Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | COVID-19 | Research

Perspectives on delivering safe and equitable trauma-focused intimate partner violence interventions via virtual means: A qualitative study during COVID-19 pandemic

Authors: Winta Ghidei, Stephanie Montesanti, Lana Wells, Peter H. Silverstone

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has been linked with increased rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) and associated experiences of compounded trauma. The emergence of this global pandemic and the public health measures introduced to limit its transmission necessitated the need for virtually delivered interventions to support continuity of care and access to interventions for individuals affected by IPV throughout the crisis. With the rapid shift to virtual delivery, understanding the barriers to accessing virtually delivering trauma-focused IPV interventions to these individuals was missed. This study aimed to qualitatively describe the challenges experienced by service providers with delivering virtually delivered IPV services that are safe, equitable, and accessible for their diverse clients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

The study involved semi-structured interviews with 24 service providers within the anti-violence sector in Alberta, Canada working with and serving individuals affected by IPV. The interviews focused on the perspectives and experiences of the providers as an indirect source of information about virtual delivery of IPV interventions for a diverse range of individuals affected by IPV. Interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Findings in our study show the concepts of equity and safety are more complex for individuals affected by IPV, especially those who are socially disadvantaged. Service providers acknowledged pre-existing systemic and institutional barriers faced by underserved individuals impact their access to IPV interventions more generally. The COVID-19 pandemic further compounded these pre-existing challenges and hindered virtual access to IPV interventions. Service providers also highlighted the pandemic exacerbated structural vulnerabilities already experienced by underserved populations, which intensified the barriers they face in seeking help, and reduced their ability to receive safe and equitable interventions virtually.

