Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Cross-sectional study about the activities for various occupational groups on board during different voyage stages

Authors: Marcus Oldenburg, Hans-Joachim Jensen

Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Employees on board must be highly qualified in order to be able to independently meet the different work requirements during the three voyage stages of a ship (port stay, river and sea passage). In this study, the activity profiles of the various occupational groups on container ships are presented according to the voyage stages.

Methods

As part of a maritime field study on 22 container ships in the North Sea area, the work processes of four different professional groups on board were evaluated, and a list of activity profiles was compiled. Directly after a voyage stage, the 323 seafarers participating in the study recorded the duration of each task within the recent voyage stage. The average proportion for each activity was determined and presented as a job activity profile.

Results

According to this profile, the diversity of tasks for the nautical officers and the deck ratings differ between the voyage stages. For watch officers, the focus of activity during port stay is on the preparation and monitoring of the loading process. During river and sea passages, more than 50% of the working time consists of monitoring the navigation area and about 10% of navigation. The main tasks for deck ratings during port stay include (preparation and follow-up) activities for loading and unloading the vessel and, during the other voyage stages, cleaning, painting and maintenance work on the ship. The activity profile for technical officers and engine room ratings less often differs significantly between the various voyage stages. There are numerous control, repair and maintenance tasks during the entire voyage.

Conclusions

The established activity profiles show that the work diversity, especially among nautical officers and deck ratings, differs with a variety of requirements between the voyage stages. The activities of all four occupational groups varied most during port stay and less during the sea passage. To prepare maritime trainees for the expected job-related requirements and to identify the most suitable opportunities for recreation during a voyage, future maritime studies about stress on board should take the differences in the activities between occupational groups and the voyage stage into account.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Lundh M, Rydstedt LW. A static organization in a dynamic context - a qualitative study of changes in working conditions for Swedish engine officers. Appl Ergon. 2016;55:1–7.CrossRefPubMed Lundh M, Rydstedt LW. A static organization in a dynamic context - a qualitative study of changes in working conditions for Swedish engine officers. Appl Ergon. 2016;55:1–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lennon MM. Deviation then and now - when COGSA's per package limitation is lost. St John's Law Review 2012;76(2):6. Lennon MM. Deviation then and now - when COGSA's per package limitation is lost. St John's Law Review 2012;76(2):6.
5.
go back to reference Forsell K, Eriksson H, Järvholm B, Lundh M, Andersson E, Nilsson R. Work environment and safety climate in the Swedish merchant fleet. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017;90(2):161–8.CrossRefPubMed Forsell K, Eriksson H, Järvholm B, Lundh M, Andersson E, Nilsson R. Work environment and safety climate in the Swedish merchant fleet. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017;90(2):161–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Oldenburg M, Hogan B, Jensen HJ. Systematic review of maritime field studies about stress and strain in seafaring. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013;86(1):1–15.CrossRefPubMed Oldenburg M, Hogan B, Jensen HJ. Systematic review of maritime field studies about stress and strain in seafaring. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013;86(1):1–15.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tedesco LMR, Ferrara P, Stromillo L, Arnese A, Albano L. Seafarers' perceptions of job demand: a cross-sectional study. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2017;16:1–6. Tedesco LMR, Ferrara P, Stromillo L, Arnese A, Albano L. Seafarers' perceptions of job demand: a cross-sectional study. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2017;16:1–6.
8.
go back to reference Dohrmann SB, Leppin A. Determinants of seafarers' fatigue: a systematic review and quality assessment. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017;90(1):13–37.CrossRefPubMed Dohrmann SB, Leppin A. Determinants of seafarers' fatigue: a systematic review and quality assessment. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017;90(1):13–37.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jepsen JR, Zhao Z, van Leeuwen WM. Seafarer fatigue: a review of risk factors, consequences for seafarers' health and safety and options for mitigation. Int Marit Health. 2015;66(2):106–17.CrossRefPubMed Jepsen JR, Zhao Z, van Leeuwen WM. Seafarer fatigue: a review of risk factors, consequences for seafarers' health and safety and options for mitigation. Int Marit Health. 2015;66(2):106–17.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kaluza P, Kolzsch A, Gastner MT, Blasius B. The complex network of global cargo ship movements. J Royal Society. 2010;7(48):1093–103. Kaluza P, Kolzsch A, Gastner MT, Blasius B. The complex network of global cargo ship movements. J Royal Society. 2010;7(48):1093–103.
11.
go back to reference Oldenburg M, Jensen HJ. Merchant seafaring: a changing and hazardous occupation. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69(9):685–8.CrossRefPubMed Oldenburg M, Jensen HJ. Merchant seafaring: a changing and hazardous occupation. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69(9):685–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Oldenburg M, Baur X, Schlaich C. Occupational risks and challenges of seafaring. J Occup Health. 2010;52(5):249–56.CrossRefPubMed Oldenburg M, Baur X, Schlaich C. Occupational risks and challenges of seafaring. J Occup Health. 2010;52(5):249–56.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jensen OC, Sørensen JF, Thomas M, Canals ML, Nikolic N, Hu Y. Working conditions in international seafaring. Occup Med (Lond). 2006;56(6):393–7.CrossRef Jensen OC, Sørensen JF, Thomas M, Canals ML, Nikolic N, Hu Y. Working conditions in international seafaring. Occup Med (Lond). 2006;56(6):393–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nielsen MB, Bergheim K, Eid J. Relationships between work environment factors and workers' well-being in the maritime industry. Int Marit Health. 2013;64(2):80–8.PubMed Nielsen MB, Bergheim K, Eid J. Relationships between work environment factors and workers' well-being in the maritime industry. Int Marit Health. 2013;64(2):80–8.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Carotenuto A, Molino I, Fasanaro AM, Amenta F. Psychological stress in seafarers: a review. Int Marit Health. 2012;63(4):188–94.PubMed Carotenuto A, Molino I, Fasanaro AM, Amenta F. Psychological stress in seafarers: a review. Int Marit Health. 2012;63(4):188–94.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Rottger S, Vetter S, Kowalski JT. Ship management attitudes and their relation to behavior and performance. Hum Factors. 2013;55(3):659–71.CrossRefPubMed Rottger S, Vetter S, Kowalski JT. Ship management attitudes and their relation to behavior and performance. Hum Factors. 2013;55(3):659–71.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cross-sectional study about the activities for various occupational groups on board during different voyage stages
Authors
Marcus Oldenburg
Hans-Joachim Jensen
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6673
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-019-0233-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2019 Go to the issue