Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Cytostatic Therapy | Study Protocol

A phase II/III randomized clinical trial of CisPlatin plUs Gemcitabine and Nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as pReoperative chemotherapy versus immediate resection in patIents with resecTable BiliarY Tract Cancers (BTC) at high risk for recurrence: PURITY study

Authors: Monica Niger, Federico Nichetti, Lorenzo Fornaro, Chiara Pircher, Federica Morano, Federica Palermo, Lorenza Rimassa, Tiziana Pressiani, Rossana Berardi, Andrea Casadei Gardini, Elisa Sperti, Lisa Salvatore, Davide Melisi, Francesca Bergamo, Salvatore Siena, Stefania Mosconi, Raffaella Longarini, Giuseppina Arcangeli, Salvatore Corallo, Laura Delliponti, Stefano Tamberi, Elena Fea, Giovanni Brandi, Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli, Massimiliano Salati, Paolo Baili, Rosalba Miceli, Silva Ljevar, Ilaria Cavallo, Elisa Sottotetti, Antonia Martinetti, Michele Droz Dit Busset, Carlo Sposito, Maria Di Bartolomeo, Filippo Pietrantonio, Filippo de Braud, Vincenzo Mazzaferro

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare and lethal cancers, with a 5-year survival inferior to 20%(1–3). The only potential curative treatment is surgical resection. However, despite complex surgical procedures that have a remarkable risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, the 5-year survival rate after radical surgery (R0) is 20–40% and recurrence rates are up to ~ 75%(4–6). Up to ~ 40% of patients relapse within 12 months after resection, and half of these patient will recur systemically(4–6). There is no standard of care for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in resectable BTC, but retrospective reports suggest its potential benefit (7, 8).

Methods

PURITY is a no-profit, multicentre, randomized phase II/III trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable BTC at high risk for recurrence. Primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant GAP followed by surgery as compared to upfront surgery, in terms of 12-month progression-free survival for the phase II part and of progression free survival (PFS) for the phase III study.
Key Secondary objectives are event free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival, (RFS), overall survival (OS), R0/R1/R2 resection rate, quality of life (QoL), overall response rate (ORR), resectability. Safety analyses will include toxicity rate and perioperative morbidity and mortality rate.
Exploratory studies including Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in archival tumor tissues and longitudinal ctDNA analysis are planned to identify potential biomarkers of primary resistance and prognosis.

Discussion

Considering the poor prognosis of resected BTC experiencing early tumor recurrence and the negative prognostic impact of R1/R2 resections, PURITY study is based on the rationale that NAC may improve R0 resection rates and ultimately patients’ outcomes. Furthermore, NAC should allow early eradication of microscopic distant metastases, undetectable by imaging but already present at the time of diagnosis and avoid mortality and morbidity associated with resection for patients with rapid progression or worsening general condition during neoadjuvant therapy. The randomized PURITY study will evaluate whether patients affected by BTC at high risk from recurrence benefit from a neoadjuvant therapy with GAP regimen as compared to immediate surgery.

Trial registration

PURITY is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06037980) and EuCT(2023–503295-25–00).
Literature
2.
go back to reference Banales JM, Marin JJG, Lamarca A, Rodrigues PM, Khan SA, Roberts LR, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(9):557–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Banales JM, Marin JJG, Lamarca A, Rodrigues PM, Khan SA, Roberts LR, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(9):557–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Valle JW, Kelley RK, Nervi B, Oh DY, Zhu AX. Biliary tract cancer. Lancet. 2021;397(10272):428–44.CrossRefPubMed Valle JW, Kelley RK, Nervi B, Oh DY, Zhu AX. Biliary tract cancer. Lancet. 2021;397(10272):428–44.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Zhang XF, Beal EW, Bagante F, Chakedis J, Weiss M, Popescu I, et al. Early versus late recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection with curative intent. Br J Surg. 2018;105(7):848–56.CrossRefPubMed Zhang XF, Beal EW, Bagante F, Chakedis J, Weiss M, Popescu I, et al. Early versus late recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection with curative intent. Br J Surg. 2018;105(7):848–56.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sahara K, Tsilimigras DI, Toyoda J, Miyake K, Ethun CG, Maithel SK, et al. Defining the risk of early recurrence following curative-intent resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(8):4205–13.CrossRefPubMed Sahara K, Tsilimigras DI, Toyoda J, Miyake K, Ethun CG, Maithel SK, et al. Defining the risk of early recurrence following curative-intent resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(8):4205–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Vega EA, Newhook TE, Kawaguchi Y, Qiao W, De Bellis M, Okuno M, et al. Conditional recurrence-free survival after oncologic extended resection for gallbladder cancer: an international multicenter analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(5):2675–82.CrossRefPubMed Vega EA, Newhook TE, Kawaguchi Y, Qiao W, De Bellis M, Okuno M, et al. Conditional recurrence-free survival after oncologic extended resection for gallbladder cancer: an international multicenter analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(5):2675–82.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yadav S, Xie H, Bin-Riaz I, Sharma P, Durani U, Goyal G, et al. Neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(8):1432–8.CrossRefPubMed Yadav S, Xie H, Bin-Riaz I, Sharma P, Durani U, Goyal G, et al. Neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(8):1432–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Utuama O, Permuth JB, Dagne G, Sanchez-Anguiano A, Alman A, Kumar A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score survival analysis supporting use in patients with high-risk disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(4):1939-49. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09478-3. Utuama O, Permuth JB, Dagne G, Sanchez-Anguiano A, Alman A, Kumar A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score survival analysis supporting use in patients with high-risk disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(4):1939-49. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-020-09478-3.
10.
go back to reference Bridgewater J, Fletcher P, Palmer DH, Malik HZ, Prasad R, Mirza D, et al. Long-term outcomes and exploratory analyses of the randomized Phase III BILCAP study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(18):2048–57.CrossRefPubMed Bridgewater J, Fletcher P, Palmer DH, Malik HZ, Prasad R, Mirza D, et al. Long-term outcomes and exploratory analyses of the randomized Phase III BILCAP study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(18):2048–57.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Brustia R, Langella S, Kawai T, Fonseca GM, Schielke A, Colli F, et al. Preoperative risk score for prediction of long-term outcomes after hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Report of a collaborative, international-based, external validation study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(4 Pt A):560–71. Brustia R, Langella S, Kawai T, Fonseca GM, Schielke A, Colli F, et al. Preoperative risk score for prediction of long-term outcomes after hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Report of a collaborative, international-based, external validation study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(4 Pt A):560–71.
12.
go back to reference Tsilimigras DI, Sahara K, Wu L, Moris D, Bagante F, Guglielmi A, et al. Very early recurrence after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: considering alternative treatment approaches. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(9):823–31.CrossRefPubMed Tsilimigras DI, Sahara K, Wu L, Moris D, Bagante F, Guglielmi A, et al. Very early recurrence after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: considering alternative treatment approaches. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(9):823–31.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Shroff RT, Guthrie KA, Scott AJ, Borad MJ, Goff LW, Matin K, et al. SWOG 1815: A phase III randomized trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine and cisplatin in newly diagnosed, advanced biliary tract cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(4_suppl):LBA490-LBA. Shroff RT, Guthrie KA, Scott AJ, Borad MJ, Goff LW, Matin K, et al. SWOG 1815: A phase III randomized trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine and cisplatin in newly diagnosed, advanced biliary tract cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(4_suppl):LBA490-LBA.
16.
go back to reference Maithel SK, Javle MM, Mahipal A, Lin BS-L, Akce M, Switchenko JM, et al. NEO-GAP: A phase II single-arm prospective feasibility study of neoadjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin/nab-paclitaxel for resectable high-risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):4097. Maithel SK, Javle MM, Mahipal A, Lin BS-L, Akce M, Switchenko JM, et al. NEO-GAP: A phase II single-arm prospective feasibility study of neoadjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin/nab-paclitaxel for resectable high-risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):4097.
17.
go back to reference Choi SH, Kang I, Lee SH, Kang B, Cheon J, Kim DJ, et al. Clinical feasibility of curative surgery after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2023;173(2):280–8.CrossRefPubMed Choi SH, Kang I, Lee SH, Kang B, Cheon J, Kim DJ, et al. Clinical feasibility of curative surgery after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2023;173(2):280–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Maithel SK, Keilson JM, Cao HST, Rupji M, Mahipal A, Lin BS, et al. NEO-GAP: A Single-Arm, Phase II Feasibility Trial of Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel for Resectable, High-Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(11):6558-66. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13809-5. Maithel SK, Keilson JM, Cao HST, Rupji M, Mahipal A, Lin BS, et al. NEO-GAP: A Single-Arm, Phase II Feasibility Trial of Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel for Resectable, High-Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(11):6558-66. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-023-13809-5.
19.
go back to reference Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH, Malik HZ, Prasad R, Mirza D, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(5):663–73.CrossRefPubMed Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH, Malik HZ, Prasad R, Mirza D, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(5):663–73.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A phase II/III randomized clinical trial of CisPlatin plUs Gemcitabine and Nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as pReoperative chemotherapy versus immediate resection in patIents with resecTable BiliarY Tract Cancers (BTC) at high risk for recurrence: PURITY study
Authors
Monica Niger
Federico Nichetti
Lorenzo Fornaro
Chiara Pircher
Federica Morano
Federica Palermo
Lorenza Rimassa
Tiziana Pressiani
Rossana Berardi
Andrea Casadei Gardini
Elisa Sperti
Lisa Salvatore
Davide Melisi
Francesca Bergamo
Salvatore Siena
Stefania Mosconi
Raffaella Longarini
Giuseppina Arcangeli
Salvatore Corallo
Laura Delliponti
Stefano Tamberi
Elena Fea
Giovanni Brandi
Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli
Massimiliano Salati
Paolo Baili
Rosalba Miceli
Silva Ljevar
Ilaria Cavallo
Elisa Sottotetti
Antonia Martinetti
Michele Droz Dit Busset
Carlo Sposito
Maria Di Bartolomeo
Filippo Pietrantonio
Filippo de Braud
Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12225-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Cancer 1/2024 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine