Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Cytostatic Therapy | Original Article

Outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with isolated lymph node involvement following surgical resection: implications for multi-modal management

Authors: Aryeh Pelcovits, Catrina Mueller-Leonhard, Anthony Mega, Ali Amin, Simon P. Kim, Dragan Golijanin, Boris Gershman

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are limited data on the oncologic outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with isolated lymph node (LN) involvement (pN+ M0) following surgical resection. We examined pN+ M0 UTUC in a large, nationwide oncology dataset to characterize its natural history, describe trends in utilization of perioperative chemotherapy, and identify clinicopathologic features associated with survival.

Methods

We identified 794 patients aged 18–89 years who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with lymph node dissection for pN+ M0 UTUC from 2006 to 2013 in the National Cancer Database. The associations of clinicopathologic features with overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox regression models, and a simplified risk score was created.

Results

Median follow-up among survivors was 39.5 months, during which time 555 (70%) patients died. Over the study period, neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization increased from 6.7 to 14.2% (p = 0.002), while adjuvant chemotherapy utilization remained stable (42.7 to 44.3%; p = 0.86). One-, 5-, and 8-year OS rates were 63.7%, 24.2%, and 18.7%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, older age, larger tumor size, higher pT stage, positive surgical margins, number of positive LNs, and non-receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with worse OS. A simplified risk score consisting of age, tumor size, pT stage, number of positive LNs, and margin status was created with predicted 5-year OS ranging from 12 to 44%.

Conclusions

In this large, contemporary cohort, pN+ M0 UTUC was associated with a 5-year OS of only 24%. Clinicopathologic predictors of survival after surgical resection may improve risk-stratification, counseling, and selection of patients for multimodal management.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Roupret M, Babjuk M, Comperat E et al (2018) European Association of Urology Guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 update. Eur Urol 73(1):111–122PubMedCrossRef Roupret M, Babjuk M, Comperat E et al (2018) European Association of Urology Guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 update. Eur Urol 73(1):111–122PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Spiess PE, Agarwal N, Bangs R et al (2017) Bladder Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN 15(10):1240–1267CrossRef Spiess PE, Agarwal N, Bangs R et al (2017) Bladder Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN 15(10):1240–1267CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Leow JJ, Martin-Doyle W, Fay AP, Choueiri TK, Chang SL, Bellmunt J (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol 66(3):529–541PubMedCrossRef Leow JJ, Martin-Doyle W, Fay AP, Choueiri TK, Chang SL, Bellmunt J (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol 66(3):529–541PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF et al (2009) Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer 115(6):1224–1233PubMedCrossRef Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF et al (2009) Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer 115(6):1224–1233PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Matin SF, Margulis V, Kamat A et al (2010) Incidence of downstaging and complete remission after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. Cancer 116(13):3127–3134PubMedCrossRef Matin SF, Margulis V, Kamat A et al (2010) Incidence of downstaging and complete remission after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. Cancer 116(13):3127–3134PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Porten S, Siefker-Radtke AO, Xiao L et al (2014) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer 120(12):1794–1799PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Porten S, Siefker-Radtke AO, Xiao L et al (2014) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer 120(12):1794–1799PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Seisen T, Krasnow RE, Bellmunt J et al (2017) Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy for locally advanced and/or positive regional lymph node upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 35(8):852–860PubMedCrossRef Seisen T, Krasnow RE, Bellmunt J et al (2017) Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy for locally advanced and/or positive regional lymph node upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 35(8):852–860PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Birtle AJ, Chester JD, Jones RJ et al (2018) Results of POUT: a phase III randomised trial of perioperative chemotherapy versus surveillance in upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). J Clin Oncol 36(6_suppl):407CrossRef Birtle AJ, Chester JD, Jones RJ et al (2018) Results of POUT: a phase III randomised trial of perioperative chemotherapy versus surveillance in upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). J Clin Oncol 36(6_suppl):407CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lucca I, Kassouf W, Kapoor A et al (2015) The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy: a retrospective study. BJU Int 116(1):72–78PubMedCrossRef Lucca I, Kassouf W, Kapoor A et al (2015) The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy: a retrospective study. BJU Int 116(1):72–78PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gershman B, Moreira DM, Thompson RH et al (2017) Renal cell carcinoma with isolated lymph node involvement: long-term natural history and predictors of oncologic outcomes following surgical resection. Eur Urol 72(2):300–306PubMedCrossRef Gershman B, Moreira DM, Thompson RH et al (2017) Renal cell carcinoma with isolated lymph node involvement: long-term natural history and predictors of oncologic outcomes following surgical resection. Eur Urol 72(2):300–306PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Karmali RJ, Suami H, Wood CG, Karam JA (2014) Lymphatic drainage in renal cell carcinoma: back to the basics. BJU Int 114(6):806–817PubMedCrossRef Karmali RJ, Suami H, Wood CG, Karam JA (2014) Lymphatic drainage in renal cell carcinoma: back to the basics. BJU Int 114(6):806–817PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Terrone C, Guercio S, De Luca S et al (2003) The number of lymph nodes examined and staging accuracy in renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 91(1):37–40PubMedCrossRef Terrone C, Guercio S, De Luca S et al (2003) The number of lymph nodes examined and staging accuracy in renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 91(1):37–40PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kaag MG, O’Malley RL, O’Malley P et al (2010) Changes in renal function following nephroureterectomy may affect the use of perioperative chemotherapy. Eur Urol 58(4):581–587PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kaag MG, O’Malley RL, O’Malley P et al (2010) Changes in renal function following nephroureterectomy may affect the use of perioperative chemotherapy. Eur Urol 58(4):581–587PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shirasaki Y, Tsushima T, Saika T, Nasu Y, Kumon H (2004) Kidney function after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 64(1):43–47 (discussion 48) PubMedCrossRef Shirasaki Y, Tsushima T, Saika T, Nasu Y, Kumon H (2004) Kidney function after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 64(1):43–47 (discussion 48) PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Youssef RF, Shariat SF, Lotan Y et al (2011) Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma with loco-regional nodal metastases: insights from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. BJU Int 108(8):1286–1291PubMedCrossRef Youssef RF, Shariat SF, Lotan Y et al (2011) Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma with loco-regional nodal metastases: insights from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. BJU Int 108(8):1286–1291PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cohen A, Kuchta K, Park S (2017) Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy use in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 35(6):322–327PubMedCrossRef Cohen A, Kuchta K, Park S (2017) Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy use in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 35(6):322–327PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gin GE, Ruel NH, Kardos SV et al (2017) Utilization of perioperative systemic chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 35(5):192–200PubMedCrossRef Gin GE, Ruel NH, Kardos SV et al (2017) Utilization of perioperative systemic chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 35(5):192–200PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Golombos DM, O’Malley P, Lewicki P et al (2017) The impact of socioeconomic status on perioperative complications and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. World J Urol 35(7):1063–1071PubMedCrossRef Golombos DM, O’Malley P, Lewicki P et al (2017) The impact of socioeconomic status on perioperative complications and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. World J Urol 35(7):1063–1071PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Klapheke A, Yap SA, Pan K, Cress RD (2018) Sociodemographic disparities in chemotherapy treatment and impact on survival among patients with metastatic bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 36(6):308.e319–308.e325CrossRef Klapheke A, Yap SA, Pan K, Cress RD (2018) Sociodemographic disparities in chemotherapy treatment and impact on survival among patients with metastatic bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 36(6):308.e319–308.e325CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lara J, Brunson A, Keegan TH et al (2016) Determinants of survival for adolescents and young adults with urothelial bladder cancer: results from the california cancer registry. J Urol 196(5):1378–1382PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lara J, Brunson A, Keegan TH et al (2016) Determinants of survival for adolescents and young adults with urothelial bladder cancer: results from the california cancer registry. J Urol 196(5):1378–1382PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Odisho AY, Etzioni R, Gore JL (2018) Beyond classic risk adjustment: socioeconomic status and hospital performance in urologic oncology surgery. Cancer 124(16):3372–3380PubMedCrossRef Odisho AY, Etzioni R, Gore JL (2018) Beyond classic risk adjustment: socioeconomic status and hospital performance in urologic oncology surgery. Cancer 124(16):3372–3380PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Smith ND, Prasad SM, Patel AR et al (2016) Bladder Cancer mortality in the United States: a geographic and temporal analysis of socioeconomic and environmental factors. J Urol 195(2):290–296PubMedCrossRef Smith ND, Prasad SM, Patel AR et al (2016) Bladder Cancer mortality in the United States: a geographic and temporal analysis of socioeconomic and environmental factors. J Urol 195(2):290–296PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with isolated lymph node involvement following surgical resection: implications for multi-modal management
Authors
Aryeh Pelcovits
Catrina Mueller-Leonhard
Anthony Mega
Ali Amin
Simon P. Kim
Dragan Golijanin
Boris Gershman
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02897-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

World Journal of Urology 5/2020 Go to the issue