Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2013

01-04-2013

CT and MR enterography in evaluating small bowel diseases: when to use which modality?

Authors: Gabriele Masselli, Gianfranco Gualdi

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

MR and CT techniques optimized for small bowel imaging are playing an increasing role in the evaluation of small bowel disorders. Several studies have shown the advantages of these techniques over traditional barium fluoroscopic examinations due to improvements in spatial and temporal resolution combined with improved bowel distending agents. The preference of MR vs. CT has been geographical and based on expertise and public policy. With the increasing awareness of radiation exposure, there has been a more global interest in implementing techniques that either reduce or eliminate radiation exposure. This is especially important in patients with chronic diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease who may require multiple studies over a lifetime or in studies that require sequential imaging time points such as in assessment of gastrointestinal motility. MRI has many properties that make it well suited to imaging of the small bowel: the lack of ionizing radiation, the improved tissue contrast that can be obtained by using a variety of pulse sequences, and the ability to perform real time functional imaging. Moreover, MR modalities allow visualization of the entire bowel, without overlapping bowel loops, as well as the detection of both intra- and extraluminal abnormalities.The intra- and extraluminal MR findings, combined with contrast enhancement and functional information, help to make an accurate diagnosis and consequently characterize small bowel diseases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Furukawa A, Saotome T, Yamasaki M, et al. (2004) Cross-sectional imaging in Crohn disease. Radiographics 24:689–702PubMedCrossRef Furukawa A, Saotome T, Yamasaki M, et al. (2004) Cross-sectional imaging in Crohn disease. Radiographics 24:689–702PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Siddiki HA, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, et al. (2009) Prospective comparison of state-of-the-art MR enterography and CT enterography in small bowel Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:113–121PubMedCrossRef Siddiki HA, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, et al. (2009) Prospective comparison of state-of-the-art MR enterography and CT enterography in small bowel Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:113–121PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lee SS, Kim AY, Yang SK, et al. (2009) Crohn disease of the small bowel: comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and small-bowel follow-through as diagnostic techniques. Radiology 251:751–761PubMedCrossRef Lee SS, Kim AY, Yang SK, et al. (2009) Crohn disease of the small bowel: comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and small-bowel follow-through as diagnostic techniques. Radiology 251:751–761PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schreyer AG, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, et al. (2004) Modern imaging using computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:45–54PubMedCrossRef Schreyer AG, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, et al. (2004) Modern imaging using computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:45–54PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schmidt S, Lepori D, Meuwly JY, et al. (2003) Prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis: interobserver agreement and sensitivity by of “sign-by-sign” correlation. Eur Radiol 13:1303–1311PubMed Schmidt S, Lepori D, Meuwly JY, et al. (2003) Prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis: interobserver agreement and sensitivity by of “sign-by-sign” correlation. Eur Radiol 13:1303–1311PubMed
6.
go back to reference Masselli G, Brizi GM, Parrella A, et al. (2004) Crohn disease: magnetic resonance enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 29(3):326–328PubMedCrossRef Masselli G, Brizi GM, Parrella A, et al. (2004) Crohn disease: magnetic resonance enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 29(3):326–328PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Horsthuis K, Stokkers PC, Stoker J (2008) Detection of inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic performance of cross-sectional imaging modalities. Abdom Imaging 33(4):407–416PubMedCrossRef Horsthuis K, Stokkers PC, Stoker J (2008) Detection of inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic performance of cross-sectional imaging modalities. Abdom Imaging 33(4):407–416PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Carucci LR, Levine MS (2002) Radiographic imaging of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 31:93–117PubMedCrossRef Carucci LR, Levine MS (2002) Radiographic imaging of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 31:93–117PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Maglinte DD, Sandrasegaran K, Lappas JC, Chiorean M (2007) CT enteroclysis. Radiology 245(3):661–671PubMedCrossRef Maglinte DD, Sandrasegaran K, Lappas JC, Chiorean M (2007) CT enteroclysis. Radiology 245(3):661–671PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Bruining DH, Huprich JE (2011) New concepts in intestinal imaging for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140(6):1795–1806PubMedCrossRef Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Bruining DH, Huprich JE (2011) New concepts in intestinal imaging for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140(6):1795–1806PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Masselli G, Vecchioli A, Gualdi GF (2006) Crohn disease of the small bowel: MR enteroclysis versus conventional enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 31(4):400–409PubMedCrossRef Masselli G, Vecchioli A, Gualdi GF (2006) Crohn disease of the small bowel: MR enteroclysis versus conventional enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 31(4):400–409PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fidler JL, Guimaraes L, Einstein DM (2009) MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiographics 29(6):1811–1825PubMedCrossRef Fidler JL, Guimaraes L, Einstein DM (2009) MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiographics 29(6):1811–1825PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cipriano LE, Levesque BG, Zaric GS, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ (2012) Cost-effectiveness of imaging strategies to reduce radiation-induced cancer risk in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 18(7):1240–1248PubMedCrossRef Cipriano LE, Levesque BG, Zaric GS, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ (2012) Cost-effectiveness of imaging strategies to reduce radiation-induced cancer risk in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 18(7):1240–1248PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lawrance IC, Welman CJ, Shipman P, Murray K (2009) Correlation of MRI-determined small bowel Crohn’s disease categories with medical response and surgical pathology. World J Gastroenterol 15(27):3367–3375PubMedCrossRef Lawrance IC, Welman CJ, Shipman P, Murray K (2009) Correlation of MRI-determined small bowel Crohn’s disease categories with medical response and surgical pathology. World J Gastroenterol 15(27):3367–3375PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Masselli G, Polettini E, Casciani E, et al. (2009) Small-bowel neoplasms: prospective evaluation of MR enteroclysis. Radiology 251(3):743–750PubMedCrossRef Masselli G, Polettini E, Casciani E, et al. (2009) Small-bowel neoplasms: prospective evaluation of MR enteroclysis. Radiology 251(3):743–750PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Van Weyenberg SJ, Meijerink MR, Jacobs MA, et al. (2010) MR enteroclysis in the diagnosis of small-bowel neoplasms. Radiology 254:765–773PubMedCrossRef Van Weyenberg SJ, Meijerink MR, Jacobs MA, et al. (2010) MR enteroclysis in the diagnosis of small-bowel neoplasms. Radiology 254:765–773PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gore R, Levine M, Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Sandrasegaran K (2008) Malignant tumors of the small bowel. In: Gore R, Levine M (eds) Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, pp 853–869 Gore R, Levine M, Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Sandrasegaran K (2008) Malignant tumors of the small bowel. In: Gore R, Levine M (eds) Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, pp 853–869
21.
22.
go back to reference Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, Gualdi G (2008) Comparison of MR enteroclysis with MR enterography and conventional enteroclysis in patients with Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol 18(3):438–447PubMedCrossRef Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, Gualdi G (2008) Comparison of MR enteroclysis with MR enterography and conventional enteroclysis in patients with Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol 18(3):438–447PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L, et al. (2007) A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 17:2294–2301PubMedCrossRef Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L, et al. (2007) A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 17:2294–2301PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Korman U, Kurugoglu S, Ogut G (2005) Conventional enteroclysis with complementary MR Enteroclysis: a combination of small bowel imaging. Abdom Imaging 30:564–575PubMedCrossRef Korman U, Kurugoglu S, Ogut G (2005) Conventional enteroclysis with complementary MR Enteroclysis: a combination of small bowel imaging. Abdom Imaging 30:564–575PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, et al. (2000) Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 215(3):717–725PubMed Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, et al. (2000) Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 215(3):717–725PubMed
26.
go back to reference Masselli G, Brizi MG, Menchini L, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance enteroclysis of Crohn’s. Radiol Med 110:221–233PubMed Masselli G, Brizi MG, Menchini L, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance enteroclysis of Crohn’s. Radiol Med 110:221–233PubMed
27.
go back to reference Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, et al. (2004) Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:491–497PubMedCrossRef Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, et al. (2004) Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:491–497PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Maglinte DD, Gourtsoyiannis N, Rex D, et al. (2003) Classification of small bowel Crohn’s subtypes based on multimodality imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 41:285–303PubMedCrossRef Maglinte DD, Gourtsoyiannis N, Rex D, et al. (2003) Classification of small bowel Crohn’s subtypes based on multimodality imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 41:285–303PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos P (2002) MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 12(11):2651–2658PubMed Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos P (2002) MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 12(11):2651–2658PubMed
30.
