Top

BMC Public Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | COVID-19 | Research

Working from home during COVID-19: boundary management tactics and energy resources management strategies reported by public service employees in a qualitative study

Authors: Laura Seinsche, Kristina Schubin, Jana Neumann, Holger Pfaff

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Background

Increased working from home has imposed new challenges on public service employees, while also granting opportunities for job crafting. Grounding on the Job Demands-Resources model and Hobfoll’s Conservation of Resources theory this exploratory research aims to investigate the work-nonwork balance of employees one and a half years after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the research focus lies on employees’ job crafting strategies to optimize their working from home experience concerning boundary management and energy resource management.

Methods

Twelve semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with public service employees from different sectors in Germany. The experiences were content analyzed using the software MaxQDA and inductive and deductive categories were derived.

Results

Boundary management comprised different strategies such as communicative (e.g., negotiating work time), physical (e.g., going to the garden), temporal (e.g., logging off in between the work day) and behavioral (e.g., prioritizing tasks) strategies. The job crafting strategies regarding energy management included preventing exhaustion (e.g. taking breaks), healthy cooking and energy management in case of sickness (e.g. deciding on sick leave).

Conclusions

This qualitative case study enriches research on job crafting by offering insights on boundary tactics and energy resources management strategies for remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results point out different starting points for employees and decision makers, how a work-nonwork balance, energy management and thus employees’ wellbeing may be increased when working from home in the future.

Trial registration

The study design and methodology were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Cologne and the study was prospectively registered (Ref No. 21-1417_1).

Available only for authorised users

Eurofound. Living, working and COVID-19. Luxembourg; 2020.

Barbieri B, Balia S, Sulis I, Cois E, Cabras C, Atzara S, de Simone S. Don’t call it Smart: Working from Home during the Pandemic Crisis. Front Psychol. 2021;12:741585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.741585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Brenke K. Home Office: Möglichkeiten Werden Bei Weitem Nicht ausgeschöpft. DIW-Wochenbericht. 2016;83:95–105.

Siegel J, Fischer C, Drathschmidt N, Gelep A, Kralinski T. Verwaltung Im Lockdown. VM Verwaltung Manage. 2020;26:279–87. https://doi.org/10.5771/0947-9856-2020-6-279.CrossRef

Delanoeije J, Verbruggen M, Germeys L. Boundary role transitions: a day-to-day approach to explain the effects of home-based telework on work-to-home conflict and home-to-work conflict. Hum Relat. 2019;72:1843–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718823071.CrossRef

Bellavia GM, Frone MK. Work-family conflict. In: Barling J, Kelloway E, Frone M, editors. Handbook of work stress. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2005. pp. 113–48. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412975995.n6.

Berkowsky RW. When you just cannot get away: exploring the use of information and communication technologies in facilitating negative work/home spillover. Inform Communication Soc. 2013;16:519–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.772650.CrossRef

Sato K, Sakata R, Murayama C, Yamaguchi M, Matsuoka Y, Kondo N. Changes in work and life patterns associated with depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study of health app (CALO mama) users. Occup Environ Med. 2021;78:632–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106945.CrossRefPubMed

Palumbo R. Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working from home on work-life balance. IJPSM. 2020;33:771–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-06-2020-0150.CrossRef

10.

Wu H, Chen Y. The impact of work from Home (WFH) on workload and Productivity in terms of different tasks and occupations. In: Stephanidis C, Salvendy G, Wei J, Yamamoto S, Mori H, Meiselwitz G, et al. editors. HCI International 2020 – late breaking papers: Interaction, Knowledge and Social Media. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_52.CrossRef

11.

Sardeshmukh SR, Sharma D, Golden TD. Impact of telework on exhaustion and job engagement: a job demands and job resources model. New Technol Work Employ. 2012;27:193–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00284.x.CrossRef

12.

Garcia-Contreras R, Munoz-Chavez P, Valle-Cruz D, Ruvalcaba-Gomez EA, Becerra-Santiago JA. Teleworking in Times of COVID-19. Some Lessons for the Public Sector from the Emergent Implementation During the Pandemic Period. In: DG.O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research; 09 06 2021 11 06 2021; Omaha NE USA. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2021. pp. 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463700.

