Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Breast Oncology

Current Practices and Barriers to the Integration of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Canadian Perspective

Authors: Jessica Maxwell, MD, FRCSC, Amanda Roberts, MD, MPH, FRCSC, Tulin Cil, MD, MEd, FRCSC, Ron Somogyi, MD, MSc, FRCSC, Fahima Osman, MD, MPH, FRCSC

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the safety and popularity of oncoplastic surgery, there is limited data examining utilization and barriers associated with its incorporation into practice. This study examines the use of oncoplastic techniques in breast conserving surgery and determines the barriers associated with their implementation.

Methods

A 13-item survey was mailed to all registered general surgeons in Ontario, Canada. The survey assessed surgeon demographics, utilization of specific oncoplastic techniques, and perceived barriers.

Results

A total of 234 survey responses were received, representing a response rate of 32.2 % (234 of 725). Of the respondents, 166 surgeons (70.9 %) reported a practice volume of at least 25 % breast surgery. Comparison was made between general surgeons performing oncoplastic breast surgery (N = 79) and those who did not use these techniques (N = 87). Surgeon gender, years in practice, fellowship training, and access to plastic surgery were similar across groups. Both groups rated the importance of breast cosmesis similarly. General surgeons with a practice volume involving >50 % breast surgery were more likely to use oncoplastic techniques (OR 8.82, p < .001) and involve plastic surgeons in breast conserving surgery (OR 2.21, p = .02). For surgeons not performing oncoplastic surgery, a lack of training and access to plastic surgeons were identified as significant barriers. For those using oncoplastic techniques, the absence of specific billing codes was identified as a limiting factor.

Conclusions

Lack of training, access to plastic surgeons, and absence of appropriate reimbursement for these cases are significant barriers to the adoption of oncoplastic techniques.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1456–61.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1456–61.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.CrossRefPubMed Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907–11.CrossRefPubMed Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907–11.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, et al. Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:441–52.PubMed Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, et al. Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:441–52.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Julien JP, Bijker N, Fentiman IS, et al. Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Lancet. 2000;355:528–33.CrossRefPubMed Julien JP, Bijker N, Fentiman IS, et al. Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Lancet. 2000;355:528–33.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:571–3.CrossRefPubMed Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:571–3.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, Kiebert G, Fentiman IS, Mignolet F, Bartelink H. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:307–14.CrossRefPubMed Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, Kiebert G, Fentiman IS, Mignolet F, Bartelink H. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:307–14.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Yarnold JR, Broderick M, Regan J, Ross G, Goddard A. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning. Radiother Oncol. 1992;25:160–6.CrossRefPubMed Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Yarnold JR, Broderick M, Regan J, Ross G, Goddard A. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning. Radiother Oncol. 1992;25:160–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3331–7.CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3331–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Silverstein MJ, Mai T, Savalia N, Vaince F, Guerra L. Oncoplastic breast surgery: the new paradigm. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:82–9.CrossRefPubMed Silverstein MJ, Mai T, Savalia N, Vaince F, Guerra L. Oncoplastic breast surgery: the new paradigm. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:82–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Clough KB, Nos C, Salmon RJ, Soussaline M, Durand JC. Conservative treatment of breast cancers by mammaplasty and irradiation: a new approach to lower quadrant tumors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:363–70.CrossRefPubMed Clough KB, Nos C, Salmon RJ, Soussaline M, Durand JC. Conservative treatment of breast cancers by mammaplasty and irradiation: a new approach to lower quadrant tumors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:363–70.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Audretsch W, Rezai M, Kolotas C, Zamboglou N, Schnabel T, Bojar H. Tumor-specific immediate reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Perspectives in Plastic Surgery. 1998;11:71–100. Audretsch W, Rezai M, Kolotas C, Zamboglou N, Schnabel T, Bojar H. Tumor-specific immediate reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Perspectives in Plastic Surgery. 1998;11:71–100.
13.
go back to reference Petit JY, Rietjens M, Garusi C, Greuze M, Perry C. Integration of plastic surgery in the course of breast-conserving surgery for cancer to improve cosmetic results and radicality of tumor excision. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1998;152:202–11.CrossRefPubMed Petit JY, Rietjens M, Garusi C, Greuze M, Perry C. Integration of plastic surgery in the course of breast-conserving surgery for cancer to improve cosmetic results and radicality of tumor excision. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1998;152:202–11.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou MC. Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2003;237:26–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou MC. Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2003;237:26–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Meretoja TJ, Svarvar C, Jahkola TA. Outcome of oncoplastic breast surgery in 90 prospective patients. Am J Surg. 2010;200:224–8.CrossRefPubMed Meretoja TJ, Svarvar C, Jahkola TA. Outcome of oncoplastic breast surgery in 90 prospective patients. Am J Surg. 2010;200:224–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dogan L, Gulcelik, MA, Karaman N, Ozaslan C, Reis E. Oncoplastic surgery in surgical treatment of breast cancer: is the timing of adjuvant treatment affected? Clin Breast Cancer. 2013;13:202–5.CrossRefPubMed Dogan L, Gulcelik, MA, Karaman N, Ozaslan C, Reis E. Oncoplastic surgery in surgical treatment of breast cancer: is the timing of adjuvant treatment affected? Clin Breast Cancer. 2013;13:202–5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Quan ML, Hodgson N, Przybysz R, et al. Surgery for Breast Cancer. In: Urbach DR, Simunovic M, Schultz SE, editors. Cancer Surgery in Ontario: ICES Atlas. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2008. Quan ML, Hodgson N, Przybysz R, et al. Surgery for Breast Cancer. In: Urbach DR, Simunovic M, Schultz SE, editors. Cancer Surgery in Ontario: ICES Atlas. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2008.
21.
go back to reference Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: A classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1375–91.CrossRefPubMed Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: A classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1375–91.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson ARM, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1505–9.CrossRefPubMed Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson ARM, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1505–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of breast asymmetry after breast-conserving operation for breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:274–80.CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of breast asymmetry after breast-conserving operation for breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:274–80.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Homes DR, Schooler W, Smith R. Oncoplastic approaches to breast conservation. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011:1–16. Homes DR, Schooler W, Smith R. Oncoplastic approaches to breast conservation. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011:1–16.
25.
go back to reference Asgiersson, KS, Rasheed KT, McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD. Oncological and cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;31:817–23.CrossRef Asgiersson, KS, Rasheed KT, McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD. Oncological and cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;31:817–23.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Berry MG, Fatoussi AD, Curnier A, Couturaud B, Salmon RJ. Oncoplastic breast surgery: A review and systemic approach. J Plast Recon Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1233–43.CrossRef Berry MG, Fatoussi AD, Curnier A, Couturaud B, Salmon RJ. Oncoplastic breast surgery: A review and systemic approach. J Plast Recon Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1233–43.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Maycha PL, Gough IR, Margaritoni M, Deo SVS, Sandelin K, Buccimazza I, Agarwal G. Oncoplastic breast surgery: a global perspective on practice, availability, and training. World J Surg. 2008;32:2570–7.CrossRef Maycha PL, Gough IR, Margaritoni M, Deo SVS, Sandelin K, Buccimazza I, Agarwal G. Oncoplastic breast surgery: a global perspective on practice, availability, and training. World J Surg. 2008;32:2570–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Zucca Matthes AG, Viera RA, Michelli RA, Ribeiro GH, Bailão A Jr, Haikel RL, Matthes Ado C. The development of an Oncoplastic Training Center—OTC. Int J Surg. 2012;10:265–9.CrossRefPubMed Zucca Matthes AG, Viera RA, Michelli RA, Ribeiro GH, Bailão A Jr, Haikel RL, Matthes Ado C. The development of an Oncoplastic Training Center—OTC. Int J Surg. 2012;10:265–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Yunaev M, Kingston G. Oncoplastic breast surgery in Australia and New Zealand—2014 and beyond. Gland Surg. 2014;3:77–80.PubMedPubMedCentral Yunaev M, Kingston G. Oncoplastic breast surgery in Australia and New Zealand—2014 and beyond. Gland Surg. 2014;3:77–80.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Sclafani LM, Bleznak A, Kelly T, El-Tamer MB. Training a new generation of breast surgeons: are we succeeding? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1856–61.CrossRefPubMed Sclafani LM, Bleznak A, Kelly T, El-Tamer MB. Training a new generation of breast surgeons: are we succeeding? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1856–61.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Down SK, Pereira JK, Leinster S, Simpson A. Training the oncoplastic breast surgeon—current and future perspectives. Gland Surg. 2013;2:126–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Down SK, Pereira JK, Leinster S, Simpson A. Training the oncoplastic breast surgeon—current and future perspectives. Gland Surg. 2013;2:126–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Grava-Gubins I, Scott S. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates amongst Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54:1424–30.PubMedPubMedCentral Grava-Gubins I, Scott S. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates amongst Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54:1424–30.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Current Practices and Barriers to the Integration of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Canadian Perspective
Authors
Jessica Maxwell, MD, FRCSC
Amanda Roberts, MD, MPH, FRCSC
Tulin Cil, MD, MEd, FRCSC
Ron Somogyi, MD, MSc, FRCSC
Fahima Osman, MD, MPH, FRCSC
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5318-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2016 Go to the issue

Breast Oncology

What Are We Missing?