Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 6/2015

01-11-2015 | Original Paper

Current practices in percutaneous nephrolithotomy in Mexico: results of a nation-wide electronic survey

Authors: Christian I. Villeda Sandoval, Benjamin E. Montaño Roca, Ricardo A. Castillejos Molina, Carlos E. Mendez-Probst

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Practice patterns and choice of technological instruments in PCNL are not always standardized. There are no previous reports on the PCNL practice tendencies and patterns in Latin America. The aim of the study is to describe the current practice patterns of PCNL among the members of the Mexican Society of Urology (“Sociedad Mexicana de Urologia”). Observational and descriptive study. A 9-item closed questionnaire on PCNL practice patterns was answered by members of the Mexican Society of Urology in a secure website hosted survey after e-mail invitation. A descriptive numerical and graphical analysis was performed. A total of 90 contestants were registered out of 492 potential participants. PCNL is performed by 80 % of the participants, with an average of 16 procedures per year. Percutaneous tracts are commonly obtained by urologists on the same day of the procedure. Sequential and telescopic dilators are equally preferred over balloons. The pneumatic litotriptor is the most common choice and CT scan and X-ray are equally used as follow-up. The practice patterns of PCNL from Mexican urologists are different from other international reports. Influence of socio-economic circumstances is inferred.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE et al (2005) AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 173:1991–2000CrossRefPubMed Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE et al (2005) AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 173:1991–2000CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fernström I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257–259PubMed Fernström I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257–259PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kalogeropoulou C, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN (2009) Imaging in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23(10):1571–1577CrossRefPubMed Kalogeropoulou C, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN (2009) Imaging in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23(10):1571–1577CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Antonelli JA, Pearle MS (2013) Advances in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Clin N Am 40(1):99–113CrossRef Antonelli JA, Pearle MS (2013) Advances in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Clin N Am 40(1):99–113CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kauer PC, Laguna MP, Alivizatos G et al (2005) Present practice and treatment strategies in endourological stone management. results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-Technology (ESUT). Eur Urol 48:182–188CrossRefPubMed Kauer PC, Laguna MP, Alivizatos G et al (2005) Present practice and treatment strategies in endourological stone management. results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-Technology (ESUT). Eur Urol 48:182–188CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Huang WY, Wu SC, Chen YF et al (2014) Surgeon volume for percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with medical costs and length of hospital stay: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan. J Endourol 28:915–921CrossRefPubMed Huang WY, Wu SC, Chen YF et al (2014) Surgeon volume for percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with medical costs and length of hospital stay: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan. J Endourol 28:915–921CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kim HL, Hollowel CMP, Patel RV et al (2000) Use of new technology in endourology and laparoscopy by american urologists: internet and postal survey. Urology 56(5):760–765CrossRefPubMed Kim HL, Hollowel CMP, Patel RV et al (2000) Use of new technology in endourology and laparoscopy by american urologists: internet and postal survey. Urology 56(5):760–765CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K et al (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access: experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 96:875–878CrossRefPubMed Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K et al (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access: experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 96:875–878CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Babbin JS, Rowland D, Tarnam L et al (2008) Percutaneous renal intervention: comparison of 2-D and time-resolved 3-D (4-D) ultrasound for minimal calyceal dilation using an ultrasound phantom and fluoroscopic control. Ultrasound Med Biol 34:1765–1769CrossRef Babbin JS, Rowland D, Tarnam L et al (2008) Percutaneous renal intervention: comparison of 2-D and time-resolved 3-D (4-D) ultrasound for minimal calyceal dilation using an ultrasound phantom and fluoroscopic control. Ultrasound Med Biol 34:1765–1769CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Armitage JN, Irving ST, Burgess NA (2012) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United Kingdom: results of a prospective data registry. Eur Urol 61:1188–1193CrossRefPubMed Armitage JN, Irving ST, Burgess NA (2012) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United Kingdom: results of a prospective data registry. Eur Urol 61:1188–1193CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sivalingam S, Cannon ST, Nakada SY (2014) Current practices in percutaneous nephrolithotomy among endourologists. J Endourol 28(5):524–527CrossRefPubMed Sivalingam S, Cannon ST, Nakada SY (2014) Current practices in percutaneous nephrolithotomy among endourologists. J Endourol 28(5):524–527CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Current practices in percutaneous nephrolithotomy in Mexico: results of a nation-wide electronic survey
Authors
Christian I. Villeda Sandoval
Benjamin E. Montaño Roca
Ricardo A. Castillejos Molina
Carlos E. Mendez-Probst
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0797-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Urolithiasis 6/2015 Go to the issue