Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context

Authors: Elisabet Machín-Martín, Héctor González-de la Torre, Haridian Bordón-Reyes, Julia Jeppesen-Gutiérrez, Alicia Martín-Martínez

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several instruments have been designed to assess the childbirth experience. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) is one of the most widely used tools. There is an improved version of this instrument, the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ 2.0), which has not been adapted or validated for use in Spain. The aim of present study is to adapt the CEQ 2.0 to the Spanish context and evaluate its psychometric properties.

Methods

This research was carried out in 2 stages. In the first stage, a methodological study was carried out in which the instrument was translated and back-translated, content validity was assessed by 10 experts (by calculating Aiken's V coefficient) and face validity was assessed in a sample of 30 postpartum women. In the second stage, a cross-sectional study was carried out to evaluate construct validity by using confirmatory factor analysis, reliability evaluation (internal consistency and temporal stability) and validation by known groups.

Results

In Stage 1, a Spanish version of the CEQ 2.0 (CEQ-E 2.0) was obtained with adequate face and content validity, with Aiken V scores greater than 0.70 for all items. A final sample of 500 women participated in Stage 2 of the study. The fit values for the obtained four-domain model were RMSEA = 0.038 [95% CI: 0.038–0.042], CFI = 0.989 [95% CI: 0.984–0.991], and GFI = 0.990 [95% CI: 0.982–0.991]. The overall Omega and Cronbach's Alpha coefficients were 0.872 [95% CI: 0.850–0.891] and 0.870 [95% CI: 0.849–0.890] respectively. A coefficient of intraclass correlation of 0.824 [95% CI: 0.314–0.936] (p ≤ 0.001) and a concordance coefficient of 0.694 [95% CI: 0.523–0.811] were obtained.