Conclusion

The findings from this qualitative research identified key determining factors for delivering safe, equitable, and accessible virtually delivered intervention for a diverse range of populations. To ensure virtual interventions are safe and equitable it is necessary for service providers to acknowledge and attend to underlying systemic and institutional barriers including discrimination and social exclusion. There is also a need for a collaborative commitment from multiple levels of the social, health, and political systems.
Literature
1.
World Health Organization. Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. In. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
2.
Emezue C. Digital or digitally delivered responses to domestic and intimate partner violence during COVID-19. JMIR public health and surveillance. 2020;6(3):e19831.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
4.
Montesanti SR, Thurston WE. Mapping the role of structural and interpersonal violence in the lives of women: implications for public health interventions and policy. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15(1):100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
6.
Taub A: A new COVID-19 crisis: Domestic abuse rises worldwide. In: The New York Times New York, NY; 2020.
7.
Dubinski K, Margison A. National survey finds domestic violence during pandemic was more frequent and severe. In. CBC News: CBC; 2020.
8.
Trudell AL, Whitmore E. Pandemic meets Pandemic: Understanding the impacts of COVID 19 on gender based violence services and survivors in Canada. In. Ottawa. & London: Ending Violence Association of Canada & Anova; 2020.
9.
Gelder NV, Peterman A, Potts A, O’Donnell M, Thompson K, Shah N, Oertelt- Prigione S. COVID-19: Reducing the risk of infection might increase the risk of intimate partner violence. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;21(100348):1–2.
10.
Hooker L, Versteegh L, Lindgren H, Taft A. Differences in help-seeking behaviours and perceived helpfulness of services between abused and non‐abused women: A cross‐sectional survey of Australian postpartum women. Health Soc Care Commun. 2020;28(3):958–68.CrossRef
11.
Collin-Vézina D, Brend D, Beeman I. When it counts the most: Trauma-informed care and the COVID-19 global pandemic. Dev Child Welf. 2020;2(3):172–9.CrossRef
12.
Bright CF, Burton C, Kosky M. Considerations of the impacts of COVID-19 on domestic violence in the United States. Social Sci Humanit Open. 2020;2(1):100069.
13.
Brooks S, Webster R, Smith L, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395:912–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Cotter A: Intimate partner violence in Canada, 2018: An overview. In.: Juristat. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 85-002-X; 2021.
15.
Prevention Institute: A health equity and multisector approach to preventing domestic violence. In. Oakland, CA; 2017.
16.
Ahmadzai M. A study on visible minority immigrant women’s experiences with domestic violence. Open J Social Sci. 2016;4:269–86.
17.
Health Canada. Certain circumstances issues in equity and responsiveness in access to health care in Canada. In: A collection of papers and reports prepared for Health Canada 2001. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2001.
18.
Rossiter K, Yercich S, Jackson M. Assessing the complexities and implications of anti-violence service delivery in British Columbia. In.: Report prepared for the Ending Violence Association of British Columbia (EVA BC); 2014.
19.
20.
The Canadian Women’s Foundation, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Network ON, Faraday F. Resetting normal: women, decent work and Canada’s fractured care economy. In. Toronto: The Canadian Women’s Foundation; 2020.
21.
Press J. More funding for shelters needed to help domestic violence victims in Canada: Report. In.: The Canadian Press; 2020.
22.
23.
Simić S, Djikanović B, Lagro-Janssen A, Lo Fo Wong S, Jansen HAFM, Koso S, Otašević S. Help-seeking behaviour of Serbian women who experienced intimate partner violence. Fam Pract. 2011;29(2):189–95.PubMed
24.
Afrouz R, Crisp BR, Taket A. Seeking help in domestic violence among muslim women in muslim-majority and non-muslim-majority countries: A literature review. Trauma Violence & Abuse. 2020;21(3):551–66.CrossRef
25.
Barrett BJ, Pierre MS. Variations in women’s help seeking in response to intimate partner violence: Findings from a Canadian population-based study. Violence Against Women. 2011;17(1):47–70.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Bent-Goodley T. Health disparities and violence against women: Why and how cultural and societal influences matter. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007;8(2):90–104.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Fiolet R, Tarzia L, Hameed M, Hegarty K. Indigenous peoples’ help-seeking behaviors for family violence: A scoping review. Trauma Violence & Abuse. 2021;22(2):370–80.CrossRef
28.
Abban V: Violence against women: Why race matters In., vol. 2020. Toronto, ON: Wellesley Institute; 2013.
29.
Mental Health Commission of Canada. Immigrant, refugee, ethnocultural and racialized populations and the social determinants of health. In. Ottawa, Canada; 2019.
