Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 3/2010

01-03-2010 | Clinical Research

Criteria for Assessing Esophageal Motility in Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Patients: The Importance of the Lower Esophageal Contractile Segment

Authors: Paul Robert Burton, Wendy A. Brown, Cheryl Laurie, Geoff Hebbard, Paul E. O’Brien

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Esophageal function appears critical in laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) patients; however, conventional motility assessments have not proven to be clinically useful. Recent combined video fluoroscopic and high-resolution manometric studies have identified important components of esophageal function in LAGB patients.

Methods

Successful and symptomatic LAGB patients, with normal or mildly impaired esophageal peristalsis, underwent a standardized, water swallow, high-resolution manometry protocol designed specifically to assess the lower esophageal contractile segment (LECS), in combination with conventional measures of esophageal motility. Differences in response to changes in LAGB volume were assessed.

Results

There were 101 symptomatic and 29 successful patients. More symptomatic patients had a mild impairment in esophageal motility (39.6% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.005). Successful patients demonstrated an intact LECS during normal swallows more frequently than symptomatic patients (95% vs. 43%, p < 0.005). Absolute intraluminal pressures were not different between the groups. Removing all fluid from the LAGB revealed more hypotensive swallows in the symptomatic patients (30% vs. 17%, p = 0.002), an effect not observed when the LAGB volume was increased (8% vs. 5%, p = 0.21). Receiver operator characteristic analysis determined that an intact LECS in 70% of normal swallows defined normal motility in LAGB patients.

Conclusions

The LECS is a valuable measure of esophageal function in LAGB patients and complements conventional manometric criteria. Symptomatic patients have less normal swallows; however, these also frequently demonstrate a deficient LECS. Further information can be elucidated by performing swallows at differing LAGB volumes. High-resolution manometry, using these adapted criteria, is now a useful in the investigation in symptomatic LAGB patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference O'Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston TB, et al. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1032–40.CrossRefPubMed O'Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston TB, et al. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1032–40.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Favretti F, Ashton D, Busetto L, et al. The gastric band: first-choice procedure for obesity surgery. World J Surg. 2009;33:2039–48.CrossRefPubMed Favretti F, Ashton D, Busetto L, et al. The gastric band: first-choice procedure for obesity surgery. World J Surg. 2009;33:2039–48.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference de Jong JR, Besselink MG, van Ramshorst B, et al. Effects of adjustable gastric banding on gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motility: a systematic review. Obes Rev 2009 (in press). de Jong JR, Besselink MG, van Ramshorst B, et al. Effects of adjustable gastric banding on gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motility: a systematic review. Obes Rev 2009 (in press).
4.
go back to reference Korenkov M, Kohler L, Yucel N, et al. Esophageal motility and reflux symptoms before and after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2002;12:72–6.CrossRefPubMed Korenkov M, Kohler L, Yucel N, et al. Esophageal motility and reflux symptoms before and after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2002;12:72–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference de Jong JR, van Ramshorst B, Timmer R, et al. Effect of laparoscopic gastric banding on esophageal motility. Obes Surg. 2006;16:52–8.CrossRefPubMed de Jong JR, van Ramshorst B, Timmer R, et al. Effect of laparoscopic gastric banding on esophageal motility. Obes Surg. 2006;16:52–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, et al. The effect of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands on esophageal motility and the gastroesophageal junction; analysis using high resolution video manometry. Obes Surg. 2009;19:905–14.CrossRefPubMed Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, et al. The effect of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands on esophageal motility and the gastroesophageal junction; analysis using high resolution video manometry. Obes Surg. 2009;19:905–14.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, et al. Mechanisms of bolus clearance in patients with laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands. Obes Surg 2009 (in press). Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, et al. Mechanisms of bolus clearance in patients with laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands. Obes Surg 2009 (in press).
8.
go back to reference Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie CP, et al. Effects of gastric band adjustments on intraluminal pressure. Obes Surg 2009 (in press). Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie CP, et al. Effects of gastric band adjustments on intraluminal pressure. Obes Surg 2009 (in press).
9.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:627–35.CrossRefPubMed Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:627–35.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, et al. Pathophysiology of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: analysis and classification using high-resolution video manometry and a stress barium protocol. Obes Surg 2009. doi:10.1007/s11695-009-9970-z. Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, et al. Pathophysiology of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: analysis and classification using high-resolution video manometry and a stress barium protocol. Obes Surg 2009. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-009-9970-z.
11.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Challenging the limits of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:16–8.CrossRefPubMed Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Challenging the limits of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:16–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tutuian R, Castell DO. Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:230–6.CrossRefPubMed Tutuian R, Castell DO. Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:230–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Lodhia N, et al. Utilizing intraluminal pressure gradients to predict esophageal clearance: a validation study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1898–905.CrossRefPubMed Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Lodhia N, et al. Utilizing intraluminal pressure gradients to predict esophageal clearance: a validation study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1898–905.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ghosh SK, Kahrilas PJ, Lodhia N, et al. Utilizing intraluminal pressure differences to predict esophageal bolus flow dynamics. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;293:G1023–8.CrossRefPubMed Ghosh SK, Kahrilas PJ, Lodhia N, et al. Utilizing intraluminal pressure differences to predict esophageal bolus flow dynamics. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;293:G1023–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Muinuddin A, Xue S, Diamant NE. Regional differences in the response of feline esophageal smooth muscle to stretch and cholinergic stimulation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;281:G1460–7.PubMed Muinuddin A, Xue S, Diamant NE. Regional differences in the response of feline esophageal smooth muscle to stretch and cholinergic stimulation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;281:G1460–7.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Cohen S, Green F. The mechanics of esophageal muscle contraction. Evidence of an inotropic effect of gastrin. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:2029–40.CrossRefPubMed Cohen S, Green F. The mechanics of esophageal muscle contraction. Evidence of an inotropic effect of gastrin. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:2029–40.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tottrup A, Forman A, Uldbjerg N, et al. Mechanical properties of isolated human esophageal smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:G338–43.PubMed Tottrup A, Forman A, Uldbjerg N, et al. Mechanical properties of isolated human esophageal smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:G338–43.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of normal and high-amplitude esophageal peristalsis. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:G1098–107.PubMed Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of normal and high-amplitude esophageal peristalsis. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:G1098–107.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ. Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:73–80.PubMed Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ. Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:73–80.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Koppman JS, Poggi L, Szomstein S, et al. Esophageal motility disorders in the morbidly obese population. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:761–4.CrossRefPubMed Koppman JS, Poggi L, Szomstein S, et al. Esophageal motility disorders in the morbidly obese population. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:761–4.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jaffin BW, Knoepflmacher P, Greenstein R. High prevalence of asymptomatic esophageal motility disorders among morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 1999;9:390–5.CrossRefPubMed Jaffin BW, Knoepflmacher P, Greenstein R. High prevalence of asymptomatic esophageal motility disorders among morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 1999;9:390–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lew JI, Daud A, DiGorgi MF, et al. Preoperative esophageal manometry and outcome of laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1242–7.CrossRefPubMed Lew JI, Daud A, DiGorgi MF, et al. Preoperative esophageal manometry and outcome of laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1242–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Brown W, Burton P, Anderson M, et al. Symmetrical pouch dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: incidence and management. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1104–8.CrossRefPubMed Brown W, Burton P, Anderson M, et al. Symmetrical pouch dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: incidence and management. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1104–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Foletto M, Bernante P, Busetto L, et al. Laparoscopic gastric rebanding for slippage with pouch dilation: results on 29 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1099–103.CrossRefPubMed Foletto M, Bernante P, Busetto L, et al. Laparoscopic gastric rebanding for slippage with pouch dilation: results on 29 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1099–103.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Muller MK, Attigah N, Wildi S, et al. High secondary failure rate of rebanding after failed gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:448–53.CrossRefPubMed Muller MK, Attigah N, Wildi S, et al. High secondary failure rate of rebanding after failed gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:448–53.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Criteria for Assessing Esophageal Motility in Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Patients: The Importance of the Lower Esophageal Contractile Segment
Authors
Paul Robert Burton
Wendy A. Brown
Cheryl Laurie
Geoff Hebbard
Paul E. O’Brien
Publication date
01-03-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-0043-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Obesity Surgery 3/2010 Go to the issue