Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research article

De-identifying a public use microdata file from the Canadian national discharge abstract database

Authors: Khaled El Emam, David Paton, Fida Dankar, Gunes Koru

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) collects hospital discharge abstract data (DAD) from Canadian provinces and territories. There are many demands for the disclosure of this data for research and analysis to inform policy making. To expedite the disclosure of data for some of these purposes, the construction of a DAD public use microdata file (PUMF) was considered. Such purposes include: confirming some published results, providing broader feedback to CIHI to improve data quality, training students and fellows, providing an easily accessible data set for researchers to prepare for analyses on the full DAD data set, and serve as a large health data set for computer scientists and statisticians to evaluate analysis and data mining techniques. The objective of this study was to measure the probability of re-identification for records in a PUMF, and to de-identify a national DAD PUMF consisting of 10% of records.

Methods

Plausible attacks on a PUMF were evaluated. Based on these attacks, the 2008-2009 national DAD was de-identified. A new algorithm was developed to minimize the amount of suppression while maximizing the precision of the data. The acceptable threshold for the probability of correct re-identification of a record was set at between 0.04 and 0.05. Information loss was measured in terms of the extent of suppression and entropy.

Results

Two different PUMF files were produced, one with geographic information, and one with no geographic information but more clinical information. At a threshold of 0.05, the maximum proportion of records with the diagnosis code suppressed was 20%, but these suppressions represented only 8-9% of all values in the DAD. Our suppression algorithm has less information loss than a more traditional approach to suppression. Smaller regions, patients with longer stays, and age groups that are infrequently admitted to hospitals tend to be the ones with the highest rates of suppression.

Conclusions

The strategies we used to maximize data utility and minimize information loss can result in a PUMF that would be useful for the specific purposes noted earlier. However, to create a more detailed file with less information loss suitable for more complex health services research, the risk would need to be mitigated by requiring the data recipient to commit to a data sharing agreement.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Fienberg S, Martin M, Straf M: Sharing Research Data. 1985, Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council
2.
Hutchon D: Publishing raw data and real time statistical analysis on e-journals. British Medical Journal. 2001, 322 (3): 530-PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Are journals doing enough to prevent fraudulent publication?. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2006, 174 (4): 431-
4.
Abraham K: Microdata access and labor market research: The US experience. Allegmeines Statistisches Archiv. 2005, 89: 121-139. 10.1007/s10182-005-0197-6.
5.
Vickers A: Whose data set is it anyway?. Sharing raw data from randomized trials. Trials. 2006, 7 (15):
6.
7.
8.
9.
Commission of the European Communities. On scientific information in the digital age: Access, dissemination and preservation. 2007
10.
Lowrance W: Access to collections of data and materials for health research: A report to the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust. Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust. 2006
11.
Yolles B, Connors J, Grufferman S: Obtaining access to data from government-sponsored medical research. NEJM. 1986, 315 (26): 1669-1672. 10.1056/NEJM198612253152608.PubMed
12.
Hogue C: Ethical issues in sharing epidemiologic data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1991, 44 (Suppl I): 103S-107S.PubMed
13.
Hedrick T: Justifications for the sharing of social science data. Law and Human Behavior. 1988, 12 (2): 163-171. 10.1007/BF01073124.
14.
Mackie C, Bradburn N: Improving access to and confidentiality of research data: Report of a workshop. 2000, Washington: The National Academies Press
15.
Boyko E: Why disseminate microdata?. United Nations Economic and social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Workshop on Census and Survey Microdata. 2008
16.
Winkler W: Producing Public-Use Microdata That Are Analytically Valid And Confidential. US Census Bureau. 1997
17.
Statistics Canada: 2001 Census Public Use Microdata File: Individuals file user documentation. 2001
18.
Dale A, Elliot M: Proposals for the 2001 samples of anonymized records: An assessment of disclosure risk. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 2001, 164 (3): 427-447. 10.1111/1467-985X.00212.
19.
Marsh C, Skinner C, Arber S, Penhale B, Openshaw S, Hobcraft J, Lievesley D, Walford N: The case for samples of anonymized records from the 1991 census. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (Statistics in Society). 1991, 154 (2): 305-340. 10.2307/2983043.
20.
21.
Marsh C, Dale A, Skinner C: Safe data versus safe settings: Access to microdata from the British census. International Statistical Review. 1994, 62 (1): 35-53. 10.2307/1403544.
22.
Alexander L, Jabine T: Access to social security microdata files for research and statistical purposes. Social Security Bulletin. 1978, 41 (8): 3-17.PubMed
23.
Department of Health and Human Services: Comparative Effectiveness Research Public Use Data Pilot Project. 2010
24.
Department of Health and Human Services: CER-Public Use Data Pilot Project. 2010
25.
Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure Project. The state experience in health quality data collection. 2004
26.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Healthcare cost and utilization project: SID/SASD/SEDD Application Kit. 2010
27.
Canadian Institute for Health Information: Data Quality Documentation, Discharge Abstract Database. 2009-2010: Executive Summary. 2010
28.
Canadian Institute for Health Information: Privacy and security framework. 2010
29.
Schoenman J, Sutton J, Kintala S, Love D, Maw R: The value of hospital discharge databases. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2005
30.
Samarati P: Protecting respondents identities in microdata release. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 2001, 13 (6): 1010-1027. 10.1109/69.971193. [10.1109/69.971193]
31.
Sweeney L: k-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. International Journal on Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems. 2002, 10 (5): 557-570. 10.1142/S0218488502001648.
32.
Skinner C: On identification dislcosure and prediction disclosure for microdata. Statistics Neerlandica. 1992, 46 (1): 21-32. 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1992.tb01324.x.
33.
Subcommittee on Disclosure Limitation Methodology - Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology. Statistical Policy Working paper 22: Report on statistical disclosure control. Statistical Policy Office, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. 1994
34.
Machanavajjhala A, Gehrke J, Kifer D: l-Diversity: Privacy Beyond k-Anonymity. Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data. 2007, 1 (1): 1-47. 10.1145/1217299.1217300.
35.
Hansell S: AOL Removes Search Data on Group of Web Users. 2006, New York Times
36.
Barbaro M, Zeller T: A Face Is Exposed for AOL Searcher No. 4417749. New York Times. 2006
37.
Zeller T: AOL Moves to Increase Privacy on Search Queries New York Times. 2006
38.
Ochoa S, Rasmussen J, Robson C, Salib M: Reidentification of individuals in Chicago's homicide database: A technical and legal study. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2001
39.
Narayanan A, Shmatikov V: Robust de-anonymization of large datasets (how to break anonymity of the Netflix prize dataset). 2008, University of Texas at Austin
40.
Appellate Court of Illinois - Fifth District. The Southern Illinoisan v. Department of Public Health. 2004
41.
42.
Federal Court (Canada): Mike Gordon vs. The Minister of Health: Affidavit of Bill Wilson. 2006
43.
El Emam K, Kosseim P: Privacy Interests in Prescription Records, Part 2: Patient Privacy. IEEE Security and Privacy. 2009, 7 (2): 75-78.
44.
Lafky D: The Safe Harbor method of de-identification: An empirical test. Fourth National HIPAA Summit West. 2010
45.
Fung BCM, Wang K, Chen R, Yu PS: Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing: A Survey of Recent Developments. ACM Computing Surveys. 2010, 42 (4):
46.
Chen B-C, Kifer D, LeFevre K, Machanavajjhala A: Privacy preserving data publishing. Foundations and Trends in Databases. 2009, 2 (1-2): 1-167.
47.
Alexander LA, Jabine TB: Access to social security microdata files for research and statistical purposes. Social Security Bulletin. 1978, 41 (8): 3-17.PubMed
48.
de Waal T, Willenborg L: A view on statistical disclosure control for microdata. Survey Methodology. 1996, 22 (1): 95-103.
49.
Willenborg L, de Waal T: Elements of Statistical Disclosure Control. Lecture Notes in Statistics. 2001, 155: Springer
50.
Domingo-Ferrer J, Torra Vc: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies. North-Holland: Amsterdam. 2002, 113-134.
51.
Skinner C, Elliot M: A measure of disclosure risk for microdata. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology. 2002, 64: 855--867. 10.1111/1467-9868.00365.
52.
Domingo-Ferrer J, Torra Vc: Ordinal, Continuous and Heterogeneous k-Anonymity Through Microaggregation. Data Min Knowl Discov. 2005, 11: 195-212. 10.1007/s10618-005-0007-5. [10.1007/s10618-005-0007-5]
53.
Templ M: Statistical Disclosure Control for Microdata Using the R-Package sdcMicro. Trans Data Privacy. 2008, 1: 67--85.
54.
Dandekar RA: Cost effective implementation of synthetic tabulation (a.k.a. controlled tabular adjustments) in legacy and new statistical data publication systems. Joint ECE/Eurostat Work Session on Statistical Data Confidentiality, Luxembourg. 2003
55.
Dandekar RA: Maximum Utility-Minimum Information Loss Table Server Design for Statistical Disclosure Control of Tabular Data. Privacy in statistical databases. Edited by: Josep Domingo-Ferrer, Vicen\cc Torra. 2004
56.
Castro J: Minimum-distance controlled perturbation methods for large-scale tabular data protection. European Journal of Operational Research. 2004, 171-
57.
Cox LH, Kelly JP, Patil R: Balancing quality and confidentiality for multivariate tabular data. Privacy in statistical databases. Edited by: Josep Domingo-Ferrer, Torra V. 2004
58.
Doyle P, Lane JI, Theeuwes JJM, Zayatz LM: Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Data Access: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies. Elsevier Science. 2001, 1
59.
Domingo-Ferrer J, Torra Vc: Disclosure Control Methods and Information Loss for Microdata. Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Data Access: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies. Edited by: P. Doyle, et al. 2001, Elsevier Science
60.
Kim JJ: A method for limiting disclosure in microdata based on random noise and transformation. Proceedings of the ASA Section on Survey Research Methodology. 1986, American Statistical Association: Alexandria, Virginia, 370-375.
61.
Little RJA: Statistical Analysis of Masked Data. Journal of Official Statistics. 1993, 9 (2): 407-426.
62.
Sullivan G, Fuller WA: The use of measurement error to avoid disclosure. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Methods Section. 1989, American Statistical Association: Alexandria, Virginia, 802-808.
63.
Sullivan G, Fuller WA: The construction of masking error for categorical variables. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Methods Section. 1990, American Statistical Association: Alexandria, Virginia, 435-440.
64.
Kargupta H, Datta S, Wang Q, Sivakumar K: Random data perturbation techniques and privacy preserving data mining. Knowledge and Information Systems. 2005, 7: 387-414. 10.1007/s10115-004-0173-6.
65.
Liew CK, Choi UJ, Liew CJ: A Data Distortion by Probability Distribution. ACM Transactions on Database Systems. 1985, 10 (3): 395-411. 10.1145/3979.4017.
66.
Defays D, Nanopoulos P: Panels of enterprises and confidentiality: The small aggregates method. Proceedings of the 1992 Symposium on Design and Analysis of Longitudinal Surveys. 1993, Statistics Canada: Ottowa, Canada
67.
Nanopoulos P: Confidentiality In The European Statistical System. Qüestiió. 1997, 21 (1 i 2): 219-220.
68.
Defays D, Anwar M: Masking data using micro-aggregation. Journal of Official Statistics. 1998, 14: 449-461.
69.
Domingo-Ferrer J, Mateo-Sanz J: Practical data-oriented microaggregation for statistical disclosure control. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2002, 14 (1): 189-201. 10.1109/69.979982. [10.1109/69.979982]
70.
Sande G: Exact and approximate methods for data directed microaggregation in one or more dimensions. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuziness, and Knowledge-Based Systems. 2002, 10 (5): 459-476. 10.1142/S0218488502001582.
71.
Torra V: Microaggregation for categorical variables: A median based approach. Privacy in Statistical Databases. 2004, Springer LNCS
72.
Domingo-Ferrer J, Mateo-Sanz JM: Resampling for statistical confidentiality in contingency tables. Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 1999, 38 (11-12): 13-32. 10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00281-3.
73.
