Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021

01-10-2021 | Cryolipolysis | Original Article

A Prospective Study Determining Patient Satisfaction with Combined Cryolipolysis and Shockwave Therapy Treatment for Noninvasive Body Contouring

Author: Alain Michon

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With an increased interest in nonsurgical and minimally invasive body fat reduction and body contouring procedures with limited side effects and downtime, cryolipolysis has emerged as a compelling and safe alternative to surgical fat removal methods. A massage of the treated areas generally follows cryolipolysis treatment to improve blood circulation and increase apoptotic fat cells' removal. In this study, following cryolipolysis, we used shockwave therapy instead of massage to enhance the results of the body contouring treatment and improve the patient’s comfort. We then assessed patients’ comfort and satisfaction using the combination of cryolipolysis and shockwave therapy in reducing fat volume.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study of 30 patients who underwent at least one cryolipolysis therapy cycle followed by shockwave treatment. Subjects were given a posttreatment questionnaire to assess the patient’s comfort and satisfaction degree with the combination of cryolipolysis and shockwave therapy for fat reduction. Answers were recorded on a five-point Likert-style scale, entered into a database and were analyzed.

Results

We found an overall high satisfaction rate for most patients when treated with shockwave therapy after cryolipolysis treatment. The majority of patients described the discomfort associated with treatment as minimal or tolerable (76.7%) and were prepared to recommend cryolipolysis treatment followed by shockwave therapy to friends (68.9%). Overall, 76.7% of patients found the combination therapy comfortable, 68.3% were satisfied with the results, 57.7% said the results met their expectations.

Conclusion

The most important aspects of body contouring methods is a patient’s safety, comfort, satisfaction and self-image improvement. In this study, we report a high level of patient satisfaction when using a combination of fat reduction procedures of cryolipolysis followed by shockwave therapy. The majority of cases report being satisfied or extremely satisfied with the treatment and found this body contouring combination method comfortable. Cryolipolysis combined with shockwave treatment appears to be a safe and efficient way of reducing the size of localized and stubborn fat deposits for subjects who desire nonsurgical localized fat reduction.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.​
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ugalmugale S, Swain R (2020) Body fat reduction market size by procedure (Surgical {Liposuction, Abdominoplasty}, Non-surgical {Cryolipolysis, Ultrasound, Laser Lipolysis}), By Gender (Female, Male), By Service Provider (Hospitals, Clinics, Medical Spas). Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook, Application Potential, Price Trends, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2020–2026. Global Market Insights, Report id: GMI3141 Ugalmugale S, Swain R (2020) Body fat reduction market size by procedure (Surgical {Liposuction, Abdominoplasty}, Non-surgical {Cryolipolysis, Ultrasound, Laser Lipolysis}), By Gender (Female, Male), By Service Provider (Hospitals, Clinics, Medical Spas). Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook, Application Potential, Price Trends, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2020–2026. Global Market Insights, Report id: GMI3141
2.
go back to reference Rao RB, Ely SF, Hoffman RS (1999) Deaths related to liposuction. N Engl J Med 340:1471–1475CrossRef Rao RB, Ely SF, Hoffman RS (1999) Deaths related to liposuction. N Engl J Med 340:1471–1475CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ferraro GA, De Francesco F, Cataldo C et al (2012) Synergistic effects of cryolipolysis and shock waves for noninvasive body contouring. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:666–679CrossRef Ferraro GA, De Francesco F, Cataldo C et al (2012) Synergistic effects of cryolipolysis and shock waves for noninvasive body contouring. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:666–679CrossRef
4.
go back to reference ASAPS (2018) Cosmetic (Aesthetic) Surgery National Data Bank, STATISTICS. Report by The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery ASAPS (2018) Cosmetic (Aesthetic) Surgery National Data Bank, STATISTICS. Report by The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
5.
go back to reference Jewell ML, Solish NJ, Desilets CS (2011) Noninvasive body sculpting technologies with an emphasis on high-intensity focused ultrasound. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:901–912CrossRef Jewell ML, Solish NJ, Desilets CS (2011) Noninvasive body sculpting technologies with an emphasis on high-intensity focused ultrasound. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:901–912CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Klein KB, Zelickson B, Riopelle JG et al (2009) Non-invasive cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat reduction does not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests. Lasers Surg Med 41:785–790CrossRef Klein KB, Zelickson B, Riopelle JG et al (2009) Non-invasive cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat reduction does not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests. Lasers Surg Med 41:785–790CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Klein KB, Bachelor EP, Becker EV et al (2017) Multiple same day cryolipolysis treatments for the reduction of subcutaneous fat are safe and do not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests. Lasers Surg Med 49:640–644CrossRef Klein KB, Bachelor EP, Becker EV et al (2017) Multiple same day cryolipolysis treatments for the reduction of subcutaneous fat are safe and do not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests. Lasers Surg Med 49:640–644CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stevens WG, Pietrzak LK, Spring MA (2013) Broad overview of a clinical and commercial experience with CoolSculpting. Aesthet Surg J 33:835–846CrossRef Stevens WG, Pietrzak LK, Spring MA (2013) Broad overview of a clinical and commercial experience with CoolSculpting. Aesthet Surg J 33:835–846CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Manstein D, Laubach H, Watanabe K et al (2008) Selective cryolysis: a novel method of non-invasive fat removal. Lasers Surg Med 40:595–604CrossRef Manstein D, Laubach H, Watanabe K et al (2008) Selective cryolysis: a novel method of non-invasive fat removal. Lasers Surg Med 40:595–604CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Thiam AR, Beller M (2017) The why, when and how of lipid droplet diversity. J Cell Sci 130:315–324PubMed Thiam AR, Beller M (2017) The why, when and how of lipid droplet diversity. J Cell Sci 130:315–324PubMed
11.
go back to reference Boey GE, Wasilenchuk JL (2014) Enhanced clinical outcome with manual massage following cryolipolysis treatment: a 4-month study of safety and efficacy. Lasers Surg Med 46:20–26CrossRef Boey GE, Wasilenchuk JL (2014) Enhanced clinical outcome with manual massage following cryolipolysis treatment: a 4-month study of safety and efficacy. Lasers Surg Med 46:20–26CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dierickx CC, Mazer JM, Sand M et al (2013) Safety, tolerance, and patient satisfaction with noninvasive cryolipolysis. Dermatol Surg 39:1209–1216CrossRef Dierickx CC, Mazer JM, Sand M et al (2013) Safety, tolerance, and patient satisfaction with noninvasive cryolipolysis. Dermatol Surg 39:1209–1216CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Krueger N, Mai SV, Luebberding S et al (2014) Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 7:201–205PubMedPubMedCentral Krueger N, Mai SV, Luebberding S et al (2014) Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 7:201–205PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Antonic V, Mittermayr R, Schaden W et al (2011) Evidence supporting extracorporeal shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds. Wounds 23:204–215PubMed Antonic V, Mittermayr R, Schaden W et al (2011) Evidence supporting extracorporeal shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds. Wounds 23:204–215PubMed
15.
go back to reference Carulli C, Tonelli F, Innocenti M et al (2016) Effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in three major tendon diseases. J Orthop Traumatol 17:15–20CrossRef Carulli C, Tonelli F, Innocenti M et al (2016) Effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in three major tendon diseases. J Orthop Traumatol 17:15–20CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kilmer SL, Burns AJ, Zelickson BD (2016) Safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis for non-invasive reduction of submental fat. Lasers Surg Med 48:3–13CrossRef Kilmer SL, Burns AJ, Zelickson BD (2016) Safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis for non-invasive reduction of submental fat. Lasers Surg Med 48:3–13CrossRef
18.
go back to reference ZELTIQ (2018) User Manual CoolSculpting System. ZELTIQ (2018) User Manual CoolSculpting System.
19.
go back to reference Zelickson B, Egbert BM, Preciado J et al (2009) Cryolipolysis for noninvasive fat cell destruction: initial results from a pig model. Dermatol Surg 35:1462–1470CrossRef Zelickson B, Egbert BM, Preciado J et al (2009) Cryolipolysis for noninvasive fat cell destruction: initial results from a pig model. Dermatol Surg 35:1462–1470CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Meyer PF, da Silva RM, Oliveira G et al (2016) Effects of cryolipolysis on abdominal adiposity. Case Rep Dermatol Med 2016:6052194PubMedPubMedCentral Meyer PF, da Silva RM, Oliveira G et al (2016) Effects of cryolipolysis on abdominal adiposity. Case Rep Dermatol Med 2016:6052194PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Nelson AA, Wasserman D, Avram MM (2009) Cryolipolysis for reduction of excess adipose tissue. Semin Cutan Med Surg 28:244–249CrossRef Nelson AA, Wasserman D, Avram MM (2009) Cryolipolysis for reduction of excess adipose tissue. Semin Cutan Med Surg 28:244–249CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vetrano M, d’Alessandro F, Torrisi MR et al (2011) Extracorporeal shock wave therapy promotes cell proliferation and collagen synthesis of primary cultured human tenocytes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:2159–2168CrossRef Vetrano M, d’Alessandro F, Torrisi MR et al (2011) Extracorporeal shock wave therapy promotes cell proliferation and collagen synthesis of primary cultured human tenocytes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:2159–2168CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kuo YR, Wang CT, Wang FS et al (2009) Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy enhanced wound healing via increasing topical blood perfusion and tissue regeneration in a rat model of STZ-induced diabetes. Wound Repair Regen 17:522–530CrossRef Kuo YR, Wang CT, Wang FS et al (2009) Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy enhanced wound healing via increasing topical blood perfusion and tissue regeneration in a rat model of STZ-induced diabetes. Wound Repair Regen 17:522–530CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Zhang L, Fu XB, Chen S et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J 15:590–599CrossRef Zhang L, Fu XB, Chen S et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J 15:590–599CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Greer N, Foman NA, MacDonald R et al (2013) Advanced wound care therapies for nonhealing diabetic, venous, and arterial ulcers: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 159:532–542CrossRef Greer N, Foman NA, MacDonald R et al (2013) Advanced wound care therapies for nonhealing diabetic, venous, and arterial ulcers: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 159:532–542CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wang CJ, Kuo YR, Wu RW et al (2009) Extracorporeal shockwave treatment for chronic diabetic foot ulcers. J Surg Res 152:96–103CrossRef Wang CJ, Kuo YR, Wu RW et al (2009) Extracorporeal shockwave treatment for chronic diabetic foot ulcers. J Surg Res 152:96–103CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Stojadinovic A, Elster EA, Anam K et al (2008) Angiogenic response to extracorporeal shock wave treatment in murine skin isografts. Angiogenesis 11:369–380CrossRef Stojadinovic A, Elster EA, Anam K et al (2008) Angiogenic response to extracorporeal shock wave treatment in murine skin isografts. Angiogenesis 11:369–380CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Knobloch K, Kraemer R (2015) Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for the treatment of cellulite: a current metaanalysis. Int J Surg 24:210–217CrossRef Knobloch K, Kraemer R (2015) Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for the treatment of cellulite: a current metaanalysis. Int J Surg 24:210–217CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Prospective Study Determining Patient Satisfaction with Combined Cryolipolysis and Shockwave Therapy Treatment for Noninvasive Body Contouring
Author
Alain Michon
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02139-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021 Go to the issue