Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Current agreement between ActiGraph and CUPAR in measuring moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity for adolescents

Authors: Yijuan Lu, Liang Hu, Kehong Yu

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

The study aims to develop and validate the Curriculum-related Physical Activity Recall questionnaire (CUPAR) as a measure of physical activity in adolescents. 83 middle-school students (13.23 ± 0.74 yrs) completed the CUPAR and whore ActiGraph accelerometers for seven consecutive days. Correlations and Bland–Altman plots were to examine the agreement between these two measures. Significant correlations were observed between the CUPAR and ActiGraph accelerometer for 5-day MPA (r = 0.29, p < 0.01), and for both 5-day and 7-day VPA (r = 0.47 and 0.79, ps < 0.01), and MVPA (r = 0.79 and 0.42, ps < 0.01). Plots showed reasonable agreement between the CUPAR and ActiGraph estimates of VPA and MVPA. The agreement between CUPAR and ActiGraph was higher for in-school VPA (r = 0.58, p < 0.01) and MVPA (r = 0.44, p < 0.01) as compared to the out-school VPA (r = 0.22, p < 0.05) and MVPA (r = 0.26, p < 0.05). The CUPAR can reduce respondents’ burden, representing a reliable and efficient measure of physical activity among adolescents, especially for PA occurred during in-school sessions and at vigorous intensity.

Available only for authorised users

Litt DM, Iannotti RJ, Wang J. Motivations for Adolescent Physical Activity. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(2):220–226. PubMed ID: 21415449 https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.8.2.220

Mounesan L, Sepidarkish M, Hosseini H, Ahmadi A, Majdzadeh R. Policy Brief on Promoting Physical Activity Among Adolescents. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3(9):599–606 PubMed ID: 23024847.PubMedPubMedCentral

Fernandes HM. Physical activity levels in Portuguese adolescents: A 10-year trend analysis (2006–2016). J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(2):185–189. PubMed ID: 28595866 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.015

Griffiths LJ, Cortina-Borja M, Sera F, et al. How active are our children? Findings from the Millennium Cohort Study. Bmj Open. 2013;3(8):e002893. PubMed ID: 23965931 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002893

Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(5):963–975. PMID: 10795788 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200005000-00014

Sterdt E, Liersch S, Walter U. Correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents: A systematic review of reviews. Health Educ J. 2014;73(1):72–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896912469578.CrossRef

Trost SG, Ward DS, Mcgraw B, Pate RP. Validity of the Previous Day Physical Activity Recall (PDPAR) in fifth-grade children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1999;11(11):341–8. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.11.4.341.CrossRef

Sylvia LG, Bernstein EE, Hubbard JL, Keating L, Anderson EJ. Practical Guide to Measuring Physical Activity. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(2):199–208. PubMed ID: 24290836 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2013.09.018

Hills AP, Mokhtar N, Byrne NM. Assessment of Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure: An Overview of Objective Measures. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2014;1(1):5. PubMed ID: 25988109 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2014.00005

10.

Buckinx F, Paquot N, Fadeur M, et al. Assessment of the energy expenditure of Belgian nursing home residents using indirect calorimetry. Nutrition. 2018;57:12–16. PubMed ID: 30099232 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2018.05.010

11.

Watanabe D, Nanri H, Sagayama H, et al. Estimation of Energy Intake by a Food Frequency Questionnaire: Calibration and Validation with the Doubly Labeled Water Method in Japanese Older People. Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1546. PubMed ID: 31323937 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071546

12.

Shephard RJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sport Med. 2003;37(3):197–206. PubMed ID: 12782543 https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.3.197

13.

Cancela JM, Lago J, Ouvina L, Ayan C. Validity of the 24-h previous day physical activity recall (PDPAR-24) in Spanish adolescents. Nutr Hosp. 2015;31(4):1701–1707. PubMed ID: 25795961 https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2015.31.4.8310

14.

Koorts H, Mattocks C, Ness AR, Deere K, Blair SN, Pate R, Riddoch C. The Association Between the Type, Context, and Levels of Physical Activity Amongst Adolescents. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(8):1057–1065. PubMed ID: 22039136 https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.8.8.1057

15.

Lennox A, Pienaar AE, Welders C. Physical fitness and the physical activity status of 15-year-old adolescents in a semi-urban community. South African Journal for Research in Sport Physical Education and Recreation. 2008;30(1):59–73.CrossRef

16.

Tucker JM, Welk G, Nusser SM, Beyler NK, Dzewaltowski D. Estimating Minutes of Physical Activity From the Previous Day Physical Activity Recall: Validation of a Prediction Equation. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(1):71–78. PubMed ID: 21297187 https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.8.1.71

17.

Ridley K, Ainsworth BE, Olds TS. Development of a Compendium of Energy Expenditures for Youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phy Act. 2008;5(1):45. PubMed ID: 18782458 https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-45

18.

Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: A Second Update of Codes and MET Values. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2011;43(8):1575–81 PubMed ID:26274586.CrossRef

19.

Lee KY, Macfarlane DJ, Cerin E. Comparison of three models of actigraph accelerometers during free living and controlled laboratory conditions. Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(3):332–339. PubMed ID: 23679150 https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2011.643925

20.

Fillon A, Pereira B, Vanhelst J, et al. Development of the Children and Adolescents Physical Activity and Sedentary Questionnaire (CAPAS-Q): Psychometric Validity and Clinical Interpretation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):13782. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113782.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Robbins, Lorraine B et al. “Reliability and Validity of the Commitment to Physical Activity Scale for Adolescents.” American journal of health promotion : AJHP vol. 2017;31,(4): 343–352. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.150114-QUAN-665

22.

Napolitano MA, Borradaile KE, Lewis BA, et al. Accelerometer use in a physical activity intervention trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010;31(6):514–523. PubMed ID: 20723619 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2010.08.004

23.

Weston J, Bordes A, Chopra S, Ruch AM, Van Merriënboer B, Joilin A, Mikolov T. Towards AI Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Tasks. 2015. p. arXiv:1502.05698. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv150205698W. Accessed 1 Feb 2015.

24.

Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, Mcmurray RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008;26(14):1557–1565. PubMed ID: 18949660 https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802334196

25.

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. London: Psychology Press; 1988. p. 110–1.

26.

Martin Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307–310. PubMed ID: 2868172 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8

27.

Kimm SY, Glynn NW, Kriska AM, et al. Longitudinal changes in physical activity in a biracial cohort during adolescence. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(8):1445–1454. PubMed ID: 10949011 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200008000-00013

28.

Dogan NO. Bland-Altman analysis: A paradigm to understand correlation and agreement. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18(4):139–41. PubMed ID: 30533555 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.09.001

29.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–310. PubMed ID: 14726173 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15270-1

30.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135–160. PubMed ID: 10501650 https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204

31.

Krouwer JS. Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method. Stat Med. 2008;27(5):778–780. PubMed ID: 16818830 https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3086

32.

Krouwer J. Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method. Stat Med. 2008;27(5):778–780. PubMed ID:17907247 https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3086

33.

Dollman J, Stanley R, Wilson A. The Concurrent Validity of the 3-Day Physical Activity Recall in Australian Youth. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2015;27(2):262–267. PubMed ID: 25902553 https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2014-0117

34.

Treuth MS, Sherwood NE, Butte NF, et al. Validity and reliability of activity measures in African-American girls for GEMS. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(3):532–539. PubMed ID: 12618587 https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000053702.03884.3F

35.

Jing WJ, Tom B, Patrick LW, An CT, Jane PA. Validation of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) among Chinese Children. Biomed Environ Sci. 2016;29(03):177–186. PubMed ID: 27109128 https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2016.022

36.

Johnson RA, Miller I, Freund JE. Probability and statistics for engineers. London: Pearson Education; 2000.

37.

Pate RR, Ross R, Dowda M, Trost SG, Sirard J. Validation of a three-day physical activity recall instrument in female youth. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2003;15:257–65.CrossRef

38.

Jing Bo. Research on the influence of classroom teaching environment on high intensity physical activities of junior high school students in Physical Education [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Institute of physical education; 2019.

39.

Ainsworth, B.E., W.L. Haskell, M.C. Whitt, et al. Compendium of Physical Activities: An update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32:S498-S516, 2000. PubMed ID: 10993420 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009

Title: Current agreement between ActiGraph and CUPAR in measuring moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity for adolescents
Authors: Yijuan Lu
Liang Hu
Kehong Yu
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04541-4

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Current agreement between ActiGraph and CUPAR in measuring moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity for adolescents

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Spontaneous tumor lysis syndrome (STLS) during biopsy for burkitt lymphoma: a case report

Unhealthy food consumption and its determinants among children aged 6 to 23 months in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis of the demographic and health survey

Appropriate feeding practices and associated factors during diarrheal disease among children aged 6 to 23 months in Sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis of the recent demographic and health survey

Minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Treatment of children with refractory/relapse high risk langerhans cell histiocytosis with the combination of cytarabine, vindesine and prednisone

‘We did everything by phone’: a qualitative study of mothers' experience of smartphone-aided screening of cerebral palsy in Kathmandu, Nepal