Top

BMC Public Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | COVID-19 | Research

Factors influencing psychological concerns about COVID-19 in South Korea: direct and indirect damage during the early stages of pandemic

Authors: Min-sung Kim, Sung-il Cho

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Background

COVID-19 pandemic has led to psychological concerns, the distribution of which across populations may differ depending on whether pandemic-related damage is direct or indirect. This study aims to investigate concerns associated with direct and indirect damage according to population characteristics, and identify relatively vulnerable groups that are particularly affected by concerns.

Method

This cross-sectional study used data from the 2020 Korea Community Health Survey, which collected data based on a complex sampling design. A total of 208,106 responses from individuals aged ≥ 19 were collected via in-person interviews. The items related to COVID-19 concerns were measured by Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5 and categorized into two types: direct concerns, which pertained to infection or death, and indirect concerns, which pertained to criticism, vulnerability, and economic damage, through factor analysis. We compared the means and effect size of direct concerns, indirect concerns, and overall concerns using weighted mean, ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis.

Results

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor structure for psychological concerns about COVID-19 (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.97, SRMR = 0.02, RMSEA = 0.06), which were divided into direct and indirect concerns. Mean scores were 3.62 for direct concerns and 4.07 for indirect concerns. Direct concerns were higher in females (B = .26); the elderly (B = .15); those diagnosed with hypertension or diabetes (B = .04; B = .06); those with few assistants during quarantine (B = .15); and those whose neighbors responded inappropriately to COVID-19 (B = .07). Indirect concerns were lower among the elderly (B = -.04), and higher among young; married (B = .25); pink- or blue-collar workers (B = .08; B = .06); and those who felt that the city responded inappropriately to COVID-19 (B = .02).

Conclusion

The prevalence of concerns regarding direct and indirect damage caused by the COVID-19 pandemic differed according to population characteristics. Some factors had a marked influence on direct and indirect concerns. Our findings could inform psychological interventions and policies for future pandemics. Customized interventions are needed to prevent negative psychological concerns and improve mental health.

Andaç Demirtaş-Madran H. Accepting restrictions and compliance with recommended preventive behaviors for COVID-19: a discussion based on the key approaches and current research on fear appeals. Front Psychol. 2021;12:558437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.558437.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zhou X, Snoswell CL, Harding LE, Bambling M, Edirippulige S, Bai X, Smith AC. The role of telehealth in reducing the mental health burden from COVID-19. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(4):377–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0068.CrossRefPubMed

Park H-J. Kim min-sun, Kim se-hee, song ka-ram. The relationship between fear of social stigma according to adult’s COVID-19 Infection, change in quality of life, and COVID-19 anxiety: the mediating effects of perceived situational control. Kor J Counsel Psychoth. 2021;13(2):39–62.

Park sangmi. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among population. Korean J Health Educ Promot. 2020;37(5):83–91.CrossRef

Gaurav V, Ankur B, Talayeh A, De CM, Srijan K. Examining the impact of sharing COVID-19 misinformation online on mental health. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11488-y.CrossRef

Kim WJ, Lee EY, Cha YI, Heo H, Hong SJ. Socioeconomic status and daily life changes, concerns, and precautionary behaviors related to COVID-19. J Korean Soc Living Environ Sys. 2022;29(2):165–75.CrossRef

Kim SK, Jo HS. The moderating effect of the presence of an assistant in quarantine on the relationship between subjective health and psychological concerns about COVID-19 Infection: focusing on the comparison between the young adults and the old adults. Kookmin Social Science Review. 2022;34(2):33–60. https://doi.org/10.54711/KSSR.34.2.02.CrossRef

Williams S, Armitage C, Tampe T, Dienes K. Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during COVID-19 pandemic: a UK-based focus group study. BMJ. 2020;10(7):E039334.