Conclusions

The Spanish version of CEQ 2.0 (CEQ-E 2.0), has adequate psychometric properties and is a valid, useful, and reliable instrument for assessing the childbirth experience in Spanish women.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Lemmens SMP, van Montfort P, Meertens LJE, Spaanderman MEA, Smits LJM, de Vries RG, Scheepers HCJ. Perinatal factors related to pregnancy and childbirth satisfaction: a prospective cohort study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;42(3):181–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Taheri M, Takian A, Taghizadeh Z, Jafari N, Sarafraz N. Creating a positive perception of childbirth experience: systematic review and meta-analysis of prenatal and intrapartum interventions. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Mattison CA, Dion ML, Lavis JN, Hutton EK, Wilson MG. Midwifery and obstetrics: factors influencing mothers’ satisfaction with the birth experience. Birth. 2018;45(3):322–7.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Otalea M, Nanu I, Nanu MI, Elden H, Linden K, Zaigham M, Vik ES, Kongslien S, Nedberg I, Costa R, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Sacks E, Muzigaba M, Lincetto O, Lazzerini M, IMAgiNE EURO Study Group. WHO Standards-based questionnaire to measure health workers’ perspective on the quality of care around the time of childbirth in the WHO European region: development and mixed-methods validation in six countries. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4):e056753.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Ghanbari-Homaie S, Meedya S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Jafarabadi MA, Mohammadi E, Mirghafourvand M. Recommendations for improving primiparous women’s childbirth experience: results from a multiphase study in Iran. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):146.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
7.
McKelvin G, Thomson G, Downe S. The childbirth experience: a systematic review of predictors and outcomes. Women Birth. 2021;34(5):407–16.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Olza I, Uvnas-Moberg K, Ekström-Bergström A, Leahy-Warren P, Karlsdottir SI, Nieuwenhuijze M, Villarmea S, Hadjigeorgiou E, Kazmierczak M, Spyridou A, Buckley S. Birth as a neuro-psycho-social event: An integrative model of maternal experiences and their relation to neurohormonal events during childbirth. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0230992.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Kohan S, Hajihashemi M, Valiani M, Beigi M, Mohebbi-Dehnavi Z. Maternal-infant outcomes of birth planning: a review study. J Educ Health Promot. 2023;12:315.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Kempe P, Vikström-Bolin M. Women’s satisfaction with the birthing experience in relation to duration of labour, obstetric interventions and mode of birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;246:156–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Oskoui BS, Mehrabi E, Nourizadeh R, Esmaeilpour K. The effect of mindfulness-based counseling on the childbirth experience of primiparous women: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):274.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Sys D, Kajdy A, Niżniowska M, Baranowska B, Raczkiewicz D, Tataj-Puzyna U. The experience of women giving birth after cesarean section-A longitudinal observational study. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(12):1806.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Silva-Fernandez CS, de la Calle M, Arribas SM, Garrosa E, Ramiro-Cortijo D. Factors associated with obstetric violence implicated in the development of postpartum depression and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review. Nurs Rep. 2023;13(4):1553–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Carlhäll S, Nelson M, Svenvik M, Axelsson D, Blomberg M. Maternal childbirth experience and time in labor: a population-based cohort study. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11930.ADSPubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Alizadeh-Dibazari Z, Abdolalipour S, Mirghafourvand M. The effect of prenatal education on fear of childbirth, pain intensity during labour and childbirth experience: a scoping review using systematic approach and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):541.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
Khsim IEF, Rodríguez MM, Riquelme Gallego B, Caparros-Gonzalez RA, Amezcua-Prieto C. Risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder after childbirth: a systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(11):2598.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Wigert H, Nilsson C, Dencker A, Begley C, Jangsten E, Sparud-Lundin C, Mollberg M, Patel H. Women’s experiences of fear of childbirth: a metasynthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2020;15(1):1704484.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Rúger-Navarrete A, Vázquez-Lara JM, Antúnez-Calvente I, Rodríguez-Díaz L, Riesco-González FJ, Palomo-Gómez R, Gómez-Salgado J, Fernández-Carrasco FJ. Antenatal fear of childbirth as a risk factor for a bad childbirth experience. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(3):297.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Dencker A, Nilsson C, Begley C, Jangsten E, Mollberg M, Patel H, Wigert H, Hessman E, Sjöblom H, Sparud-Lundin C. Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth: a systematic review. Women Birth. 2019;32(2):99–111.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Downe S, Finlayson K, Oladapo OT, Bonet M, Gülmezoglu AM. What matters to women during childbirth: a systematic qualitative review. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0194906.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Pereda-Goikoetxea B, Huitzi-Egilegor JX, Zubeldia-Etxeberria J, Uranga-Iturrioz MJ, Elorza-Puyadena MI. Hospital childbirth: perspectives of women and professionals for a positive experience-a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(19):10238.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Nijagal MA, Wissig S, Stowell C, Olson E, Amer-Wahlin I, Bonsel G, Brooks A, Coleman M, Devi Karalasingam S, Duffy JMN, Flanagan T, Gebhardt S, Greene ME, Groenendaal F, R Jeganathan JR, Kowaliw T, Lamain-de-Ruiter M, Main E, Owens M, Petersen R, Reiss I, Sakala C, Speciale AM, Thompson R, Okunade O, Franx A. Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, an ICHOM proposal. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):953.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Olza I, Leahy-Warren P, Benyamini Y, Kazmierczak M, Karlsdottir SI, Spyridou A, Crespo-Mirasol E, Takács L, Hall PJ, Murphy M, Jonsdottir SS, Downe S, Nieuwenhuijze MJ. Women’s psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e020347.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):CD003766.PubMed
