Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2011

Open Access 01-02-2011 | Pictorial Review

CT colonography: avoiding traps and pitfalls

Authors: Philippe Lefere, Stefaan Gryspeerdt

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a reliable technique for detecting tumoral lesions in the colon. However, good performance of polyp detection is only achieved if experienced CTC radiologists combine meticulous interpretation with state-of-the-art CTC technique. To reach this experience level, CTC training is mandatory. With a considerably long and steep learning curve, it has been demonstrated that in inexperienced hands both technical failure and observer errors stand for the majority of missed lesions. The purpose of this pictorial review is to give an overview of traps and pitfalls in CTC imaging resulting in false negative and positive findings, and how to avoid them by application of state-of-the-art CTC technique and interpretation.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412PubMedCrossRef Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Regge D (2007) the IMPACT Study Group Investigators (2007) Accuracy of CT colonography in subjects at increased risk of colorectal carcinoma: a multicenter study on 1000 patients. Presented at annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago Regge D (2007) the IMPACT Study Group Investigators (2007) Accuracy of CT colonography in subjects at increased risk of colorectal carcinoma: a multicenter study on 1000 patients. Presented at annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago
4.
go back to reference Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, Schafer C, Horst D, Becker CR et al (2009) Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 58(2):241–248PubMedCrossRef Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, Schafer C, Horst D, Becker CR et al (2009) Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 58(2):241–248PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Burling D, International collaboration for CT colonography standards (2010) CT colonography standards. Clin Radiol 65:474–480CrossRef Burling D, International collaboration for CT colonography standards (2010) CT colonography standards. Clin Radiol 65:474–480CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, Davis W, Bosworth HB, Sanders L et al (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365(9456):305–311PubMedCrossRef Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, Davis W, Bosworth HB, Sanders L et al (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365(9456):305–311PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Doshi T, Rusinak D, Halvorsen RA, Rockey DC, Suzuki K (2007) Dachman AH (2005) CT colonography: false-negative interpretations. Radiology 244(1):165–173PubMedCrossRef Doshi T, Rusinak D, Halvorsen RA, Rockey DC, Suzuki K (2007) Dachman AH (2005) CT colonography: false-negative interpretations. Radiology 244(1):165–173PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT (2005) Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:786-792 Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT (2005) Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:786-792
9.
go back to reference Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Dewyspelaere J et al (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224:393–403PubMedCrossRef Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Dewyspelaere J et al (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224:393–403PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference O’Connor SD, Summers RM, Choi JR et al (2006) Oral contrast adherence to polyps on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:51–57PubMedCrossRef O’Connor SD, Summers RM, Choi JR et al (2006) Oral contrast adherence to polyps on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:51–57PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Taylor AJ (2008) Asymptomatic pneumatosis at CT colonography: a benign self-limited imaging finding distinct from perforation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:W112–W117PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Taylor AJ (2008) Asymptomatic pneumatosis at CT colonography: a benign self-limited imaging finding distinct from perforation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:W112–W117PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yoshida H, Näppi J (2007) CAD in CT colonography without and with oral contrast agents: progress and challenges. Comput Med Imaging Graph 31:267–284PubMedCrossRef Yoshida H, Näppi J (2007) CAD in CT colonography without and with oral contrast agents: progress and challenges. Comput Med Imaging Graph 31:267–284PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chen JC, Dchman AH (2006) Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1086–1089PubMedCrossRef Chen JC, Dchman AH (2006) Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1086–1089PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dachman AH, Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Morrin M (2007) CT colonography: visualization methods, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am 45:347–59PubMedCrossRef Dachman AH, Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Morrin M (2007) CT colonography: visualization methods, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am 45:347–59PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Reeders JW, Tytgat GN (1994) Clinical Radiology and endoscopy of the colon. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 375–377 Reeders JW, Tytgat GN (1994) Clinical Radiology and endoscopy of the colon. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 375–377
17.
go back to reference Floch HM, Floch NR, Kowdley K et al (2005) Netter’s Gastroenterology. V. Colon, rectum and anus. Icon Learning Systems, Teterboro Floch HM, Floch NR, Kowdley K et al (2005) Netter’s Gastroenterology. V. Colon, rectum and anus. Icon Learning Systems, Teterboro
18.
go back to reference Gryspeerdt SS, Herman MJ, Baekelandt MA et al (2004) Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 14:768–777PubMedCrossRef Gryspeerdt SS, Herman MJ, Baekelandt MA et al (2004) Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 14:768–777PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M et al (2003) Diverticular disease in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13:L62–L74PubMedCrossRef Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M et al (2003) Diverticular disease in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13:L62–L74PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Glick SN (1991) Inverted colonic diverticulum: air contrast barium enema findings in six cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:961–964PubMedCrossRef Glick SN (1991) Inverted colonic diverticulum: air contrast barium enema findings in six cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:961–964PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chintapalli KN, Chopra S, Ghiatas AA et al (1999) Diverticulitis vs colon cancer: differentiation with helical CT findings. Radiology 210:429–435PubMedCrossRef Chintapalli KN, Chopra S, Ghiatas AA et al (1999) Diverticulitis vs colon cancer: differentiation with helical CT findings. Radiology 210:429–435PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kelly JK (1991) Polypoid prolapsing mucosal folds in diverticular disease. Am J Surg Pathol 15:871–878PubMedCrossRef Kelly JK (1991) Polypoid prolapsing mucosal folds in diverticular disease. Am J Surg Pathol 15:871–878PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
CT colonography: avoiding traps and pitfalls
Authors
Philippe Lefere
Stefaan Gryspeerdt
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0054-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Insights into Imaging 1/2011 Go to the issue