Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Editorial

Cytologic Diagnosis of Bile Duct Strictures: Brush or Scrape?

Author: Jason S. Gold

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

Achieving a pathologic diagnosis for biliary strictures short of surgical resection is notoriously difficult, which in turn impairs the ability to deliver optimal clinical care. Confidence in classifying a biliary stricture as benign is limited since biopsies of strictures ultimately proven to be malignant yield the correct diagnosis only about half the time, an uncertainty which in turn leads to overtreatment. Approximately 10–15% of biliary strictures suspicious for malignancy are benign when analyzed following surgical resection, comprising a wide array of histopathologic entities [1, 2]. As many medical oncologists are reluctant to systemically treat unresectable biliary strictures without a pathologic confirmation of malignancy, the inability to accurately diagnose these strictures also results in undertreatment. Furthermore, in the absence of a pathologic diagnosis, the treatment given may not always be appropriate since systemic treatment may be targeted against a suspected malignancy different from the one actually present (i.e., metastatic disease or hepatocellular carcinoma mimicking cholangiocarcinoma). Similarly, even when the correct histopathologic diagnosis is targeted, the inability to uniformly obtain adequate tissue limits the ability to provide personalized therapy. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Corvera CU, Blumgart LH, Darvishian F, et al. Clinical and pathologic features of proximal biliary strictures masquerading as hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:862–869.CrossRef Corvera CU, Blumgart LH, Darvishian F, et al. Clinical and pathologic features of proximal biliary strictures masquerading as hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:862–869.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Scheuermann U, Widyaningsih R, Hoppe-Lotichius M, Heise M, Otto G. Detection of benign hilar bile duct stenoses—a retrospective analysis in 250 patients with suspicion of Klatskin tumour. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016;8:43–49.CrossRef Scheuermann U, Widyaningsih R, Hoppe-Lotichius M, Heise M, Otto G. Detection of benign hilar bile duct stenoses—a retrospective analysis in 250 patients with suspicion of Klatskin tumour. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016;8:43–49.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kurzawinski TR, Deery A, Dooley JS, Dick R, Hobbs KE, Davidson BR. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures. Hepatology. 1993;18:1399–1403.CrossRef Kurzawinski TR, Deery A, Dooley JS, Dick R, Hobbs KE, Davidson BR. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures. Hepatology. 1993;18:1399–1403.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fogel EL, Sherman S. How to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. Endoscopy. 1999;31:758–760.CrossRef Fogel EL, Sherman S. How to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. Endoscopy. 1999;31:758–760.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yamaguchi T, Shirai Y, Nakamura N, et al. Usefulness of brush cytology combined with pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: significance of pancreatic juice cytology after brushing. Pancreas. 2012;41:1225–1229.CrossRef Yamaguchi T, Shirai Y, Nakamura N, et al. Usefulness of brush cytology combined with pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: significance of pancreatic juice cytology after brushing. Pancreas. 2012;41:1225–1229.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Burnett AS, Calvert TJ, Chokshi RJ. Sensitivity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography standard cytology: 10-y review of the literature. J Surg Res. 2013;184:304–311.CrossRef Burnett AS, Calvert TJ, Chokshi RJ. Sensitivity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography standard cytology: 10-y review of the literature. J Surg Res. 2013;184:304–311.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V, Konjeti R, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:168–176.CrossRef Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V, Konjeti R, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:168–176.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Uehara H, Tatsumi K, Masuda E, et al. Scraping cytology with a guidewire for pancreatic-ductal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:52–59.CrossRef Uehara H, Tatsumi K, Masuda E, et al. Scraping cytology with a guidewire for pancreatic-ductal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:52–59.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sakuma Y, Kodama Y, Sogabe Y, et al. Diagnostic performance of a new endoscopic scraper for malignant biliary strictures: a multicenter prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:371–379.CrossRef Sakuma Y, Kodama Y, Sogabe Y, et al. Diagnostic performance of a new endoscopic scraper for malignant biliary strictures: a multicenter prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:371–379.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference De Moura DTH, Moura EGH, Bernardo WM, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasound for tissue diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound. 2018;7:10–19.CrossRef De Moura DTH, Moura EGH, Bernardo WM, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasound for tissue diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound. 2018;7:10–19.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cytologic Diagnosis of Bile Duct Strictures: Brush or Scrape?
Author
Jason S. Gold
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5256-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1/2019 Go to the issue

Multicenter Seminars: IBD (MUSE: IBD)

Introduction to the IBD Case Conference Series

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine