Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 3/2011

01-09-2011 | Original Article

CPR in the nursing home: fool’s errand or looming dilemma?

Authors: D. Lyons, N. Gormley, W. Zulfiquar, M. Silverman, M. Philpot

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The indications for CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) have expanded greatly since the technique was introduced and theoretically it can be attempted on all prior to death. Policy initiatives (such as the British Medical Association/Royal College of Nursing guidelines) have attempted to provide a clinical rationale for the withholding of inappropriate CPR. Traditionally a care home was felt to be an inappropriate environment to attempt CPR but increased use of advance directives may bring the issue to the fore in this setting.

Aims

We elicited the views of managers of care homes regarding resuscitation strategies in hypothetical situations and in actual practice.

Method

A purpose designed questionnaire in two parts was compiled, gathering factual information and employing a Likert scale to gauge opinion about this issue. The survey was conducted among 187 continuing care homes in South London the subjects being the care managers of the homes surveyed.

Results and conclusion

Responses were obtained from 86 care homes. Care managers would resuscitate 66% of cases of witnessed cardiac arrest but few efforts were reported. Policies in assigning ‘Do not resuscitate’ orders were referred to by only 9% of homes but 80% of facilities would welcome them, yet 50% would exclude the patient from this discussion. Clear policy guidelines are required for continuing care homes, and advance statements about CPR as part of residents care plans could reduce inappropriate resuscitative efforts and hospital transfers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lyons D, Mulcahy R, O’ Neill D (2002) How far should we go? The extent to which doctors choose to resuscitate patients. J Ir Coll Phys Surg 31(1):28–31 Lyons D, Mulcahy R, O’ Neill D (2002) How far should we go? The extent to which doctors choose to resuscitate patients. J Ir Coll Phys Surg 31(1):28–31
2.
go back to reference Mc Intyre K (1993) Failure of “predictors” of cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes to predict cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes Implications for do-not-resuscitate policy and advance directives. Arch Int Med 153:1292–1296 Mc Intyre K (1993) Failure of “predictors” of cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes to predict cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes Implications for do-not-resuscitate policy and advance directives. Arch Int Med 153:1292–1296
3.
go back to reference Aquilina C, Greaves S, Al-Saadi M, Parmentier H, Tarrant C, Wantoch E (2006) Please do not resuscitate: automatic refusal is as harmful as offering resuscitation to all. BMJ 332:608–609PubMedCrossRef Aquilina C, Greaves S, Al-Saadi M, Parmentier H, Tarrant C, Wantoch E (2006) Please do not resuscitate: automatic refusal is as harmful as offering resuscitation to all. BMJ 332:608–609PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hayes S, Henshaw D, Rai G, Stewart K (1999) Audit of resuscitation decisions has little impact on clinical practice. J Royal Coll Phys Lond 33(4):348–350 Hayes S, Henshaw D, Rai G, Stewart K (1999) Audit of resuscitation decisions has little impact on clinical practice. J Royal Coll Phys Lond 33(4):348–350
5.
go back to reference Conroy S, Luxton T, Dingwall R, Harwood R, Gladman J (2006) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in continuing care settings: time for a rethink? BMJ 332:479–482PubMedCrossRef Conroy S, Luxton T, Dingwall R, Harwood R, Gladman J (2006) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in continuing care settings: time for a rethink? BMJ 332:479–482PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Turrell AR, Castelden CM, Freestone B (1998) Long stay care and the NHS; discontinuities between policy and practice. BMJ 317:942–944PubMed Turrell AR, Castelden CM, Freestone B (1998) Long stay care and the NHS; discontinuities between policy and practice. BMJ 317:942–944PubMed
7.
go back to reference Resuscitation Council (2001) ‘Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing’ London: Resuscitation Council Resuscitation Council (2001) ‘Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing’ London: Resuscitation Council
8.
go back to reference Levy CR, Fish R, Kramer A (2005) Do-not-resuscitate and do-not-hospitalise directives of persons admitted to skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare benefit. JAGS 53(12):2060–2068CrossRef Levy CR, Fish R, Kramer A (2005) Do-not-resuscitate and do-not-hospitalise directives of persons admitted to skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare benefit. JAGS 53(12):2060–2068CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shah MN, Fairbanks R, Lerner EB (2006) Cardiac arrests in skilled nursing facilities: continuing room for improvement? J Am Med Dir Assoc 7(6):350–354PubMedCrossRef Shah MN, Fairbanks R, Lerner EB (2006) Cardiac arrests in skilled nursing facilities: continuing room for improvement? J Am Med Dir Assoc 7(6):350–354PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nichol G, Valenzuela T, Roe D, Clark L, Huszti E, Wells GA (2003) Cost effectiveness of defibrillation by targeted responders in public settings. Circulation 108:697–703PubMedCrossRef Nichol G, Valenzuela T, Roe D, Clark L, Huszti E, Wells GA (2003) Cost effectiveness of defibrillation by targeted responders in public settings. Circulation 108:697–703PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sanna T, La Torre G, de Waure C (2008) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus automated external defibrillator use by non-healthcare professionals: a meta-analysis of 1583 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 76(2):226–232PubMedCrossRef Sanna T, La Torre G, de Waure C (2008) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus automated external defibrillator use by non-healthcare professionals: a meta-analysis of 1583 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 76(2):226–232PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tresch DD, Neahring JM, Duthie EH, Mark DH, Kartes SK, Aufderheide TP (1993) Outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in nursing homes: can we predict who will benefit? Am J Med 95(2):123–130PubMedCrossRef Tresch DD, Neahring JM, Duthie EH, Mark DH, Kartes SK, Aufderheide TP (1993) Outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in nursing homes: can we predict who will benefit? Am J Med 95(2):123–130PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lo YT, Way JJ, Liu LF, Wang CN (2010) Prevalence and related factors of do-not-resuscitate directives among nursing home residents in Taiwan. J Am Med Dir Assoc 11(6):436–442PubMedCrossRef Lo YT, Way JJ, Liu LF, Wang CN (2010) Prevalence and related factors of do-not-resuscitate directives among nursing home residents in Taiwan. J Am Med Dir Assoc 11(6):436–442PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference O’ Brien M, O’ Keeffe ST (2009) Resuscitation decisions in Irish long-stay units. Ir J Med Sci 178(4):423–425CrossRef O’ Brien M, O’ Keeffe ST (2009) Resuscitation decisions in Irish long-stay units. Ir J Med Sci 178(4):423–425CrossRef
Metadata
Title
CPR in the nursing home: fool’s errand or looming dilemma?
Authors
D. Lyons
N. Gormley
W. Zulfiquar
M. Silverman
M. Philpot
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-011-0704-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 3/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine