Top

International Orthopaedics

Published in:

01-09-2012 | Original Paper

Crossed pinning in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis

Authors: Irena Krusche-Mandl, Silke Aldrian, Julia Köttstorfer, Astrid Seis, Gerhild Thalhammer, Alexander Egkher

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 9/2012

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyse the management of displaced paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures at our Level I Trauma Centre and to determine clinical and radiographic long-term results following operative treatment.

Methods

Clinical and radiological results of 78 paediatric patients (29 female, 49 male; mean age 5.1 years) with supracondylar humerus fractures, treated from 1992 to 2004, were evaluated. Gartland’s classification yielded 32 type II, 44 type III and further two flexion injuries. In all patients the follow-up period exceeded 12 months. Assessment after an average of 8.1 years (1.1–19.5) included neurovascular examination, Flynn’s criteria (elbow function and carrying angle), pain, complications (infections, growth disturbances or iatrogenic nerve injuries) and measurement of the humeroulnar angle.

Results

According to Flynn’s criteria 73 patients (93.5 %) had a satisfactory outcome, while five (6.4 %) were graded as unsatisfactory (two due to cubitus varus and three because of limited elbow motion). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score averaged 0 (range 0–1) and the mean carrying angle measured 8.4° (−8 to 20°), compared to 10.8° on the contralateral side (2–20°). Injury-related complications yielded absent pulses in four (5.1 %), five (6.4 %) primary median, two (2.6 %) primary radial and one (1.3 %) primary ulnar nerve injury. Treatment-related complications included a secondary displacement and one iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. Based on primary nerve lesion as a dependent variable, statistical analysis showed that age had a significant influence revealing that older paediatric patients had a significantly higher risk (p = 0.02). Functional outcome as a dependent variable revealed an indirect proportion to the clinical carrying angle, achieving statistical significance (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Crossed pinning in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures is an effective method. Evaluation of the outcome in our study group demonstrated good results with the treatment approach described.

Wilkins KE (1990) Fractures and dislocations of the elbow region. In: Rockwood CA, Wilkins KE, King RE (eds) Fractures in children. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 509–721

Kocher MS, Kasser JR, Waters PM, Bae D, Snyder BD, Hresko MT, Hedequist D, Karlin L, Kim YJ, Murray MM et al (2007) Lateral entry compared with medial and lateral entry pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:706–712PubMedCrossRef

Ramachandran M, Skaggs DL, Crawford HA, Eastwood DM, Lalonde FD, Vitale MG, Do TT, Kay RM (2008) Delaying treatment of supracondylar fractures in children: has the pendulum swung too far? J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1228–1233PubMedCrossRef

Pirone AM, Graham HK, Krajbich JI (1988) Management of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:641–650PubMed

Gartland JJ (1959) Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 109:145–154PubMed

Green DW, Widmann RF, Frank JS, Gardner MJ (2005) Low incidence of ulnar nerve injury with crossed pin placement for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using a mini-open technique. J Orthop Trauma 19:158–163PubMedCrossRef

Mehlman CT, Strub WM, Roy DR, Wall EJ, Crawford AH (2001) The effect of surgical timing on the perioperative complications of treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:323–327PubMed

Skaggs DL, Hale JM, Bassett J, Kaminsky C, Kay RM, Tolo VT (2001) Operative treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. The consequences of pin placement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:735–740PubMed

Zionts LE, McKellop HA, Hathaway R (1994) Torsional strength of pin configurations used to fix supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:253–256PubMed

10.

Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL (1974) Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Sixteen years’ experience with long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:263–272PubMed

11.

Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A (2008) Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth 101:17–24PubMedCrossRef

12.

Webb AJ, Sherman FC (1989) Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop 9:315–325PubMed

13.

D’Ambrosia RD (1972) Supracondylar fractures of humerus–prevention of cubitus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54:60–66PubMed

14.

Smith L (1960) Deformity following supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42-A:235–252PubMed

15.

Shim JS, Lee YS (2002) Treatment of completely displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children by cross-fixation with three Kirschner wires. J Pediatr Orthop 22:12–16PubMedCrossRef

16.

Lyons JP, Ashley E, Hoffer MM (1998) Ulnar nerve palsies after percutaneous cross-pinning of supracondylar fractures in children’s elbows. J Pediatr Orthop 18:43–45PubMedCrossRef

17.

Mostafavi HR, Spero C (2000) Crossed pin fixation of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 376:56–61PubMedCrossRef

18.

Royce RO, Dutkowsky JP, Kasser JR, Rand FR (1991) Neurologic complications after K-wire fixation of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 11:191–194PubMedCrossRef

19.

Taniguchi Y, Matsuzaki K, Tamaki T (2000) Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after percutaneous cross-pinning of supracondylar fracture in a child. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:160–162PubMedCrossRef

20.

Kekomäki M, Luoma R, Rikalainen H, Vilkki P (1984) Operative reduction and fixation of a difficult supracondylar extension fracture of the humerus. J Pediatr Orthop 4:13–15PubMedCrossRef

Title: Crossed pinning in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis
Authors: Irena Krusche-Mandl
Silke Aldrian
Julia Köttstorfer
Astrid Seis
Gerhild Thalhammer
Alexander Egkher
Publication date: 01-09-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: International Orthopaedics / Issue 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1582-x

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Crossed pinning in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2012

The locking attachment plate for proximal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures—a biomechanical comparison of two techniques

Pain and activity levels before and after platelet-rich plasma injection treatment of patellar tendinopathy: a prospective cohort study and the influence of previous treatments

The long-term outcome of silastic implant arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a retrospective analysis of one hundred and eight feet

Initial Achilles tendon repair strength—synthesized biomechanical data from 196 cadaver repairs

Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized clinical study

Metaphyseal locking compression plate as an external fixator for the distal tibia