13.

de Bloom J, Vaziri H, Tay L, Kujanpää M. An identity-based integrative needs model of crafting: crafting within and across life domains. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105:1423–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000495.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Tims M, Twemlow M, Fong CYM. A state-of-the-art overview of job-crafting research: current trends and future research directions. CDI. 2022;27:54–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2021-0216.CrossRef

15.

Bakker A, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Managerial Psychol. 2007:309–28.

16.

Demerouti E, Bakker A, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli WB. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86:499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Lesener T, Gusy B, Wolter C. The job demands-resources model: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work Stress. 2019;33:76–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065.CrossRef

18.

Xanthopoulou D, Bakker A, Demerouti E, Schaufeli WB. Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. J Vocat Behav. 2009;74:235–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003.CrossRef

19.

Demerouti E, Bakker A, Halbesleben JRB. Productive and counterproductive job crafting: a daily diary study. J Occup Health Psychol. 2015;20:457–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039002.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Maslach C, Jackson SE. Burnout in organizational settings. Appl Social Psychol Annual. 1984;5:133–53.

21.

Pijpker R, Kerksieck P, Tušl M, de Bloom J, Brauchli R, Bauer GF. The role of off-job crafting in Burnout Prevention during COVID-19 Crisis: a longitudinal study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Zhang F, Parker SK. Reorienting job crafting research: a hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review. J Organiz Behav. 2019;40:126–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2332.CrossRef

23.

Sonnentag S, Fritz C. The recovery experience questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007;12:204–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Sonnentag S, Fritz C. Recovery from job stress: the stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. J Organiz Behav. 2015;36:S72–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924.CrossRef

25.

Uglanova E, Dettmers J. Improving employee Mental Health through an internet-based job crafting intervention. J Personnel Psychol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000304.CrossRef

26.

Sakuraya A, Shimazu A, Imamura K, Namba K, Kawakami N. Effects of a job crafting intervention program on work engagement among Japanese employees: a pretest-posttest study. BMC Psychol. 2016;4:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0157-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Tims M, Bakker A, Derks D. The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. J Occup Health Psychol. 2013;18:230–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032141.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Singh V, Singh M. A burnout model of job crafting: multiple mediator effects on job performance. IIMB Manage Rev. 2018;30:305–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.05.001.CrossRef

29.

Petrou P, Demerouti E, Schaufeli WB. Job crafting in changing organizations: antecedents and implications for exhaustion and performance. J Occup Health Psychol. 2015;20:470–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039003.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Shi Y, She Z, Li D, Zhang H, Niu K. Job crafting promotes internal recovery state, especially in jobs that demand self-control: a daily diary design. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1889. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11915-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Gravador LN, Teng-Calleja M. Work-life balance crafting behaviors: an empirical study. PR. 2018;47:786–804. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2016-0112.CrossRef

32.

McDowall A, Lindsay A. Work–life balance in the police: the development of a self-management competency Framework. J Bus Psychol. 2014;29:397–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9321-x.CrossRef

33.

Kossek EE, Lautsch BA, Eaton SC. Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. J Vocat Behav. 2006;68:347–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002.CrossRef

34.

Lapierre LM, van Steenbergen EF, Peeters MCW, Kluwer ES. Juggling work and family responsibilities when involuntarily working more from home: a multiwave study of financial sales professionals. J Organiz Behav. 2016;37:804–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2075.CrossRef

35.

Kreiner GE, Hollensbe EC, Sheep ML. Balancing Borders and bridges: negotiating the work-home interface via Boundary Work tactics. AMJ. 2009;52:704–30. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669916.CrossRef

36.

Bogaerts Y, de Cooman R, de Gieter S. Getting the work-nonwork Interface you are looking for: the relevance of work-nonwork Boundary Management Fit. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Allen TD, Merlo K, Lawrence RC, Slutsky J, Gray CE. Boundary Management and work-Nonwork Balance while Working from Home. Appl Psychol. 2021;70:60–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12300.CrossRef

38.

Sonnentag S, Venz L, Casper A. Advances in recovery research: what have we learned? What should be done next? J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22:365–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000079.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Sonnentag S, Cheng BH, Parker SL. Recovery from work: advancing the Field toward the future. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2022;9:33–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091355.CrossRef

40.

