Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2018

01-02-2018 | Original Article

Decision Delivery Interval in Emergency and Urgent Caesarean Sections: Need to Reconsider the Recommendations?

Authors: Nalini Mishra, Ruchi Gupta, Nomita Singh

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The timeline between a decision made and delivery of the baby is termed decision delivery interval (DDI). According to current recommendations, an emergency caesarean section must be performed within 30 min of the decision. The present study was conducted with an objective to assess DDI in a busy obstetric unit in India and its impact on obstetric outcome.

Material and Method

A total of 480 women with indications of category I (emergency): Immediate threat to life of woman or foetus (n = 66), and category II (urgent): Maternal or foetal compromise but not immediately life-threatening (n = 414), were studied in the context of DDI and composite adverse perinatal outcomes including fresh stillbirth, 5-min Apgar score <7 and NICU admission.

Result

Recommended DDI of <30 min could be achieved in 30% cases of emergency CS only. Sixty-three per cent with prolapsed cord could be delivered within 30 min. The composite neonatal outcomes were not significantly increased up to DDI of 60 min for category I (emergency) (except in prolapsed cord) and up to 90 min in category II (urgent) caesarean sections.

Conclusion

Authors propose reconsideration of the present recommendations of DDI in categories I and II, while Crash CS (cord prolapse or catastrophic antepartum haemorrhage) should be a separate group with recommended DDI of 30 min. For the remaining cases in the present emergency CS group, the suggested DDI of 60 and, for urgent group, 90 min may be made following further studies to prevent this DDI yardstick from becoming a rod at our back.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Classification of urgency of caesarean section—a continuum of risk (Good Practice No. 11). London: RCOG Press; 2010. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Classification of urgency of caesarean section—a continuum of risk (Good Practice No. 11). London: RCOG Press; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Clinical negligence scheme for trusts clinical risk management standards for Acute Trusts Level 3 Assessment of Barts and the London NHS Trust 22nd and 23rd November 2010. Clinical negligence scheme for trusts clinical risk management standards for Acute Trusts Level 3 Assessment of Barts and the London NHS Trust 22nd and 23rd November 2010.
3.
go back to reference Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6–11.CrossRefPubMed Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6–11.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cerbinskaite A, Malone S, McDermott J, et al. Emergency caesarean section: influences on the decision-to-delivery interval. J Pregnancy. Volume 2011, Article ID 640379, doi:10.1155/2011/640379. Cerbinskaite A, Malone S, McDermott J, et al. Emergency caesarean section: influences on the decision-to-delivery interval. J Pregnancy. Volume 2011, Article ID 640379, doi:10.​1155/​2011/​640379.
5.
go back to reference Kei-Man CHOW, Shui-Lam MAK. Maternal and fetal outcomes in extremely urgent caesarean delivery in relation to the decision-to delivery interval. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery. 2015;15(1):16–22. Kei-Man CHOW, Shui-Lam MAK. Maternal and fetal outcomes in extremely urgent caesarean delivery in relation to the decision-to delivery interval. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery. 2015;15(1):16–22.
6.
go back to reference Chukwudi OE, Okonkwo CA. Decision—delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(5):946–50.PubMedPubMedCentral Chukwudi OE, Okonkwo CA. Decision—delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(5):946–50.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Oppong SA, Tuuli MG, Seffah JD, et al. Is there a safe limit of delay for emergency caesarean section in ghana? results of analysis of early perinatal outcome. Ghana Med J. 2014;48(1):24–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oppong SA, Tuuli MG, Seffah JD, et al. Is there a safe limit of delay for emergency caesarean section in ghana? results of analysis of early perinatal outcome. Ghana Med J. 2014;48(1):24–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Amankwah Y, Walker M. A prospective study of the efficiency of the “code 333” process at the Ottawa hospital. JOGC. 2011;33(3):244–51.PubMed Amankwah Y, Walker M. A prospective study of the efficiency of the “code 333” process at the Ottawa hospital. JOGC. 2011;33(3):244–51.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Umar UA, Gaya SA. Outcome of umbilical cord prolapse at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, North-Western Nigeria. Niger J Basic Clin Sci. 2015;12:20–4.CrossRef Umar UA, Gaya SA. Outcome of umbilical cord prolapse at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, North-Western Nigeria. Niger J Basic Clin Sci. 2015;12:20–4.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Leung TY, Chung PW, Rogers MS, et al. Urgent caesarean delivery for fetal bradycardia. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;14:1023–8.CrossRef Leung TY, Chung PW, Rogers MS, et al. Urgent caesarean delivery for fetal bradycardia. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;14:1023–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rotich SK, Ndavi MP, Rukaria-Kaumbutho R, et al. Early perinatal outcome in cases delivered through Caesarean section following clinical diagnosis of severe foetal distress at Kenyatta National Hospital. East Afr Med J. 2006;83:250–8.CrossRefPubMed Rotich SK, Ndavi MP, Rukaria-Kaumbutho R, et al. Early perinatal outcome in cases delivered through Caesarean section following clinical diagnosis of severe foetal distress at Kenyatta National Hospital. East Afr Med J. 2006;83:250–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Roy KK, Baruah J, Kumar S, et al. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75:1249–52.CrossRefPubMed Roy KK, Baruah J, Kumar S, et al. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75:1249–52.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6–11.CrossRefPubMed Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6–11.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pearson GA, Kelly B, Russell R, et al. Target decision to delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section based on neonatal outcomes and three year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):276–81.CrossRefPubMed Pearson GA, Kelly B, Russell R, et al. Target decision to delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section based on neonatal outcomes and three year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):276–81.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kolas T, Hofos D, Olan P. Predictions for the decision to-delivery interval for emergency Caesarean section in Norway. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica. 2006;85:561–6.CrossRef Kolas T, Hofos D, Olan P. Predictions for the decision to-delivery interval for emergency Caesarean section in Norway. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica. 2006;85:561–6.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Singh R, Deo S, Pradeep Y. The decision-to-delivery interval in emergency Caesarean sections and its correlation with perinatal outcome: evidence from 204 deliveries in a developing country. Trop Doct. 2012;42(2):67–9.CrossRefPubMed Singh R, Deo S, Pradeep Y. The decision-to-delivery interval in emergency Caesarean sections and its correlation with perinatal outcome: evidence from 204 deliveries in a developing country. Trop Doct. 2012;42(2):67–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Decision Delivery Interval in Emergency and Urgent Caesarean Sections: Need to Reconsider the Recommendations?
Authors
Nalini Mishra
Ruchi Gupta
Nomita Singh
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-0991-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2018 Go to the issue