go back to reference Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, et al. (2002) Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 222:652–660PubMedCrossRef Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, et al. (2002) Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 222:652–660PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gore R, Masselli G, Caroline D (2008) Crohn’s disease of the small bowel. In: Gore R, Levine M (eds) Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, pp 781–806CrossRef Gore R, Masselli G, Caroline D (2008) Crohn’s disease of the small bowel. In: Gore R, Levine M (eds) Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, pp 781–806CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. (2001) MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(6):1325–1332PubMedCrossRef Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. (2001) MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(6):1325–1332PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Stokkers PC, Stoker J (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 19(6):1450–1460PubMedCrossRef Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Stokkers PC, Stoker J (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 19(6):1450–1460PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Taylor SA, Punwani S, Rodriguez-Justo M, et al. (2009) Mural Crohn disease: correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings with angiogenesis and inflammation at histologic examination—pilot study. Radiology 251(2):369–379PubMedCrossRef Taylor SA, Punwani S, Rodriguez-Justo M, et al. (2009) Mural Crohn disease: correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings with angiogenesis and inflammation at histologic examination—pilot study. Radiology 251(2):369–379PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Froehlich JM, Waldherr C, Stoupis C, et al. (2010) MR motility imaging in Crohn’s disease improves lesion detection compared with standard MR imaging. Eur Radiol 20:1945–1951PubMedCrossRef Froehlich JM, Waldherr C, Stoupis C, et al. (2010) MR motility imaging in Crohn’s disease improves lesion detection compared with standard MR imaging. Eur Radiol 20:1945–1951PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Tolan DJ, Greenhalgh R, Zealley IA, et al. (2010) MR enterographic manifestations of small bowel Crohn disease. Radiographics 30(2):367–384PubMedCrossRef Tolan DJ, Greenhalgh R, Zealley IA, et al. (2010) MR enterographic manifestations of small bowel Crohn disease. Radiographics 30(2):367–384PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Herrmann KA, Michaely HJ, Zech CJ, et al. (2006) Internal fistulas in Crohn disease: magnetic resonance enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 31:675–687PubMedCrossRef Herrmann KA, Michaely HJ, Zech CJ, et al. (2006) Internal fistulas in Crohn disease: magnetic resonance enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 31:675–687PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Narin B, Aja W, Langhorst J, et al. (2004) Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 14:1535–1542PubMedCrossRef Narin B, Aja W, Langhorst J, et al. (2004) Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 14:1535–1542PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Oto A, Zhu F, Kulkarni K, Karczmar GS, et al. (2009) Evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection of bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease. Acad Radiol 16(5):597–600PubMedCrossRef Oto A, Zhu F, Kulkarni K, Karczmar GS, et al. (2009) Evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection of bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease. Acad Radiol 16(5):597–600PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Masselli G, Gualdi G (2010) Evaluation of small bowel tumors: MR enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 35(1):23–30PubMedCrossRef Masselli G, Gualdi G (2010) Evaluation of small bowel tumors: MR enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 35(1):23–30PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Pilleul F, Penigaud M, Milot L, et al. (2006) Possible small-bowel neoplasms: contrast-enhanced and water-enhanced multidetector CT enteroclysis. Radiology 241(3):796–801PubMedCrossRef Pilleul F, Penigaud M, Milot L, et al. (2006) Possible small-bowel neoplasms: contrast-enhanced and water-enhanced multidetector CT enteroclysis. Radiology 241(3):796–801PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Masselli G, Brizi MG, Restaino G, Vecchioli A (2004) MR enteroclysis in solitary ileal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:828–829PubMedCrossRef Masselli G, Brizi MG, Restaino G, Vecchioli A (2004) MR enteroclysis in solitary ileal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:828–829PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Van Weyenberg SJ, Van Waesberghe JH, Ell C, Pohl J (2009) Enteroscopy and its relationship to radiological small bowel imaging. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 19(3):389–407PubMedCrossRef Van Weyenberg SJ, Van Waesberghe JH, Ell C, Pohl J (2009) Enteroscopy and its relationship to radiological small bowel imaging. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 19(3):389–407PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Masselli G, Colaiacomo MC, Marcelli G, et al. (2012) MRI of the small-bowel: how to differentiate primary neoplasms and mimickers. Celiac disease: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Br J Radiol 85(1014):824–837PubMedCrossRef Masselli G, Colaiacomo MC, Marcelli G, et al. (2012) MRI of the small-bowel: how to differentiate primary neoplasms and mimickers. Celiac disease: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Br J Radiol 85(1014):824–837PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Albert JG, Martiny F, Krummenerl A, et al. (2005) Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis. Gut 54(12):1721–1727PubMedCrossRef Albert JG, Martiny F, Krummenerl A, et al. (2005) Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis. Gut 54(12):1721–1727PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Lee SS, Oh TS, Kim HJ, et al. (2011) Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: diagnostic performance of multidetector CT enterography. Radiology 259(3):739–748PubMedCrossRef Lee SS, Oh TS, Kim HJ, et al. (2011) Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: diagnostic performance of multidetector CT enterography. Radiology 259(3):739–748PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Fork FT, Aabakken L (2007) Capsule enteroscopy and radiology of the small intestine. Eur Radiol 17:3103–3111PubMedCrossRef Fork FT, Aabakken L (2007) Capsule enteroscopy and radiology of the small intestine. Eur Radiol 17:3103–3111PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Postgate A, Despott E, Burling D, et al. (2008) Significant small-bowel lesions detected by alternative diagnostic modalities after negative capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 68:1209–1214PubMedCrossRef Postgate A, Despott E, Burling D, et al. (2008) Significant small-bowel lesions detected by alternative diagnostic modalities after negative capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 68:1209–1214PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Huprich JE, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, et al. (2011) Prospective blinded comparison of wireless capsule endoscopy and multiphase CT enterography in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Radiology 260(3):744–751PubMedCrossRef Huprich JE, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, et al. (2011) Prospective blinded comparison of wireless capsule endoscopy and multiphase CT enterography in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Radiology 260(3):744–751PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Soyer P, Boudiaf M, Dray X, et al. (2009) CT enteroclysis features of uncomplicated celiac disease: retrospective analysis of 44 patients. Radiology 253(2):416–424PubMedCrossRef Soyer P, Boudiaf M, Dray X, et al. (2009) CT enteroclysis features of uncomplicated celiac disease: retrospective analysis of 44 patients. Radiology 253(2):416–424PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Masselli G, Picarelli A, Di Tola M, et al. (2010) Celiac disease: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 256(3):783–790PubMedCrossRef Masselli G, Picarelli A, Di Tola M, et al. (2010) Celiac disease: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 256(3):783–790PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Masselli G, Picarelli A, Gualdi G (2010) Celiac disease: MR enterography and contrast enhanced MRI. Abdom Imaging 35(4):399–406PubMedCrossRef Masselli G, Picarelli A, Gualdi G (2010) Celiac disease: MR enterography and contrast enhanced MRI. Abdom Imaging 35(4):399–406PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Lienemann A, Sprenger D, Steitz HO, et al. (2010) Detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions by using functional cine MR imaging: preliminary results. Radiology 217(2):421–425 Lienemann A, Sprenger D, Steitz HO, et al. (2010) Detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions by using functional cine MR imaging: preliminary results. Radiology 217(2):421–425
56.
go back to reference Reginelli A, Pezzullo MG, Scaglione M, et al. (2008) Gastrointestinal disorders in elderly patients. Radiol Clin North Am 46(4):755–771PubMedCrossRef Reginelli A, Pezzullo MG, Scaglione M, et al. (2008) Gastrointestinal disorders in elderly patients. Radiol Clin North Am 46(4):755–771PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
CT and MR enterography in evaluating small bowel diseases: when to use which modality?
Authors
Gabriele Masselli
Gianfranco Gualdi
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9961-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Abdominal Radiology 2/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine