Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Original Research

Decisional Conflict During Major Medical Treatment Decision-making: a Survey Study

Authors: Kristen E. Pecanac, PhD, RN, Roger L. Brown, PhD, Hanna B. Kremsreiter

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Both patients and surrogate decision-makers experience decisional conflict when making a major medical treatment decision with life or death implications. The relationship between health literacy and decisional conflict while making a major medical treatment decision is not understood.

Objective

To identify the prevalence of individuals making major medical treatment decisions for themselves or someone else and to explore the relationships between decisional conflict and circumstances of the decision as well as the decision-maker.

Design

Two-phase survey study: in phase 1, we screened for who made a major treatment decision; in phase 2, we asked eligible respondents about their experience making the decision.

Participants

Address-based random sample of 4000 Wisconsin residents; 1072 completed phase 1 and 464 completed phase 2.

Main Measures

We asked respondents about types of decisions made, the most difficult decision made, and characteristics of the decision-maker and the decision. We included the Decisional Conflict Scale and four domains of the Health Literacy Questionnaire. Open-ended questions also allowed respondents to describe their experiences.

Key Results

About 43% of respondents reported making a major medical treatment decision. Decisions about major surgery and life support were regarded as the most difficult decisions. Respondents who made the decision for a spouse/partner (β = 6.65, p = 0.012), parent (β = 9.27, p < 0.001), or someone else (β = 10.7, p < 0.001) had higher decisional conflict. Respondents who reported higher ability to actively engage with healthcare providers (β = − 5.24, p = 0.002) and to understand health information well enough to know what to do (β = − 6.12, p = 0.001) had lower decisional conflict.

