Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Original Scientific Report

Decision-Making in the Emergency Laparotomy: A Mixed Methodology Study

Authors: Louise Hendra, Tim Hendra, Stephen J. Parker

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

More than 30,000 emergency laparotomies take place annually in England and Wales (Symons et al. in Br J Surg 100(10):1318–1325, 2013; Shapter et al. in Anaesthesia 67(5):474–478, 2012). They are associated with high morbidity and an average inpatient 30-day mortality rate of 11%. Inextricably linked to outcomes is the decision-making process of whether or not to operate (NELA Project Team First patient report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. RCoA, London, 2015; Crebbin et al. in Aust N Z J Surg 83(6):422–428, 2013). A mixed-methods study was undertaken to investigate decision-making in the emergency laparotomy and influencing factors.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were undertaken amongst general surgeons, exploring the decision-making process. Results helped guide design of an online survey, consisting of vignettes and subsequent questions. Respondents were asked to decide whether or not they would perform a laparotomy for each vignette and the results compared to grade, risk attitudes and reflective practice. Responses were analysed for effect of previous positive and negative experiences and for consistency.

Results

Interviews revealed multiple important factors when considering whether or not to perform an emergency laparotomy, broadly categorised into patient-related, surgeon-related and external factors. A total of 116 general surgeons completed the survey: 12 SHOs, 79 registrars and 25 consultants. Non-consultants were 10.4% (95% CI ±9.7%) more likely to perform an emergency laparotomy than consultants (p = 0.036) on multivariate analysis. No association was observed between operative practices and risk attitudes (p = 0.22), reflective practice (p = 0.7) or previous positive or negative experiences in univariate (p = 0.67) or multivariate analysis. Surgeons were not proven to be either consistent nor inconsistent in their decision-making.

Conclusion

The decision to operate or not in an emergency laparotomy directly effects patient outcome. This study demonstrates a difference in decision-making and risk attitudes between consultants and their juniors. To address this, formal teaching of models of decision-making, influencing factors and vignette-based consultant-led discussions should be introduced into surgical training.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Symons NRA, Moorthy K, Almoudaris AM et al (2013) Mortality in high-risk emergency general surgical admissions. Br J Surg 100(10):1318–1325CrossRefPubMed Symons NRA, Moorthy K, Almoudaris AM et al (2013) Mortality in high-risk emergency general surgical admissions. Br J Surg 100(10):1318–1325CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Shapter SL, Paul MJ, White SM (2012) Incidence and estimated annual cost of emergency laparotomy in England: Is there a major funding shortfall? Anaesthesia 67(5):474–478CrossRefPubMed Shapter SL, Paul MJ, White SM (2012) Incidence and estimated annual cost of emergency laparotomy in England: Is there a major funding shortfall? Anaesthesia 67(5):474–478CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference NELA Project Team (2015) First patient report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. RCoA, London NELA Project Team (2015) First patient report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. RCoA, London
4.
go back to reference Crebbin W, Beasley SW, Watters DAK (2013) Clinical decision making: How surgeons do it. Aust N Z J Surg 83(6):422–428CrossRef Crebbin W, Beasley SW, Watters DAK (2013) Clinical decision making: How surgeons do it. Aust N Z J Surg 83(6):422–428CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Szatmary P, Arora S, Sevdalis N (2010) To operate or not to operate? A multi-method analysis of decision-making in emergency surgery. Am J Surg 200(2):298–304CrossRefPubMed Szatmary P, Arora S, Sevdalis N (2010) To operate or not to operate? A multi-method analysis of decision-making in emergency surgery. Am J Surg 200(2):298–304CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Francis DMA (2009) Surgical decision making. Aust N Z J Surg 79(12):886–891CrossRef Francis DMA (2009) Surgical decision making. Aust N Z J Surg 79(12):886–891CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sutton PA, Hornby ST, Vimalachandran D, McNally S (2015) Instinct, intuition and surgical decision-making. RCS Bull 97(8):345–347 Sutton PA, Hornby ST, Vimalachandran D, McNally S (2015) Instinct, intuition and surgical decision-making. RCS Bull 97(8):345–347
9.
go back to reference Campbell G, Watters DAK (2013) Making decisions in emergency surgery. Aust N Z J Surg 83(6):429–433CrossRef Campbell G, Watters DAK (2013) Making decisions in emergency surgery. Aust N Z J Surg 83(6):429–433CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tubbs EP, Elrod JA, Flum DR (2006) Risk taking and the tolerance of uncertainty: implications for surgeons. J Surg Res 131(1):1–6CrossRefPubMed Tubbs EP, Elrod JA, Flum DR (2006) Risk taking and the tolerance of uncertainty: implications for surgeons. J Surg Res 131(1):1–6CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Long JS (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, p 54 Long JS (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, p 54
14.
go back to reference Nakata Y, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Goto T, Morita S (2000) Risk attitudes of anaesthesiologists and surgeons in clinical decision making with expected years of life. J Clin Anaesth 12(2):146–150CrossRef Nakata Y, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Goto T, Morita S (2000) Risk attitudes of anaesthesiologists and surgeons in clinical decision making with expected years of life. J Clin Anaesth 12(2):146–150CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Decision-Making in the Emergency Laparotomy: A Mixed Methodology Study
Authors
Louise Hendra
Tim Hendra
Stephen J. Parker
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4849-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

World Journal of Surgery 3/2019 Go to the issue