Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | COVID-19 | Research

Misinformation about spinal manipulation and boosting immunity: an analysis of Twitter activity during the COVID-19 crisis

Authors: Greg Kawchuk, Jan Hartvigsen, Steen Harsted, Casper Glissmann Nim, Luana Nyirö

Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Social media has become an increasingly important tool in monitoring the onset and spread of infectious diseases globally as well monitoring the spread of information about those diseases. This includes the spread of misinformation, which has been documented within the context of the emerging COVID-19 crisis. Understanding the creation, spread and uptake of social media misinformation is of critical importance to public safety. In this descriptive study, we detail Twitter activity regarding spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and claims it increases, or “boosts”, immunity. Spinal manipulation is a common intervention used by many health professions, most commonly by chiropractors. There is no clinical evidence that SMT improves human immunity.

Methods

Social media searching software (Talkwalker Quick Search) was used to describe Twitter activity regarding SMT and improving or boosting immunity. Searches were performed for the 3 months and 12 months before March 31, 2020 using terms related to 1) SMT, 2) the professions that most often provide SMT and 3) immunity. From these searches, we determined the magnitude and time course of Twitter activity then coded this activity into content that promoted or refuted a SMT/immunity link. Content themes, high-influence users and user demographics were then stratified as either promoting or refuting this linkage.

Results

Twitter misinformation regarding a SMT/immunity link increased dramatically during the onset of the COVID crisis. Activity levels (number of tweets) and engagement scores (likes + retweets) were roughly equal between content promoting or refuting a SMT/immunity link, however, the potential reach (audience) of tweets refuting a SMT/immunity link was 3 times higher than those promoting a link. Users with the greatest influence on Twitter, as either promoters or refuters, were individuals, not institutions or organizations. The majority of tweets promoting a SMT/immunity link were generated in the USA while the majority of refuting tweets originated from Canada.

Conclusion

Twitter activity about SMT and immunity increased during the COVID-19 crisis. Results from this work have the potential to help policy makers and others understand the impact of SMT misinformation and devise strategies to mitigate its impact.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Swire-Thompson B, Lazer D. Public health and online misinformation: challenges and recommendations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2020;41:433–51.CrossRef Swire-Thompson B, Lazer D. Public health and online misinformation: challenges and recommendations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2020;41:433–51.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yiannakoulias N, Slavik CE, Chase M. Expressions of pro- and anti-vaccine sentiment on YouTube. Vaccine. 2019;37:2057–64.CrossRef Yiannakoulias N, Slavik CE, Chase M. Expressions of pro- and anti-vaccine sentiment on YouTube. Vaccine. 2019;37:2057–64.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bukhari M, Galloway J. Twitter, #alternativefacts, careless whispers and rheumatology. Rheumatology. 2018;57:773–4.CrossRef Bukhari M, Galloway J. Twitter, #alternativefacts, careless whispers and rheumatology. Rheumatology. 2018;57:773–4.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sinnenberg L, Buttenheim AM, Padrez K, Mancheno C, Ungar L, Merchant RM. Twitter as a tool for Health Research: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2017;107:e1–8.CrossRef Sinnenberg L, Buttenheim AM, Padrez K, Mancheno C, Ungar L, Merchant RM. Twitter as a tool for Health Research: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2017;107:e1–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Harris JK, Choucair B, Maier RC, Jolani N, Bernhardt JM. Are public health organizations tweeting to the choir? Understanding local health department Twitter followership. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e31.CrossRef Harris JK, Choucair B, Maier RC, Jolani N, Bernhardt JM. Are public health organizations tweeting to the choir? Understanding local health department Twitter followership. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e31.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yun GW, Morin D, Park S, Joa CY, Labbe B, Lim J, et al. Social media and flu: media twitter accounts as agenda setters. Int J Med Inform. 2016;91:67–73.CrossRef Yun GW, Morin D, Park S, Joa CY, Labbe B, Lim J, et al. Social media and flu: media twitter accounts as agenda setters. Int J Med Inform. 2016;91:67–73.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Steffens MS, Dunn AG, Wiley KE, Leask J. How organisations promoting vaccination respond to misinformation on social media: a qualitative investigation. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1348.CrossRef Steffens MS, Dunn AG, Wiley KE, Leask J. How organisations promoting vaccination respond to misinformation on social media: a qualitative investigation. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1348.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Boyd-Barrett O. RussiaGate and propaganda: disinformation in the age of social media: Routledge; 2019. Boyd-Barrett O. RussiaGate and propaganda: disinformation in the age of social media: Routledge; 2019.
17.
go back to reference Larson HJ. Blocking information on COVID-19 can fuel the spread of misinformation. Nature. 2020;580:306.CrossRef Larson HJ. Blocking information on COVID-19 can fuel the spread of misinformation. Nature. 2020;580:306.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Smith GD, Ng F, Ho Cheung Li W. COVID-19: emerging compassion, courage and resilience in the face of misinformation and adversity. J Clin Nurs 2020;29: 1425–1428. Smith GD, Ng F, Ho Cheung Li W. COVID-19: emerging compassion, courage and resilience in the face of misinformation and adversity. J Clin Nurs 2020;29: 1425–1428.
20.
go back to reference Hurwitz EL. Epidemiology: spinal manipulation utilization. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22:648–54.CrossRef Hurwitz EL. Epidemiology: spinal manipulation utilization. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22:648–54.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Rolls K, Hansen M, Jackson D, Elliott D. How health care professionals use social media to create virtual communities: an integrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e166.CrossRef Rolls K, Hansen M, Jackson D, Elliott D. How health care professionals use social media to create virtual communities: an integrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e166.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Marcon AR, Klostermann P, Caulfield T. Chiropractic and spinal manipulation therapy on twitter: case study examining the presence of critiques and debates. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016;2:e153.CrossRef Marcon AR, Klostermann P, Caulfield T. Chiropractic and spinal manipulation therapy on twitter: case study examining the presence of critiques and debates. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016;2:e153.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Misinformation about spinal manipulation and boosting immunity: an analysis of Twitter activity during the COVID-19 crisis
Authors
Greg Kawchuk
Jan Hartvigsen
Steen Harsted
Casper Glissmann Nim
Luana Nyirö
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
COVID-19
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 2045-709X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-020-00319-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2020 Go to the issue