Domingo-Ferrer J, Torra V: Disclosure Control Methods and Information Loss for Microdata. Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Data Access: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies. Edited by: P. Doyle, et al. 2001
74.
Jimenez J, Torra V: Utility and Risk of JPEG-based Continuous Microdata Protection Methods. International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security. 2009
75.
Rubin DB: Discussion Statistical Disclosure Limitation (also cited as: Satisfying confidentiality constraints through the use of synthetic multiply-imputed microdata). Journal of Official Statistics. 1996, 9 (2): 461--468.
76.
Heer GR: A Bootstrap Procedure to Preserve Statistical Confidentiality in Contingency Tables. International Seminar on Statistical Confidentiality. Edited by: D. Lievesley. 1993, Luxembourg, 261-271.
77.
Gopal R, Garfinkel R, Goes P: Confidentiality via Camouflage: The CVC Approach to Disclosure Limitation When Answering Queries to Databases. OPERATIONS RESEARCH. 2002, 50 (3): 501-516. 10.1287/opre.50.3.501.7745.
78.
Gouweleeuw JP, Kooiman P, Willenborg LCRJ, P.-P dW: dW. Post Randomisation for Statistical Disclosure Control: Theory and Implementation. Journal of Official Statistics. 1998, 14 (4): 463--478.
79.
Willenborg L, de Waal T: Statistical Disclosure Control in Practice. 1996, Springer, 1
80.
Hundepool A, Willenborg L: $\mu$- and $\tau$-argus: Software for Statistical Disclosure Control. 3rd International Seminar on Statistical Confidentiality. 1996, Bled
81.
Samarati P, Sweeney L: Protecting privacy when disclosing information: k-anonymity and its enforcement through generalisation and suppression. 1998, SRI International
82.
Samarati P: Protecting respondents' identities in microdata release. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2001, 13 (6): 1010-1027. 10.1109/69.971193.
83.
Sweeney L: Achieving k-anonymity privacy protection using generalization and suppression. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. 2002, 10 (5): 571-588. 10.1142/S021848850200165X.
84.
Ciriani V, De Capitani di Vimercati SSF, Samarati P: k-Anonymity. Secure Data Management in Decentralized Systems. 2007, Springer
85.
Bayardo R, Agrawal R: Data Privacy through Optimal k-Anonymization Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering. 2005
86.
Iyengar V: Transforming data to satisfy privacy constraints. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2002
87.
El Emam K, Dankar F, Issa R, Jonker E, Amyot D, Cogo E, Corriveau J-P, Walker M, Chowdhury S, Vaillancourt R, Roffey T, Bottomley J: A Globally Optimal k-Anonymity Method for the De-identification of Health Data Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2009
88.
Hundepool A, Domingo-Ferrer J, Franconi L, Giessing S, Lenz R, Naylor J, Nordholt ES, Seri G, Wolf P-PD: Handbook on Statistical Disclosure Control (Version 1.2). A Network of Excellence in the European Statistical System in the field of Statistical Disclosure Control. 2010
89.
Winkler WE: Re-identification methods for evaluating the confidentiality of analytically valid microdata. Research in Official Statistics. 1998, 1 (2): 50--69.
90.
Domingo-Ferrer J, Mateo-sanz JM, Torra Vc: Comparing SDC Methods for Microdata on the Basis of Information Loss and Disclosure. Proceedings of ETK-NTTS 2001. 2001, Luxemburg: Eurostat, 807-826. Eurostat
91.
Shannon CE: A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal. 1948, 27-
92.
Shannon CE: Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems. The Bell System Technical Journal. 1949
93.
de Waal T, Willenborg L: Information loss through global recoding and local suppression. Netherlands Official Statistics. 1999, 17-20. Spring Special Issue
94.
Kooiman P, Willenborg L, Gouweleeuw J: PRAM: a method for disclosure limitation of microdata. Statistics Netherlands, Division Research and Development, Department of Statistical Methods. 1997
95.
Gionis A, Tassa T: k-Anonymization with Minimal Loss of Information. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 2009, 21 (2): 206-219.
96.
El Emam K, Dankar FK, Issa R, Jonker E, Amyot D, Cogo E, Corriveau J-P, Walker M, Chowdhury S, Vaillancourt R, Roffey T, Bottomley J: A globally optimal k-anonymity method for the de-identification of health data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2009, 16 (5): 670-82. 10.1197/jamia.M3144. [10.1197/jamia.M3144]PubMedPubMedCentral
97.
Sweeney L: Computational disclosure control: A primer on data privacy protection. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2001
98.
Bayardo RJ, Agrawal R: Data privacy through optimal k-anonymization. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering. 2005, 217-228.
99.
El Emam K, Dankar FK: Protecting privacy using k-anonymity. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2008, 15 (5): 627-37. 10.1197/jamia.M2716. [10.1197/jamia.M2716]PubMedPubMedCentral
100.
LeFevre K, DeWitt DJ, Ramakrishnan R: Mondrian Multidimensional K-Anonymity. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering. 2006, IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 25-
101.
Hore B, Jammalamadaka RC, Mehrotra S: Flexible Anonymization For Privacy Preserving Data Publishing: A Systematic Search Based Approach. SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM). 2007
102.
103.
104.
note on the individual risk of disclosure A. Silvia Polettini. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. 2003
105.
106.
Sweeney L: Datafly: A system for providing anoinymity to medical data. Proceedings of the IFIP TC11 WG11.3 Eleventh International Conference on Database Securty XI: Status and Prospects. 1997
107.
Fung BCM, Wang K, Fu AW-C, Yu PS: Introduction to Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing: Concepts and Techniques. 2010, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1
