Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2023

01-09-2023 | Cytostatic Therapy | Pancreatic Tumors

Impact of Preoperative Tumor Size on Prognosis of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas

Authors: Yoichi Miyata, MD, PhD, Naoto Yonamine, MD, Ibuki Fujinuma, MD, Takazumi Tsunenari, MD, Yasuhiro Takihata, MD, Hiroyuki Hakoda, MD, Akiko Nakazawa, MD, Toshimitsu Iwasaki, MD, PhD, Takahiro Einama, MD, PhD, Junichi Togashi, MD, PhD, Hironori Tsujimoto, MD, PhD, Hideki Ueno, MD, PhD, Yoshifumi Beck, MD, PhD, Yoji Kishi, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Tumor size (TS) is a well-established prognostic factor of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, whether a uniform treatment strategy can be applied for all resectable PDACs (R-PDACs) and borderline resectable PDACs (BR-PDACs), regardless of TS, remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative TS on surgical outcomes of patients with R-PDACs and BR-PDACs.

Methods

Chart data from three institutions were reviewed to select patients who underwent pancreatectomy for R-PDACs and BR-PDACs between January 2006 and December 2020. The patients were divided into TSsmall and TSlarge groups according to a TS cutoff value determined for each of R- and BR-PDAC using the minimum P value approach for the risk of R1 resection.

Results

TS of 35 mm and 24 mm was the best cutoff value in R-PDAC and BR-PDAC, respectively. The R1 rate was higher in the TSlarge than TSsmall group, in both R- (n = 35, 37% versus n = 294, 19%; P = 0.011) and BR-PDAC (n = 89, 37% versus n = 27, 15%; P = 0.030). Overall survival was significantly better in the TSsmall than TSlarge group in R-PDAC (38.2 versus 12.1 months; P < 0.001), but comparable between the two groups in BR-DPAC (21.2 versus 22.7 months; P = 0.363). Multivariate analysis revealed TS > 35 mm as an independent predictor of worse survival in patients with R-PDAC.