30.
Das C. Barriers and supports to divorce for victimised British-Indian mothers and consequences of divorce: Narratives of British-Indian adult children of divorce. Child Care in Practice. 2012;18(2):147–64.CrossRef
31.
Barrett BJ, Pierre MS. Variations in women’s help seeking in response to intimate partner violence: Findings from a Canadian population-based study. Violence against women, 17(1):47–70.
32.
Montesanti S, Ghidei W, Silverstone P, Wells L. Examining the effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of virtual care interventions to provide trauma-focused treatment to domestic violence and sexual assault populations: Findings of a rapid knowledge synthesis. In. Online; Available from https://​cihr-irsc.​gc.​ca/​e/​52069.​html: Report to the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR); 2020.
33.
Chen JA, Chung WJ, Young SK, Tuttle MC, Collins MB, Darghouth SL, Longley R, Levy R, Razafsha M, Kerner JC, et al: COVID-19 and telepsychiatry: Early outpatient experiences and implications for the future. General Hospital Psychiatry 2020, 66:89–95.
34.
Hensel JM, Ellard K, Kolte k M, Wilson G, Sareen J: Digital health solutions for indigenous mental well-being. Current psychiatry reports 2019, 21(8):68.
35.
Jack SM, Munro-Kramer ML, Roberts Williams J, Schminkey D, Tomlinson E, Jennings Mayo‐Wilson L, Bradbury‐Jones C, Campbell JC. Recognizing and responding to intimate partner violence using telehealth: Practical guidance for nurses and midwives. J Clin Nurs. 2020;30(3–4):588–602.PubMed
36.
Westwood T, Wendt S, Seymour K. Women’s perceptions of safety after domestic violence: Exploring experiences of a safety contact program. Affilia: J Women Social Work. 2020;35(2):260–73.CrossRef
37.
El Morr C, Layal M. Effectiveness of ICT-based intimate partner violence interventions: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–25.
38.
Fiolet R, Tarzia L, Owen R, Eccles C, Nicholson K, Owen M, Fry S, Knox J, Hegarty K. Indigenous perspectives on using technology as a supportive resource when experiencing family violence. J Technol Hum Serv. 2020;38(3):203–25.CrossRef
39.
Rossi FS, Shankar M, Buckholdt K, Bailey Y, Israni ST, Iverson KM. Trying times and trying out solutions: Intimate partner violence screening and support for women veterans during COVID-19. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(9):2728–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
41.
Stark L, Robinson MV, Seff I, Gillespie A, Colarelli J, Landis D. The effectiveness of women and girls safe spaces: A systematic review of evidence to address violence against women and girls in humanitarian contexts. Trauma Violence Abuse 2021:1–13.
42.
Befus DR, Kumodzi T, Schminkey D, St Ivany A. Advancing health equity and social justice in forensic nursing research, education, practice, and policy: Introducing structural violence and trauma- and violence-informed care. J Forensic Nurs. 2019;15(4):199–205.PubMedCrossRef
43.
44.
Mayan MJ. Essentials of qualitative inquiry. Walnut Creek. Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009.
45.
Naples NA. Feminism and method: Ethnography, discourse analysis, and activist research. Routledge; 2013.
46.
Montesanti S, Ghidei W, Silverstone P, Wells L, Squires S, Bailey A. Examining organization and provider challenges with the adoption of virtual domestic violence and sexual assault interventions in Alberta, Canada, during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022;27(3):169–79.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Bacchus LJ, Bullock L, Sharps P, Burnett C, Schminkey DL, Buller AM, Campbell J. Infusing technology into perinatal home visitation in the United States for women experiencing intimate partner violence: Exploring the interpretive flexibility of an mHealth intervention. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(11):e302.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Montesanti S, Ghidei W. IMPACT working group: Virtual or remote-based delivery of domestic violence & sexual violence interventions: A handbook for the anti-violence sector. In. Alberta, Canada: IMPACT; 2021.
49.
Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. In: Encyclopedia of critical psychology. edn. New York: Springer; 2014. pp. 1947–52.CrossRef
50.
Mkandawire-Valhmu L, Stevens PE. The Critical Value of Focus Group Discussions in Research With Women Living With HIV in Malawi. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(5):684–96.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Reeves S, Kuper A, Hodges BD. Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2008;337:a1020.CrossRef
52.
Christensen MC. Using photovoice to address gender-based violence: A qualitative systematic review. Trauma Violence & Abuse. 2019;20(4):484–97.CrossRef
53.
Buch E, Staller KM. The Feminist Practice of Ethnography. In: Feminist Research Practice. edn. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2011.
54.
Gottlieb A: Ethnographic Methods: Ethnography: Theory and Methods. In: A Handbook for Social Science Field Research: Essays & Bibliographic Sources on Research Design and Methods. edn. Edited by Perecman E, Curran SR: SAGE Publications; 2011.