Feuerhahn N, Sonnentag S, Woll A. Exercise after work, psychological mediators, and affect: a day-level study. Eur J Work Organizational Psychol. 2014;23:62–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.709965.CrossRef

41.

ten Brummelhuis LL, Bakker A. Staying engaged during the week: the effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012;17:445–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029213.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Blasche G, Pasalic S, Bauböck V-M, Haluza D, Schoberberger R. Effects of Rest-Break Intention on Rest-Break frequency and work-related fatigue. Hum Factors. 2017;59:289–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816671605.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Tucker P. The impact of rest breaks upon accident risk, fatigue and performance: a review. Work Stress. 2003;17:123–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267837031000155949.CrossRef

44.

Parker SK. Beyond motivation: job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:661–91. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115208.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Hunter EM, Wu C. Give me a better break: choosing workday break activities to maximize resource recovery. J Appl Psychol. 2016;101:302–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000045.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Korpela K, Kinnunen U. How is leisure time interacting with Nature related to the need for recovery from Work demands? Testing multiple mediators. Leisure Sci. 2010;33:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2011.533103.CrossRef

47.

Bennett AA, Gabriel AS, Calderwood C, Dahling JJ, Trougakos JP. Better together? Examining profiles of employee recovery experiences. J Appl Psychol. 2016;101:1635–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000157.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Fritz C, Lam CF, Spreitzer GM. It’s the little things that Matter: an examination of knowledge workers’ Energy Management. AMP. 2011;25:28–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.25.3.zol28.CrossRef

49.

Zacher H, Brailsford HA, Parker SL. Micro-breaks matter: a diary study on the effects of energy management strategies on occupational well-being. J Vocat Behav. 2014;85:287–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.005.CrossRef

50.

Op den Kamp EM, Tims M, Bakker A, Demerouti E. Proactive vitality management in the work context: development and validation of a new instrument. Eur J Work Organizational Psychol. 2018;27:493–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1483915.CrossRef

51.

Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol. 1989;44:513–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Wood S, Daniels K, Ogbonnaya C. Use of work–nonwork supports and employee well-being: the mediating roles of job demands, job control, supportive management and work–nonwork conflict. Int J Hum Resource Manage. 2020;31:1793–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1423102.CrossRef

53.

Ashforth BE, Kreiner GE, Fugate M. All in a day’s work: boundaries and Micro Role transitions. Acad Manage Rev. 2000;25:472. https://doi.org/10.2307/259305.CrossRef

54.

Clark SC. Work/Family Border Theory: a new theory of Work/Family balance. Hum Relat. 2000;53:747–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536001.CrossRef

55.

Nippert-Eng CE. Home and work: negotiating boundaries through Everyday Life. Chicago, I. L.: University of Chicago Press; 1996.CrossRef

56.

Audenaert M, George B, Bauwens R, Decuypere A, Descamps A-M, Muylaert J, et al. Empowering Leadership, Social Support, and Job crafting in Public organizations: a Multilevel Study. Public Personnel Manage. 2020;49:367–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019873681.CrossRef

57.

Luu TT. Activating job crafting in public services: the roles of discretionary human resource practices and employee use of normative public values. Public Manage Rev. 2021;23:1184–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1730942.CrossRef

58.

Oakman J, Kinsman N, Graham M, Stuckey R, Weale V. Strategies to manage working from home during the pandemic: the employee experience. Ind Health. 2022;60:319–33. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2022-0042.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Caringal-Go JF, Teng-Calleja M, Bertulfo DJ, Manaois JO. Work-life balance crafting during COVID-19: exploring strategies of telecommuting employees in the Philippines. Community Work Family. 2022;25:112–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2021.1956880.CrossRef

60.

Hur W-M, Shin Y. Is resting and sleeping well helpful to job crafting? Daily relationship between recovery experiences, sleep quality, feelings of recovery, and job crafting. Appl Psychol. 2023;72:1608–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12454.CrossRef

61.

Haun VC, Remmel C, Haun S. Boundary management and recovery when working from home: the moderating roles of segmentation preference and availability demands. German J Hum Resource Manage. 2022;36:270–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022221079048.CrossRef

62.

Seinsche L, Schubin K, Neumann J, Pfaff H. Do I want to work from home today? Specific job crafting strategies of public service employees working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: a qualitative study. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1183812. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183812.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Wessels C, Schippers MC, Stegmann S, Bakker A, van Baalen PJ, Proper KI. Fostering flexibility in the New World of Work: a model of time-spatial job crafting. Front Psychol. 2019;10:505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Neuman WL. Social Research Methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education; 2003.

66.

Wilson TP. Theorien Der Interaktion und Modelle Soziologischer Erklärung. editor. Alltagswissen, Interaktion und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt; 1973. pp. 51–79. Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen.

67.

Witzel A, Reiter H. The problem-centred interview. London, UK: Sage; 2012.

68.

Stebbins RA. Exploratory research in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publ; 2001.CrossRef

69.

Rendle KA, Abramson CM, Garrett SB, Halley MC, Dohan D. Beyond exploratory: a tailored framework for designing and assessing qualitative health research. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e030123. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Mayring P. Qualitative forschungsdesigns. In: Mey G, Mruck K, editors. Handbuch qualitative Forschung in Der Psychologie. Wiesbaden: Springer; 2018. pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18387-5_18-2.CrossRef

71.

Kuckartz U. Mixed methods: Methodologie, Forschungsdesigns Und Analyseverfahren. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2014.CrossRef

72.

Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage; 2002.

73.

Neumann J, Lindert L, Seinsche L, Zeike SJ, Pfaff H. Homeoffice- und Präsenzkultur im öffentlichen Dienst in Zeiten der Covid-19-Pandemie aktualisierte Version.; 2020.

74.

Kuckartz U. Einführung in die computergestützte Analyse Qualitativer Daten. 3rd ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2010.CrossRef

75.

Software VERBI. MAXQDA 2022. Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software; 2022.

76.

Kreiner GE. Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: a person‐environment fit perspective. J Organizational Behav. 2006;27:485–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.386.CrossRef

77.

Lohaus D, Habermann W, Presenteeism. A review and research directions. Hum Resource Manage Rev. 2019;29:43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.010.CrossRef

78.

Neumann J, Seinsche L, Zeike SJ, Lindert L, Pfaff H. Homeoffice- und Präsenzkultur Im öffentlichen Dienst in Zeiten Der Covid-19-Pandemie. Follow-Up-Befragung; 2021.

79.

Wüstner K. Das Individuum in Einem Auszehrenden Arbeitsumfeld. Die auszehrende Organisation. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler; 2014. pp. 13–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05307-9_2.CrossRef

80.

Rastetter D. Diversity – diskriminierung – digitalisierung: Kann digitalisierte Arbeit Diskriminierung abbauen und diversity fördern? In: Frieß W, Mucha A, Rastetter D, editors. Diversity Management Und seine Kontexte: celebrate Diversity?! 1st ed. Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich; 2019. pp. 159–72.CrossRef

81.

Ruhle SA, Süß S. Presenteeism and Absenteeism at Work—an analysis of archetypes of sickness attendance cultures. J Bus Psychol. 2020;35:241–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09615-0.CrossRef

82.

Schubin K, Seinsche L, Pfaff H, Zeike S. A workplace mindfulness training program may affect mindfulness, well-being, health literacy and work performance of upper-level ICT-managers: an exploratory study in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychol. 2023;14:994959. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.994959.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

83.

Bohanny W, Wu S-FV, Liu C-Y, Yeh S-H, Tsay S-L, Wang T-J. Health literacy, self-efficacy, and self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013;25:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-7599.12017.CrossRefPubMed

84.

dbb beamtenbund. und tarifunion. Monitor öffentlicher Dienst 2021. Berlin; 2021.

Title: Working from home during COVID-19: boundary management tactics and energy resources management strategies reported by public service employees in a qualitative study
Authors: Laura Seinsche
Kristina Schubin
Jana Neumann
Holger Pfaff
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keyword: COVID-19
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18744-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Working from home during COVID-19: boundary management tactics and energy resources management strategies reported by public service employees in a qualitative study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Relationship between self-reported hearing and vision problems, cognitive decline, depressive symptoms, and life satisfaction in older adults: a retrospective observational study

Factors associated with quality of life among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the role of family caregivers

Cervical cancer screening among women with comorbidities: evidence from the 2022 Tanzania demographic and health survey

Associations between COVID-19 incidence, weight status, and social participation restrictions in the U.S.: evidence from the national population, cross-sectional study

The association of psychological distress and economic and health worries with tobacco smoking behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-year longitudinal cohort study

Personal resources for addressing the work demands of Ukrainian oncologists in stressful crisis situations