Conclusion

Larger TS was associated with a higher R1 rate and is a worse prognostic factor in patients with R-PDAC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Motoi F, Satoi S, Honda G, et al. A single-arm, phase II trial of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and S1 in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: PREP-01 study. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:194–203.CrossRefPubMed Motoi F, Satoi S, Honda G, et al. A single-arm, phase II trial of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and S1 in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: PREP-01 study. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:194–203.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Uesaka K, Boku N, Fukutomi A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01). Lancet. 2016;388:248–57.CrossRefPubMed Uesaka K, Boku N, Fukutomi A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01). Lancet. 2016;388:248–57.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Katz M H, Pisters P W, Evans D B, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:833-46; discussion 46-8. Katz M H, Pisters P W, Evans D B, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:833-46; discussion 46-8.
9.
go back to reference Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;155:977–88.CrossRefPubMed Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;155:977–88.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Okada K, Uemura K, Kondo N, et al. Preoperative risk factors for para-aortic lymph node positivity in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2021;21:606–12.CrossRefPubMed Okada K, Uemura K, Kondo N, et al. Preoperative risk factors for para-aortic lymph node positivity in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2021;21:606–12.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zhang W, Ji L, Wang X, et al. Nomogram predicts risk and prognostic factors for bone metastasis of pancreatic cancer: a population-based analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:752176.CrossRefPubMed Zhang W, Ji L, Wang X, et al. Nomogram predicts risk and prognostic factors for bone metastasis of pancreatic cancer: a population-based analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:752176.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lee KH, Lee JK, Choi DW, et al. Postoperative prognosis prediction of pancreatic cancer with seven microRNAs. Pancreas. 2015;44:764–8.CrossRefPubMed Lee KH, Lee JK, Choi DW, et al. Postoperative prognosis prediction of pancreatic cancer with seven microRNAs. Pancreas. 2015;44:764–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Toesca DAS, Jeffrey RB, von Eyben R, et al. Predicting pancreatic cancer resectability and outcomes based on an objective quantitative scoring system. Pancreas. 2019;48:622–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Toesca DAS, Jeffrey RB, von Eyben R, et al. Predicting pancreatic cancer resectability and outcomes based on an objective quantitative scoring system. Pancreas. 2019;48:622–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Murakami Y, Satoi S, Sho M, et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network resectability status for pancreatic carcinoma predicts overall survival. World J Surg. 2015;39:2306–14.CrossRefPubMed Murakami Y, Satoi S, Sho M, et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network resectability status for pancreatic carcinoma predicts overall survival. World J Surg. 2015;39:2306–14.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. New York: Wiley 2017. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. New York: Wiley 2017.
16.
go back to reference Motoi F, Kosuge T, Ueno H, et al. Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (Prep-02/JSAP05). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49:190–4.CrossRefPubMed Motoi F, Kosuge T, Ueno H, et al. Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (Prep-02/JSAP05). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49:190–4.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691–703.CrossRef Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691–703.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–25.CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–25.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Fortner JG, Klimstra DS, Senie RT, Maclean BJ. Tumor size is the primary prognosticator for pancreatic cancer after regional pancreatectomy. Ann Surg. 1996;223:147–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fortner JG, Klimstra DS, Senie RT, Maclean BJ. Tumor size is the primary prognosticator for pancreatic cancer after regional pancreatectomy. Ann Surg. 1996;223:147–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Ansari D, Bauden M, Bergstrom S, et al. Relationship between tumour size and outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2017;104:600–7.CrossRefPubMed Ansari D, Bauden M, Bergstrom S, et al. Relationship between tumour size and outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2017;104:600–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hur C, Tramontano AC, Dowling EC, et al. Early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma survival is dependent on size: positive implications for future targeted screening. Pancreas. 2016;45:1062–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hur C, Tramontano AC, Dowling EC, et al. Early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma survival is dependent on size: positive implications for future targeted screening. Pancreas. 2016;45:1062–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Jamieson NB, Foulis AK, Oien KA, et al. Peripancreatic fat invasion is an independent predictor of poor outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:512–24.CrossRefPubMed Jamieson NB, Foulis AK, Oien KA, et al. Peripancreatic fat invasion is an independent predictor of poor outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:512–24.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Saka B, Balci S, Basturk O, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is spread to the peripancreatic soft tissue in the majority of resected cases, rendering the AJCC T-stage protocol (7th edition) inapplicable and insignificant: a size-based staging system (pT1: </=2, pT2: >2-</=4, pT3: >4 cm) is more valid and clinically relevant. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2010-8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5093-7 Saka B, Balci S, Basturk O, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is spread to the peripancreatic soft tissue in the majority of resected cases, rendering the AJCC T-stage protocol (7th edition) inapplicable and insignificant: a size-based staging system (pT1: </=2, pT2: >2-</=4, pT3: >4 cm) is more valid and clinically relevant. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2010-8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-016-5093-7
26.
go back to reference Gemenetzis G, Groot VP, Blair AB, et al. Survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2019;270:340–7.CrossRefPubMed Gemenetzis G, Groot VP, Blair AB, et al. Survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2019;270:340–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Inoue Y, Saiura A, Oba A, et al. Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for borderline resectable pancreatic cancers: Intention-to-treat analysis compared with upfront surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021;28:143–55.CrossRefPubMed Inoue Y, Saiura A, Oba A, et al. Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for borderline resectable pancreatic cancers: Intention-to-treat analysis compared with upfront surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021;28:143–55.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Versteijne E, van Dam JL, Suker M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: long-term results of the Dutch randomized PREOPANC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:1220–30.CrossRefPubMed Versteijne E, van Dam JL, Suker M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: long-term results of the Dutch randomized PREOPANC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:1220–30.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Versteijne E, Vogel JA, Besselink MG, et al. Meta-analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105:946–58.CrossRefPubMed Versteijne E, Vogel JA, Besselink MG, et al. Meta-analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105:946–58.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of Preoperative Tumor Size on Prognosis of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas
Authors
Yoichi Miyata, MD, PhD
Naoto Yonamine, MD
Ibuki Fujinuma, MD
Takazumi Tsunenari, MD
Yasuhiro Takihata, MD
Hiroyuki Hakoda, MD
Akiko Nakazawa, MD
Toshimitsu Iwasaki, MD, PhD
Takahiro Einama, MD, PhD
Junichi Togashi, MD, PhD
Hironori Tsujimoto, MD, PhD
Hideki Ueno, MD, PhD
Yoshifumi Beck, MD, PhD
Yoji Kishi, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-09-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2023
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14219-3

Other articles of this Issue 13/2023

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2023 Go to the issue