Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Medical Systems 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | COVID-19 | Review

Zoom and its Discontents: Group Decision Making in Pediatric Cardiology in the Time of COVID (and Beyond)

Aurthors

Authors: Mark H.D. Danton, Ian Bushnell

Published in: Journal of Medical Systems | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

The emergence of Covid-19 has led to change within hospital-based healthcare. An example, has been to reconfigure clinical decision making meetings from traditional in-person (Face-to-face, FtF) to online video-conferencing (VC) format inorder to decrease contagion risk. Despite its widespread uptake, there is minimal empirical data evaluating this format. This narrative review considers the implications on medical decision-making when clinicians communicate remotely via Microsoft Teams. The discussion is informed by the psychological literature and by commentary obtained from a survey of paediatric cardiac clinicians who participated in clinical meetings when video-conferencing was first introduced. Whist video-conferencing can optimize clinician presence, this is potentially offset by compromises in current imaging quality, the group discussion, information sharing and decision quality. Implementing a shift from face-to-face to VC within the group decision-making process requires an appreciation of the changed environment, appropriate adaptations and the implemention of new technology solutions. Meanwhile, healthcare should carefully consider the potential implications of clinical decision making using online video conferencing, be prepared to adapt and evaluate prior to a shift away from face-to-face formats.
Literature
1.
go back to reference NHS. Near Me Clinics https://www.nearme.scot/ (2022, accessed 16/5/2022). NHS. Near Me Clinics https://​www.​nearme.​scot/​ (2022, accessed 16/5/2022).
2.
go back to reference Duignan S, Ryan A, O’Keeffe D, et al. Prospective Analysis of Decision Making During Joint Cardiology Cardiothoracic Conference in Treatment of 107 Consecutive Children with Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2018; 39: 1330–1338. 20180512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-018-1899-3. Duignan S, Ryan A, O’Keeffe D, et al. Prospective Analysis of Decision Making During Joint Cardiology Cardiothoracic Conference in Treatment of 107 Consecutive Children with Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2018; 39: 1330–1338. 20180512. DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00246-018-1899-3.
7.
go back to reference Larrick RP, Mannes, A.E., Soll, J.B. The Social Psychology of the Wisdom of Crowds. In: Krueger JI (ed) Social Judgement and Decision Making. Psychology Press, 2012, pp.227–242. Larrick RP, Mannes, A.E., Soll, J.B. The Social Psychology of the Wisdom of Crowds. In: Krueger JI (ed) Social Judgement and Decision Making. Psychology Press, 2012, pp.227–242.
8.
go back to reference Croskerry P. The Importance of Cognitive Errors in Diagnosis and Strategies to Minimize Them. Academic Medicine 2003; 78: 775–780.CrossRefPubMed Croskerry P. The Importance of Cognitive Errors in Diagnosis and Strategies to Minimize Them. Academic Medicine 2003; 78: 775–780.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kahneman D. Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Cambridge University Press 1982. Kahneman D. Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Cambridge University Press 1982.
17.
go back to reference Asch SE. Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American 1955; 193: 31–35.CrossRef Asch SE. Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American 1955; 193: 31–35.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Brodbeck FC, Kerschreiter R, Mojzisch A, et al. Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: the information asymmetries model. Academy of Management Review 2007; 32: 459–479.CrossRef Brodbeck FC, Kerschreiter R, Mojzisch A, et al. Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: the information asymmetries model. Academy of Management Review 2007; 32: 459–479.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tindale RS, Talbot M and Martinez R. Decision Making. In: Levine JM (ed) Group Processes. First ed. Oxon UK, New York USA Routlledge part of the Taylor and Frances Group, 2013, pp.165–192. Tindale RS, Talbot M and Martinez R. Decision Making. In: Levine JM (ed) Group Processes. First ed. Oxon UK, New York USA Routlledge part of the Taylor and Frances Group, 2013, pp.165–192.
22.
go back to reference de Silva P. Looking back to the future: a personal reflection on the Francis Inquiry Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry 2014: 4–6. de Silva P. Looking back to the future: a personal reflection on the Francis Inquiry Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry 2014: 4–6.
24.
go back to reference Stasser G and Titus W. Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion Jornal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985; 48: 1467–1478.CrossRef Stasser G and Titus W. Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion Jornal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985; 48: 1467–1478.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Christensen C, Larson JR, Abbott A, et al. Decision Making of Clinical Teams: Commication Patterns and Diagnostic Error. Medical Decision Making 2000; 20: 45–50.CrossRefPubMed Christensen C, Larson JR, Abbott A, et al. Decision Making of Clinical Teams: Commication Patterns and Diagnostic Error. Medical Decision Making 2000; 20: 45–50.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lantane B, Williams K and Harkins S. Many hands make light the work: The cause and consequences of social loafing Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979; 37: 822–832.CrossRef Lantane B, Williams K and Harkins S. Many hands make light the work: The cause and consequences of social loafing Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979; 37: 822–832.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Shiue Y-C, C-M. C and Chang C-C. Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior 2010; 26: 768–777.CrossRef Shiue Y-C, C-M. C and Chang C-C. Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior 2010; 26: 768–777.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Blaskovich JL. Exploring the effect of distance: An experimental investigation of vitrual collaboration, social loafing and group decisions. Journal of information systems 2008; 22: 27–46.CrossRef Blaskovich JL. Exploring the effect of distance: An experimental investigation of vitrual collaboration, social loafing and group decisions. Journal of information systems 2008; 22: 27–46.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Janis IL. Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes: Boston: Houghton Miffin, 1982. Janis IL. Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes: Boston: Houghton Miffin, 1982.
35.
go back to reference Snell MJ. Factors that increase the incidence of groupthink in hospitals: the perception of nurses and managers Proquest, Umi Dissertation Publishing, 2010, p.170. Snell MJ. Factors that increase the incidence of groupthink in hospitals: the perception of nurses and managers Proquest, Umi Dissertation Publishing, 2010, p.170.
36.
go back to reference McAvoy J and Butler T. A Paradox of Virtual Teams and Change: An Implementation of the Theory of Competing Commitments International Journal of e-Collaboration 2006; 2: 1–24.CrossRef McAvoy J and Butler T. A Paradox of Virtual Teams and Change: An Implementation of the Theory of Competing Commitments International Journal of e-Collaboration 2006; 2: 1–24.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Langeveldt L. Virtual teams: Lessons from the literature and the coalface. Australian Law Librarian 2018; 26: 74–82. Langeveldt L. Virtual teams: Lessons from the literature and the coalface. Australian Law Librarian 2018; 26: 74–82.
38.
go back to reference Davis JH. Some Compelling Intitutions about Group Consensus Decisions, Theoretical and Empricial Research, and Interpersonal Aggregation Phenomena: Selected Examples, 1950–1990 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1992; 52: 3–38.CrossRef Davis JH. Some Compelling Intitutions about Group Consensus Decisions, Theoretical and Empricial Research, and Interpersonal Aggregation Phenomena: Selected Examples, 1950–1990 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1992; 52: 3–38.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Jones PE, Rowlofsma, P.H.M.P. The potential for social contextual and group biases in team decision-making: biases, conditions and psychological mechanisms Ergonomics 2000; 43: 1129–1152. Jones PE, Rowlofsma, P.H.M.P. The potential for social contextual and group biases in team decision-making: biases, conditions and psychological mechanisms Ergonomics 2000; 43: 1129–1152.
41.
go back to reference Doherty-Sneddon G, O’’Malley C, S. G, et al. Face-toFace and Video-Mediated Communication: A Comparison of Dialogue Structure and Task Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied 1997; 3: 105–125. Doherty-Sneddon G, O’’Malley C, S. G, et al. Face-toFace and Video-Mediated Communication: A Comparison of Dialogue Structure and Task Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied 1997; 3: 105–125.
42.
go back to reference Rajasekaran RB, Whitehall D, Cosker TDA, et al. Will vitrual multidisciplinary meetings become the norm for musculoskeletal oncology care following COVID-19 pandemic? - experience from a tertiary sarcoma centre BioMed Central Musculoskeletal Disorders 2021; 22: 1–7.CrossRef Rajasekaran RB, Whitehall D, Cosker TDA, et al. Will vitrual multidisciplinary meetings become the norm for musculoskeletal oncology care following COVID-19 pandemic? - experience from a tertiary sarcoma centre BioMed Central Musculoskeletal Disorders 2021; 22: 1–7.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Abad AZ, Castella VO, Cuenca IG, et al. Teamwork in Different Communication Contexts: A Longitudinal Study Psychology in Spain 2002; 6: 41–55. Abad AZ, Castella VO, Cuenca IG, et al. Teamwork in Different Communication Contexts: A Longitudinal Study Psychology in Spain 2002; 6: 41–55.
45.
go back to reference Sidpra J, Chhadbda S, Gaier C, et al. Virtual multidisciplinary team meetings in the age of COVID-19: an effective and pragmatic alternative. Quantative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery 2020; 10: 1204–1207.CrossRef Sidpra J, Chhadbda S, Gaier C, et al. Virtual multidisciplinary team meetings in the age of COVID-19: an effective and pragmatic alternative. Quantative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery 2020; 10: 1204–1207.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Zoom and its Discontents: Group Decision Making in Pediatric Cardiology in the Time of COVID (and Beyond)
Aurthors
Authors
Mark H.D. Danton
Ian Bushnell
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
COVID-19
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0148-5598
Electronic ISSN: 1573-689X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01944-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Journal of Medical Systems 1/2023 Go to the issue