Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2012

01-05-2012 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Critical analysis of risk factors for shoulder dystocia

Authors: Avishai Tsur, Ruslan Sergienko, Arnon Wiznitzer, Alexander Zlotnik, Eyal Sheiner

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The study was aimed to define trends, risk factors and perinatal outcome associated with shoulder dystocia (SD).

Methods

A population-based study comparing all singleton deliveries with and without SD was conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

Shoulder dystocia complicated 0.2% (n = 451) of all deliveries included in the study (n = 240,189). The rate of SD declined from 0.4% in 1988 to 0.13% in 2009. Independent risk factors for SD in a multivariable analysis were fetal macrosomia (birth-weight ≥ 4 kg; OR = 16.1; 95% CI 13.2–19.6, P < 0.001), failure of labor to progress during the second stage (OR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.5–3.7, P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.4–2.3, P < 0.001) and advanced maternal age (years, OR = 1.02; 95% CI 1.001–1.03, P = 0.029). Perinatal mortality was significantly higher after SD as compared to the comparison group (6.2 vs. 1.4%, P <0.001). Another multivariable analysis, with perinatal mortality as the outcome variable, controlling for confounders such as maternal age, gestational age, diabetes mellitus, etc. was constructed; SD was noted as an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality (adjusted OR = 11.1; 95% CI 7.2–17.1, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Shoulder dystocia, associated with macrosomia, labor dystocia, diabetes mellitus, and advanced maternal age, is an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality. In an era of increased rate of cesarean deliveries, and perhaps increased accuracy of birth weight estimation, the rate of shoulder dystocia gradually declines.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sokol RJ, Blackwell SC (2003) American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin: Shoulder dystocia. Number 40, November 2002. (Replaces practice pattern number 7, October 1997). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 80(1):87–92 Sokol RJ, Blackwell SC (2003) American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin: Shoulder dystocia. Number 40, November 2002. (Replaces practice pattern number 7, October 1997). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 80(1):87–92
2.
go back to reference Gottlieb AG, Galan HL (2007) Shoulder dystocia: an update. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 34(3):501–531PubMedCrossRef Gottlieb AG, Galan HL (2007) Shoulder dystocia: an update. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 34(3):501–531PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gherman RB (2002) Shoulder dystocia: an evidence-based evaluation of the obstetric nightmare. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45(2):345–362PubMedCrossRef Gherman RB (2002) Shoulder dystocia: an evidence-based evaluation of the obstetric nightmare. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45(2):345–362PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference McFarland MB, Langer O, Piper JM, Berkus MD (1996) Perinatal outcome and the type and number of maneuvers in shoulder dystocia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 55(3):219–224PubMedCrossRef McFarland MB, Langer O, Piper JM, Berkus MD (1996) Perinatal outcome and the type and number of maneuvers in shoulder dystocia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 55(3):219–224PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Souter I, Neumann K, Ouzounian JG, Paul RH (1997) The McRoberts’ maneuver for the alleviation of shoulder dystocia: how successful is it? Obstet Gynecol 176(3):656–661CrossRef Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Souter I, Neumann K, Ouzounian JG, Paul RH (1997) The McRoberts’ maneuver for the alleviation of shoulder dystocia: how successful is it? Obstet Gynecol 176(3):656–661CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gherman RB (2005) Shoulder dystocia: prevention and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 32(2):297–305PubMedCrossRef Gherman RB (2005) Shoulder dystocia: prevention and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 32(2):297–305PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sheiner E, Levy A, Hershkovitz R, Hallak M, Hammel RD, Katz M, Mazor M (2004) Determining factors associated with shoulder dystocia: a population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 126(1):11–15CrossRef Sheiner E, Levy A, Hershkovitz R, Hallak M, Hammel RD, Katz M, Mazor M (2004) Determining factors associated with shoulder dystocia: a population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 126(1):11–15CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ginsberg NA, Moisidis C (2001) How to predict recurrent shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 184(7):1427–1430CrossRef Ginsberg NA, Moisidis C (2001) How to predict recurrent shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 184(7):1427–1430CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bingham J, Chauhan SP, Hayes E, Gherman R, Lewis D (2010) Recurrent shoulder dystocia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 65(3):183PubMedCrossRef Bingham J, Chauhan SP, Hayes E, Gherman R, Lewis D (2010) Recurrent shoulder dystocia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 65(3):183PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Poggi SH, Stallings SP, Ghidini A, Spong CY, Deering SH, Allen RH (2003) Intrapartum risk factors for permanent brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 189(3):725–729CrossRef Poggi SH, Stallings SP, Ghidini A, Spong CY, Deering SH, Allen RH (2003) Intrapartum risk factors for permanent brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 189(3):725–729CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gemer O, Bergman M, Segal S (1999) Labor abnormalities as a risk factor for shoulder dystocia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78(8):735PubMedCrossRef Gemer O, Bergman M, Segal S (1999) Labor abnormalities as a risk factor for shoulder dystocia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78(8):735PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Inglis SR, Feier N, Chetiyaar JB, Naylor MH, Sumersille M, Cervellione KL, Predanic M (2011) Effects of shoulder dystocia training on the incidence of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 204(4):322 Inglis SR, Feier N, Chetiyaar JB, Naylor MH, Sumersille M, Cervellione KL, Predanic M (2011) Effects of shoulder dystocia training on the incidence of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 204(4):322
13.
go back to reference Levy A, Sheiner E, Hammel RD, Hershkovitz R, Hallak M, Katz M, Mazor M (2006) Shoulder dystocia: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273(4):203–206PubMedCrossRef Levy A, Sheiner E, Hammel RD, Hershkovitz R, Hallak M, Katz M, Mazor M (2006) Shoulder dystocia: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273(4):203–206PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics (2002) ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gynecol 99(1):159–167 ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics (2002) ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gynecol 99(1):159–167
15.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics (2001) ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 30, September 2001 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 200, December 1994). Gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 98(3):525–538 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics (2001) ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 30, September 2001 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 200, December 1994). Gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 98(3):525–538
16.
go back to reference ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins (2005) ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 60, March 2005. Pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 105(3):675–685 ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins (2005) ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 60, March 2005. Pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 105(3):675–685
17.
go back to reference Menacker F, Hamilton BE (2010) Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. CHS data brief, no 35. Centers for disease control and prevention national center for health statistics, Hyattsville Menacker F, Hamilton BE (2010) Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. CHS data brief, no 35. Centers for disease control and prevention national center for health statistics, Hyattsville
18.
go back to reference Spellacy WN, Miller S, Winegar A, Peterson PQ (1985) Macrosomia: maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 66:158–161PubMed Spellacy WN, Miller S, Winegar A, Peterson PQ (1985) Macrosomia: maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 66:158–161PubMed
19.
go back to reference Robinson H, Tkatch S, Mayes DC, Bott N, Okun N (2003) Is maternal obesity a predictor of shoulder dystocia? Obstet Gynecol 101(1):24PubMedCrossRef Robinson H, Tkatch S, Mayes DC, Bott N, Okun N (2003) Is maternal obesity a predictor of shoulder dystocia? Obstet Gynecol 101(1):24PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Critical analysis of risk factors for shoulder dystocia
Authors
Avishai Tsur
Ruslan Sergienko
Arnon Wiznitzer
Alexander Zlotnik
Eyal Sheiner
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2139-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2012 Go to the issue