Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: views of families

Authors: Paula Kersten, Margaret Dudley, Shoba Nayar, Hinemoa Elder, Heather Robertson, Robyn Tauroa, Kathryn M. McPherson

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Screening children for behavioural difficulties requires the use of a tool that is culturally valid. We explored the cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for pre-school children (aged 3–5) as perceived by families in New Zealand.

Methods

A qualitative interpretive descriptive study (focus groups and interviews) in which 65 participants from five key ethnic groups (New Zealand European, Māori, Pacific, Asian and other immigrant parents) took part. Thematic analysis using an inductive approach, in which the themes identified are strongly linked to the data, was employed.

Results

Many parents reported they were unclear about the purpose of the tool, affecting its perceived value. Participants reported not understanding the context in which they should consider the questions and had difficulty understanding some questions and response options. Māori parents generally did not support the questionnaire based approach, preferring face to face interaction. Parents from Māori, Pacific Island, Asian, and new immigrant groups reported the tool lacked explicit consideration of children in their cultural context. Parents discussed the importance of timing and multiple perspectives when interpreting scores from the tool.

Conclusions

In summary, this study posed a number of challenges to the use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in New Zealand. Further work is required to develop a tool that is culturally appropriate with good content validity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference White J, et al. Assessing wellbeing at school entry using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Professional perspectives. Educ Res. 2013;55(1):87–98.CrossRef White J, et al. Assessing wellbeing at school entry using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Professional perspectives. Educ Res. 2013;55(1):87–98.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Eivers AR, Brendgen M, Borge AIH. Stability and change in prosocial and antisocial behavior across the transition to school: Teacher and peer perspectives. Early Educ Development. 2010;21(6):843–64.CrossRef Eivers AR, Brendgen M, Borge AIH. Stability and change in prosocial and antisocial behavior across the transition to school: Teacher and peer perspectives. Early Educ Development. 2010;21(6):843–64.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bierman KL, et al. School Outcomes of Aggressive-Disruptive Children: Prediction From Kindergarten Risk Factors and Impact of the Fast Track Prevention Program. Aggress Behav. 2013;39(2):114–30.CrossRefPubMed Bierman KL, et al. School Outcomes of Aggressive-Disruptive Children: Prediction From Kindergarten Risk Factors and Impact of the Fast Track Prevention Program. Aggress Behav. 2013;39(2):114–30.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kim-Cohen J, et al. Five-year predictive validity of DSM-IV conduct disorder research diagnosis in 41/2-5-year-old children. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;18(5):284–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim-Cohen J, et al. Five-year predictive validity of DSM-IV conduct disorder research diagnosis in 41/2-5-year-old children. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;18(5):284–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Kim-Cohen J, et al. Prior juvenile diagnoses in adults with mental disorder: Developmental follow-back of a prospective-longitudinal cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(7):709–17.CrossRefPubMed Kim-Cohen J, et al. Prior juvenile diagnoses in adults with mental disorder: Developmental follow-back of a prospective-longitudinal cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(7):709–17.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Caspi A, et al. Behavioral observations at age 3 years predict adult psychiatric disorders: Longitudinal evidence from a birth cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53(11):1033–9.CrossRefPubMed Caspi A, et al. Behavioral observations at age 3 years predict adult psychiatric disorders: Longitudinal evidence from a birth cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53(11):1033–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kessler RC, et al. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593–602.CrossRefPubMed Kessler RC, et al. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593–602.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38(5):581–6.CrossRefPubMed Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38(5):581–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;7(3):125–30.CrossRefPubMed Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;7(3):125–30.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kersten P, et al. A systematic review of evidence for the psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Int J Behav Dev. 2016;40(1):64–75. Kersten P, et al. A systematic review of evidence for the psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Int J Behav Dev. 2016;40(1):64–75.
11.
go back to reference Williamson A, et al. Acceptability of an emotional and behavioural screening tool for children in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services in urban NSW. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010;44(10):894–900.CrossRefPubMed Williamson A, et al. Acceptability of an emotional and behavioural screening tool for children in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services in urban NSW. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010;44(10):894–900.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Alyahri A, Goodman R. Validation of the Arabic Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Development and Well-Being Assessment. East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12 Suppl 2:S138–46.PubMed Alyahri A, Goodman R. Validation of the Arabic Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Development and Well-Being Assessment. East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12 Suppl 2:S138–46.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Cefaia C, et al. The structure and use of the teacher and parent Maltese Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Int J Emotional Educ. 2011;3:4–19.CrossRef Cefaia C, et al. The structure and use of the teacher and parent Maltese Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Int J Emotional Educ. 2011;3:4–19.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Thabet AA, Stretch D, Vostanis P. Child mental health problems in Arab children: Application of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Int J Soc Psychiat. 2000;46(4):266–80.CrossRefPubMed Thabet AA, Stretch D, Vostanis P. Child mental health problems in Arab children: Application of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Int J Soc Psychiat. 2000;46(4):266–80.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Goodman R, Renfrew D, Mullick M. Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;9(2):129–34.CrossRefPubMed Goodman R, Renfrew D, Mullick M. Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;9(2):129–34.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Samad L, et al. Child and adolescent psychopathology in a developing country: Testing the validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Urdu version). Int J Methods Psychiatric Res. 2005;14(3):158–66.CrossRef Samad L, et al. Child and adolescent psychopathology in a developing country: Testing the validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Urdu version). Int J Methods Psychiatric Res. 2005;14(3):158–66.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Toh TK, et al. Chinese translation of strengths and difficulties questionnaire requires urgent review before field trials for validity and reliability. Child And Adolescent Psychiatry And Mental Health, 2008;2:23. Toh TK, et al. Chinese translation of strengths and difficulties questionnaire requires urgent review before field trials for validity and reliability. Child And Adolescent Psychiatry And Mental Health, 2008;2:23.
18.
20.
21.
go back to reference Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London: Sage publications; 2000.CrossRef Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London: Sage publications; 2000.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. California: Sage publications; 2002. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. California: Sage publications; 2002.
23.
go back to reference Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.CrossRef Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Elder H. Indigenous Theory Building for Māori Children and Adolescents with Traumatic Brain Injury and their Extended Family. Brain Impairment. 2013;14:406–14.CrossRef Elder H. Indigenous Theory Building for Māori Children and Adolescents with Traumatic Brain Injury and their Extended Family. Brain Impairment. 2013;14:406–14.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Høegh MC, Høegh S-M. Trans-adapting outcome measures in rehabilitation: Cross-cultural issues. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19(6):955–70.CrossRefPubMed Høegh MC, Høegh S-M. Trans-adapting outcome measures in rehabilitation: Cross-cultural issues. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19(6):955–70.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Goldblatt H, Karnieli-Miller O, Neumann M. Sharing qualitative research findings with participants: Study experiences of methodological and ethical dilemmas. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(3):389–95.CrossRefPubMed Goldblatt H, Karnieli-Miller O, Neumann M. Sharing qualitative research findings with participants: Study experiences of methodological and ethical dilemmas. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(3):389–95.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Beaton DE, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRefPubMed Beaton DE, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference de Klerk G. Cross-Cultural Testing in Online Readings in Testing and Assessment. In: Born M, Foxcroft CD, Butter R, editors. International Test Commission. 2008. de Klerk G. Cross-Cultural Testing in Online Readings in Testing and Assessment. In: Born M, Foxcroft CD, Butter R, editors. International Test Commission. 2008.
31.
go back to reference Van de Vijver F, Tanzer NK. Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: an overview. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée. 2004;54(2):119–35.CrossRef Van de Vijver F, Tanzer NK. Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: an overview. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée. 2004;54(2):119–35.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Stasiak K, et al. Measuring outcome in child and adolescent mental health services: Consumers’ views of measures. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;18(4):519–35.CrossRefPubMed Stasiak K, et al. Measuring outcome in child and adolescent mental health services: Consumers’ views of measures. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;18(4):519–35.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference O’Brien AP, Boddy JM, Hardy DJ. Culturally specific process measures to improve mental health clinical practice: indigenous focus. Aust N Z J Psychiatr. 2007;41(8):667–74.CrossRef O’Brien AP, Boddy JM, Hardy DJ. Culturally specific process measures to improve mental health clinical practice: indigenous focus. Aust N Z J Psychiatr. 2007;41(8):667–74.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Goodman A, Goodman R. Strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a dimensional measure of child mental health. J Am Acad Child Adolescent Psychiatry. 2009;48(4):400–3.CrossRef Goodman A, Goodman R. Strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a dimensional measure of child mental health. J Am Acad Child Adolescent Psychiatry. 2009;48(4):400–3.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Glascoe FP. Screening for developmental and behavioral problems. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11(3):173–9.CrossRefPubMed Glascoe FP. Screening for developmental and behavioral problems. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11(3):173–9.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Ministry of Health. The B4 School Check. A handbook for practitioners. Wellington: Ministry of Health. 2008. Ministry of Health. The B4 School Check. A handbook for practitioners. Wellington: Ministry of Health. 2008.
37.
go back to reference Kersten P, et al. A validation and norming study of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the New Zealand context. Final report Substudy 1. Auckland: AUT University; 2013. Kersten P, et al. A validation and norming study of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the New Zealand context. Final report Substudy 1. Auckland: AUT University; 2013.
Metadata
Title
Cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: views of families
Authors
Paula Kersten
Margaret Dudley
Shoba Nayar
Hinemoa Elder
Heather Robertson
Robyn Tauroa
Kathryn M. McPherson
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1063-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Psychiatry 1/2016 Go to the issue