Serafini R, Powell S, Frere J, Saali A, Krystal H, Kumar V, Katz C. Psychological distress in the face of a pandemic: an observational study characterizing the impact of COVID-19 on immigrant outpatient mental health. Psychiatry Res. 2021;295:113595.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Lee DH, Kim YJ, Hwang HH, Nam SK, Jung DS. A longitudinal comparative study of two periods regarding the influences of psycho-social factors on emotional distress among Korean adults during the Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). Korean Psychol J Cult Social Issues. 2021;27(4):629–59.CrossRef

11.

Moon JH, Kim SJ, Seong KO. An exploratory study on COVID-19 phobia and influencing factors. J Social Sci. 2021;32(1):285–307. https://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2021.01.32.1.285.CrossRef

12.

Kohler H, Bäuerle A, Schweda A, Weismüller B, Fink M, Musche V, Skoda E. Increased COVID-19-related fear and subjective risk perception regarding COVID-19 affects behavior in individuals with internal high-risk disease. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021;12:2150132721996898.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Arcadio A, Leidy Y. Factors explaining the fear of being infected with COVID-19. Health Expect. 2022;25(2):506–12.CrossRef

14.

Commodari E, La Rosa V, Coniglio M. Health risk perceptions in the era of the new coronavirus: are the Italian people ready for a novel virus? A cross-sectional study on perceived personal and comparative susceptibility for Infectious Disease. Public Health. 2020;187:8–14.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Motta Zanin G, Gentile E, Parisi A, Spasiano D. A preliminary evaluation of the public risk perception related to the COVID-19 health emergency in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Diana T, Tanin T, Konstantin IK. Role of social media in shaping public risk perception during COIVD-19 pandemic: a theoretical review. Int J Bus Manag Sci. 2021;7(2):35–41. https://doi.org/10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.72.1005.CrossRef

17.

Lee JH, Park MS, Lee SW. Spatiotemporal evolution and the diffusion pattern of COVID-19 in South Korea in three waves. Korea Spat Plann Rev. 2021;110:43–62. https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2021.110.003.CrossRef

18.

Kim KL, Oh CH, Zhu YJ. Investigating topics of incivility related to COVID-19 on twitter: analysis of targets and keywords of hate speech. J Korean Soc Inform Manage. 2022;39(1):331–50. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.1.331.CrossRef

19.

Lee H, Kim KY, Kim JY, et al. Evaluation of the Public Health Emergency Response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Daegu, Korea during the First Half of 2020. J Prev Med Public Health. 2022;55(4):360–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Jeon JA, Lee JH. Mental health care status and challenges in COVID-19. Health Welf Issue Focus. 2020;375:1–8.

21.

Shon DI. A study on the expressions used in COVID-19 news - focusing on fear and hate reflected in headlines. J Ehwa Korean Lang Lit. 2020;51:137–66.CrossRef

22.

Oh JH, Lee BY, Choi MY, Choi YH. Stigma scarier than Infection? Analysis of stigma patterns in COVID-19 headlines by epidemic period. Korean J Adv Public Relat. 2023;25(1):45–85. https://doi.org/10.16914/kjapr.2023.25.1.45.CrossRef

23.

Tarek B, Sasha G, Briner EL, Thake J, Kisely S, Rao S. COVID-19-related concerns and symptoms of anxiety: does concern play a role in predicting severity and risk? Curēus. 2021;13(11):e19999. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19999.CrossRef

24.

Makhashvili N, Javakhishvili JD, Sturua L, Pilauri K, Fuhryard Roberts DC. The influence of concern about COVID-19 on mental health in the Republic of Georgia: a cross-sectional study. Global Health. 2020;16:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00641-9.CrossRef

25.

Mullins RJ, Meeker TJ, Vinch PM, Tulloch IK, Saffer MI, Jui-Hong C, et al. A cross-sectional time course of COVID-19 related worry, perceived stress, and general anxiety in the context of post-traumatic stress disorder-like symptomatology. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(12):7178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Czymara C, Langenkamp A, Cano T. Cause for concerns: gender inequality in experiencing the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany. Eur Soc. 2021;23(S1):S68–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1808692.CrossRef

27.

Van Loon AWG, et al. Prepandemic risk factors of COVID-19-related concerns in adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Res Adolescence. 2021;31(3):531–45.CrossRef

28.

Cipolotti L, Chan E, Murphy P, van Harskamp N, Foley JA. Factors contributing to the distress, concerns, and needs of UK Neuroscience health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Psychother. 2021;94:536–43.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Thomas SL, Heck RH. Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Res High Educt. 2001;42(5):517–40.CrossRef

30.

Debbie L. A primer for using and understanding weights with national datasets. The J Exp Educ. 2005;73(3):221–48.CrossRef

31.

Kabacoff R. R in action: Data Analysis and Graphics with R. Shelter Island: Manning Publication; 2015. p. 608.

32.

Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford publication; 2016.

33.

Byrne BM, Campbell TL. Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: a look beneath the surface. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1999;30(5):555–74.CrossRef

34.

Goretzko D, Pham Trang TH, Bühner M. Exploratory factor analysis: current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Curr Psychol. 2021;07(7):3510–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00300-2.CrossRef

35.

Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using Multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education; 2013.

36.

Yıldırım M, Güler A. Factor analysis of the COVID-19 perceived risk scale: a preliminary study. Death Stud. 2022;46(5):1065–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1784311.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Li-tze H, Peter M. Bentler. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

38.

Babyak MA, Green SB. Confirmatory factor analysis: an introduction for psychosomatic medicine researchers. Psychosom Med. 2010;72(6):587–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181de3f8a.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Alavi M, Visentin DC, Thapa DK, Hunt GE, Watson R, Cleary M. Chi-square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis. J Adv Nur. 2020;76(9):2209–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14399.CrossRef

40.

Um MY, Cho SW. Scale development in social work practice. Korea: Hakjisa; 2005. p. 97–108.

41.

Buckner J, Bassuk E. Mental disorders and service utilization among youths from homeless and low-income housed families. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36(7):890–900. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199707000-00010.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Farrell L, Sijbenga A, Barrett P. An examination of childhood anxiety depression and self-esteem across socioeconomic groups: a comparison study between high and low socio-economic status school communities. Adv Sch Ment Health Promot. 2009;2(1):5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1754730X.2009.9715694.CrossRef

43.

Gan Y, Ma J, Wu J, Chen Y, Zhu H, Hall BJ. Immediate and delayed psychological effects of province-wide lockdown and personal quarantine during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Psychol Med. 2022;52(7):1321–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720003116.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Pieh C, Budimir S, Delgadillo J, Barkham M, Fontaine J, Probst T. Mental health during COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom. Psychosom Med. 2021;83(4):328–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000871.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Rossi R, Socci V, Talevi D, Mensi S, Niolu C, Pacitti F, Di Marco A, Rossi A, Siracusano A, Di Lorenzo G. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11: 790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00790.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Alsharawy A, Spoon R, Smith A, Ball S. Gender differences in fear and risk perception during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychol. 2021;12:689467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689467.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Anita LK, Jokic-Begic N. COVID-19: concerns and behaviours in Croatia. Br J Health Psychol. 2020;25(4):849–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12425.CrossRef

48.

Szkody E, Stearns M, Stanhope L, McKinney C. Stress-buffering role of social support during COVID‐19. Fam Process. 2021;60(3):1002–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12618.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Samuels J, Holingue C, Nestadt P, Bienvenu O, Phan P, Nestadt G. An investigation of COVID-19 related worry in a United States population sample. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;144:360–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.10.036.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, KRIHS interactive report: COVID-19 spread and social distancing measures. 2022;04. Web:https://interactive.krihs.re.kr/interactive/covid19/index.html.

51.

Hwang SO. The heterogeneous impacts of COVID-19 across different types of employment arrangements: real time survey evidence from Korea. Korean J Labor Stud. 2020;26(3):5–34.

52.

Lee WH. Factors associated with unmet healthcare needs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea: Results from Korean Community Health Survey 2020. [master’s thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2022.

53.

Ko KK, Kim B. A critical review of the evaluation of the COVID-19 response in South Korea: issue changes and analysis of empirical evidence. Korean J Policy Stud. 2020;58:1–29.

54.

Yang JY, Sohn AR, Cho BH. Effects of pride in K-quarantine on COVID-19 prevention behaviors. Health Soc Sci. 2021;58(1):25–52.

55.

Bounoua N, Goodling S, Sadeh N. Cross-lagged analysis of COVID-19-related worry and media consumption in a socioeconomically disadvantaged sample of community adults. Front Psychol. 2021;12:728629. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728629.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Han J, Cha M, Lee W. Anger contributes to the spread of COVID-19 misinformation. Harv Kennedy School Misinform Rev. 2020;1(3):1–14.

57.

Kim D, Park C, Kim E, Han J, Song H. Social sharing of emotion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cyberpsychol Behav Social Netw. 2022;25(6):369–76.CrossRef

58.

Lee H, Lee HS, Yeon JY, Shim HJ. COVID-19 and anger-inducing news coverage: focusing on major topics and the transition of negative emotions. Asian Commun Res. 2023;37(3):80–126. https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2023.67.3.003.CrossRef

59.

Kim HW, Kim KY, Kim SA, Yoon HC, Jin SH, Jang EH, Choo YJ. Changes in health behavior, mental health, and the degree of practice of quarantine rules according to the psychological concerns of local residents during the COVID-19 outbreak. Korean Public Health Res. 2021;47(4):107–19. https://doi.org/10.22900/kphr.2021.47.4.008.CrossRef

60.

Levy I, Cohen-Louck K. Predicting individual function during COVID-19 lockdown: depression, fear of COVID-19, age, and employment. Front Psychol. 2021;12: 682122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Lee SH. The spread of COVID-19 and changes in household income and spending. Labor Rev. 2020;189:7–20.

62.

Dahlberg L. Loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aging Ment Health. 2021;25(7):1161–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.1875195.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Tasnim S, Hossain M, Mazumder H. Impact of rumors and misinformation on COVID-19 in social media. J Prev Med Public Health. 2020;53(3):171–4. https://doi.org/10.3961/JPMPH.20.094.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Motta M, Stecula D, Farhart C. How right-leaning media coverage of COVID-19 facilitated the spread of misinformation in the early stages of the pandemic in the U.S. Can J Polit Sci. 2020;53(2):335–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000396.CrossRef

65.

Su Z, McDonnell D, Wen J, Kozak M, Abbas J, Šegalo S, et al. Mental health consequences of COVID-19 media coverage: the need for effective crisis communication practices. Global Health. 2021;17:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00654-4.CrossRef

66.

Blix I, Birkeland MS, Thoresen S. Worry and mental health in the Covid-19 pandemic: vulnerability factors in the general Norwegian population. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10927-1.CrossRef

67.

Biviá-Roig G, La Rosa V, Gómez-Tébar M, Serrano-Raya L, Amer-Cuenca J, Caruso S, Lisón J. Analysis of the impact of the confinement resulting from COVID-19 on the lifestyle and psychological wellbeing of Spanish pregnant women: a internet-based cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165933.CrossRef

Title: Factors influencing psychological concerns about COVID-19 in South Korea: direct and indirect damage during the early stages of pandemic
Authors: Min-sung Kim
Sung-il Cho
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keyword: COVID-19
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17476-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Factors influencing psychological concerns about COVID-19 in South Korea: direct and indirect damage during the early stages of pandemic

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Association between health-related social media use and E-cigarette use among current cigarette users: the roles of anti-tobacco messages and harm perception

Contents analysis of thyroid cancer-related information uploaded to YouTube by physicians in Korea: endorsing thyroid cancer screening, potentially leading to overdiagnosis

Cost and economic evidence for asset-based approaches to health improvement and their evaluation methods: a systematic review

Co-design of a personalised digital intervention to improve vegetable intake in adults living in Australian rural communities

Common predictors of cervical cancer related mortality in Ethiopia. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Adapting a complex violence prevention intervention: a case study of the Good School Toolkit in Uganda