Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2022

03-06-2022 | Editorial

Cross-Jurisdiction Comparative Research in Work Disability Prevention: Introduction to the Special Series

Author: Professor Alex Collie

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

The systems that societies construct to support work disability prevention can have powerful effects on both the experiences of people with work disability as well as their health and employment outcomes. Comparative studies between jurisdictions provide an opportunity to gain insights into these system level impacts, by comparing system features, processes and experiences; and by determining if jurisdictional variation affects outcomes. In turn, this can prompt policy and practice reform. Reflecting the diversity of work disability systems globally, there is growing interest in cross-jurisdiction comparative research in the field. This special series presents seven articles addressing important methodological and conceptual aspects of comparative research in work disability prevention, and presents practical examples of how jurisdictions vary and the impact this can have on workers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aarts L, Burkhauser R, de Jong P. Curing the Dutch disease: an international perspective on disability policy reform. Brookfield: Aldershot; 1996. 171 p. Aarts L, Burkhauser R, de Jong P. Curing the Dutch disease: an international perspective on disability policy reform. Brookfield: Aldershot; 1996. 171 p.
2.
go back to reference Collie A, Beck D, Gray SE, Lane TJ. Impact of legislative reform on benefit access and disability duration in workers’ compensation: an interrupted time series study. Occup Environ Med. 2020;77(1):32–9.CrossRef Collie A, Beck D, Gray SE, Lane TJ. Impact of legislative reform on benefit access and disability duration in workers’ compensation: an interrupted time series study. Occup Environ Med. 2020;77(1):32–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lippel K. Workers describe the effect of the workers’ compensation process on their health: a quebec study. Int J Law Psychiat. 2007;30(4–5):427–43.CrossRef Lippel K. Workers describe the effect of the workers’ compensation process on their health: a quebec study. Int J Law Psychiat. 2007;30(4–5):427–43.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. The “toxic dose” of system problems: why some injured workers don’t return to work as expected. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):349–66.CrossRef MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. The “toxic dose” of system problems: why some injured workers don’t return to work as expected. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):349–66.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jetha A, Pransky G, Fish J, Hettinger LJ. Return-to-work within a complex and dynamic organizational work disability system. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(3):276–85.CrossRef Jetha A, Pransky G, Fish J, Hettinger LJ. Return-to-work within a complex and dynamic organizational work disability system. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(3):276–85.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Costa-Black K. Work disability models: past and present. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of Work Disability: Prevention and Management. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2014. pp. 71–93. Costa-Black K. Work disability models: past and present. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of Work Disability: Prevention and Management. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2014. pp. 71–93.
7.
go back to reference Lippel K, Eakin JM, Holness DL, Howse D. The structure and process of workers’ compensation systems and the role of doctors: a comparison of Ontario and Quebec. Am J Ind Med. 2016;59(12):1070–86.CrossRef Lippel K, Eakin JM, Holness DL, Howse D. The structure and process of workers’ compensation systems and the role of doctors: a comparison of Ontario and Quebec. Am J Ind Med. 2016;59(12):1070–86.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schneider EC, Shah A, Doty MM, Tikkanen R, Fields K, Williams IIRD. Mirror. Mirror 2021: reflecting poorly: healthcare in the US compared to other high income countries. Washington: The Commonwealth Fund; 2021. 4 August 2021. Schneider EC, Shah A, Doty MM, Tikkanen R, Fields K, Williams IIRD. Mirror. Mirror 2021: reflecting poorly: healthcare in the US compared to other high income countries. Washington: The Commonwealth Fund; 2021. 4 August 2021.
9.
go back to reference Lippel K, Lotters F. Public insurance systems: a comparison of cause-based and disability-based income support systems. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. The Role and Influence of Care Providers on Work Disability. Springer; 2013. pp. 183–202. Lippel K, Lotters F. Public insurance systems: a comparison of cause-based and disability-based income support systems. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. The Role and Influence of Care Providers on Work Disability. Springer; 2013. pp. 183–202.
10.
go back to reference Collie A, Di Donato M, Iles R. Work disability in Australia: an overview of prevalence, expenditure, support systems and services. J Occup Rehabil. 2018. pp. 526–539. Collie A, Di Donato M, Iles R. Work disability in Australia: an overview of prevalence, expenditure, support systems and services. J Occup Rehabil. 2018. pp. 526–539.
11.
go back to reference Shraim M, Cifuentes M, Willetts JL, Marucci-Wellman HR, Pransky G. Length of disability and medical costs in low back pain: do state workers’ compensation policies make a difference? J Occup Environ Med. 2015;57(12):1275–83.CrossRef Shraim M, Cifuentes M, Willetts JL, Marucci-Wellman HR, Pransky G. Length of disability and medical costs in low back pain: do state workers’ compensation policies make a difference? J Occup Environ Med. 2015;57(12):1275–83.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, van der Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):419–26.CrossRef Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, van der Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):419–26.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Collie A, Lane TJ, Hassani-Mahmooei B, Thompson J, McLeod C. Does time off work after injury vary by jurisdiction? A comparative study of eight Australian workers’ compensation systems. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5):e010910.CrossRef Collie A, Lane TJ, Hassani-Mahmooei B, Thompson J, McLeod C. Does time off work after injury vary by jurisdiction? A comparative study of eight Australian workers’ compensation systems. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5):e010910.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hudon A, MacEachen E, Lippel K. Framing the care of injured workers: an empirical four-jurisdictional comparison of workers’ compensation boards’ healthcare policies. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 (in press). Hudon A, MacEachen E, Lippel K. Framing the care of injured workers: an empirical four-jurisdictional comparison of workers’ compensation boards’ healthcare policies. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 (in press).
15.
go back to reference Sharpe K, McGrail K, Mustard C, McLeod C. A framework for understanding how variation in health care service delivery affects work disability management. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 (in press). Sharpe K, McGrail K, Mustard C, McLeod C. A framework for understanding how variation in health care service delivery affects work disability management. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 (in press).
16.
go back to reference Collie A, Sheehan L, Di Donato M. Variation in general practice services provided to australian workers with low back pain: a cross-jurisdictional comparative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 (in press). Collie A, Sheehan L, Di Donato M. Variation in general practice services provided to australian workers with low back pain: a cross-jurisdictional comparative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 (in press).
17.
go back to reference Macpherson RA, Lane TJ, Collie A, McLeod CB. Exploring differences in work disability duration by size of firm in Canada and Australia. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 (in press). Macpherson RA, Lane TJ, Collie A, McLeod CB. Exploring differences in work disability duration by size of firm in Canada and Australia. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 (in press).
18.
go back to reference De Rijk A, Negue KC, Houkes I. The cross-country comparison model for labor participation (CCC model for LP) of persons with chronic diseases. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2022 (in press). De Rijk A, Negue KC, Houkes I. The cross-country comparison model for labor participation (CCC model for LP) of persons with chronic diseases. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2022 (in press).
19.
go back to reference Lane TJ. Collider bias in administrative workers’ compensation claims data: a challenge for cross-jurisdictional research. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 (in press). Lane TJ. Collider bias in administrative workers’ compensation claims data: a challenge for cross-jurisdictional research. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 (in press).
20.
go back to reference Thompson J, Cruz-Gambardella C. Development of a computational policy model for comparing the effect of compensation scheme policies on recovery after workplace injury. Journal of Occcupational Rehabilitation. 2022 (in press). Thompson J, Cruz-Gambardella C. Development of a computational policy model for comparing the effect of compensation scheme policies on recovery after workplace injury. Journal of Occcupational Rehabilitation. 2022 (in press).
Metadata
Title
Cross-Jurisdiction Comparative Research in Work Disability Prevention: Introduction to the Special Series
Author
Professor Alex Collie
Publication date
03-06-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10050-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2022 Go to the issue