26.
Joensuu J, Saarijärvi H, Rouhe H, Gissler M, Ulander VM, Heinonen S, Torkki P, Mikkola T. Maternal childbirth experience and pain relief methods: a retrospective 7-year cohort study of 85 488 parturients in Finland. BMJ Open. 2022;12(5):e061186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Alfaro Blazquez R, Corchon S, Ferrer FE. Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review. Midwifery. 2017;55:103–12.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Nilvér H, Begley C, Berg M. Measuring women’s childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):203.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Walker KF, Wilson P, Bugg GJ, Dencker A, Thornton JG. Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:86.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Soriano-Vidal FJ, Oliver-Roig A, Cabrero-García J, Congost-Maestre N, Dencker A, Richart-Martínez M. The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):372.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Zhu X, Wang Y, Zhou H, Qiu L, Pang R. Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215373.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Abbaspoor Z, Moghaddam-Banaem L, Ronaghi S, Dencker A. Translation and cultural adaptation of the childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in Iran. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019;24(4):296–300.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Patabendige M, Palihawadana TS, Herath RP, Wijesinghe PS. Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in the Sri Lankan setting: translation, cultural adaptation and validation into the Sinhala language. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):534.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Kalok A, Nordin N, Sharip S, Abdul Rahman R, Shah SA, Abdullah Mahdy Z, Kamisan AI. Psychometric Evaluation of the Malay Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-My). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(13):7644.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Boie S, Lauridsen HH, Glavind J, Smed MK, Uldbjerg N, Bor P. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)-Validation of its use in a Danish-speaking population of new mothers stimulated with oxytocin during labour. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233122.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Kazemi S, Dencker A, Pazandeh F, Montazeri A, Sedigh-Mobarakabadi S, Hajian S. Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:6879283.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Place K, Kruit H, Rahkonen L. Comparison of primiparous women’s childbirth experience in labor induction with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol - a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(10):1153–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
González-de la Torre H, Miñarro-Jiménez S, Palma-Arjona I, Jeppesen-Gutierrez J, Berenguer-Pérez M, Verdú-Soriano J. Perceived satisfaction of women during labour at the Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil of the Canary Islands through the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E). Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2021;31(1):21–30.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Lathrop A, Bonsack CF, Haas DM. Women’s experiences with water birth: A matched groups prospective study. Birth. 2018;45(4):416–23.PubMedCrossRef
40.
da Silva Vieira RCM, Ferreira CHJ, de Carvalho Cavalli F, do Prado MLR, Beleza ACS, Driusso P. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the childbirth experience questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):477.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Dencker A, Bergqvist L, Berg M, Greenbrook JTV, Nilsson C, Lundgren I. Measuring women’s experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):199.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Walker KF, Dencker A, Thornton JG. Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019;5:100097.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Lok KYW, Fan HSL, Ko RWT, Kwok JYY, Wong JYH, Fong DYT, Shek NWM, Ngan HYS, Choi EPH. Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):126.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Peters LL, van der Pijl MSG, Vedam S, Barkema WS, van Lohuizen MT, Jansen DEMC, Feijen-de Jong EI. Assessing Dutch women’s experiences of labour and birth: adaptations and psychometric evaluations of the measures Mothers on Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, Mothers on Respect Index, and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):134.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Ghanbari-Homayi S, Dencker A, Fardiazar Z, Jafarabadi MA, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Meedya S, Mohammadi E, Mirghafourvand M. Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):465.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Ahmadpour P, Faroughi F, Mirghafourvand M. The relationship of childbirth experience with postpartum depression and anxiety: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–91.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Penfield RD, Giacobbi PR Jr. Applying a score confidence interval to Aiken’s item content-relevance index. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sc. 2004;8:213–25.CrossRef
49.
Soto CM, Segovia JL. Confidence intervals for the content validity: a visual basic computer program for the Aiken’s V. Anal Psicol. 2009;25:169–71.
50.
Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019;15(2):214–21.PubMedCrossRef
51.
52.
Barrio-Cantalejo IM, Simón-Lorda P, Melguizo M, Escalona I, Marijuán MI, Hernando P. Validación de la Escala INFLESZ para evaluar la legibilidad de los textos dirigidos a pacientes. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2008;31(2):135–52.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-Seva U, Hernández-Dorado A, Muñiz J. Decalogue for the Factor Analysis of Test Items. Psicothema. 2022;34(1):7–17.PubMed
54.
Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, Nam NH, Ng SJ, Abbas KS, Huy NT, Marušić A, Paul CL, Kwok J, Karbwang J, de Waure C, Drummond FJ, Kizawa Y, Taal E, Vermeulen J, Lee GHM, Gyedu A, To KG, Verra ML, Jacqz-Aigrain ÉM, Leclercq WKG, Salminen ST, Sherbourne CD, Mintzes B, Lozano S, Tran US, Matsui M, Karamouzian M. A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3179–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Lloret-Segura S, Ferreres-Traver A, Hernández-Baeza A, Tomás-Marco I. The exploratory factor analysis of items: guided analysis based on empirical data and software. Anal Psicol. 2017;33:417–32.
56.
Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-Seva U, Bargalló-Escrivà MT. Gulliksen’s pool: A quick tool for preliminary detection of problematic items in item factor analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0290611.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-Seva U. A note on improving EAP trait estimation in oblique factor-analytic and item response theory models. Psicologica. 2016;37:235–47.
58.
Hancock GR, Mueller RO. Rethinking Construct Reliability within Latent Variable Systems. In: Cudeck R, du Toit S, Sörbom D, editors. Structural equation modeling: Present and future. Scientific Software, United States of America: Lincolnwood; 2001. p. 195–216.
59.
Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-Seva U. Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 2018;78(5):762–80.PubMedCrossRef
60.
61.
Lloret-Segura S, Ferreres-Traver A, Hernandez A, Tomás I. Exploratory item factor analysis: a practical guide revised and updated. An De Psicol. 2014;30:1151–69.
62.
Comrey AL, Lee HB. A First Course in Factor Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2013.CrossRef
63.
64.
LísaSigurðardóttir V, L Mangindin E, Stoll K, Marie Swift E. Childbirth experience questionnaire 2 - Icelandic translation and validation. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2023;37:100882.CrossRef
65.
Henriksen L, Debrecéniová J, Hrabovská A, Pufflerová Š, Blix E. Adaption and validation of the childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ-SK) in Slovakia. Eur J Midwifery. 2023;7:6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
Jha P, Jha VK, Sharma B, Jha A, Erlandsson K, Bogren M. Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 in Karnataka state, India. PLoS One. 2023;18(11):e0291591.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
Webb R, Ayers S, Bogaerts A, Jeličić L, Pawlicka P, Van Haeken S, Uddin N, Xuereb RB, Kolesnikova N, COST action CA18211:DEVoTION team. When birth is not as expected: a systematic review of the impact of a mismatch between expectations and experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):475.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Thomson G, Feeley C, Moran VH, Downe S, Oladapo OT. Women’s experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
Shahveisi M, Nourizadeh R, Mehrabi E. The effect of shared decision-making in choosing the method of labor analgesia on childbirth experience among primiparous women. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0274559.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Weng MH, Chou HC, Liaw JJ. Women’s sense of control during labour and birth with epidural analgesia: a qualitative descriptive study. Midwifery. 2023;116:103496.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Chabbert M, Panagiotou D, Wendland J. Predictive factors of women’s subjective perception of childbirth experience: a systematic review of the literature. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021;39(1):43.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Sijtsma K, Pfadt JM. Part II: On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha: Discussing Lower Bounds and Correlated Errors. Psychometrika. 2021;86(4):843–60.MathSciNetPubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
73.
Viladrich C, Angulo-Brunet AR, Doval E. A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Anal Psicol. 2017;33(3):755–82.CrossRef
74.
Deng L, Chan W. Testing the difference between reliability coefficients alpha and omega. Educ Psychol Meas. 2017;77(2):185–203.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol. 2014;105(3):399–412.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C. Childbirth experiences among women with fear of birth randomized to internet-based cognitive therapy or midwife counseling. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;41(3):205–14.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Lyngbye K, Melgaard D, Lindblad V, Kragholm KH, Eidhammer A, Westmark S, Maimburg RD. Do women’s perceptions of their childbirth experiences change over time? A six-week follow-up study in a Danish population. Midwifery. 2022;113:103429.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Mena-Tudela D, Iglesias-Casás S, González-Chordá VM, Cervera-Gasch Á, Andreu-Pejó L, Valero-Chilleron MJ. Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part I): Women’s Perception and Interterritorial Differences. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):7726.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context
Authors
Elisabet Machín-Martín
Héctor González-de la Torre
Haridian Bordón-Reyes
Julia Jeppesen-Gutiérrez
Alicia Martín-Martínez
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06400-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024 Go to the issue

Research

Exploring the association between unintended pregnancies and unmet contraceptive needs among Ugandan women of reproductive age: an analysis of the 2016 Uganda demographic and health survey

Research

Early to mid-pregnancy HbA1c levels and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes in three low middle-income countries in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa

Research

Association between maternal health service utilization and under-five mortality rate in China and its provinces, 1990–2017

Research

Pressure to provide milk among mothers of very low birth weight infants: an explorative study

Research

Patient-centered respectful maternity care: a factor analysis contextualizing marginalized identities, trust, and informed choice

Research

Comprehensive reference intervals for white blood cell counts during pregnancy