlop J (1939) Transcondylar fractures of the humerus in childhood. J Bone Joint Surg 21:59–73
8.
go back to reference Dodge HS (1972) Displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children—treatment by Dunlop’s traction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54:1408–1418 Dodge HS (1972) Displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children—treatment by Dunlop’s traction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54:1408–1418
9.
go back to reference Prietto CA (1979) Supracondylar fractures of the humerus. A comparative study of Dunlop’s traction versus percutaneous pinning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:425–428 Prietto CA (1979) Supracondylar fractures of the humerus. A comparative study of Dunlop’s traction versus percutaneous pinning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:425–428
10.
go back to reference Smith L (1960) Deformity following supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42-A:235–252 Smith L (1960) Deformity following supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42-A:235–252
11.
go back to reference Palmer EE, Niemann KM, Vesely D, Armstrong JH (1978) Supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:653–656 Palmer EE, Niemann KM, Vesely D, Armstrong JH (1978) Supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:653–656
12.
go back to reference Miller OL (1939) Blind nailing of the T fracture of the lower end of the humerus which involves the joint. J Bone Joint Surg 21:933–938 Miller OL (1939) Blind nailing of the T fracture of the lower end of the humerus which involves the joint. J Bone Joint Surg 21:933–938
13.
go back to reference Swenson AL (1948) The treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus by Kirschner-wire transfixion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 30:993–997 Swenson AL (1948) The treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus by Kirschner-wire transfixion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 30:993–997
14.
go back to reference Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL (1974) Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Sixteen years’ experience with long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:263–272 Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL (1974) Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Sixteen years’ experience with long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:263–272
15.
go back to reference Pirone AM, Graham HK, Krajbich JI (1988) Management of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:641–650 Pirone AM, Graham HK, Krajbich JI (1988) Management of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:641–650
16.
go back to reference Kocher MS, Kasser JR, Waters PM, Bae D, Snyder BD, Hresko MT, Hedequist D, Karlin L, Kim YJ, Murray MM, Millis MB, Emans JB, Dichtel L, Matheney T, Lee BM (2007) Lateral entry compared with medial and lateral entry pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:706–712CrossRef Kocher MS, Kasser JR, Waters PM, Bae D, Snyder BD, Hresko MT, Hedequist D, Karlin L, Kim YJ, Murray MM, Millis MB, Emans JB, Dichtel L, Matheney T, Lee BM (2007) Lateral entry compared with medial and lateral entry pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:706–712CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lyons JP, Ashley E, Hoffer MM (1998) Ulnar nerve palsies after percutaneous cross-pinning of supracondylar fractures in children’s elbows. J Pediatr Orthop 18:43–45 Lyons JP, Ashley E, Hoffer MM (1998) Ulnar nerve palsies after percutaneous cross-pinning of supracondylar fractures in children’s elbows. J Pediatr Orthop 18:43–45
18.
go back to reference Beaty JH, Kasser JR (2006) The elbow region: general concepts in the pediatric patient. In: Beaty JH, Kasser JR (eds) Rockwood and Wilkins’ fractures in children. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 529–541 Beaty JH, Kasser JR (2006) The elbow region: general concepts in the pediatric patient. In: Beaty JH, Kasser JR (eds) Rockwood and Wilkins’ fractures in children. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 529–541
19.
go back to reference Brudvik C, Hove LM (2003) Childhood fractures in Bergen, Norway: identifying high-risk groups and activities. J Pediatr Orthop 23:629–634CrossRef Brudvik C, Hove LM (2003) Childhood fractures in Bergen, Norway: identifying high-risk groups and activities. J Pediatr Orthop 23:629–634CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Walmsley PJ, Kelly MB, Robb JE, Annan IH, Porter DE (2006) Delay increases the need for open reduction of type-III supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:528–530CrossRef Walmsley PJ, Kelly MB, Robb JE, Annan IH, Porter DE (2006) Delay increases the need for open reduction of type-III supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:528–530CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Carmichael KD, Joyner K (2006) Quality of reduction versus timing of surgical intervention for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Orthopedics 29:628–632 Carmichael KD, Joyner K (2006) Quality of reduction versus timing of surgical intervention for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Orthopedics 29:628–632
22.
go back to reference Gupta N, Kay RM, Leitch K, Femino JD, Tolo VT, Skaggs DL (2004) Effect of surgical delay on perioperative complications and need for open reduction in supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 24:245–248CrossRef Gupta N, Kay RM, Leitch K, Femino JD, Tolo VT, Skaggs DL (2004) Effect of surgical delay on perioperative complications and need for open reduction in supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 24:245–248CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Iyengar SR, Hoffinger SA, Townsend DR (1999) Early versus delayed reduction and pinning of type III displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: a comparative study. J Orthop Trauma 13:51–55CrossRef Iyengar SR, Hoffinger SA, Townsend DR (1999) Early versus delayed reduction and pinning of type III displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: a comparative study. J Orthop Trauma 13:51–55CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Leet AI, Frisancho J, Ebramzadeh E (2002) Delayed treatment of type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 22:203–207 Leet AI, Frisancho J, Ebramzadeh E (2002) Delayed treatment of type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 22:203–207
25.
go back to reference Mehlman CT, Strub WM, Roy DR, Wall EJ, Crawford AH (2001) The effect of surgical timing on the perioperative complications of treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:323–327 Mehlman CT, Strub WM, Roy DR, Wall EJ, Crawford AH (2001) The effect of surgical timing on the perioperative complications of treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:323–327
26.
go back to reference Sibinski M, Sharma H, Bennet GC (2006) Early versus delayed treatment of extension type-3 supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:380–381CrossRef Sibinski M, Sharma H, Bennet GC (2006) Early versus delayed treatment of extension type-3 supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:380–381CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Deformity and functional outcome after treatment for supracondylar humerus fractures in children: a 5- to 10-year follow-up of 139 supracondylar humerus fractures treated by plaster cast, skeletal traction or crossed wire fixation
Authors
Sven Young
Jonas M. Fevang
Gunnar Gullaksen
Per T. Nilsen
Lars B. Engesæter
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 1863-2521
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2548
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-010-0274-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 5/2010 Go to the issue