Conclusions

The need to make major treatment decisions is likely to increase and making decisions on someone else’s behalf appeared to be especially difficult. Improving communication to encourage patient and family engagement in the decision-making conversation, particularly for individuals with limited health literacy, may be helpful.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Garvelink MM, Boland L, Klein K, et al. Decisional conflict scale findings among patients and surrogates making health decisions: Part II of an anniversary review. Med Decis Making. 2019;39:315-326.CrossRef Garvelink MM, Boland L, Klein K, et al. Decisional conflict scale findings among patients and surrogates making health decisions: Part II of an anniversary review. Med Decis Making. 2019;39:315-326.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Heyland DK, Heyland R, Dodek P, et al. Discordance between patients’ stated values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care: Results of a multicentre survey. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017;7:292-299.CrossRef Heyland DK, Heyland R, Dodek P, et al. Discordance between patients’ stated values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care: Results of a multicentre survey. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017;7:292-299.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Silveira MJ, Kim SY, Langa, KM. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1211-1218.CrossRef Silveira MJ, Kim SY, Langa, KM. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1211-1218.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chiarchiaro J, Buddadhumaruk P, Arnold RM, White DB. Prior advance care planning is associated with less decisional conflict among surrogates for critically ill patients. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12;1528-1533.CrossRef Chiarchiaro J, Buddadhumaruk P, Arnold RM, White DB. Prior advance care planning is associated with less decisional conflict among surrogates for critically ill patients. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12;1528-1533.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Orom H, Biddle C, Underwood W 3rd, Nelson CJ, Homish DL. What is a “good” treatment decision? decisional control, knowledge, treatment decision making, and quality of life in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Med Decis Making. 2016;36:714-25.CrossRef Orom H, Biddle C, Underwood W 3rd, Nelson CJ, Homish DL. What is a “good” treatment decision? decisional control, knowledge, treatment decision making, and quality of life in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Med Decis Making. 2016;36:714-25.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kremer H, Ironson G, Schneiderman N, Hautzinger M. “It’s my body”: Does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict? Med Decis Making. 2007;27:522-32.CrossRef Kremer H, Ironson G, Schneiderman N, Hautzinger M. “It’s my body”: Does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict? Med Decis Making. 2007;27:522-32.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health. 2013;13;658.CrossRef Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health. 2013;13;658.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Song MK, Sereika SM. An evaluation of the Decisional Conflict Scale for measuring the quality of end-of-life decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:397-404.CrossRef Song MK, Sereika SM. An evaluation of the Decisional Conflict Scale for measuring the quality of end-of-life decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:397-404.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pecanac KE, Brown RL, Steingrub J, Anderson W, Matthay MA, White DB. A psychometric study of the decisional conflict scale in surrogate decision makers. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101:1957-1965.CrossRef Pecanac KE, Brown RL, Steingrub J, Anderson W, Matthay MA, White DB. A psychometric study of the decisional conflict scale in surrogate decision makers. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101:1957-1965.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1996;267-288. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1996;267-288.
13.
go back to reference Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–115.CrossRef Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–115.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference O’Connor AM, Drake ER, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Laupacis A, Elmslie T. A survey of the decision-making needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions. Health Expect. 2003;6:97-109.CrossRef O’Connor AM, Drake ER, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Laupacis A, Elmslie T. A survey of the decision-making needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions. Health Expect. 2003;6:97-109.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sprung CL, Ricou B, Hartog CS, et al. Changes in End-of-Life Practices in European Intensive Care Units From 1999 to 2016. JAMA. 2019:1-12. Sprung CL, Ricou B, Hartog CS, et al. Changes in End-of-Life Practices in European Intensive Care Units From 1999 to 2016. JAMA. 2019:1-12.
16.
go back to reference Aboumatar HJ, Carson KA, Beach MC, Roter DL, Cooper LA. The impact of health literacy on desire for participation in healthcare, medical visit communication, and patient reported outcomes among patients with hypertension. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:1469-1476.CrossRef Aboumatar HJ, Carson KA, Beach MC, Roter DL, Cooper LA. The impact of health literacy on desire for participation in healthcare, medical visit communication, and patient reported outcomes among patients with hypertension. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:1469-1476.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Morony S, et al. Can adults with low literacy understand shared decision making questions? A qualitative investigation. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:1796-1802.CrossRef Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Morony S, et al. Can adults with low literacy understand shared decision making questions? A qualitative investigation. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:1796-1802.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference McNeil A, Arena R. The evolution of health literacy and communication: Introducing health harmonics. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;59:463-470.CrossRef McNeil A, Arena R. The evolution of health literacy and communication: Introducing health harmonics. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;59:463-470.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ingersoll LT, Saeed F, Ladwig S, et al. Feeling heard and understood in the hospital environment: Benchmarking communication quality among patients with advanced cancer before and after palliative care consultation. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;56:239-244.CrossRef Ingersoll LT, Saeed F, Ladwig S, et al. Feeling heard and understood in the hospital environment: Benchmarking communication quality among patients with advanced cancer before and after palliative care consultation. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;56:239-244.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sanders JJ, Curtis JR, Tulsky JA. Achieving goal-concordant care: A conceptual model and approach to measuring serious illness communication and its impact. J Palliat Med. 2018;21:S17-S27CrossRef Sanders JJ, Curtis JR, Tulsky JA. Achieving goal-concordant care: A conceptual model and approach to measuring serious illness communication and its impact. J Palliat Med. 2018;21:S17-S27CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tulsky JA, Beach MC, Butow, PN, et al. A research agenda for communication between health care professionals and patients living with serious illness. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1361-1366.CrossRef Tulsky JA, Beach MC, Butow, PN, et al. A research agenda for communication between health care professionals and patients living with serious illness. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1361-1366.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Johnson CC, Suchyta MR, Darowski ES, et al. Psychological sequelae in family caregivers of critically iii intensive care unit patients. A systematic review. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16:894-909.CrossRef Johnson CC, Suchyta MR, Darowski ES, et al. Psychological sequelae in family caregivers of critically iii intensive care unit patients. A systematic review. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16:894-909.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Davidson JE, Jones C, Bienvenu OJ. Family response to critical illness: Postintensive care syndrome-family. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:618-624.CrossRef Davidson JE, Jones C, Bienvenu OJ. Family response to critical illness: Postintensive care syndrome-family. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:618-624.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Peltier WL, Gani F, Blissitt J, et al. Initial experience with “Honoring Choices Wisconsin”: Implementation of an advance care planning pilot in a tertiary care setting. J Palliat Med. 2017;20:998–1003.CrossRef Peltier WL, Gani F, Blissitt J, et al. Initial experience with “Honoring Choices Wisconsin”: Implementation of an advance care planning pilot in a tertiary care setting. J Palliat Med. 2017;20:998–1003.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pecanac KE, Repenshek MF, Tennenbaum D, et al. Respecting Choices® and Advance Directives in a Diverse Community. J Palliat Med. 2014;17:282-287.CrossRef Pecanac KE, Repenshek MF, Tennenbaum D, et al. Respecting Choices® and Advance Directives in a Diverse Community. J Palliat Med. 2014;17:282-287.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hammes BJ, Rooney BL. Death and end-of-life planning in one Midwestern community. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:383-390.CrossRef Hammes BJ, Rooney BL. Death and end-of-life planning in one Midwestern community. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:383-390.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Decisional Conflict During Major Medical Treatment Decision-making: a Survey Study
Authors
Kristen E. Pecanac, PhD, RN
Roger L. Brown, PhD
Hanna B. Kremsreiter
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06125-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2021 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine