Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | COVID-19 | Research

Trends in educational disparities in preventive behaviours, risk perception, perceived effectiveness and trust in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany

Authors: Timo-Kolja Pförtner, Simone Dohle, Kira Isabel Hower

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Educational disparities in health and health behaviours have always been relevant in public health research and are particularly challenging in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. First studies suggest that factors important for the containment of the COVID-19 pandemic, such as prevention behaviour, risk perception, perceived effectiveness of containment measures, and trust in authorities handling the pandemic, vary by educational status. This study builds on recent debate by examining trends in absolute and relative educational disparities in these factors in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.

Methods

Data stem from four waves of the GESIS Panel surveyed between March and October 2020 in Germany (15,902 observations from 4,690 individuals). Trends in absolute and relative disparities were examined for preventive behaviour, risk perception, perceived effectiveness of COVID-19 containment measures, and trust in individuals and institutions handling the COVID-19 pandemic by educational status using sex, age, residence, nationality, children under 16 living in household, family status, household size, the Big Five Inventory, and income class as control factors. Descriptive statistics as well as unadjusted and adjusted linear regression models and random effects models were performed.

Results

We observed an initially rising and then falling trend in preventive behaviour with consistent and significant absolute and relative disparities with a lower preventive behaviour among low educated individuals. Indication of a U-shaped trend with consistent significantly lower values among lower educated individuals was found for risk perception, whereas perceived effectiveness and trust decreased significantly over time but did not significantly vary by educational status.

Conclusions

Results indicate persistent educational disparities in preventive behaviour and risk perception and a general decline in perceived effectiveness and trust in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. To address this overall downward trend and existing disparities, comprehensive and strategic management is needed to communicate the risks of the pandemic and the benefits of COVID-19 containment measures. Both must be adapted to the different needs of educational groups in particular in order to overcome gaps in preventive behaviour and risk perception by educational status.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference ECDC & JRC. The Response Measure Database (RMD); 2020. ECDC & JRC. The Response Measure Database (RMD); 2020.
10.
go back to reference Scandurra C, Bochicchio V, Dolce P, Valerio P, Muzii B, Maldonato NM. Why people were less compliant with public health regulations during the second wave of the Covid-19 outbreak: The role of trust in governmental organizations, future anxiety, fatigue, and Covid-19 risk perception. Curr Psychol. 2021:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02059-x. Scandurra C, Bochicchio V, Dolce P, Valerio P, Muzii B, Maldonato NM. Why people were less compliant with public health regulations during the second wave of the Covid-19 outbreak: The role of trust in governmental organizations, future anxiety, fatigue, and Covid-19 risk perception. Curr Psychol. 2021:1–11. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12144-021-02059-x.
11.
go back to reference Champion VL, Skinner CS. The Health Belief Model. In: Kasprzyk D, editor. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. p. 45–66. Champion VL, Skinner CS. The Health Belief Model. In: Kasprzyk D, editor. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. p. 45–66.
12.
go back to reference Rogers RW. Cognitive and Physiological Processes in Fear Appeals and Attitude Change: A Revised Theory of Protection Motivation. In: Cacioppo J, Petty R, editors. Social Psychophysiology. New York: Guilford Press; 1983. p. 153–77. Rogers RW. Cognitive and Physiological Processes in Fear Appeals and Attitude Change: A Revised Theory of Protection Motivation. In: Cacioppo J, Petty R, editors. Social Psychophysiology. New York: Guilford Press; 1983. p. 153–77.
26.
go back to reference Schneider SL. Applying the ISCED-97 to the German educational qualifications. In: Schneider SL, editor. The international standard classification of education. Mannheim: MZES; 2008. p. 77–102. Schneider SL. Applying the ISCED-97 to the German educational qualifications. In: Schneider SL, editor. The international standard classification of education. Mannheim: MZES; 2008. p. 77–102.
29.
go back to reference Petersen T. Analyzing Panel Data: Fixed- and Random-Effects Models. In: Hardy M, Bryman A, editors. Handbook of Data Analysis. London. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2004. p. 332–45.CrossRef Petersen T. Analyzing Panel Data: Fixed- and Random-Effects Models. In: Hardy M, Bryman A, editors. Handbook of Data Analysis. London. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2004. p. 332–45.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trends in educational disparities in preventive behaviours, risk perception, perceived effectiveness and trust in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany
Authors
Timo-Kolja Pförtner
Simone Dohle
Kira Isabel Hower
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
COVID-19
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13341-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Public Health 1/2022 Go to the issue