55.
Badawy SM, Radovic A. Digital approaches to remote pediatric health care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: Existing evidence and a call for further research. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020;3(1):e20049.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Williams EE, Arant KR, Leifer VP, Balcom MC, Levy-Carrick NC, Lewis-O’Connor A, Katz JN. Provider perspectives on the provision of safe, equitable, trauma-informed care for intimate partner violence survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):315.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
58.
Heyworth L, Kirsh S, Zulman D, Ferguson JM, Kizer KW. Expanding access through virtual care: The VA’s early experience with COVID-19. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery 2020, 1(4).
59.
Rural Canadians still lack high-speed, reliable internet: Report [https://ipolitics.​ca/​2021/​10/​28/​rural-canadians-still-lack-high-speed-reliable-internet-report/​].
60.
Bloom TL, Glass NE, Case J, Wright C, Nolte K, Parsons L. Feasibility of an online safety planning intervention for rural and urban pregnant abused women. Nurs Res. 2014;63(4):242–51.CrossRef
61.
Ghidei W, Montesanti S, Tomkow K, Silverstone P, Wells L, Campbell S. Examining the effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of virtual care interventions to provide trauma-focused care and treatment to domestic violence and/or sexual violence populations. Trauma, Violence and Abuse 2021, In Review.
62.
Metheny N, Perri M, Velonis A, Kamalanathan J, Hassan M, Buhariwala P, Du Mont J, Mason R, O’Campo P. Evidence for changing intimate partner violence safety planning needs as a result of COVID-19: results from phase I of a rapid intervention. Public Health. 2021;194:11–3.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Sabri B, Hartley M, Saha J, Murray S, Glass N, Campbell JC. Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on women’s health and safety: A study of immigrant survivors of intimate partner violence. Health Care Women Int. 2020;41(11–12):1294–312.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Bremner JD, Walker JD, Whitfield C, Perry BD, Dube SR, Giles WH. The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin NeuroSci. 2006;256(3):174–86.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Muskett C. Trauma-informed care in inpatient mental health settings: A review of the literature. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2014;23(1):51–9.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Varcoe C, Wathen C, Ford-Gilboe M, Smye V, Browne A. VEGA briefing note on trauma and violence-informed care. VEGA Project and PreVAiL Research Network 2016.
67.
Ponic P, Varcoe C, Smutylo T. Trauma- (and violence-) informed approaches to supporting victims of violence: Policy and practice considerations. Victims of Crime Research Digest 2016.
68.
Kulkarni S. Intersectional trauma-informed intimate partner violence (IPV) services: Narrowing the gap between IPV service delivery and survivor needs. J family violence. 2019;34(1):55–64.CrossRef
69.
Khanlou N, Vazquez LM, Pashang S, Connolly JA, Ahmad F, Ssawe A. 2020 Syndemic: Convergence of COVID-19, gender-based violence, and racism pandemics. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 2021.
70.
Horton R. Offline: COVID-19 is not a pandemic. Lancet (London England). 2020;396(10255):874.CrossRef
71.
Szasz G: Epidemics, pandemics, syndemics, and intersectionality. BCMJ 2020.
72.
Sherwin J, Lawrence K, Gragnano V, Testa PA. Scaling virtual health at the epicentre of coronavirus disease 2019: A case study from NYU Langone Health. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2020:1357633X20941395.
Metadata
Title
Perspectives on delivering safe and equitable trauma-focused intimate partner violence interventions via virtual means: A qualitative study during COVID-19 pandemic
Authors
Winta Ghidei
Stephanie Montesanti
Lana Wells
Peter H. Silverstone
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
COVID-19
COVID-19
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14224-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Public Health 1/2022 Go to the issue

Research

Comparative analysis of contraceptive use in Punjab and Manipur: exploring beyond women’s education and empowerment

Research

Perceived cardiovascular disease risk and tailored communication strategies among rural and urban community dwellers in Rwanda: a qualitative study

Research

A community edutainment intervention for gender-based violence, sexual and reproductive health, and maternal and child health in rural Senegal: a process evaluation

Research

Socio-cultural context of adolescent sexuality and youth friendly service intervention in West Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: a qualitative study

Research

Adherence to behaviours associated with the test, trace, and isolate system: an analysis using the theoretical domains framework

Research

Association of metabolites of benzene and toluene with lipid profiles in Korean adults: Korean National Environmental Health Survey (2015–2017)