108.
Xiao X, Tao Y: Personalized privacy preservation. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. 2006, ACM: New York, NY, USA, 229-240.
109.
Iyengar VS: Transforming data to satisfy privacy constraints. Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 2002, ACM: New York, NY, USA, 279-288.
110.
Fung BCM, Wang K, Yu PS: Top-down specialization for information and privacy preservation. ICDE 2005. Proceedings. 21st International Conference on Data Engineering. 2005, 205-216.
111.
Fung BCM, Wang K, Yu PS: Anonymizing Classification Data for Privacy Preservation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE). 2007, 19 (5): 711--725.
112.
El Emam K: Risk-based de-identification of health data. IEEE Security and Privacy. 2010, 8 (3): 64-67.
113.
Statistics Canada: Handbook for creating public use microdata files. 2006
114.
Cancer Care Ontario Data Use and Disclosure Policy. Cancer Care Ontario. 2005
115.
Security and confidentiality policies and procedures. Health Quality Council. 2004
116.
117.
Privacy code. Manitoba Center for Health Policy. 2002
118.
Subcommittee on Disclosure Limitation Methodology - Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology. Working paper 22: Report on statistical disclosure control. 1994, Office of Management and Budget
119.
Statistics Canada: Therapeutic abortion survey. 2007
120.
Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia. 1998, Order No. 261-1998
121.
Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario.
122.
Ministry of Health and Long Term care (Ontario). Corporate Policy. 1984, 3-1-21
123.
Duncan G, Jabine T, de Wolf S: Private Lives and Public Policies: Confidentiality and Accessibility of Government Statistics. 1993, National Academies Press
124.
de Waal A, Willenborg L: A view on statistical disclosure control for microdata. Survey Methodology. 1996, 22 (1): 95-103.
125.
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Quebec (CAI). Chenard v. Ministere de l'agriculture, des pecheries et de l'alimentation (141). 1997
126.
National Center for Education Statistics. NCES Statistical Standards. 2003, US Department of Education
127.
National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics: Report to the Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services on Enhanced Protections for Uses of Health Data: A Stewardship Framework for "Secondary Uses" of Electronically Collected and Transmitted Health Data. 2007
128.
Sweeney L: Data sharing under HIPAA: 12 years later. Workshop on the HIPAA Privacy Rule's De-Identification Standard. 2010, Department of Health and Human Services
129.
El Emam K, Jabbouri S, Sams S, Drouet Y, Power M: Evaluating common de-identification heuristics for personal health information. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2006, 8 (4): e28-10.2196/jmir.8.4.e28. [PMID: 17213047 ]PubMedPubMedCentral
130.
El Emam K, Jonker E, Sams S, Neri E, Neisa A, Gao T, Chowdhury S: De-Identification Guidelines for Personal Health Information. 2007, Report produced for the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada: Ottawa
131.
Benitez K, Malin B: Evaluating re-identification risks with respect to the HIPAA privacy rule. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2010, 17 (2): 169-177. 10.1136/jamia.2009.000026.PubMedPubMedCentral
132.
Torra V, Domingo-Ferrer J: Record linkage methods for multidatabase data mining. Information Fusion in Data Mining. 2003, 101-132.
133.
Torra V, Abowd J, Domingo-Ferrer J: Using Mahalanobis distance-based record linkage for dislcosure risk assessment. 2006, 233-242. Springer LNCS
134.
El Emam K, Dankar F: Protecting privacy using k-anonymity. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2008, 15: 627-637. 10.1197/jamia.M2716.PubMedPubMedCentral
135.
136.
Loukides G, Denny J, Malin B: The disclosure of diagnosis codes can breach research participants' privacy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2010, 17: 322-327.PubMedPubMedCentral
137.
El Emam K: Methods for the de-identification of electronic health records for genomic research. Genome Medicine. 2011, 3 (25):
138.
Meyerson A, Williams R: On the complexity of optimal k-anonymity. Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on the Principles of Database Systems. 2004
139.
Aggarwal G, Feder T, Kenthapadi K, Motwani R, Panigrahy R, Thomas D, Zhu A: Anonymizing Tables. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT05). 2005
140.
El Emam K, Dankar F, Vaillancourt R, Roffey T, Lysyk M: Evaluating patient re-identification risk from hospital prescription records. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 2009, 62 (4): 307-319.
Metadata
Title
De-identifying a public use microdata file from the Canadian national discharge abstract database
Authors
Khaled El Emam
David Paton
Fida Dankar
Gunes Koru
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-53

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2011 Go to the issue

Research article

Building consensus about eHealth in Slovene primary health care: Delphi study

Research article

Process evaluation of a web-based intervention aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants

Technical advance

Using a computerized provider order entry system to meet the unique prescribing needs of children: description of an advanced dosing model

Research article

Successful implementation of new technologies in nursing care: a questionnaire survey of nurse-users

Research article

HIS-based Kaplan-Meier plots - a single source approach for documenting and reusing routine survival information

Research article

Evaluation of internet access and utilization by medical students in Lahore, Pakistan